Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014

Open Access 01-04-2014 | Clinical Trial

The clinical utility of genetic testing in breast cancer kindreds: a prospective study in families without a demonstrable BRCA mutation

Authors: Pål Møller, Astrid Stormorken, Marit Muri Holmen, Anne Irene Hagen, Anita Vabø, Lovise Mæhle

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

We report prospectively observed risk for breast cancer in breast cancer kindreds without a demonstrable BRCA1/2 mutation. According to family history, the optimal available member(s) of each breast cancer kindred attending our clinic was tested for BRCA mutations. Women in families without a demonstrable BRCA mutation were subjected to annual mammography. BRCA mutations were demonstrated in 496/2,118 (23 %) breast cancer kindreds. In families without a demonstrable BRCA mutation, a total of 3,161 healthy women aged 25–59 years were prospectively followed for 24,808 observation years. Sixty-four cancers were observed, compared to 34.0 expected (p < 0.01), arriving at a 7.9 % cumulative risk at age 60 compared to 4.0 % in the population [relative risk (RR) = 2.0]. Women with one mother or sister affected ≤50 years and with no other close relatives with breast cancer did not have increased risk (0 cancers observed and 0.6 expected at age 40, 11 cancers observed and 7.9 expected at age 60, p > 0.05). Excluding these, cumulative risk at 60 years was 8.8 % (RR = 2.2). The highest cumulative risk at 60 years was 11.4 %, found in families with two cases ≤55 years (RR = 2.8). In breast cancer kindreds without a demonstrable BRCA mutation, the risk for breast cancer in female first degree relatives was about twice the risk in the general population. Women with one early affected relative only did not have increased risk for early onset breast cancer, while those with more than one young affected relative had close to three times population risk.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Claus EB (2001) Risk models used to counsel women for breast and ovarian cancer: a guide for clinicians. Fam Cancer 1:197–206PubMedCrossRef Claus EB (2001) Risk models used to counsel women for breast and ovarian cancer: a guide for clinicians. Fam Cancer 1:197–206PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Møller P, Hagen AI, Apold J et al (2007) Genetic epidemiology of BRCA mutations-family history detects less than 50 % of the mutation carriers. Eur J Cancer 43(11):1713–1717PubMedCrossRef Møller P, Hagen AI, Apold J et al (2007) Genetic epidemiology of BRCA mutations-family history detects less than 50 % of the mutation carriers. Eur J Cancer 43(11):1713–1717PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Saetersdal A, Dørum A, Heimdal K et al (1996) Inherited predisposition to breast carcinoma. Results of first round examination of 537 women at risk. Anticancer Res 16(4A):1989–1992PubMed Saetersdal A, Dørum A, Heimdal K et al (1996) Inherited predisposition to breast carcinoma. Results of first round examination of 537 women at risk. Anticancer Res 16(4A):1989–1992PubMed
5.
go back to reference Møller P, Evans G, Haites N et al (1999) Guidelines for follow-up of women at high risk for inherited breast cancer: consensus statement from the Biomed 2 Demonstration Programme on Inherited Breast Cancer. Dis Markers 15(1–3):207–211PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Møller P, Evans G, Haites N et al (1999) Guidelines for follow-up of women at high risk for inherited breast cancer: consensus statement from the Biomed 2 Demonstration Programme on Inherited Breast Cancer. Dis Markers 15(1–3):207–211PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Møller P, Clark N (2011) CGEN—a Clinical GENetics software application. Hum Mutat 32(5):537–542PubMedCrossRef Møller P, Clark N (2011) CGEN—a Clinical GENetics software application. Hum Mutat 32(5):537–542PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Herman S, Varga D, Deissler HL, Kreienberg R, Deissler H (2012) Medium-sized deletion in the BRCA1 gene: limitations of Sanger sequencing and MLPA analyses. Genet Mol Biol 35(1):53–56PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Herman S, Varga D, Deissler HL, Kreienberg R, Deissler H (2012) Medium-sized deletion in the BRCA1 gene: limitations of Sanger sequencing and MLPA analyses. Genet Mol Biol 35(1):53–56PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA, Finch A, Poll A et al (2009) Breast cancer risks in women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer who have tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Br J Cancer 100(2):421–425PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Metcalfe KA, Finch A, Poll A et al (2009) Breast cancer risks in women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer who have tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Br J Cancer 100(2):421–425PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lubinski J, Huzarski T, Byrski T et al (2012) The risk of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 mutation from North America and Poland. Int J Cancer 131(1):229–234PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lubinski J, Huzarski T, Byrski T et al (2012) The risk of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 mutation from North America and Poland. Int J Cancer 131(1):229–234PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Møller P, Maehle L, Vabø A, Clark N, Sun P, Narod SA (2013) Age-specific incidence rates for breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 mutations from Norway. Clin Genet 83(1):88–91PubMedCrossRef Møller P, Maehle L, Vabø A, Clark N, Sun P, Narod SA (2013) Age-specific incidence rates for breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 mutations from Norway. Clin Genet 83(1):88–91PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Lingsma HF, Evans DG, Thompson D, Kaas R, Manders P, van Asperen CJ, Adank M, Hooning MJ, Kwan Lim GE, Eeles R, Oosterwijk JC, Leach MO, Steyerberg EW (2013) Optimal age to start preventive measures in women with BRCA1/2 mutations or high familial breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer 133(1):156–163PubMedCrossRef Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Lingsma HF, Evans DG, Thompson D, Kaas R, Manders P, van Asperen CJ, Adank M, Hooning MJ, Kwan Lim GE, Eeles R, Oosterwijk JC, Leach MO, Steyerberg EW (2013) Optimal age to start preventive measures in women with BRCA1/2 mutations or high familial breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer 133(1):156–163PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Evans DG, Thomas S, Caunt J, Roberts L, Howell A, Wilson M, Fox R, Sibbering DM, Moss S, Wallis MG, Eccles DM, Duffy S; FH02 Study Group (2014) Mammographic surveillance in women aged 35–39 at enhanced familial risk of breast cancer (FH02). Fam Cancer 13(1):13–21 Evans DG, Thomas S, Caunt J, Roberts L, Howell A, Wilson M, Fox R, Sibbering DM, Moss S, Wallis MG, Eccles DM, Duffy S; FH02 Study Group (2014) Mammographic surveillance in women aged 35–39 at enhanced familial risk of breast cancer (FH02). Fam Cancer 13(1):13–21
15.
go back to reference Evans DG, Ingham S, Dawe S, Roberts L, Lalloo F, Brentnall AR, Stavrinos P, Howell A (2013) Breast cancer risk assessment in 8,824 women attending a family history evaluation and screening programme. Fam Cancer. doi:10.1007/s10689-013-9694-z Evans DG, Ingham S, Dawe S, Roberts L, Lalloo F, Brentnall AR, Stavrinos P, Howell A (2013) Breast cancer risk assessment in 8,824 women attending a family history evaluation and screening programme. Fam Cancer. doi:10.​1007/​s10689-013-9694-z
Metadata
Title
The clinical utility of genetic testing in breast cancer kindreds: a prospective study in families without a demonstrable BRCA mutation
Authors
Pål Møller
Astrid Stormorken
Marit Muri Holmen
Anne Irene Hagen
Anita Vabø
Lovise Mæhle
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2902-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine