Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2015

01-08-2015 | Epidemiology

Decision-making impact on adjuvant chemotherapy allocation in early node-negative breast cancer with a 21-gene assay: systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Federico Augustovski, Natalie Soto, Joaquín Caporale, Lucas Gonzalez, Luz Gibbons, Agustín Ciapponi

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Risk stratification based on results provided by a 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX®) in early stage breast cancer can help optimize hormone therapy (HT) and/or chemotherapy (CT) decisions. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of decision impact (DI) and net change in CT use before and after assay results, both in the whole studies’ population and by recurrence risk score (RS) strata. A systematic search of studies with prospective data collection reported physician’s decision on treatment allocation in early stage node-negative breast cancer was performed. DI reflects the proportion of patients whose management was changed, and net change focuses on CT change. A random-effects model is reported. Fifteen studies (N = 2229) met our inclusion criteria: 50.09, 37.35, and 13.38 % of patients with low, intermediate, and high RS. Treatment decision changed in 29.5 % (95 % CI 26.29–32.86). Net reduction of CT use was 12 % (8–17 %). It was 16 % (12.00–19.00) in the low RS group, 0 % (−3.00 to 3.00) in the intermediate RS group, and increased by 2 % (−1.00 to 3.00) in the high RS group. Use of a 21-gene assay showed a significant impact on treatment decisions. From 100 women tested, 30 could have their treatment optimized, and 12 could avoid CT. Its main effects consist of sparing chemotherapy in low risk patients and slightly increasing it in the high risk category. DI could be higher in selected patient populations with greater uncertainty regarding initial treatment decisions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. 2013; http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed 01 Jul 2013 Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. 2013; http://​globocan.​iarc.​fr. Accessed 01 Jul 2013
2.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Paik S, Tang G, Shak S et al (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(23):3726–3734CrossRefPubMed Paik S, Tang G, Shak S et al (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(23):3726–3734CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Issa AM, Chaudhari VS, Marchant GE (2015) The value of multigene predictors of clinical outcome in breast cancer: an analysis of the evidence. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 15(2):277–286CrossRefPubMed Issa AM, Chaudhari VS, Marchant GE (2015) The value of multigene predictors of clinical outcome in breast cancer: an analysis of the evidence. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 15(2):277–286CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Blohmer JU, Rezai M, Kümmel S et al (2013) Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting. J Med Econ 16(1):30–40CrossRefPubMed Blohmer JU, Rezai M, Kümmel S et al (2013) Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting. J Med Econ 16(1):30–40CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Vataire AL, Laas E, Aballea S, Gligorov J, Rouzier R, Chereau E (2012) Cost-effectiveness of a chemotherapy predictive test. Bull Cancer 99(10):907–914PubMed Vataire AL, Laas E, Aballea S, Gligorov J, Rouzier R, Chereau E (2012) Cost-effectiveness of a chemotherapy predictive test. Bull Cancer 99(10):907–914PubMed
8.
go back to reference Holt S, Bertelli G, Humphreys I et al (2013) A decision impact, decision conflict and economic assessment of routine Oncotype DX testing of 146 women with node-negative or pNImi, ER-positive breast cancer in the UK. Br J Cancer 108(11):2250–2258PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Holt S, Bertelli G, Humphreys I et al (2013) A decision impact, decision conflict and economic assessment of routine Oncotype DX testing of 146 women with node-negative or pNImi, ER-positive breast cancer in the UK. Br J Cancer 108(11):2250–2258PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2013) NICE diagnostics guidance [DG10]: Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer management: MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, IHC4 and Mammostrat. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg10. Accessed July 2014 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2013) NICE diagnostics guidance [DG10]: Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer management: MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, IHC4 and Mammostrat. http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​guidance/​dg10. Accessed July 2014
10.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269
12.
go back to reference StatsDirect statistical software. [computer program] (2013). StatsDirect Ltd, England StatsDirect statistical software. [computer program] (2013). StatsDirect Ltd, England
13.
go back to reference Bianchini G, Pusztai L, Karn T et al (2013) Proliferation and estrogen signaling can distinguish patients at risk for early versus late relapse among estrogen receptor positive breast cancers. Breast cancer Res 15(5):R86PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bianchini G, Pusztai L, Karn T et al (2013) Proliferation and estrogen signaling can distinguish patients at risk for early versus late relapse among estrogen receptor positive breast cancers. Breast cancer Res 15(5):R86PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chen C, Dhanda R, Tseng WY, Forsyth M, Patt DA (2013) Evaluating use characteristics for the oncotype dx 21-gene recurrence score and concordance with chemotherapy use in early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 9(4):182–187PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Chen C, Dhanda R, Tseng WY, Forsyth M, Patt DA (2013) Evaluating use characteristics for the oncotype dx 21-gene recurrence score and concordance with chemotherapy use in early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 9(4):182–187PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Green S (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Vol 5: Wiley Online Library, ChichesterCrossRef Higgins JP, Green S (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Vol 5: Wiley Online Library, ChichesterCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Albanell J, Gonzalez A, Ruiz-Borrego M et al (2012) Prospective transGEICAM study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and traditional clinicopathological factors on adjuvant clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) node-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23(3):625–631CrossRefPubMed Albanell J, Gonzalez A, Ruiz-Borrego M et al (2012) Prospective transGEICAM study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and traditional clinicopathological factors on adjuvant clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) node-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23(3):625–631CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bargallo JER, Lara F, Shaw Dulin RJ et al (2012) A study of the impact of the 21-gene breast cancer assay on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in Women with breast cancer in a Mexican Public Hospital. ESMO, Vienna Bargallo JER, Lara F, Shaw Dulin RJ et al (2012) A study of the impact of the 21-gene breast cancer assay on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in Women with breast cancer in a Mexican Public Hospital. ESMO, Vienna
18.
go back to reference Cheung PS, Tong AC, Leung RC, Kwan WH, Yau TC (2014) Initial experience with the Oncotype DX assay in decision-making for adjuvant therapy of early oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 20:401PubMed Cheung PS, Tong AC, Leung RC, Kwan WH, Yau TC (2014) Initial experience with the Oncotype DX assay in decision-making for adjuvant therapy of early oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 20:401PubMed
19.
go back to reference Davidson JA, Cromwell I, Ellard SL et al (2013) A prospective clinical utility and pharmacoeconomic study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(R) assay in oestrogen receptor positive node negative breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 49(11):2469–2475CrossRefPubMed Davidson JA, Cromwell I, Ellard SL et al (2013) A prospective clinical utility and pharmacoeconomic study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(R) assay in oestrogen receptor positive node negative breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 49(11):2469–2475CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference de Boer RH, Baker C, Speakman D, Chao CY, Yoshizawa C, Mann GB (2013) The impact of a genomic assay (Oncotype DX) on adjuvant treatment recommendations in early breast cancer. Med J Aust 199(3):205–208CrossRefPubMed de Boer RH, Baker C, Speakman D, Chao CY, Yoshizawa C, Mann GB (2013) The impact of a genomic assay (Oncotype DX) on adjuvant treatment recommendations in early breast cancer. Med J Aust 199(3):205–208CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Eiermann W, Rezai M, Kummel S et al (2013) The 21-gene recurrence score assay impacts adjuvant therapy recommendations for ER-positive, node-negative and node-positive early breast cancer resulting in a risk-adapted change in chemotherapy use. Ann Oncol 24(3):618–624PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Eiermann W, Rezai M, Kummel S et al (2013) The 21-gene recurrence score assay impacts adjuvant therapy recommendations for ER-positive, node-negative and node-positive early breast cancer resulting in a risk-adapted change in chemotherapy use. Ann Oncol 24(3):618–624PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Gerson Cwilich R, Alban de la Torre LF, Villalobos Prieto A, Serrano Olvera JA (2012) Clinicopathological features, prognosis and influence in the adjuvant treatment of the risk recurrence groups determined by the 21 gene expression profile, Oncotype Dx(R), in early breast cancer. Gac med de Mex 148(2):117–124 Gerson Cwilich R, Alban de la Torre LF, Villalobos Prieto A, Serrano Olvera JA (2012) Clinicopathological features, prognosis and influence in the adjuvant treatment of the risk recurrence groups determined by the 21 gene expression profile, Oncotype Dx(R), in early breast cancer. Gac med de Mex 148(2):117–124
23.
go back to reference Gligorov J, Pivot XB, Naman HL et al (2012) Prospective study of the impact of using the 21-gene recurrence score assay on clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, early-stage breast cancer in France. J Clin Oncol 30(15):568 Gligorov J, Pivot XB, Naman HL et al (2012) Prospective study of the impact of using the 21-gene recurrence score assay on clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, early-stage breast cancer in France. J Clin Oncol 30(15):568
24.
go back to reference Henry LR, Stojadinovic A, Swain SM, Prindiville S, Cordes R, Soballe PW (2009) The influence of a gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions. J Surg Oncol 99(6):319–323CrossRefPubMed Henry LR, Stojadinovic A, Swain SM, Prindiville S, Cordes R, Soballe PW (2009) The influence of a gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions. J Surg Oncol 99(6):319–323CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Klang SH, Hammerman A, Liebermann N, Efrat N, Doberne J, Hornberger J (2010) Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization. Value Health 13(4):381–387CrossRefPubMed Klang SH, Hammerman A, Liebermann N, Efrat N, Doberne J, Hornberger J (2010) Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization. Value Health 13(4):381–387CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Levine M, Julian J, Cochrane B (2014) The OCOG Oncotype DX® Field Evaluation Study. ASCO, Chicago Levine M, Julian J, Cochrane B (2014) The OCOG Oncotype DX® Field Evaluation Study. ASCO, Chicago
27.
go back to reference Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J et al (2010) Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1671–1676CrossRefPubMed Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J et al (2010) Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1671–1676CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Oratz R, Paul D, Cohn AL, Sedlacek SM (2007) Impact of a commercial reference laboratory test recurrence score on decision making in early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 3(4):182–186PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Oratz R, Paul D, Cohn AL, Sedlacek SM (2007) Impact of a commercial reference laboratory test recurrence score on decision making in early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 3(4):182–186PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Yamauchi H, Nakagawa C, Takei H et al (2014) Prospective study of the effect of the 21-gene assay on adjuvant clinical decision-making in Japanese women with estrogen receptor-positive, node-negative, and node-positive breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 14(3):191–197CrossRefPubMed Yamauchi H, Nakagawa C, Takei H et al (2014) Prospective study of the effect of the 21-gene assay on adjuvant clinical decision-making in Japanese women with estrogen receptor-positive, node-negative, and node-positive breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 14(3):191–197CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Carlson JJ, Roth JA (2013) The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141(1):13–22PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Carlson JJ, Roth JA (2013) The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141(1):13–22PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Hornberger J, Chien R. Meta-analysis of the Decision Impact of the 21-Gene Breast Cancer Recurrence Score® in Clinical Practice. St Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference; 2011; St Gallen, Switzerland Hornberger J, Chien R. Meta-analysis of the Decision Impact of the 21-Gene Breast Cancer Recurrence Score® in Clinical Practice. St Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference; 2011; St Gallen, Switzerland
32.
go back to reference Martinez-Ferez I (2014) Marquez-Pel aez S, Romero-Tabares A, Beltr an-Calvo C. Prognostic genomic tests in breast cancer: clinical utility, efficiency and impact on clinical decision making. Eur J Cancer 50:S200 Martinez-Ferez I (2014) Marquez-Pel aez S, Romero-Tabares A, Beltr an-Calvo C. Prognostic genomic tests in breast cancer: clinical utility, efficiency and impact on clinical decision making. Eur J Cancer 50:S200
33.
go back to reference Albanell J, Gligorov J H, S., Blohmer J, Eiermann W, Svedmann C. Meta-analysis of Prospective European Studies Assessing the Impact of Using the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Clinical Decision Making in Women with ER-positive, HER2-negative Early Stage Breast Cancer. European Society of Medical Oncology; 2012; Vienna, Austria Albanell J, Gligorov J H, S., Blohmer J, Eiermann W, Svedmann C. Meta-analysis of Prospective European Studies Assessing the Impact of Using the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Clinical Decision Making in Women with ER-positive, HER2-negative Early Stage Breast Cancer. European Society of Medical Oncology; 2012; Vienna, Austria
34.
go back to reference Burke E, Trodden D, Plun-Favreau J, Sing AP (2014) The 21-gene breast cancer assay: a roadmap of clinical evidence. Eur J Cancer 50:S206 Burke E, Trodden D, Plun-Favreau J, Sing AP (2014) The 21-gene breast cancer assay: a roadmap of clinical evidence. Eur J Cancer 50:S206
36.
go back to reference van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van ‘t Veer LJ et al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. New Engl J Med. 347(25):1999–2009CrossRefPubMed van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van ‘t Veer LJ et al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. New Engl J Med. 347(25):1999–2009CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Bartlett JMS, Thomas J, Ross DT et al (2010) Mammostrat (R) as a tool to stratify breast cancer patients at risk of recurrence during endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res 12(4):R47PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bartlett JMS, Thomas J, Ross DT et al (2010) Mammostrat (R) as a tool to stratify breast cancer patients at risk of recurrence during endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res 12(4):R47PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Simon RM, Paik S, Hayes DF (2009) Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(21):1446–1452PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Simon RM, Paik S, Hayes DF (2009) Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(21):1446–1452PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Decision-making impact on adjuvant chemotherapy allocation in early node-negative breast cancer with a 21-gene assay: systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Federico Augustovski
Natalie Soto
Joaquín Caporale
Lucas Gonzalez
Luz Gibbons
Agustín Ciapponi
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3483-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine