Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2013

01-09-2013 | Epidemiology

Associations between genetic variants in the TGF-β signaling pathway and breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women

Authors: Stephanie D. Boone, Kathy B. Baumgartner, Richard N. Baumgartner, Avonne E. Connor, Christina M. Pinkston, Esther M. John, Lisa M. Hines, Mariana C. Stern, Anna R. Giuliano, Gabriela Torres-Mejia, Guy N. Brock, Frank D. Groves, Richard A. Kerber, Roger K. Wolff, Martha L. Slattery

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The TGF-β signaling pathway has a significant role in breast cancer initiation and promotion by regulating various cellular processes. We evaluated whether genetic variation in eight genes (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-βR1, TGF-βR2, TGF-βR3, RUNX1, RUNX2, and RUNX3) is associated with breast cancer risk in women from the Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study. A total of 3,524 cases (1,431 non-Hispanic whites (NHW); 2,093 Hispanics/Native Americans(NA)) and 4,209 population-based controls (1,599 NHWs; 2,610 Hispanics/NAs) were included in analyses. Genotypes for 47 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were determined. Additionally, 104 ancestral informative markers estimated proportion of NA ancestry. Associations with breast cancer risk overall, by menopausal status, NA ancestry, and estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor tumor phenotype were evaluated. After adjustment for multiple comparisons, two SNPs were significantly associated with breast cancer risk: RUNX3 (rs906296 ORCG/GG = 1.15 95 % CI 1.04–1.26) and TGF-β1 (rs4803455 ORCA/AA = 0.89 95 % CI 0.81–0.98). RUNX3 (rs906296) and TGF-βR2 (rs3773644) were associated with risk in pre-menopausal women (p adj = 0.002 and 0.02, respectively) and in those with intermediate to high NA ancestry (p adj = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). Self-reported race was strongly correlated with NA ancestry (r = 0.86). There was a significant interaction between NA ancestry and RUNX1 (rs7279383, p adj = 0.04). Four RUNX SNPs were associated with increased risk of ER− tumors. Results provide evidence that genetic variation in TGF-β and RUNX genes are associated with breast cancer risk. This is the first report of significant associations between genetic variants in TGF-β and RUNX genes and breast cancer risk among women of NA ancestry.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shi Y, Massague J (2003) Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell 113(6):685–700PubMedCrossRef Shi Y, Massague J (2003) Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell 113(6):685–700PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Elliott RL, Blobe GC (2005) Role of transforming growth factor beta in human cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(9):2078–2093PubMedCrossRef Elliott RL, Blobe GC (2005) Role of transforming growth factor beta in human cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(9):2078–2093PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pierce DF Jr et al (1995) Mammary tumor suppression by transforming growth factor beta 1 transgene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92(10):4254–4258PubMedCrossRef Pierce DF Jr et al (1995) Mammary tumor suppression by transforming growth factor beta 1 transgene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92(10):4254–4258PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Scollen S et al (2011) TGF-beta signaling pathway and breast cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(6):1112–1119PubMedCrossRef Scollen S et al (2011) TGF-beta signaling pathway and breast cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(6):1112–1119PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zu X et al (2012) Transforming growth factor-beta signaling in tumor initiation, progression and therapy in breast cancer: an update. Cell Tissue Res 347(1):73–84PubMedCrossRef Zu X et al (2012) Transforming growth factor-beta signaling in tumor initiation, progression and therapy in breast cancer: an update. Cell Tissue Res 347(1):73–84PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Huang B et al (2011) RUNX3 acts as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer by targeting estrogen receptor alpha. Oncogene, New England Huang B et al (2011) RUNX3 acts as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer by targeting estrogen receptor alpha. Oncogene, New England
8.
go back to reference Band AM, Laiho M (2011) Crosstalk of TGF-beta and estrogen receptor signaling in breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 16(2):109–115PubMedCrossRef Band AM, Laiho M (2011) Crosstalk of TGF-beta and estrogen receptor signaling in breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 16(2):109–115PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chimge NO, Frenkel B (2012) The RUNX family in breast cancer: relationships with estrogen signaling. Oncogene, New England Chimge NO, Frenkel B (2012) The RUNX family in breast cancer: relationships with estrogen signaling. Oncogene, New England
10.
go back to reference Bierie B et al (2009) Abrogation of TGF-beta signaling enhances chemokine production and correlates with prognosis in human breast cancer. J Clin Invest 119(6):1571–1582PubMedCrossRef Bierie B et al (2009) Abrogation of TGF-beta signaling enhances chemokine production and correlates with prognosis in human breast cancer. J Clin Invest 119(6):1571–1582PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Miyazono K, Maeda S, Imamura T (2004) Coordinate regulation of cell growth and differentiation by TGF-beta superfamily and Runx proteins. Oncogene 23(24):4232–4237PubMedCrossRef Miyazono K, Maeda S, Imamura T (2004) Coordinate regulation of cell growth and differentiation by TGF-beta superfamily and Runx proteins. Oncogene 23(24):4232–4237PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cameron ER, Neil JC (2004) The Runx genes: lineage-specific oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Oncogene 23(24):4308–4314PubMedCrossRef Cameron ER, Neil JC (2004) The Runx genes: lineage-specific oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Oncogene 23(24):4308–4314PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ito Y (2004) Oncogenic potential of the RUNX gene family: ‘overview’. Oncogene 23(24):4198–4208PubMedCrossRef Ito Y (2004) Oncogenic potential of the RUNX gene family: ‘overview’. Oncogene 23(24):4198–4208PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Levy L, Hill CS (2006) Alterations in components of the TGF-beta superfamily signaling pathways in human cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 17(1–2):41–58PubMedCrossRef Levy L, Hill CS (2006) Alterations in components of the TGF-beta superfamily signaling pathways in human cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 17(1–2):41–58PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Serra R, Crowley MR (2005) Mouse models of transforming growth factor beta impact in breast development and cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 12(4):749–760PubMedCrossRef Serra R, Crowley MR (2005) Mouse models of transforming growth factor beta impact in breast development and cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 12(4):749–760PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cox A et al (2007) A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet 39(3):352–358PubMedCrossRef Cox A et al (2007) A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet 39(3):352–358PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Qi X et al (2010) Transforming growth factor-beta1 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 27 case-control studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122(1):273–279PubMedCrossRef Qi X et al (2010) Transforming growth factor-beta1 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 27 case-control studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122(1):273–279PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Liao RY et al (2010) TGFBR1×6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls. Mol Biol Rep 37(7):3227–3232PubMedCrossRef Liao RY et al (2010) TGFBR1×6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls. Mol Biol Rep 37(7):3227–3232PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Colleran G et al (2010) The TGFBR1×6A/9A polymorphism is not associated with differential risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119(2):437–442PubMedCrossRef Colleran G et al (2010) The TGFBR1×6A/9A polymorphism is not associated with differential risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119(2):437–442PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ma X et al (2012) Pathway analyses identify TGFBR2 as potential breast cancer susceptibility gene: results from a consortium study among Asians. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(7):1176–1184PubMedCrossRef Ma X et al (2012) Pathway analyses identify TGFBR2 as potential breast cancer susceptibility gene: results from a consortium study among Asians. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(7):1176–1184PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pasche B et al (2004) TGFBR1×6A and cancer: a meta-analysis of 12 case-control studies. J Clin Oncol 22(4):756–758PubMedCrossRef Pasche B et al (2004) TGFBR1×6A and cancer: a meta-analysis of 12 case-control studies. J Clin Oncol 22(4):756–758PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Niu W et al (2010) Association of TGFB1 -509 C > T polymorphism with breast cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis involving 23,579 subjects. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124(1):243–249PubMedCrossRef Niu W et al (2010) Association of TGFB1 -509 C > T polymorphism with breast cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis involving 23,579 subjects. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124(1):243–249PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wang YQ et al (2012) Association between TGFBR1 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 35 case-control studies. PLoS One 7(8):e42899PubMedCrossRef Wang YQ et al (2012) Association between TGFBR1 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 35 case-control studies. PLoS One 7(8):e42899PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Woo SU et al (2010) Association of a TGF-beta1 gene -509 C/T polymorphism with breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124(2):481–485PubMedCrossRef Woo SU et al (2010) Association of a TGF-beta1 gene -509 C/T polymorphism with breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124(2):481–485PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Baxter SW et al (2002) Transforming growth factor beta receptor 1 polyalanine polymorphism and exon 5 mutation analysis in breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11(2):211–214PubMed Baxter SW et al (2002) Transforming growth factor beta receptor 1 polyalanine polymorphism and exon 5 mutation analysis in breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11(2):211–214PubMed
27.
go back to reference Jin Q et al (2004) Polymorphisms and haplotype structures in genes for transforming growth factor beta1 and its receptors in familial and unselected breast cancers. Int J Cancer 112(1):94–99PubMedCrossRef Jin Q et al (2004) Polymorphisms and haplotype structures in genes for transforming growth factor beta1 and its receptors in familial and unselected breast cancers. Int J Cancer 112(1):94–99PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kaklamani VG et al (2005) Combined genetic assessment of transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathway variants may predict breast cancer risk. Cancer Res 65(8):3454–3461PubMed Kaklamani VG et al (2005) Combined genetic assessment of transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathway variants may predict breast cancer risk. Cancer Res 65(8):3454–3461PubMed
29.
go back to reference Le Marchand L et al (2004) T29C polymorphism in the transforming growth factor beta1 gene and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(3):412–415PubMed Le Marchand L et al (2004) T29C polymorphism in the transforming growth factor beta1 gene and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(3):412–415PubMed
30.
go back to reference Cox DG et al (2007) TGFB1 and TGFBR1 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in the Nurses’ Health Study. BMC Cancer 7:175PubMedCrossRef Cox DG et al (2007) TGFB1 and TGFBR1 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in the Nurses’ Health Study. BMC Cancer 7:175PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hishida A et al (2003) Transforming growth factor B1 T29C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in Japanese women. Breast Cancer 10(1):63–69PubMedCrossRef Hishida A et al (2003) Transforming growth factor B1 T29C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in Japanese women. Breast Cancer 10(1):63–69PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Dunning AM et al (2003) A transforming growth factor beta1 signal peptide variant increases secretion in vitro and is associated with increased incidence of invasive breast cancer. Cancer Res 63(10):2610–2615PubMed Dunning AM et al (2003) A transforming growth factor beta1 signal peptide variant increases secretion in vitro and is associated with increased incidence of invasive breast cancer. Cancer Res 63(10):2610–2615PubMed
33.
go back to reference Pasche B et al (2010) Constitutively decreased TGFBR1 allelic expression is a common finding in colorectal cancer and is associated with three TGFBR1 SNPs. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 29:57PubMedCrossRef Pasche B et al (2010) Constitutively decreased TGFBR1 allelic expression is a common finding in colorectal cancer and is associated with three TGFBR1 SNPs. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 29:57PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Wallace TA, Martin DN, Ambs S (2011) Interactions among genes, tumor biology and the environment in cancer health disparities: examining the evidence on a national and global scale. Carcinogenesis 32(8):1107–1121PubMedCrossRef Wallace TA, Martin DN, Ambs S (2011) Interactions among genes, tumor biology and the environment in cancer health disparities: examining the evidence on a national and global scale. Carcinogenesis 32(8):1107–1121PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Slattery M et al (2012) Genetic variation in genes involved in hormones, inflammation, and energetic factors and breast cancer risk in an admixed population. Carcinogenesis, Austin Slattery M et al (2012) Genetic variation in genes involved in hormones, inflammation, and energetic factors and breast cancer risk in an admixed population. Carcinogenesis, Austin
36.
go back to reference Collins-Schramm HE et al (2004) Mexican American ancestry-informative markers: examination of population structure and marker characteristics in European Americans, Mexican Americans Amerindians and Asians. Hum Genet 114(3):263–271PubMedCrossRef Collins-Schramm HE et al (2004) Mexican American ancestry-informative markers: examination of population structure and marker characteristics in European Americans, Mexican Americans Amerindians and Asians. Hum Genet 114(3):263–271PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2):945–959PubMed Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2):945–959PubMed
38.
go back to reference Bursac Z et al (2008) Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med 3:17PubMedCrossRef Bursac Z et al (2008) Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med 3:17PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Dubin N, Pasternack BS (1986) Risk assessment for case-control subgroups by polychotomous logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol 123(6):1101–1117PubMed Dubin N, Pasternack BS (1986) Risk assessment for case-control subgroups by polychotomous logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol 123(6):1101–1117PubMed
40.
go back to reference Hosmer D Jr, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. In: Sons JWA (ed) Probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York Hosmer D Jr, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. In: Sons JWA (ed) Probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York
41.
go back to reference Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70 Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70
42.
go back to reference Nyholt DR (2004) A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am J Hum Genet 74(4):765–769PubMedCrossRef Nyholt DR (2004) A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am J Hum Genet 74(4):765–769PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Li J, Ji L (2005) Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analyses using the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix. Heredity (Edinb) 95(3):221–227CrossRef Li J, Ji L (2005) Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analyses using the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix. Heredity (Edinb) 95(3):221–227CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Moustakas A et al (2002) Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling in regulation of cell growth and differentiation. Immunol Lett 82(1–2):85–91PubMedCrossRef Moustakas A et al (2002) Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling in regulation of cell growth and differentiation. Immunol Lett 82(1–2):85–91PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Lee JD et al (2010) The type III TGF-beta receptor suppresses breast cancer progression through GIPC-mediated inhibition of TGF-beta signaling. Carcinogenesis 31(2):175–183PubMedCrossRef Lee JD et al (2010) The type III TGF-beta receptor suppresses breast cancer progression through GIPC-mediated inhibition of TGF-beta signaling. Carcinogenesis 31(2):175–183PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Gobbi H et al (1999) Transforming growth factor-beta and breast cancer risk in women with mammary epithelial hyperplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(24):2096–2101PubMedCrossRef Gobbi H et al (1999) Transforming growth factor-beta and breast cancer risk in women with mammary epithelial hyperplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(24):2096–2101PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Ewen ME et al (1995) p53-dependent repression of CDK4 translation in TGF-beta-induced G1 cell-cycle arrest. Genes Dev 9(2):204–217PubMedCrossRef Ewen ME et al (1995) p53-dependent repression of CDK4 translation in TGF-beta-induced G1 cell-cycle arrest. Genes Dev 9(2):204–217PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Li QL et al (2002) Causal relationship between the loss of RUNX3 expression and gastric cancer. Cell 109(1):113–124PubMedCrossRef Li QL et al (2002) Causal relationship between the loss of RUNX3 expression and gastric cancer. Cell 109(1):113–124PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Blyth K, Cameron ER, Neil JC (2005) The RUNX genes: gain or loss of function in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 5(5):376–387PubMedCrossRef Blyth K, Cameron ER, Neil JC (2005) The RUNX genes: gain or loss of function in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 5(5):376–387PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Ito Y, Miyazono K (2003) RUNX transcription factors as key targets of TGF-beta superfamily signaling. Curr Opin Genet Dev 13(1):43–47PubMedCrossRef Ito Y, Miyazono K (2003) RUNX transcription factors as key targets of TGF-beta superfamily signaling. Curr Opin Genet Dev 13(1):43–47PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Slattery ML et al (2011) Associations between genetic variation in RUNX1, RUNX2, RUNX3, MAPK1 and eIF4E and riskof colon and rectal cancer: additional support for a TGF-beta-signaling pathway. Carcinogenesis 32(3):318–326PubMedCrossRef Slattery ML et al (2011) Associations between genetic variation in RUNX1, RUNX2, RUNX3, MAPK1 and eIF4E and riskof colon and rectal cancer: additional support for a TGF-beta-signaling pathway. Carcinogenesis 32(3):318–326PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Ito I et al (2010) Estrogen inhibits transforming growth factor beta signaling by promoting Smad2/3 degradation. J Biol Chem 285(19):14747–14755PubMedCrossRef Ito I et al (2010) Estrogen inhibits transforming growth factor beta signaling by promoting Smad2/3 degradation. J Biol Chem 285(19):14747–14755PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Matsuda T et al (2001) Cross-talk between transforming growth factor-beta and estrogen receptor signaling through Smad3. J Biol Chem 276(46):42908–42914PubMedCrossRef Matsuda T et al (2001) Cross-talk between transforming growth factor-beta and estrogen receptor signaling through Smad3. J Biol Chem 276(46):42908–42914PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Lau QC et al (2006) RUNX3 is frequently inactivated by dual mechanisms of protein mislocalization and promoter hypermethylation in breast cancer. Cancer Res 66(13):6512–6520PubMedCrossRef Lau QC et al (2006) RUNX3 is frequently inactivated by dual mechanisms of protein mislocalization and promoter hypermethylation in breast cancer. Cancer Res 66(13):6512–6520PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Associations between genetic variants in the TGF-β signaling pathway and breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women
Authors
Stephanie D. Boone
Kathy B. Baumgartner
Richard N. Baumgartner
Avonne E. Connor
Christina M. Pinkston
Esther M. John
Lisa M. Hines
Mariana C. Stern
Anna R. Giuliano
Gabriela Torres-Mejia
Guy N. Brock
Frank D. Groves
Richard A. Kerber
Roger K. Wolff
Martha L. Slattery
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2690-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine