Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2014

01-07-2014 | Preclinical study

Monitoring patient-centered outcomes through the progression of breast reconstruction: a multicentered prospective longitudinal evaluation

Authors: Li-Fen Chao, Ketan M. Patel, Shin-Cheh Chen, Hung-Bun Lam, Chia-Yu Lin, Hsueh-Erh Liu, Ming-Huei Cheng

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Studies have shown that having breast reconstruction has a positive influence on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at the conclusion of treatment. However, no study has critically evaluated changes to these patient-reported outcomes during the process of undergoing breast reconstruction. This study was to prospectively evaluate changes to patient-centered metrics through the progression of breast reconstruction. An IRB-approved prospective, multi-institutional study was performed for all patients undergoing breast reconstruction between 2009 and 2011. The Breast-Q reconstruction questionnaire was used for evaluation of HRQoL and was administered at five intervals in the perioperative period. Longitudinal evaluation was performed to assess changes to HRQoL metrics during this perioperative interval. One hundred and ten patients were enrolled, and 100 patients (91.9 %) completed appropriate follow-up. Preoperative HRQoL scores were higher in patients electing to forgo reconstruction (P < 0.004), while postoperative HRQoL scores consistently deteriorated at multiple time points following mastectomy as compared to reconstructed patients. On subgroup analysis, results indicated lower initial HRQoL scores in delayed reconstruction (P < 0.05) as compared to immediate reconstruction. These scores did, however, merge at approximately 9 months postoperatively. Changes to HRQoL outcomes occur through progression of breast reconstruction. Within the first year of surgery, early decreases are mirrored by significant increases at later time points above baseline levels when evaluating most forms of reconstruction. Choosing against reconstruction will likely result in continued deterioration of HRQoL for patients undergoing cancer surgery, but steady improvements can be expected if delayed reconstruction is chosen.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vahdaninia M, Omidvari S, Montazeri A (2010) What do predict anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients? A follow-up study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 45(3):355–361PubMedCrossRef Vahdaninia M, Omidvari S, Montazeri A (2010) What do predict anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients? A follow-up study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 45(3):355–361PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Arora NK, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, McTavish F, Cella DF, Pingree S, Mendenhall JH, Mahvi DM (2001) Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of younger women with breast carcinoma. Cancer 92(5):1288–1298PubMedCrossRef Arora NK, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, McTavish F, Cella DF, Pingree S, Mendenhall JH, Mahvi DM (2001) Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of younger women with breast carcinoma. Cancer 92(5):1288–1298PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hofsø K, Miaskowski C, Bjordal K, Cooper BA, Rustøen T (2012) Previous chemotherapy influences the symptom experience and quality of life of women with breast cancer prior to radiation therapy. Cancer Nurs 35(3):167–177PubMedCrossRef Hofsø K, Miaskowski C, Bjordal K, Cooper BA, Rustøen T (2012) Previous chemotherapy influences the symptom experience and quality of life of women with breast cancer prior to radiation therapy. Cancer Nurs 35(3):167–177PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR, Wyatt GE, Ganz PA (2000) Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(17):1422–1429PubMedCrossRef Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR, Wyatt GE, Ganz PA (2000) Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(17):1422–1429PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nissen M, Swenson K, Ritz L, Farrell J, Sladek M, Lally R (2001) Quality of life after breast carcinoma surgery. Cancer 91(7):1238–1246PubMedCrossRef Nissen M, Swenson K, Ritz L, Farrell J, Sladek M, Lally R (2001) Quality of life after breast carcinoma surgery. Cancer 91(7):1238–1246PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Addington-Hall J, Kalra L (2001) Measuring quality of life: who should measure quality of life? Br Med J 322(7299):1417–1420CrossRef Addington-Hall J, Kalra L (2001) Measuring quality of life: who should measure quality of life? Br Med J 322(7299):1417–1420CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dian D, Schwenn K, Mylonas I, Janni W, Friese K, Jaenicke F (2007) Quality of life among breast cancer patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction versus breast conserving therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 133(4):247–252 PubMedCrossRef Dian D, Schwenn K, Mylonas I, Janni W, Friese K, Jaenicke F (2007) Quality of life among breast cancer patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction versus breast conserving therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 133(4):247–252 PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Eltahir Y, Werners LL, Dreise MM, van Emmichoven IAZ, Jansen L, Werker PM, de Bock GH (2013) Quality-of-life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(2):201e–209ePubMedCrossRef Eltahir Y, Werners LL, Dreise MM, van Emmichoven IAZ, Jansen L, Werker PM, de Bock GH (2013) Quality-of-life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(2):201e–209ePubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL (2012) The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(2):293–302PubMedCrossRef Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL (2012) The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(2):293–302PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Macadam SA, Ho AL, Cook E Jr, Lennox PA, Pusic AL (2010) Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes among saline and silicone implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(3):761–771PubMedCrossRef Macadam SA, Ho AL, Cook E Jr, Lennox PA, Pusic AL (2010) Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes among saline and silicone implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(3):761–771PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tadiparthi S, Staley H, Collis N, O’Donoghue JM (2013) An analysis of the motivating and risk factors for conversion from implant-based to total autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(1):23–33PubMedCrossRef Tadiparthi S, Staley H, Collis N, O’Donoghue JM (2013) An analysis of the motivating and risk factors for conversion from implant-based to total autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(1):23–33PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sheina A, Macadam ALH, Lennox PA, Pusic AL (2013) Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(3):431–441CrossRef Sheina A, Macadam ALH, Lennox PA, Pusic AL (2013) Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(3):431–441CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1):13–22CrossRef Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1):13–22CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rosson GD, Shridharani SM, Magarakis M, Manahan MA, Basdag B, Gilson MM, Pusic AL (2013) Quality of life before reconstructive breast surgery: a preoperative comparison of patients with immediate, delayed, and major revision reconstruction. Microsurgery 33(4):253–258. doi:10.1002/micr.22081 PubMedCrossRef Rosson GD, Shridharani SM, Magarakis M, Manahan MA, Basdag B, Gilson MM, Pusic AL (2013) Quality of life before reconstructive breast surgery: a preoperative comparison of patients with immediate, delayed, and major revision reconstruction. Microsurgery 33(4):253–258. doi:10.​1002/​micr.​22081 PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wilkins E, Cederna P, Lowery J, Davis J, Kim H, Roth R, Goldfarb S, Izenberg P, Houin H, Shaheen K (2000) Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(5):1014–1025PubMedCrossRef Wilkins E, Cederna P, Lowery J, Davis J, Kim H, Roth R, Goldfarb S, Izenberg P, Houin H, Shaheen K (2000) Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(5):1014–1025PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK (eds) (2000) Diseases of the Breast, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK (eds) (2000) Diseases of the Breast, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
18.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, Wilkins EG (2007) Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J Am Coll Surg 204(1):7–12PubMedCrossRef Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, Wilkins EG (2007) Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J Am Coll Surg 204(1):7–12PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Monitoring patient-centered outcomes through the progression of breast reconstruction: a multicentered prospective longitudinal evaluation
Authors
Li-Fen Chao
Ketan M. Patel
Shin-Cheh Chen
Hung-Bun Lam
Chia-Yu Lin
Hsueh-Erh Liu
Ming-Huei Cheng
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3022-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine