Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2015

01-08-2015 | Preclinical Study

Fat/water ratios measured with diffuse reflectance spectroscopy to detect breast tumor boundaries

Authors: L. L. de Boer, B. G. Molenkamp, T. M. Bydlon, B. H. W. Hendriks, J. Wesseling, H. J. C. M. Sterenborg, T. J. M. Ruers

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Recognition of the tumor during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) can be very difficult and currently a robust method of margin assessment for the surgical setting is not available. As a result, tumor-positive margins, which require additional treatment, are not found until histopathologic evaluation. With diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), tissue can be characterized during surgery based on optical parameters that are related to the tissue morphology and composition. Here we investigate which optical parameters are able to detect tumor in an area with a mixture of benign and tumor tissue and hence which parameters are most suitable for intra-operative margin assessment. DRS spectra (400–1600 nm) were obtained from 16 ex vivo lumpectomy specimens from benign, tumor border, and tumor tissue. One mastectomy specimen was used with a custom-made grid for validation purposes. The optical parameter related to the absorption of fat and water (F/W-ratio) in the extended near-infrared wavelength region (~1000–1600 nm) provided the best discrimination between benign and tumor sites resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100 % (excluding the border sites). Per patient, the scaled F/W-ratio gradually decreased from grossly benign tissue towards the tumor in 87.5 % of the specimens. In one test case, based on a predefined F/W-ratio for boundary tissue of 0.58, DRS produced a surgical resection plane that nearly overlapped with a 2-mm rim of benign tissue, 2 mm being the most widely accepted definition of a negative margin. The F/W-ratio provided excellent discrimination between sites clearly inside or outside the tumor and was able to detect the border of the tumor in one test case. This work shows the potential for DRS to guide the surgeon during BCS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK, Kiebert G, Fentiman IS, Mignolet F, Bartelink H (1998) Quality of live of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. Eur J Cancer 34(3):307–314CrossRefPubMed Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK, Kiebert G, Fentiman IS, Mignolet F, Bartelink H (1998) Quality of live of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. Eur J Cancer 34(3):307–314CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW (2000) Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer 36:1938–1943CrossRefPubMed Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW (2000) Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer 36:1938–1943CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, Recht A, Connolly J, Gelman R, Silver B, Hetelekidis S, Abner A, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ (2000) Outcome at 8 Years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 18(8):1668–1675PubMed Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, Recht A, Connolly J, Gelman R, Silver B, Hetelekidis S, Abner A, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ (2000) Outcome at 8 Years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 18(8):1668–1675PubMed
4.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong J-H, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1233–1241CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong J-H, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1233–1241CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D, Van der Schueren E, Helle PA, Van Zijl K, Bartelink H (2000) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: european organization for research and treatment of cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(14):1143–1150CrossRefPubMed Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D, Van der Schueren E, Helle PA, Van Zijl K, Bartelink H (2000) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: european organization for research and treatment of cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(14):1143–1150CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, Smith SL, Steinberg SM, Liewehr DJ, Menard C, Lippman ME, Lichter AS, Altemus RM (2003) Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy. Cancer 98:697–702. doi:10.1002/cncr.11580 CrossRefPubMed Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, Smith SL, Steinberg SM, Liewehr DJ, Menard C, Lippman ME, Lichter AS, Altemus RM (2003) Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy. Cancer 98:697–702. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​11580 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Morrow M (2014) The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 21:717–730. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3480-5 CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Morrow M (2014) The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 21:717–730. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-014-3480-5 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, Aguilar M, Marubini E (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1227–1232CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, Aguilar M, Marubini E (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1227–1232CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Singletary SE (2002) Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 184:383–393CrossRefPubMed Singletary SE (2002) Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 184:383–393CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW, Dershaw DD, Fowble B, Guiliano A, Harris JR, O’Malley F, Schnitt SJ, Singletary SE, Winchester DP (2002) Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 52(5):277–300CrossRefPubMed Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW, Dershaw DD, Fowble B, Guiliano A, Harris JR, O’Malley F, Schnitt SJ, Singletary SE, Winchester DP (2002) Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 52(5):277–300CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, Engel JM, Onitilo AA (2012) Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA 307(5):467–475CrossRefPubMed McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, Engel JM, Onitilo AA (2012) Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA 307(5):467–475CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, Lawrence G, Kearins O, Pereira J, Sheppard C, Caddy CM, van der Meulen JHP (2012) Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ 345:e4505. doi:10.1136/bmj.e4505 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, Lawrence G, Kearins O, Pereira J, Sheppard C, Caddy CM, van der Meulen JHP (2012) Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ 345:e4505. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​e4505 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Garnett A, Chen V, Franic S, Simunovic M (2010) Technical factors, surgeon case volume and positive margin rates after breast conservation surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Can J Surg 53(5):305–312PubMedCentralPubMed Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Garnett A, Chen V, Franic S, Simunovic M (2010) Technical factors, surgeon case volume and positive margin rates after breast conservation surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Can J Surg 53(5):305–312PubMedCentralPubMed
16.
go back to reference Morrow M (2008) Margins in breast-conserving therapy have we lost sight of the big picture. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 8(8):1193–1196CrossRefPubMed Morrow M (2008) Margins in breast-conserving therapy have we lost sight of the big picture. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 8(8):1193–1196CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Sahin AA, Kuerer HM, Babiera GV, Singletary SE, Whitman GJ, Ross MI, Ames FC, Feig BW, Buchholz TA, Meric-Bernstam F (2007) Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 14(4):1458–1471. doi:10.1245/s10434-006-9236-0 CrossRefPubMed Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Sahin AA, Kuerer HM, Babiera GV, Singletary SE, Whitman GJ, Ross MI, Ames FC, Feig BW, Buchholz TA, Meric-Bernstam F (2007) Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 14(4):1458–1471. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-006-9236-0 CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Guiliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, Klimberg S, Chavez-MacGregor M, Freedman G, Houssami N, Johnson PL, Morrow M (2014) Society of surgical oncology—American Society for Radiation oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88(3):553–564CrossRefPubMed Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Guiliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, Klimberg S, Chavez-MacGregor M, Freedman G, Houssami N, Johnson PL, Morrow M (2014) Society of surgical oncology—American Society for Radiation oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88(3):553–564CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Dixon JM, Irwig L, Brennan ME, Solin LJ (2010) Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Cancer 46:3219–3232CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Dixon JM, Irwig L, Brennan ME, Solin LJ (2010) Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Cancer 46:3219–3232CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Bakhshandeh M, Tutuncuoglu O, Fischer G, Masood S (2007) Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients. Diagn Cytopathol 35(10):656–659CrossRefPubMed Bakhshandeh M, Tutuncuoglu O, Fischer G, Masood S (2007) Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients. Diagn Cytopathol 35(10):656–659CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Schnabel F, Boolbol SK, Gittleman M, Karni T, Tafra L, Feldman S, Police A, Friedman NB, Karlan S, Holmes D, Willey SC, Carmon M, Fernandez K, Akbari S, Harness J, Guerra L, Frazier T, Lane K, Simmons RM, Estabrook A, Allweis T (2014) A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of marginprobe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1589–1595. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3602-0 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Schnabel F, Boolbol SK, Gittleman M, Karni T, Tafra L, Feldman S, Police A, Friedman NB, Karlan S, Holmes D, Willey SC, Carmon M, Fernandez K, Akbari S, Harness J, Guerra L, Frazier T, Lane K, Simmons RM, Estabrook A, Allweis T (2014) A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of marginprobe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1589–1595. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-014-3602-0 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Zhu C, Palmer GM, Breslin TM, Harter J, Ramanujam N (2006) Diagnosis of breast cancer using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: comparison of a monte carlo versus partial least squares analysis based feature extraction technique. Lasers Surg Med 38(7):714–724. doi:10.1002/lsm.20356 CrossRefPubMed Zhu C, Palmer GM, Breslin TM, Harter J, Ramanujam N (2006) Diagnosis of breast cancer using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: comparison of a monte carlo versus partial least squares analysis based feature extraction technique. Lasers Surg Med 38(7):714–724. doi:10.​1002/​lsm.​20356 CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Brown JQ, Bydlon TM, Richards LM, Yu B, Kennedy SA, Geradts J, Wilke LG, Junker M, Gallagher J, Barry W, Ramanujam N (2010) Optical assessment of tumor resection margins in the breast. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 16(3):530–544PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Brown JQ, Bydlon TM, Richards LM, Yu B, Kennedy SA, Geradts J, Wilke LG, Junker M, Gallagher J, Barry W, Ramanujam N (2010) Optical assessment of tumor resection margins in the breast. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 16(3):530–544PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Kennedy S, Geradts J, Bydlon T, Brown JQ, Gallagher J, Junker M, Barry W, Ramanujam N, Wilke L (2010) Optical breast cancer margin assessment: an observational study of the effects of tissue heterogeneity on optical contrast. Breast Cancer Res 12(6):R91. doi:10.1186/bcr2770 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kennedy S, Geradts J, Bydlon T, Brown JQ, Gallagher J, Junker M, Barry W, Ramanujam N, Wilke L (2010) Optical breast cancer margin assessment: an observational study of the effects of tissue heterogeneity on optical contrast. Breast Cancer Res 12(6):R91. doi:10.​1186/​bcr2770 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Evers DJ, Nachabe R, Vranken Peeters MJ, van der Hage JA, Oldenburg HS, Rutgers EJ, Lucassen GW, Hendriks BHW, Wesseling J, Ruers TJM (2013) Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: towards clinical application in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137(1):155–165. doi:10.1007/s10549-012-2350-8 CrossRefPubMed Evers DJ, Nachabe R, Vranken Peeters MJ, van der Hage JA, Oldenburg HS, Rutgers EJ, Lucassen GW, Hendriks BHW, Wesseling J, Ruers TJM (2013) Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: towards clinical application in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137(1):155–165. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-012-2350-8 CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Volynskaya Z, Haka AS, Bechtel KL, Fitzmaurice M, Shenk R, Wang N, Nazemi J, Dasari RR, Feld MS (2008) Diagnosing breast cancer using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt 13(2):024012. doi:10.1117/1.2909672 CrossRefPubMed Volynskaya Z, Haka AS, Bechtel KL, Fitzmaurice M, Shenk R, Wang N, Nazemi J, Dasari RR, Feld MS (2008) Diagnosing breast cancer using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt 13(2):024012. doi:10.​1117/​1.​2909672 CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Haka AS, Volynskaya Z, Gardecki JA, Nazemi J, Lyons J, Hicks D, Fitzmaurice M, Dasari RR, Crowe JP, Feldman SM (2006) In vivo margin assessment during partial mastectomy breast surgery using Raman spectroscopy. Cancer Res 66(6):3317–3322. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2815 CrossRefPubMed Haka AS, Volynskaya Z, Gardecki JA, Nazemi J, Lyons J, Hicks D, Fitzmaurice M, Dasari RR, Crowe JP, Feldman SM (2006) In vivo margin assessment during partial mastectomy breast surgery using Raman spectroscopy. Cancer Res 66(6):3317–3322. doi:10.​1158/​0008-5472.​CAN-05-2815 CrossRefPubMed
36.
37.
go back to reference Bigio IJ, Bown SG, Briggs G, Kelley C, Lakhani S, Pickard D, Ripley PM, Rose IG, Saunders C (2000) Diagnosis of breast cancer using elastic-scattering spectroscopy: preliminary clinical results. J Biomed Opt 5(2):221–228CrossRefPubMed Bigio IJ, Bown SG, Briggs G, Kelley C, Lakhani S, Pickard D, Ripley PM, Rose IG, Saunders C (2000) Diagnosis of breast cancer using elastic-scattering spectroscopy: preliminary clinical results. J Biomed Opt 5(2):221–228CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Majumder SK, Keller MD, Boulos FI, Kelley MC, Mahadevan-Jansen A (2008) Comparison of autofluorescence, diffuse reflectance, and Raman spectroscopy for breast tissue discrimination. J Biomed Opt 13(5):054009. doi:10.1117/1.2975962 CrossRefPubMed Majumder SK, Keller MD, Boulos FI, Kelley MC, Mahadevan-Jansen A (2008) Comparison of autofluorescence, diffuse reflectance, and Raman spectroscopy for breast tissue discrimination. J Biomed Opt 13(5):054009. doi:10.​1117/​1.​2975962 CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Laughney AM, Krishnaswamy V, Rizzo EJ, Schwab MC, Barth RJ Jr, Cuccia DJ, Tromberg B, Paulsen KD, Pogue BW, Wells WA (2013) Spectral discrimination of breast pathologies in situ using spatial frequency domain imaging. Breast Cancer Res 15:R61PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Laughney AM, Krishnaswamy V, Rizzo EJ, Schwab MC, Barth RJ Jr, Cuccia DJ, Tromberg B, Paulsen KD, Pogue BW, Wells WA (2013) Spectral discrimination of breast pathologies in situ using spatial frequency domain imaging. Breast Cancer Res 15:R61PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Nachabé R, Hendriks BHW, Van der Voort M, Dejardins AE, Sterenborg HJCM (2010) Estimation of biological chromophores using diffuse optical spectroscopy: benefit of extending the UV-VIS wavelength range to include 1000 to 1600 nm. Opt Express 18(24):1432–1442CrossRef Nachabé R, Hendriks BHW, Van der Voort M, Dejardins AE, Sterenborg HJCM (2010) Estimation of biological chromophores using diffuse optical spectroscopy: benefit of extending the UV-VIS wavelength range to include 1000 to 1600 nm. Opt Express 18(24):1432–1442CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Farrell TJ, Patterson MS, Wilson B (1992) A diffusion theory model of spatially resolved, steady-state diffuse reflectance for the noninvasive determination of tissue optical properties in vivo. Med Phys 19(4):879–888CrossRefPubMed Farrell TJ, Patterson MS, Wilson B (1992) A diffusion theory model of spatially resolved, steady-state diffuse reflectance for the noninvasive determination of tissue optical properties in vivo. Med Phys 19(4):879–888CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Nachabé R, Hendriks BHW, Desjardins AE, van der Voort M, van der Mark MB, Sterenborg HJCM (2010) Estimation of lipid and water concentrations in scattering media with diffuse optical spectroscopy from 900 to 1600 nm. J Biomed Opt 15(3):037015. doi:10.1117/1.3454392 CrossRefPubMed Nachabé R, Hendriks BHW, Desjardins AE, van der Voort M, van der Mark MB, Sterenborg HJCM (2010) Estimation of lipid and water concentrations in scattering media with diffuse optical spectroscopy from 900 to 1600 nm. J Biomed Opt 15(3):037015. doi:10.​1117/​1.​3454392 CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Shults J, Ratcliffe SJ (2009) Analysis of multi-level correlated data in the framework of generalized estimating equations via xtmultcorr procedures in Stata and qls functions in Matlab. Stat Interface 2:187–196CrossRef Shults J, Ratcliffe SJ (2009) Analysis of multi-level correlated data in the framework of generalized estimating equations via xtmultcorr procedures in Stata and qls functions in Matlab. Stat Interface 2:187–196CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Pappo I, Spector R, Schindel A, Morgenstern S, Sandbank J, Leider LT, Schneebaum S, Lelcuk S, Karni T (2010) Diagnostic performance of a novel device for real-time margin assessment in lumpectomy specimens. J Surg Res 160(2):277–281. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.02.025 CrossRefPubMed Pappo I, Spector R, Schindel A, Morgenstern S, Sandbank J, Leider LT, Schneebaum S, Lelcuk S, Karni T (2010) Diagnostic performance of a novel device for real-time margin assessment in lumpectomy specimens. J Surg Res 160(2):277–281. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jss.​2009.​02.​025 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Fat/water ratios measured with diffuse reflectance spectroscopy to detect breast tumor boundaries
Authors
L. L. de Boer
B. G. Molenkamp
T. M. Bydlon
B. H. W. Hendriks
J. Wesseling
H. J. C. M. Sterenborg
T. J. M. Ruers
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3487-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine