Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014

01-12-2014 | Clinical Trial

Amrubicin as second- or third-line treatment for women with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer: a Sarah Cannon Research Institute phase 1/2 trial

Authors: Denise A. Yardley, Eric Raefsky, John D. Hainsworth, Howard A. Burris III, Victor Priego, Alejandro Inclan

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Amrubicin is a synthetic anthracycline which has been shown in preclinical studies to have broad-spectrum anti-tumor activity and a lower potential for cardiotoxicity as compared to doxorubicin. We conducted a phase 1/2 trial of single-agent amrubicin as second- or third-line treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer. Women with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer who had normal cardiac function and measurable disease, received intravenous (IV) amrubicin every 3 weeks. Prophylactic treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) was recommended. Escalating amrubicin doses were administered in a 3 + 3 design in the phase 1 portion to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Achievement of a median PFS ≥4.5 months would warrant further development of amrubicin in this setting. Seventy-eight women (median age 58 years) were treated (phase 1, 15 patients; phase 2, 63 patients). An amrubicin dose of 110 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was selected as the phase 2 dose, and 66 patients were treated. Twelve of 66 patients (18 %) achieved objective response, and the clinical benefit rate was 42 %. Median PFS was 4 months (95 % CI 2.5, 5.8). Neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 toxicity, observed in 29 patients (44 %). One patient experienced an asymptomatic transient left ventricular ejection fraction decline (grade 3). Although the study did not meet the predefined PFS, amrubicin was well tolerated at 110 mg/m2 IV when administered every 3 weeks with prophylactic G-CSF, and was an active second- or third-line treatment for metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Norris B, Pritchard KI, James K et al (2000) Phase III comparative study of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone in disseminated metastatic/recurrent breast cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study MA8. J Clin Oncol 18:2385–2394PubMed Norris B, Pritchard KI, James K et al (2000) Phase III comparative study of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone in disseminated metastatic/recurrent breast cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study MA8. J Clin Oncol 18:2385–2394PubMed
3.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Holli K, Heikkinen M et al (1998) Combination chemotherapy versus single-agent therapy as first- and second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 16:3720–3730PubMed Joensuu H, Holli K, Heikkinen M et al (1998) Combination chemotherapy versus single-agent therapy as first- and second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 16:3720–3730PubMed
4.
go back to reference Ejlertsen B, Mouridsen HT, Langkjer ST et al (2004) Phase III study of intravenous vinorelbine in combination with epirubicin versus epirubicin alone in patients with advanced breast cancer: a Scandinavian Breast Group trial (SBG9403). J Clin Oncol 22:2313–2320PubMedCrossRef Ejlertsen B, Mouridsen HT, Langkjer ST et al (2004) Phase III study of intravenous vinorelbine in combination with epirubicin versus epirubicin alone in patients with advanced breast cancer: a Scandinavian Breast Group trial (SBG9403). J Clin Oncol 22:2313–2320PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nielsen D, Dombernowsky P, Larsen SK et al (2000) Epirubicin or epirubicin and cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer. A phase III study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 46:459–466PubMedCrossRef Nielsen D, Dombernowsky P, Larsen SK et al (2000) Epirubicin or epirubicin and cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer. A phase III study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 46:459–466PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Keller AM, Mennel RG, Georgoulias VA et al (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus vinorelbine or mitomycin C plus vinblastine in women with taxane-refractory advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3893–3901PubMedCrossRef Keller AM, Mennel RG, Georgoulias VA et al (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus vinorelbine or mitomycin C plus vinblastine in women with taxane-refractory advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3893–3901PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Stoodley PW, Richards DA, Boyd A et al (2013) Left ventricular systolic function in HER2/neu negative breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline chemotherapy: a comparative analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction and myocardial strain imaging over 12 months. Eur J Cancer 49:3396–3403PubMedCrossRef Stoodley PW, Richards DA, Boyd A et al (2013) Left ventricular systolic function in HER2/neu negative breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline chemotherapy: a comparative analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction and myocardial strain imaging over 12 months. Eur J Cancer 49:3396–3403PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hanada M, Mizuno S, Fukushima A et al (1998) A new antitumor agent amrubicin induces cell growth inhibition by stabilizing topoisomerase II–DNA complex. Jpn J Cancer Res 89:1229–1238PubMedCrossRef Hanada M, Mizuno S, Fukushima A et al (1998) A new antitumor agent amrubicin induces cell growth inhibition by stabilizing topoisomerase II–DNA complex. Jpn J Cancer Res 89:1229–1238PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yamaoka T, Hanada M, Ichii S et al (1998) Cytotoxicity of amrubicin, a novel 9-aminoanthracycline, and its active metabolite amrubicinol on human tumor cells. Jpn J Cancer Res 89:1067–1073PubMedCrossRef Yamaoka T, Hanada M, Ichii S et al (1998) Cytotoxicity of amrubicin, a novel 9-aminoanthracycline, and its active metabolite amrubicinol on human tumor cells. Jpn J Cancer Res 89:1067–1073PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Salvatorelli E, Menna P, Surapaneni S et al (2012) Pharmacokinetic characterization of amrubicin cardiac safety in an ex vivo human myocardial strip model. I. Amrubicin accumulates to a lower level than doxorubicin or epirubicin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 341:464–473PubMedCrossRef Salvatorelli E, Menna P, Surapaneni S et al (2012) Pharmacokinetic characterization of amrubicin cardiac safety in an ex vivo human myocardial strip model. I. Amrubicin accumulates to a lower level than doxorubicin or epirubicin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 341:464–473PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247PubMedCrossRef Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Inoue A, Sugawara S, Yamazaki K et al (2008) Randomized phase II trial comparing amrubicin with topotecan in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group trial 0402. J Clin Oncol 26:5401–5406PubMedCrossRef Inoue A, Sugawara S, Yamazaki K et al (2008) Randomized phase II trial comparing amrubicin with topotecan in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group trial 0402. J Clin Oncol 26:5401–5406PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ettinger DS, Jotte R, Lorigan P et al (2010) Phase II study of amrubicin as second-line therapy in patients with platinum-refractory small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2598–2603PubMedCrossRef Ettinger DS, Jotte R, Lorigan P et al (2010) Phase II study of amrubicin as second-line therapy in patients with platinum-refractory small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2598–2603PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jotte R, Conkling P, Reynolds C et al (2011) Randomized phase II trial of single-agent amrubicin or topotecan as second-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer sensitive to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 29:287–293PubMedCrossRef Jotte R, Conkling P, Reynolds C et al (2011) Randomized phase II trial of single-agent amrubicin or topotecan as second-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer sensitive to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 29:287–293PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jotte R, Von Pawel J, Spigel DR et al (2011) Randomized phase III trial of amrubicin versus topotecan (Topo) as second-line treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). ASCO Meet Abstr 29:7000 Jotte R, Von Pawel J, Spigel DR et al (2011) Randomized phase III trial of amrubicin versus topotecan (Topo) as second-line treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). ASCO Meet Abstr 29:7000
Metadata
Title
Amrubicin as second- or third-line treatment for women with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer: a Sarah Cannon Research Institute phase 1/2 trial
Authors
Denise A. Yardley
Eric Raefsky
John D. Hainsworth
Howard A. Burris III
Victor Priego
Alejandro Inclan
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3189-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine