Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014

01-08-2014 | Brief Report

ERβ splice variant expression in four large cohorts of human breast cancer patient tumors

Authors: Hallie Wimberly, Gang Han, Dushanthi Pinnaduwage, Leigh C. Murphy, Xiaohong Rose Yang, Irene L. Andrulis, Mark Sherman, Jonine Figueroa, David L. Rimm

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Though the role of Estrogen Receptor (ER)α in breast cancer has been studied extensively, there is little consensus about the role of alternative ER isoform ERβ in breast cancer biology. ERβ has significant sequence homology to ERα but is located on a different chromosome and maintains both overlapping and unique functional attributes. Five variants exist, resulting from alternative splicing of the C-terminal region of ERβ. The relevance of ERβ variants in breast cancer outcomes and response to therapy is difficult to assess because of conflicting reports in the literature, likely due to variable methods used to assess ERβ in patient tumors. Here, we quantitatively assess expression of ERβ splice variants on over 2,000 breast cancer patient samples. Antibodies against ERβ variants were validated for staining specificity in cell lines by siRNA knockdown of ESR2 and staining reproducibility on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue by quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) using AQUA technology. We found antibodies against splice variants ERβ1 and ERβ5, but not ERβ2/cx, which were sensitive, specific, and reproducible. QIF staining of validated antibodies showed both ERβ1 and ERβ5 QIF scores, which have a normal (bell shaped) distribution on most cohorts assessed, and their expression is significantly associated with each other. Extensive survival analyses show that ERβ1 is not a prognostic or predictive biomarker for breast cancer. ERβ5 appears to be a context-dependent marker of worse outcome in HER2-positive and triple-negative patients, suggesting an unknown biological function in the absence of ERα.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Liu MM, Albanese C, Anderson CM, Hilty K, Webb P, Uht RM, Price RH, Pestell RG, Kushner PJ (2002) Opposing action of estrogen receptors alpha and beta on cyclin D1 gene expression. J Biol Chem 277(27):24353–24360. doi:10.1074/jbc.M201829200 PubMedCrossRef Liu MM, Albanese C, Anderson CM, Hilty K, Webb P, Uht RM, Price RH, Pestell RG, Kushner PJ (2002) Opposing action of estrogen receptors alpha and beta on cyclin D1 gene expression. J Biol Chem 277(27):24353–24360. doi:10.​1074/​jbc.​M201829200 PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Monroe DG, Secreto FJ, Subramaniam M, Getz BJ, Khosla S, Spelsberg TC (2005) Estrogen receptor alpha and beta heterodimers exert unique effects on estrogen- and tamoxifen-dependent gene expression in human U2OS osteosarcoma cells. Mol Endocrinol 19(6):1555–1568. doi:10.1210/me.2004-0381 PubMedCrossRef Monroe DG, Secreto FJ, Subramaniam M, Getz BJ, Khosla S, Spelsberg TC (2005) Estrogen receptor alpha and beta heterodimers exert unique effects on estrogen- and tamoxifen-dependent gene expression in human U2OS osteosarcoma cells. Mol Endocrinol 19(6):1555–1568. doi:10.​1210/​me.​2004-0381 PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ogawa S, Inoue S, Watanabe T, Hiroi H, Orimo A, Hosoi T, Ouchi Y, Muramatsu M (1998) The complete primary structure of human estrogen receptor beta (hER beta) and its heterodimerization with ER alpha in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 243(1):122–126. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1997.7893 PubMedCrossRef Ogawa S, Inoue S, Watanabe T, Hiroi H, Orimo A, Hosoi T, Ouchi Y, Muramatsu M (1998) The complete primary structure of human estrogen receptor beta (hER beta) and its heterodimerization with ER alpha in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 243(1):122–126. doi:10.​1006/​bbrc.​1997.​7893 PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Williams C, Edvardsson K, Lewandowski SA, Strom A, Gustafsson JA (2008) A genome-wide study of the repressive effects of estrogen receptor beta on estrogen receptor alpha signaling in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 27(7):1019–1032. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210712 PubMedCrossRef Williams C, Edvardsson K, Lewandowski SA, Strom A, Gustafsson JA (2008) A genome-wide study of the repressive effects of estrogen receptor beta on estrogen receptor alpha signaling in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 27(7):1019–1032. doi:10.​1038/​sj.​onc.​1210712 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Charn TH, Liu ETB, Chang EC, Lee YK, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS (2010) Genome-wide dynamics of chromatin binding of estrogen receptors alpha and beta: mutual restriction and competitive site selection. Mol Endocrinol 24(1):47–59. doi:10.1210/me.2009-0252 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Charn TH, Liu ETB, Chang EC, Lee YK, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS (2010) Genome-wide dynamics of chromatin binding of estrogen receptors alpha and beta: mutual restriction and competitive site selection. Mol Endocrinol 24(1):47–59. doi:10.​1210/​me.​2009-0252 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Poola I, Abraham J, Baldwin K, Saunders A, Bhatnagar R (2005) Estrogen receptors beta4 and Beta5 are full length functionally distinct ER beta isoforms—cloning from human ovary and functional characterization. Endocrine 27(3):227–238. doi:10.1385/endo:27:3:227 PubMedCrossRef Poola I, Abraham J, Baldwin K, Saunders A, Bhatnagar R (2005) Estrogen receptors beta4 and Beta5 are full length functionally distinct ER beta isoforms—cloning from human ovary and functional characterization. Endocrine 27(3):227–238. doi:10.​1385/​endo:​27:​3:​227 PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Omoto Y, Eguchi H, Yamamoto-Yamaguchi Y, Hayashi S (2003) Estrogen receptor (ER) beta 1 and ER beta cx/beta 2 inhibit ER alpha function differently in breast cancer cell line MCF7. Oncogene 22(32):5011–5020. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206787 PubMedCrossRef Omoto Y, Eguchi H, Yamamoto-Yamaguchi Y, Hayashi S (2003) Estrogen receptor (ER) beta 1 and ER beta cx/beta 2 inhibit ER alpha function differently in breast cancer cell line MCF7. Oncogene 22(32):5011–5020. doi:10.​1038/​sj.​onc.​1206787 PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference (EBCTCG) EBCTCG (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0 (EBCTCG) EBCTCG (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(05)66544-0
13.
go back to reference Clarke M, Collins R, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Peto R, Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative G (1998) Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 351(9114):1451–1467CrossRef Clarke M, Collins R, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Peto R, Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative G (1998) Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 351(9114):1451–1467CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Clarke M, Cutter D, Darby S, McGale P, Pan HC, Taylor C, Wang YC, Dowsett M, Ingle J, Peto R, (EBCTCG) EBCTCG, (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378(9793):771–784. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60993-8 PubMedCrossRef Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Clarke M, Cutter D, Darby S, McGale P, Pan HC, Taylor C, Wang YC, Dowsett M, Ingle J, Peto R, (EBCTCG) EBCTCG, (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378(9793):771–784. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(11)60993-8 PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Murphy LC, Peng B, Lewis A, Davie JR, Leygue E, Kemp A, Ung K, Vendetti M, Shiu R (2005) Inducible upregulation of oestrogen receptor-beta 1 affects oestrogen and tamoxifen responsiveness in MCF7 human breast cancer cells. J Mol Endocrinol 34(2):553–566. doi:10.1677/jme.1.01688 PubMedCrossRef Murphy LC, Peng B, Lewis A, Davie JR, Leygue E, Kemp A, Ung K, Vendetti M, Shiu R (2005) Inducible upregulation of oestrogen receptor-beta 1 affects oestrogen and tamoxifen responsiveness in MCF7 human breast cancer cells. J Mol Endocrinol 34(2):553–566. doi:10.​1677/​jme.​1.​01688 PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Camp RL, Chung GG, Rimm DL (2002) Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays. Nat Med 8(11):1323–1327. doi:10.1038/nm791 PubMedCrossRef Camp RL, Chung GG, Rimm DL (2002) Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays. Nat Med 8(11):1323–1327. doi:10.​1038/​nm791 PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Andrulis IL, Bull SB, Blackstein ME, Sutherland D, Mak C, Sidlofsky S, Pritzker KP, Hartwick RW, Hanna W, Lickley L, Wilkinson R, Qizilbash A, Ambus U, Lipa M, Weizel H, Katz A, Baida M, Mariz S, Stoik G, Dacamara P, Strongitharm D, Geddie W, McCready D, Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group (1998) neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16(4):1340–1349PubMed Andrulis IL, Bull SB, Blackstein ME, Sutherland D, Mak C, Sidlofsky S, Pritzker KP, Hartwick RW, Hanna W, Lickley L, Wilkinson R, Qizilbash A, Ambus U, Lipa M, Weizel H, Katz A, Baida M, Mariz S, Stoik G, Dacamara P, Strongitharm D, Geddie W, McCready D, Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group (1998) neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16(4):1340–1349PubMed
20.
go back to reference García-Closas M, Brinton LA, Lissowska J, Chatterjee N, Peplonska B, Anderson WF, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Bardin-Mikolajczak A, Zatonski W, Blair A, Kalaylioglu Z, Rymkiewicz G, Mazepa-Sikora D, Kordek R, Lukaszek S, Sherman ME (2006) Established breast cancer risk factors by clinically important tumour characteristics. Br J Cancer 95(1):123–129. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603207 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef García-Closas M, Brinton LA, Lissowska J, Chatterjee N, Peplonska B, Anderson WF, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Bardin-Mikolajczak A, Zatonski W, Blair A, Kalaylioglu Z, Rymkiewicz G, Mazepa-Sikora D, Kordek R, Lukaszek S, Sherman ME (2006) Established breast cancer risk factors by clinically important tumour characteristics. Br J Cancer 95(1):123–129. doi:10.​1038/​sj.​bjc.​6603207 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Horne HN, Sherman ME, Garcia-Closas M, Pharoah PD, Blows FM, Yang XR, Hewitt SM, Conway CM, Lissowska J, Brinton LA, Prokunina-Olsson L, Dawson SJ, Caldas C, Easton DF, Chanock SJ, Figueroa JD (2014) Breast cancer susceptibility risk associations and heterogeneity by E-cadherin tumor tissue expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143(1):181–187. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2771-z PubMedCrossRef Horne HN, Sherman ME, Garcia-Closas M, Pharoah PD, Blows FM, Yang XR, Hewitt SM, Conway CM, Lissowska J, Brinton LA, Prokunina-Olsson L, Dawson SJ, Caldas C, Easton DF, Chanock SJ, Figueroa JD (2014) Breast cancer susceptibility risk associations and heterogeneity by E-cadherin tumor tissue expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143(1):181–187. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-013-2771-z PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mulligan AM, Pinnaduwage D, Bull SB, O’Malley FP, Andrulis IL (2008) Prognostic effect of basal-like breast cancers is time dependent: evidence from tissue microarray studies on a lymph node-negative cohort. Clin Cancer Res 14(13):4168–4174. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4543 PubMedCrossRef Mulligan AM, Pinnaduwage D, Bull SB, O’Malley FP, Andrulis IL (2008) Prognostic effect of basal-like breast cancers is time dependent: evidence from tissue microarray studies on a lymph node-negative cohort. Clin Cancer Res 14(13):4168–4174. doi:10.​1158/​1078-0432.​CCR-07-4543 PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM, Diagnostics SSoN-EWGoC (2006) REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100(2):229–235. doi:10.1007/s10549-006-9242-8 PubMedCrossRef McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM, Diagnostics SSoN-EWGoC (2006) REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100(2):229–235. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-006-9242-8 PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Shaaban AM, Green AR, Karthik S, Alizadeh Y, Hughes TA, Harkins L, Ellis IO, Robertson JF, Paish EC, Saunders PTK, Groome NP, Speirs V (2008) Nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of ER beta 1, ER beta 2, and ER beta 5 identifies distinct prognostic outcome for breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 14(16):5228–5235. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-4528 PubMedCrossRef Shaaban AM, Green AR, Karthik S, Alizadeh Y, Hughes TA, Harkins L, Ellis IO, Robertson JF, Paish EC, Saunders PTK, Groome NP, Speirs V (2008) Nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of ER beta 1, ER beta 2, and ER beta 5 identifies distinct prognostic outcome for breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 14(16):5228–5235. doi:10.​1158/​1078-0432.​ccr-07-4528 PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Leung YK, Lam HM, Wu SL, Song D, Levin L, Cheng LA, Wu CL, Ho SM (2010) Estrogen receptor beta 2 and beta 5 are associated with poor prognosis in prostate cancer, and promote cancer cell migration and invasion. Endocr Relat Cancer 17(3):675–689. doi:10.1677/erc-09-0294 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Leung YK, Lam HM, Wu SL, Song D, Levin L, Cheng LA, Wu CL, Ho SM (2010) Estrogen receptor beta 2 and beta 5 are associated with poor prognosis in prostate cancer, and promote cancer cell migration and invasion. Endocr Relat Cancer 17(3):675–689. doi:10.​1677/​erc-09-0294 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wu X, Subramaniam M, Negron V, Cicek M, Reynolds C, Lingle WL, Goetz MP, Ingle JN, Spelsberg TC, Hawse JR (2012) Development, characterization, and applications of a novel estrogen receptor beta monoclonal antibody. J Cell Biochem 113(2):711–723. doi:10.1002/jcb.23443 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wu X, Subramaniam M, Negron V, Cicek M, Reynolds C, Lingle WL, Goetz MP, Ingle JN, Spelsberg TC, Hawse JR (2012) Development, characterization, and applications of a novel estrogen receptor beta monoclonal antibody. J Cell Biochem 113(2):711–723. doi:10.​1002/​jcb.​23443 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hopp TA, Weiss HL, Parra IS, Cui Y, Osborne CK, Fuqua SAW (2004) Low levels of estrogen receptor beta protein predict resistance to tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 10(22):7490–7499PubMedCrossRef Hopp TA, Weiss HL, Parra IS, Cui Y, Osborne CK, Fuqua SAW (2004) Low levels of estrogen receptor beta protein predict resistance to tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 10(22):7490–7499PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Honma N, Horii R, Iwase T, Saji S, Younes M, Takubo K, Matsuura M, Ito Y, Akiyama F, Sakamoto G (2008) Clinical importance of estrogen receptor-beta evaluation in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. J Clin Oncol 26(22):3727–3734. doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.2968 PubMedCrossRef Honma N, Horii R, Iwase T, Saji S, Younes M, Takubo K, Matsuura M, Ito Y, Akiyama F, Sakamoto G (2008) Clinical importance of estrogen receptor-beta evaluation in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. J Clin Oncol 26(22):3727–3734. doi:10.​1200/​jco.​2007.​14.​2968 PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Esslimani-Sahla M, Simony-Lafontaine J, Kramar A, Lavaill R, Mollevi C, Warner M, Gustallsson JA, Rochefort H (2004) Estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) level but not its ER beta cx variant helps to predict tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 10(17):5769–5776. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-0389 PubMedCrossRef Esslimani-Sahla M, Simony-Lafontaine J, Kramar A, Lavaill R, Mollevi C, Warner M, Gustallsson JA, Rochefort H (2004) Estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) level but not its ER beta cx variant helps to predict tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 10(17):5769–5776. doi:10.​1158/​1078-0432.​ccr-04-0389 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
ERβ splice variant expression in four large cohorts of human breast cancer patient tumors
Authors
Hallie Wimberly
Gang Han
Dushanthi Pinnaduwage
Leigh C. Murphy
Xiaohong Rose Yang
Irene L. Andrulis
Mark Sherman
Jonine Figueroa
David L. Rimm
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3050-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine