Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2013

01-04-2013 | Clinical trial

Disseminated tumour cells in the bone marrow in early breast cancer: morphological categories of immunocytochemically positive cells have different impact on clinical outcome

Authors: M. Synnestvedt, E. Borgen, E. Schlichting, C. B. Schirmer, A. Renolen, K. E. Giercksky, J. M. Nesland, B. Naume

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Detection of disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) in bone marrow by immunocytochemistry (ICC) includes morphological evaluation of cytokeratin immunopositive cells. The aim of this study was to disclose the prognostic significance of different morphological categories of ICC-positive cells according to treatment status and tumour subtype. Bone marrow samples (at surgery) were analysed for the presence of cytokeratin-positive DTCs by a standard immunocytochemical method. The immunopositive cells were classified into the following categories, prior to any analysis of the association between DTCs and clinical outcome: tumour cells (TC), uninterpretable cells (UIC), hematopoietic cells (HC), and questionable HC (QHC). The analysis included 747 early breast cancer patients. Median follow-up was 84 months for relapse, and 99 months for death. The categorisation of the ICC positive cells revealed TC in 13.3 % of the patients, whereas 13.1, 17.8, and 21.4 % of the cases were positive for UIC, QHC, and HC, respectively. Analysing all patients, only TC and UIC predicted systemic relapse. Separate analysis of all patients not receiving adjuvant systemic treatment (No-Adj; n = 389) showed that only QHC were associated with reduced survival (DDFS: p = 0.008; BCSS: p = 0.004, log rank) and the presence of QHC also remained significant in multivariate analysis. Primary tumour subgroup analysis (of all patients) by hormone receptors (HR) and HER2, demonstrated that only TC/UIC had prognostic impact in the HR+/HER2− patients, whereas presence of QHC was associated with unfavourable outcome only in triple negative patients (DDFS: p = 0.004; BCSS: p = 0.024). Patients with ≥3HC had improved outcome compared to those with fewer/no HC (DDFS: p = 0.005; BCSS: p = 0.009). Hence, morphological DTC subgroups may differ in clinical significance according to primary tumour subtype and treatment status. This emphasises the importance of DTC characterisation, and separate analyses of DTC categories according to tumour subtype. Hematopoietic (“false positive”) cells might predict an immune-related favorable clinical outcome.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Braun S, Vogl FD, Naume B, Janni W, Osborne MP, Coombes RC, Schlimok G, Diel IJ, Gerber B, Gebauer G, Pierga JY, Marth C, Oruzio D, Wiedswang G, Solomayer EF, Kundt G, Strobl B, Fehm T, Wong GY, Bliss J, Vincent-Salomon A, Pantel K (2005) A pooled analysis of bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:793–802PubMedCrossRef
2.
Janni W, Vogl FD, Wiedswang G, Synnestvedt M, Fehm T, Juckstock J, Borgen E, Rack B, Braun S, Sommer H, Solomayer E, Pantel K, Nesland J, Friese K, Naume B (2011) Persistence of disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients predicts increased risk for relapse–a European pooled analysis. Clin Cancer Res 17:2967–2976PubMedCrossRef
3.
Borgen E, Naume B, Nesland JM, Kvalheim G, Beiske K, Fodstad O, Diel I, Solomayer EF, Theocharous P, Coombes RC, Smith BM, Wunder E, Marolleau JP, Garcia J, Pantel K (1999) Standardization of the immunocytochemical detection of cancer cells in BM and blood: I. Establishment of objective criteria for the evaluation of immunostained cells. Cytotherapy 1:377–388PubMedCrossRef
4.
Fehm T, Braun S, Muller V, Janni W, Gebauer G, Marth C, Schindlbeck C, Wallwiener D, Borgen E, Naume B, Pantel K, Solomayer E (2006) A concept for the standardized detection of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow from patients with primary breast cancer and its clinical implementation. Cancer 107:885–892PubMedCrossRef
5.
Bidard FC, Vincent-Salomon A, Gomme S, Nos C, de Rycke Y, Thiery JP, Sigal-Zafrani B, Mignot L, Sastre-Garau X, Pierga JY (2008) Disseminated tumor cells of breast cancer patients: a strong prognostic factor for distant and local relapse. Clin Cancer Res 14:3306–3311PubMedCrossRef
6.
Naume B, Wiedswang G, Borgen E, Kvalheim G, Karesen R, Qvist H, Janbu J, Harbitz T, Nesland JM (2004) The prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow in breast cancer patients: evaluation of morphological categories and the number of clinically significant cells. Clin Cancer Res 10:3091–3097PubMedCrossRef
7.
Naume B, Borgen E, Kvalheim G, Karesen R, Qvist H, Sauer T, Kumar T, Nesland JM (2001) Detection of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow in early-stage breast carcinoma patients: comparison with preoperative clinical parameters and primary tumor characteristics. Clin Cancer Res 7:4122–4129PubMed
8.
Wiedswang G, Borgen E, Karesen R, Kvalheim G, Nesland JM, Qvist H, Schlichting E, Sauer T, Janbu J, Harbitz T, Naume B (2003) Detection of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:3469–3478PubMedCrossRef
9.
Wiedswang G, Borgen E, Karesen R, Qvist H, Janbu J, Kvalheim G, Nesland JM, Naume B (2004) Isolated tumor cells in bone marrow three years after diagnosis in disease-free breast cancer patients predict unfavorable clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res 10:5342–5348PubMedCrossRef
10.
Curtis C, Shah SP, Chin SF, Turashvili G, Rueda OM, Dunning MJ, Speed D, Lynch AG, Samarajiwa S, Yuan Y, Graf S, Ha G, Haffari G, Bashashati A, Russell R, McKinney S, Langerod A, Green A, Provenzano E, Wishart G, Pinder S, Watson P, Markowetz F, Murphy L, Ellis I et al (2012) The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486:346–352PubMed
11.
Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ (2011) Strategies for subtypes—dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22:1736–1747PubMedCrossRef
12.
Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410PubMedCrossRef
13.
Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, Dowsett M, Fitzgibbons PL, Hanna WM, Langer A, McShane LM, Paik S, Pegram MD, Perez EA, Press MF, Rhodes A, Sturgeon C, Taube SE, Tubbs R, Vance GH, Van d V, Wheeler TM, Hayes DF (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131:18–43PubMed
14.
Cordell JL, Falini B, Erber WN, Ghosh AK, Abdulaziz Z, MacDonald S, Pulford KA, Stein H, Mason DY (1984) Immunoenzymatic labeling of monoclonal antibodies using immune complexes of alkaline phosphatase and monoclonal anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP complexes). J Histochem Cytochem 32:219–229PubMedCrossRef
15.
McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM (2006) REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:229–235PubMedCrossRef
16.
Kraan J, Sleijfer S, Strijbos MH, Ignatiadis M, Peeters D, Pierga JY, Farace F, Riethdorf S, Fehm T, Zorzino L, Tibbe AG, Maestro M, Gisbert-Criado R, Denton G, de Bono JS, Dive C, Foekens JA, Gratama JW (2011) External quality assurance of circulating tumor cell enumeration using the Cell Search® system: a feasibility study. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 80:112–118PubMed
17.
Borgen E, Pantel K, Schlimok G, Muller P, Otte M, Renolen A, Ehnle S, Coith C, Nesland JM, Naume B (2006) A European interlaboratory testing of three well-known procedures for immunocytochemical detection of epithelial cells in bone marrow. Results from analysis of normal bone marrow. Cytom B Clin Cytom 70:400–409CrossRef
18.
Krag DN, Kusminsky R, Manna E, Weaver D, Harlow SP, Covelli M, Stanley MA, McCahill L, Ittleman F, Leavitt B, Krag M, Amarante P (2009) Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients and noncancer donors. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 17:403–408PubMedCrossRef
19.
Coumans FA, Doggen CJ, Attard G, de Bono JS, Terstappen LW (2010) All circulating EpCAM+ CK+. Ann Oncol 21:1851–1857PubMedCrossRef
20.
Kim C, Paik S (2010) Gene-expression-based prognostic assays for breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7:340–347PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
Meng S, Tripathy D, Frenkel EP, Shete S, Naftalis EZ, Huth JF, Beitsch PD, Leitch M, Hoover S, Euhus D, Haley B, Morrison L, Fleming TP, Herlyn D, Terstappen LW, Fehm T, Tucker TF, Lane N, Wang J, Uhr JW (2004) Circulating tumor cells in patients with breast cancer dormancy. Clin Cancer Res 10:8152–8162PubMedCrossRef
23.
Jordan NV, Johnson GL, Abell AN (2011) Tracking the intermediate stages of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in epithelial stem cells and cancer. Cell Cycle 10:2865–2873PubMedCrossRef
24.
Hall C, Krishnamurthy S, Lodhi A, Mosalpuria K, Kuerer HM, Meric-Bernstam F, Bedrosian I, Hunt KK, Lucci A (2010) Disseminated tumor cells in biologic subtypes of stage I–III breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3252–3258PubMedCrossRef
25.
von Minckwitz G, Martin M (2012) Neoadjuvant treatments for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Ann Oncol 23 Suppl 6:vi35–vi39CrossRef
26.
Borgen E, Beiske K, Trachsel S, Nesland JM, Kvalheim G, Herstad TK, Schlichting E, Qvist H, Naume B (1998) Immunocytochemical detection of isolated epithelial cells in bone marrow: non-specific staining and contribution by plasma cells directly reactive to alkaline phosphatase. J Pathol 185:427–434PubMedCrossRef
27.
Schmidt M, Hellwig B, Hammad S, Othman A, Lohr M, Chen Z, Boehm D, Gebhard S, Petry I, Lebrecht A, Cadenas C, Marchan R, Stewart JD, Solbach C, Holmberg L, Edlund K, Kultima HG, Rody A et al (2012) A comprehensive analysis of human gene expression profiles identifies stromal immunoglobulin kappa C as a compatible prognostic marker in human solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 18:2695–2703PubMedCrossRef
28.
Blankenstein T, Coulie PG, Gilboa E, Jaffee EM (2012) The determinants of tumour immunogenicity. Nat Rev Cancer 12:307–313PubMedCrossRef
29.
Kristensen VN, Vaske CJ, Ursini-Siegel J, Van LP, Nordgard SH, Sachidanandam R, Sorlie T, Warnberg F, Haakensen VD, Helland A, Naume B, Perou CM, Haussler D, Troyanskaya OG, Borresen-Dale AL (2012) Integrated molecular profiles of invasive breast tumors and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) reveal differential vascular and interleukin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:2802–2807PubMedCrossRef
30.
Stevens KN, Fredericksen Z, Vachon CM, Wang X, Margolin S, Lindblom A, Nevanlinna H, Greco D, Aittomaki K, Blomqvist C, Chang-Claude J, Vrieling A, Flesch-Janys D, Sinn HP, Wang-Gohrke S, Nickels S, Brauch H, Ko YD, Fischer HP, Schmutzler RK, Meindl A, Bartram CR, Schott S, Engel C, Godwin AK et al (2012) 19p13.1 is a triple-negative-specific breast cancer susceptibility locus. Cancer Res 72:1795–1803PubMedCrossRef
31.
DeNardo DG, Coussens LM (2007) Inflammation and breast cancer. Balancing immune response: crosstalk between adaptive and innate immune cells during breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res 9:212PubMedCrossRef
32.
Balic M, Rapp N, Stanzer S, Lin H, Strutz J, Szkandera J, Daidone MG, Samonigg H, Cote RJ, Dandachi N (2011) Novel immunofluorescence protocol for multimarker assessment of putative disseminating breast cancer stem cells. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 19:33–40PubMedCrossRef
33.
Fehm T, Muller V, Alix-Panabieres C, Pantel K (2008) Micrometastatic spread in breast cancer: detection, molecular characterization and clinical relevance. Breast Cancer Res 10(Suppl 1):S1PubMedCrossRef
34.
Mathiesen RR, Fjelldal R, Liestol K, Due EU, Geigl JB, Riethdorf S, Borgen E, Rye IH, Schneider IJ, Obenauf AC, Mauermann O, Nilsen G, Christian LO, Borresen-Dale AL, Pantel K, Speicher MR, Naume B, Baumbusch LO (2011) High-resolution analyses of copy number changes in disseminated tumor cells of patients with breast cancer. Int J Cancer 131:E405–E415
35.
Riethdorf S, Pantel K (2008) Disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow and circulating tumor cells in blood of breast cancer patients: current state of detection and characterization. Pathobiology 75:140–148PubMedCrossRef
36.
Pierga JY, Bonneton C, Magdelenat H, Vincent-Salomon A, Nos C, Boudou E, Pouillart P, Thiery JP, de CP (2005) Real-time quantitative PCR determination of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) expression of isolated micrometastatic cells from bone marrow of breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 114:291–298PubMedCrossRef
37.
Fehm T, Solomayer EF, Meng S, Tucker T, Lane N, Wang J, Gebauer G (2005) Methods for isolating circulating epithelial cells and criteria for their classification as carcinoma cells. Cytotherapy 7:171–185PubMedCrossRef
38.
Payne RE, Wang F, Su N, Krell J, Zebrowski A, Yague E, Ma XJ, Luo Y, Coombes RC (2012) Viable circulating tumour cell detection using multiplex RNA in situ hybridisation predicts progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 106:1790–1797PubMedCrossRef
39.
Bidard FC, Vincent-Salomon A, Sigal-Zafrani B, Dieras V, Mathiot C, Mignot L, Thiery JP, Sastre-Garau X, Pierga JY (2008) Prognosis of women with stage IV breast cancer depends on detection of circulating tumor cells rather than disseminated tumor cells. Ann Oncol 19:496–500PubMedCrossRef
40.
Pierga JY, Bonneton C, Vincent-Salomon A, de CP, Nos C, Blin N, Pouillart P, Thiery JP, Magdelenat H (2004) Clinical significance of immunocytochemical detection of tumor cells using digital microscopy in peripheral blood and bone marrow of breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 10:1392–1400PubMedCrossRef
41.
Molloy TJ, Bosma AJ, Baumbusch LO, Synnestvedt M, Borgen E, Russnes HG, Schlichting E, van’t Veer LJ, Naume B (2011) The prognostic significance of tumour cell detection in the peripheral blood versus the bone marrow in 733 early-stage breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res 13:R61PubMedCrossRef
42.
Ignatiadis M, Perraki M, Apostolaki S, Politaki E, Xenidis N, Kafousi M, Stathopoulos E, Lianidou E, Sotiriou C, Georgoulias V, Mavroudis D (2007) Molecular detection and prognostic value of circulating cytokeratin-19 messenger RNA-positive and HER2 messenger RNA-positive cells in the peripheral blood of women with early-stage breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 7:883–889PubMedCrossRef
43.
Molloy TJ, Roepman P, Naume B, van’t Veer LJ (2012) A prognostic gene expression profile that predicts circulating tumor cell presence in breast cancer patients. PLoS ONE 7:e32426PubMedCrossRef
44.
Naume B, Zhao X, Synnestvedt M, Borgen E, Russnes HG, Lingjaerde OC, Stromberg M, Wiedswang G, Kvalheim G, Karesen R, Nesland JM, Borresen-Dale AL, Sorlie T (2007) Presence of bone marrow micrometastasis is associated with different recurrence risk within molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Mol Oncol 1:160–171PubMedCrossRef
45.
Woelfle U, Cloos J, Sauter G, Riethdorf L, Janicke F, van Diest P, Brakenhoff R, Pantel K (2003) Molecular signature associated with bone marrow micrometastasis in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 63:5679–5684PubMed
Metadata
Title
Disseminated tumour cells in the bone marrow in early breast cancer: morphological categories of immunocytochemically positive cells have different impact on clinical outcome
Authors
M. Synnestvedt
E. Borgen
E. Schlichting
C. B. Schirmer
A. Renolen
K. E. Giercksky
J. M. Nesland
B. Naume
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2439-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2013 Go to the issue

Epidemiology

Postpartum diagnosis demonstrates a high risk for metastasis and merits an expanded definition of pregnancy-associated breast cancer

Epidemiology

Can we select individuals with low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)? A population-based outcomes analysis

Brief Report

A trend analysis of breast cancer incidence rates in the United States from 2000 to 2009 shows a recent increase

Review

A systematic review on topoisomerase 1 inhibition in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Clinical Trial

The HER2 status of disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow of early breast cancer patients is independent from primary tumor and predicts higher risk of relapse

Preclinical Study

Tumor STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation status, as a predictor of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits