Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014

Open Access 01-10-2014 | Epidemiology

Development of prediction tools for diarrhea and rash in breast cancer patients receiving lapatinib in combination with capecitabine

Authors: George Dranitsaris, Mario E. Lacouture

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Lapatinib and capecitabine (L-CAP) is effective in HER-2 positive patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, moderate to severe diarrhea and rash (≥ grade 2) are problematic dose limiting toxicities. Since risk may vary over the course of therapy, we developed repeated measures models to predict the risk of ≥ grade 2 diarrhea and rash prior to each cycle of L-CAP. Data from 197 patients who received the L-CAP as part of a clinical trial were reviewed (Cameron, Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:533–543, 2008). Generalized estimating equations were used to develop the risk models using a backward elimination process. Risk scoring algorithms were then derived from the final model coefficients. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was undertaken to measure the predictive accuracy of the scoring algorithms. Patient age, presence of skin metastases at baseline, treatment being initiated in the spring, earlier cycles, and grade I diarrhea in the prior cycle were identified as being significant predictors for ≥ grade 2 diarrhea. The ROC analysis indicated good predictive accuracy for the diarrhea algorithm with an area under the curve of 0.78 (95 %CI: 0.72–0.82). Prior to each cycle of therapy, patients with risk scores > 125 units would be considered at high risk for developing ≥ grade 2 diarrhea. A similar prediction index was also derived in the case of ≥ grade 2 rash. Our models provide patient-specific risk information that could be helpful in assessing the risks and benefits of L-CAP in the MBC patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Konecny GE, Pegram MD, Venkatesan N et al (2006) Activity of dual kinase inhibitor lapatinib against HER-2 overexpressing and trastuzumab-treated breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 66:1630–1639PubMedCrossRef Konecny GE, Pegram MD, Venkatesan N et al (2006) Activity of dual kinase inhibitor lapatinib against HER-2 overexpressing and trastuzumab-treated breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 66:1630–1639PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nelson MH, Dolder CR (2006) Lapatinib: a novel dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity in solid tumors. Ann Pharmacother 40:261–269PubMedCrossRef Nelson MH, Dolder CR (2006) Lapatinib: a novel dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity in solid tumors. Ann Pharmacother 40:261–269PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D et al (2006) Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 355:2733–2743PubMedCrossRef Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D et al (2006) Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 355:2733–2743PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cameron D, Casey M, Press M et al (2008) A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: updated efficacy and biomarker analyses. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:533–543PubMedCrossRef Cameron D, Casey M, Press M et al (2008) A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: updated efficacy and biomarker analyses. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:533–543PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bachelot T, Romieu G, Campone M et al (2013) Lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with previously untreated brain metastases from HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a single-group phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 14:64–71PubMedCrossRef Bachelot T, Romieu G, Campone M et al (2013) Lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with previously untreated brain metastases from HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a single-group phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 14:64–71PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Grem JL, Shoemaker DD, Patrelli NJ et al (1987) Severe life threatening toxicities observed using leucovorin with 5-fluorouracil. J Clin Oncol 5:1704–1712PubMed Grem JL, Shoemaker DD, Patrelli NJ et al (1987) Severe life threatening toxicities observed using leucovorin with 5-fluorouracil. J Clin Oncol 5:1704–1712PubMed
7.
go back to reference Arnold RJ, Gabrail N, Raut M et al (2005) Clinical implications of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with cancer. J Support Oncol 3:227–232PubMed Arnold RJ, Gabrail N, Raut M et al (2005) Clinical implications of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with cancer. J Support Oncol 3:227–232PubMed
8.
go back to reference Dranitsaris G, Maroun J, Shah A (2005) Severe chemotherapy-Induced diarrhea in patients with colorectal cancer: a cost of illness analysis. Support Care Cancer 13:18–24CrossRef Dranitsaris G, Maroun J, Shah A (2005) Severe chemotherapy-Induced diarrhea in patients with colorectal cancer: a cost of illness analysis. Support Care Cancer 13:18–24CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Maroun JA, Anthony LB, Blais N et al (2007) Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with colorectal cancer: a consensus statement by the Canadian working group on chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Curr Oncol 14:13–20PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Maroun JA, Anthony LB, Blais N et al (2007) Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with colorectal cancer: a consensus statement by the Canadian working group on chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Curr Oncol 14:13–20PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Luu M, Boone SL, Patel J et al (2011) Higher severity grade of erlotinib-induced rash is associated with lower skin phototype. Clin Exp Dermatol 36:733–738PubMedCrossRef Luu M, Boone SL, Patel J et al (2011) Higher severity grade of erlotinib-induced rash is associated with lower skin phototype. Clin Exp Dermatol 36:733–738PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dranitsaris G, Rayson D, Vincent M et al (2008) Identifying patients at high risk for neutropenic complications during chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer with doxorubicin or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: the development of a prediction model. Am J Clin Oncol 31:369–374PubMedCrossRef Dranitsaris G, Rayson D, Vincent M et al (2008) Identifying patients at high risk for neutropenic complications during chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer with doxorubicin or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: the development of a prediction model. Am J Clin Oncol 31:369–374PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dranitsaris G, Vincent M, Yu J et al (2012) Development and validation of a prediction index for hand foot skin reaction in cancer patients receiving sorafenib. Ann Oncol 23:2103–2108PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Dranitsaris G, Vincent M, Yu J et al (2012) Development and validation of a prediction index for hand foot skin reaction in cancer patients receiving sorafenib. Ann Oncol 23:2103–2108PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Arbuckle RB, Huber SL, Zacker C (2000) The consequences of diarrhea occurring during chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective study. Oncologist 5:250–259PubMedCrossRef Arbuckle RB, Huber SL, Zacker C (2000) The consequences of diarrhea occurring during chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective study. Oncologist 5:250–259PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cascinu S, Barni S, Labianca R et al (1997) Evaluation of factors influencing 5-fluorouracil-induced diarrhea in colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 5:314–317PubMedCrossRef Cascinu S, Barni S, Labianca R et al (1997) Evaluation of factors influencing 5-fluorouracil-induced diarrhea in colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 5:314–317PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jatoi A, Green EM, Rowland KM Jr et al (2009) Clinical predictors of severe cetuximab-induced rash: observations from 933 patients enrolled in north central cancer treatment group study N0147. Oncology 77:120–123PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Jatoi A, Green EM, Rowland KM Jr et al (2009) Clinical predictors of severe cetuximab-induced rash: observations from 933 patients enrolled in north central cancer treatment group study N0147. Oncology 77:120–123PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Liu S, Kurzrock R (2014) Toxicity of targeted therapy: implications for response and impact of genetic polymorphisms. Cancer Treat Rev 40:883–891PubMedCrossRef Liu S, Kurzrock R (2014) Toxicity of targeted therapy: implications for response and impact of genetic polymorphisms. Cancer Treat Rev 40:883–891PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference George SL (1988) Identification and assessment of prognostic factors. Semin Oncol 15:462–471PubMed George SL (1988) Identification and assessment of prognostic factors. Semin Oncol 15:462–471PubMed
18.
go back to reference Allison PD (1999). Logistic regression using the SAS system: theory and application; chapter 8; p 79–216. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc Allison PD (1999). Logistic regression using the SAS system: theory and application; chapter 8; p 79–216. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc
19.
go back to reference Rabe-Hesketh S, Everitt B (2000). Statistical analysis using stata; chapter 9; p 119–136.Chapman & Hall/CRC. Rabe-Hesketh S, Everitt B (2000). Statistical analysis using stata; chapter 9; p 119–136.Chapman & Hall/CRC.
20.
go back to reference Lyman GH, Kuderer NM (2005) A primer in prognostic and predictive models: development and validation of neutropenia risk models. Supp Cancer Ther 2:168–175CrossRef Lyman GH, Kuderer NM (2005) A primer in prognostic and predictive models: development and validation of neutropenia risk models. Supp Cancer Ther 2:168–175CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Harrell FE Jr et al (2001) Prognostic modeling with logistic regression analysis: in search of sensible strategies in small data sets. Med Decis Making 21:45–56PubMedCrossRef Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Harrell FE Jr et al (2001) Prognostic modeling with logistic regression analysis: in search of sensible strategies in small data sets. Med Decis Making 21:45–56PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJ et al (2001) Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:774–781PubMedCrossRef Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJ et al (2001) Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:774–781PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMedCrossRef Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference McNeil BJ, Hanley JA (1984) Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Decis Making 4:137–150PubMedCrossRef McNeil BJ, Hanley JA (1984) Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Decis Making 4:137–150PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kollmannsberger C, Mitchell T (2013) Selected toxicities of targeted therapies: presentation and management. Semin Oncol 40:499–510PubMedCrossRef Kollmannsberger C, Mitchell T (2013) Selected toxicities of targeted therapies: presentation and management. Semin Oncol 40:499–510PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rosen AC, Case EC, Dusza SW et al (2013) Impact of dermatologic adverse events on quality of life in 283 cancer patients: a questionnaire study in a dermatology referral clinic. Am J Clin Dermatol 14:327–333PubMedCrossRef Rosen AC, Case EC, Dusza SW et al (2013) Impact of dermatologic adverse events on quality of life in 283 cancer patients: a questionnaire study in a dermatology referral clinic. Am J Clin Dermatol 14:327–333PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Borovicka JH, Calahan C, Gandhi M et al (2011) Economic burden of dermatologic adverse events induced by molecularly targeted cancer agents. Arch Dermatol 147:1403–1409PubMedCrossRef Borovicka JH, Calahan C, Gandhi M et al (2011) Economic burden of dermatologic adverse events induced by molecularly targeted cancer agents. Arch Dermatol 147:1403–1409PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Royston P, Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: developing a prognostic model. BMJ 338:b604PubMedCrossRef Royston P, Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: developing a prognostic model. BMJ 338:b604PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P, Moons KG (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model. BMJ 338:b605PubMedCrossRef Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P, Moons KG (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model. BMJ 338:b605PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Katz MH (2003) Multivariable analysis: a primer for readers of the medical literature. Ann Intern Med 138:644–650PubMedCrossRef Katz MH (2003) Multivariable analysis: a primer for readers of the medical literature. Ann Intern Med 138:644–650PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP (2004) Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA 291:2720–2726PubMedCrossRef Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP (2004) Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA 291:2720–2726PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of prediction tools for diarrhea and rash in breast cancer patients receiving lapatinib in combination with capecitabine
Authors
George Dranitsaris
Mario E. Lacouture
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3126-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine