Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2014

Open Access 01-04-2014 | Review

Expert perspectives on biosimilar monoclonal antibodies in breast cancer

Authors: J. Cortés, G. Curigliano, V. Diéras

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

While biosimilars of low molecular-weight biologics such as G-CSF have been available in Europe since 2006, biosimilars of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have only become available in the last year. Unlike G-CSF, mAbs are large and complex and often play a direct role in the survival of patients with life-threatening illnesses such as breast cancer. Several biosimilars are currently under development for the treatment of breast cancer, and the use of biosimilars in a setting that directly impacts patient survival raises a number of questions. In this review, we discuss the biosimilar mAbs currently in development for the treatment of breast cancer. We provide an overview of the European Medicine Agency guidelines and historic data on the development of biosimilars in order to discuss the development of biosimilar mAbs for breast cancer. Biosimilars offer a highly attractive path toward reducing the cost of medical care and should be pursued with great interest. However, for agents used to treat life-threatening diseases such as cancer, a cautious approach must be taken to ensure that there is no negative impact on patient care. Clinical trials for biosimilar mAbs must be carried out in an appropriately sensitive patient population using endpoints that can accurately demonstrate both the similarity of the biosimilar and its efficacy in the indication. Due to the abbreviated approval pathway, rigorous pharmacovigilance must be in place once a biosimilar mAb is approved in order to ensure its long-term safety and efficacy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S et al (2009) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344:783–792CrossRef Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S et al (2009) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344:783–792CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ et al (2011) Four-year follow-up of trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer: joint analysis of data from NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31. J Clin Oncol 29:3366–3373PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ et al (2011) Four-year follow-up of trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer: joint analysis of data from NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31. J Clin Oncol 29:3366–3373PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) Trial Study Team et al (2013) 2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 382:1021–1028PubMedCrossRef Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) Trial Study Team et al (2013) 2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 382:1021–1028PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Revers L, Furczon E (2010) An introduction to biologics and biosimilars. Part II: Subsequent entry biologics: biosame or biodifferent? Can Pharm J 143:184–191CrossRef Revers L, Furczon E (2010) An introduction to biologics and biosimilars. Part II: Subsequent entry biologics: biosame or biodifferent? Can Pharm J 143:184–191CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Weise M, Bielsky MC, De Smet K et al (2011) Biosimilars—why terminology matters. Nat Biotechnol 29:691–693CrossRef Weise M, Bielsky MC, De Smet K et al (2011) Biosimilars—why terminology matters. Nat Biotechnol 29:691–693CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Carey K (2011) Biosimilars encircle Rituxan, US debates innovator exclusivity. Nat Biotechnol 29:177–178PubMedCrossRef Carey K (2011) Biosimilars encircle Rituxan, US debates innovator exclusivity. Nat Biotechnol 29:177–178PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing monoclonal antibodies—non-clinical and clinical issues. London, United Kingdom: Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency 2012 Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing monoclonal antibodies—non-clinical and clinical issues. London, United Kingdom: Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency 2012
9.
go back to reference Guideline on immunogenicity assessment of monoclonal antibodies intended for in vivo clinical use. London, United Kingdom: Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency 2012 Guideline on immunogenicity assessment of monoclonal antibodies intended for in vivo clinical use. London, United Kingdom: Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency 2012
10.
go back to reference Im Y-H, Krasnozhon D, Bondarenko I, et al. (2013) Phase I/IIb clinical trial comparing PK and safety of trastuzumab and its biosimilar candidate CT-P6. Presented at the St Gallen Breast Cancer Conference 13–16 March 2013 in St. Gallen, Switzerland. Abstract 268 Im Y-H, Krasnozhon D, Bondarenko I, et al. (2013) Phase I/IIb clinical trial comparing PK and safety of trastuzumab and its biosimilar candidate CT-P6. Presented at the St Gallen Breast Cancer Conference 13–16 March 2013 in St. Gallen, Switzerland. Abstract 268
11.
go back to reference Im Y-H, Odarchenko P, Grecea D, et al. (2013) Double-blind, randomized, parallel group, phase III study to demonstrate equivalent efficacy and comparable safety of CT-P6 and trastuzumab, both in combination with paclitaxel, in patients with metastatic breast cancer as first-line treatment. J Clin Oncol 31: Poster 629 Im Y-H, Odarchenko P, Grecea D, et al. (2013) Double-blind, randomized, parallel group, phase III study to demonstrate equivalent efficacy and comparable safety of CT-P6 and trastuzumab, both in combination with paclitaxel, in patients with metastatic breast cancer as first-line treatment. J Clin Oncol 31: Poster 629
13.
go back to reference Yin D, Barker KB, Ruifeng L, et al. (2013) A phase I pharmacokinetics trial comparing PF-05280014 (a potential biosimilar) and trastuzumab in healthy volunteers (REFLECTIONS B327-01). J Clin Oncol 31: Abstract 612 Yin D, Barker KB, Ruifeng L, et al. (2013) A phase I pharmacokinetics trial comparing PF-05280014 (a potential biosimilar) and trastuzumab in healthy volunteers (REFLECTIONS B327-01). J Clin Oncol 31: Abstract 612
14.
go back to reference Ewesuedo R, Barker KB, Taylor CT, Jacobs I (2013) A phase 3 randomized, double-blind trial comparing PF-05280014 + paclitaxel vs trastuzumab + paclitaxel for treatment of HER2 + metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 73 (24 Suppl): Abstract OT1-1-03 Ewesuedo R, Barker KB, Taylor CT, Jacobs I (2013) A phase 3 randomized, double-blind trial comparing PF-05280014 + paclitaxel vs trastuzumab + paclitaxel for treatment of HER2 + metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 73 (24 Suppl): Abstract OT1-1-03
17.
go back to reference Clinical Trials.gov (Internet). Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000 Feb 29—Identifier NCT01764022, A safety and efficacy study of BCD-022 with paclitaxel compared to herceptin with paclitaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients; 7 January 2013. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01764022. Accessed Dec 2013 Clinical Trials.gov (Internet). Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000 Feb 29—Identifier NCT01764022, A safety and efficacy study of BCD-022 with paclitaxel compared to herceptin with paclitaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients; 7 January 2013. http://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT01764022. Accessed Dec 2013
18.
go back to reference Clinical Trials.gov (Internet). Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000 Feb 29—Identifier NCT01901146, Efficacy and Safety Study of ABP 980 Compared With Trastuzumab in Subjects With HER2 Positive Early Breast Cancer (Lilac); 20 May 2013. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01901146. Accessed Dec 2013 Clinical Trials.gov (Internet). Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000 Feb 29—Identifier NCT01901146, Efficacy and Safety Study of ABP 980 Compared With Trastuzumab in Subjects With HER2 Positive Early Breast Cancer (Lilac); 20 May 2013. http://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT01901146. Accessed Dec 2013
19.
go back to reference Tsavaris N, Kosmas C, Vadiaka M et al (2002) Immune changes in patients with advanced breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy with taxanes. Br J Cancer 87:21–27PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tsavaris N, Kosmas C, Vadiaka M et al (2002) Immune changes in patients with advanced breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy with taxanes. Br J Cancer 87:21–27PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Standish LJ, Torkelson C, Hamill FA et al (2008) Immune defects in breast cancer patients after radiotherapy. J Soc Integr Oncol 6:110–121PubMedCentralPubMed Standish LJ, Torkelson C, Hamill FA et al (2008) Immune defects in breast cancer patients after radiotherapy. J Soc Integr Oncol 6:110–121PubMedCentralPubMed
21.
go back to reference Saso R, Kulkarni S, Mitchell P et al (2000) Secondary myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukaemia following mitoxantrone-based therapy for breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer 83:91–94PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Saso R, Kulkarni S, Mitchell P et al (2000) Secondary myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukaemia following mitoxantrone-based therapy for breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer 83:91–94PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Smith RE (2003) Risk for the development of treatment-related acute myelocytic leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome among patients with breast cancer: review of the literature and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience. Clin Breast Cancer 4:273–279PubMedCrossRef Smith RE (2003) Risk for the development of treatment-related acute myelocytic leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome among patients with breast cancer: review of the literature and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience. Clin Breast Cancer 4:273–279PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hotta K, Kiura K, Fujiwara Y et al (2009) Association between incremental gains in the objective response rate and survival improvement in phase III trials of first-line chemotherapy for extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 20:829–834PubMedCrossRef Hotta K, Kiura K, Fujiwara Y et al (2009) Association between incremental gains in the objective response rate and survival improvement in phase III trials of first-line chemotherapy for extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 20:829–834PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lee L, Wang L, Crump M (2011) Identification of potential surrogate end points in randomized clinical trials of aggressive and indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: correlation of complete response, time-to-event and overall survival end points. Ann Oncol 22:1392–1403PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lee L, Wang L, Crump M (2011) Identification of potential surrogate end points in randomized clinical trials of aggressive and indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: correlation of complete response, time-to-event and overall survival end points. Ann Oncol 22:1392–1403PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU et al (2012) Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 30:1796–1804CrossRef Von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU et al (2012) Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 30:1796–1804CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Schneider CK, Vleminckx C, Gravanis I et al (2012) Setting the stage for biosimilar monoclonal antibodies. Nat Biotechnol 30:1179–1185PubMedCrossRef Schneider CK, Vleminckx C, Gravanis I et al (2012) Setting the stage for biosimilar monoclonal antibodies. Nat Biotechnol 30:1179–1185PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP): module V—risk management systems. London, United Kingdom: Heads of Medicines Agencies, European Medicines Agency, 2012 Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP): module V—risk management systems. London, United Kingdom: Heads of Medicines Agencies, European Medicines Agency, 2012
32.
go back to reference World Health Organization (2006) WHO informal consultation on international nonproprietary names (INN) policy for biosimilar products. World Health Organization, Geneva World Health Organization (2006) WHO informal consultation on international nonproprietary names (INN) policy for biosimilar products. World Health Organization, Geneva
33.
go back to reference Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (2008) Biosimilar products. Drug Saf Updat 1:8 Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (2008) Biosimilar products. Drug Saf Updat 1:8
34.
go back to reference The Association of the British Pharmaceuticals Industry (2013) ABPI position on biosimilar medicines. The Association of the British Pharmaceuticals Industry, London The Association of the British Pharmaceuticals Industry (2013) ABPI position on biosimilar medicines. The Association of the British Pharmaceuticals Industry, London
35.
go back to reference MabThera® (rituximab) [package insert] (2013) Roche Registration Limited, Welwyn Garden MabThera® (rituximab) [package insert] (2013) Roche Registration Limited, Welwyn Garden
36.
go back to reference Avastin® (bevacizumab) [package insert] (2013) Roche Registration Limited, Welwyn Garden Avastin® (bevacizumab) [package insert] (2013) Roche Registration Limited, Welwyn Garden
37.
38.
go back to reference Ebbers HC, Crow SA, Vulto AG, Schellekens H (2012) Interchangeability, immunogenicity, and biosimilars. Nat Biotechnol 30:1186–1190PubMedCrossRef Ebbers HC, Crow SA, Vulto AG, Schellekens H (2012) Interchangeability, immunogenicity, and biosimilars. Nat Biotechnol 30:1186–1190PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Expert perspectives on biosimilar monoclonal antibodies in breast cancer
Authors
J. Cortés
G. Curigliano
V. Diéras
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2879-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine