Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2012

01-07-2012 | Clinical Trial

Prognostic value of biologic subtype and the 21-gene recurrence score relative to local recurrence after breast conservation treatment with radiation for early stage breast carcinoma: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E2197 study

Authors: Lawrence J. Solin, Robert Gray, Lori J. Goldstein, Abram Recht, Frederick L. Baehner, Steven Shak, Sunil Badve, Edith A. Perez, Lawrence N. Shulman, Silvana Martino, Nancy E. Davidson, George W. Sledge Jr., Joseph A. Sparano

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The present study was performed to evaluate the significance of biologic subtype and 21-gene recurrence score relative to local recurrence and local–regional recurrence after breast conservation treatment with radiation. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E2197 was a prospective randomized clinical trial that compared two adjuvant systemic chemotherapy regimens for patients with operable breast carcinoma with 1–3 positive lymph nodes or negative lymph nodes with tumor size >1.0 cm. The study population was a subset of 388 patients with known 21-gene recurrence score and treated with breast conservation surgery, systemic chemotherapy, and definitive radiation treatment. Median follow-up was 9.7 years (range = 3.7–11.6 years). The 10-year rates of local recurrence and local–regional recurrence were 5.4 % and 6.6 %, respectively. Neither biologic subtype nor 21-gene Recurrence Score was associated with local recurrence or local–regional recurrence on univariate or multivariate analyses (all P ≥ 0.12). The 10-year rates of local recurrence were 4.9 % for hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative tumors, 6.0 % for triple negative tumors, and 6.4 % for HER2-positive tumors (P = 0.76), and the 10-year rates of local–regional recurrence were 6.3, 6.9, and 7.2 %, respectively (P = 0.79). For hormone receptor-positive tumors, the 10-year rates of local recurrence were 3.2, 2.9, and 10.1 % for low, intermediate, and high 21-gene recurrence score, respectively (P = 0.17), and the 10-year rates of local–regional recurrence were 3.8, 5.1, and 12.0 %, respectively (P = 0.12). For hormone receptor-positive tumors, the 21-gene recurrence score evaluated as a continuous variable was significant for local–regional recurrence (hazard ratio 2.66; P = 0.03). The 10-year rates of local recurrence and local–regional recurrence were reasonably low in all subsets of patients. Neither biologic subtype nor 21-gene recurrence score should preclude breast conservation treatment with radiation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mamounas EP, Tang G, Fisher B et al (2010) Association between the 21-gene recurrence score assay and risk of locoregional recurrence in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. J Clin Oncol 28:1677–1683PubMedCrossRef Mamounas EP, Tang G, Fisher B et al (2010) Association between the 21-gene recurrence score assay and risk of locoregional recurrence in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. J Clin Oncol 28:1677–1683PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kreike B, Halfwerk H, Armstrong N et al (2009) Local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy in relation to gene expression patterns in a large series of patients. Clin Cancer Res 15:4181–4190PubMedCrossRef Kreike B, Halfwerk H, Armstrong N et al (2009) Local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy in relation to gene expression patterns in a large series of patients. Clin Cancer Res 15:4181–4190PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nuyten DS, Kreike B, Hart AA et al (2006) Predicting a local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy by gene expression profiling. Breast Cancer Res 8:R62PubMedCrossRef Nuyten DS, Kreike B, Hart AA et al (2006) Predicting a local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy by gene expression profiling. Breast Cancer Res 8:R62PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Voduc KD, Cheang M, Tyldesley S et al (2010) Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse. J Clin Oncol 28:1684–1691PubMedCrossRef Voduc KD, Cheang M, Tyldesley S et al (2010) Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse. J Clin Oncol 28:1684–1691PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Millar EK, Graham PH, O’Toole SA et al (2009) Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastasis, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel. J Clin Oncol 27:4701–4708PubMedCrossRef Millar EK, Graham PH, O’Toole SA et al (2009) Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastasis, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel. J Clin Oncol 27:4701–4708PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Solin LJ, Hwang W-T, Vapiwala N (2009) Outcome after breast conservation treatment with radiation for women with triple-negative early-stage invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Breast Cancer 9:96–100PubMedCrossRef Solin LJ, Hwang W-T, Vapiwala N (2009) Outcome after breast conservation treatment with radiation for women with triple-negative early-stage invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Breast Cancer 9:96–100PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Freedman GM, Anderson PR, Li T et al (2009) Locoregional recurrence of triple-negative breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery and radiation. Cancer 115:946–951PubMedCrossRef Freedman GM, Anderson PR, Li T et al (2009) Locoregional recurrence of triple-negative breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery and radiation. Cancer 115:946–951PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Haffty BG, Yang Q, Reiss M et al (2006) Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5652–5657PubMedCrossRef Haffty BG, Yang Q, Reiss M et al (2006) Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5652–5657PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI et al (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13:4429–4434PubMedCrossRef Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI et al (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13:4429–4434PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nguyen PL, Taghian AG, Katz MS et al (2008) Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 26:2373–2378PubMedCrossRef Nguyen PL, Taghian AG, Katz MS et al (2008) Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 26:2373–2378PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L et al (2007) The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 13:2329–2334PubMedCrossRef Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L et al (2007) The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 13:2329–2334PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cleator S, Heller W, Coombes RC (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options. Lancet Oncol 8:235–244PubMedCrossRef Cleator S, Heller W, Coombes RC (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options. Lancet Oncol 8:235–244PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR et al (2007) Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 109:25–32PubMedCrossRef Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR et al (2007) Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 109:25–32PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO (2008) Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review. J Clin Oncol 26:2568–2581PubMedCrossRef Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO (2008) Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review. J Clin Oncol 26:2568–2581PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hernandez-Aya LF, Chavez-MacGregor M, Lei X et al (2011) Nodal status and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:2628–2634PubMedCrossRef Hernandez-Aya LF, Chavez-MacGregor M, Lei X et al (2011) Nodal status and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:2628–2634PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Abdulkarim BS, Cuartero J, Hanson J et al (2011) Increased risk of locoregional recurrence for women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy without adjuvant radiation therapy compared with breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 29:2852–2857PubMedCrossRef Abdulkarim BS, Cuartero J, Hanson J et al (2011) Increased risk of locoregional recurrence for women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy without adjuvant radiation therapy compared with breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 29:2852–2857PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Goldstein LJ, O’Neill A, Sparano JA et al (2008) Concurrent doxorubicin plus docetaxel is not more effective than concurrent doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in operable breast cancer with 0 to 3 positive axillary nodes: North American Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial E2197. J Clin Oncol 26:4092–4099PubMedCrossRef Goldstein LJ, O’Neill A, Sparano JA et al (2008) Concurrent doxorubicin plus docetaxel is not more effective than concurrent doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in operable breast cancer with 0 to 3 positive axillary nodes: North American Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial E2197. J Clin Oncol 26:4092–4099PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Goldstein LJ, Gray R, Badve S et al (2008) Prognostic utility of the 21-gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features. J Clin Oncol 26:4063–4071PubMedCrossRef Goldstein LJ, Gray R, Badve S et al (2008) Prognostic utility of the 21-gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features. J Clin Oncol 26:4063–4071PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sparano JA, Goldstein LJ, Childs BH et al (2009) Relationship between topoisomerase 2A RNA expression and recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 15:7693–7700PubMedCrossRef Sparano JA, Goldstein LJ, Childs BH et al (2009) Relationship between topoisomerase 2A RNA expression and recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 15:7693–7700PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Badve SS, Baehner FL, Gray RP et al (2008) Estrogen- and progesterone-receptor status in ECOG 2197: comparison of immunohistochemistry by local and central laboratories and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction by central laboratory. J Clin Oncol 26:2473–2481PubMedCrossRef Badve SS, Baehner FL, Gray RP et al (2008) Estrogen- and progesterone-receptor status in ECOG 2197: comparison of immunohistochemistry by local and central laboratories and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction by central laboratory. J Clin Oncol 26:2473–2481PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Ruan PK, Gray RJ (2008) Analyses of cumulative incidence functions via non-parametric multiple imputation. Stat Med 27:5709–5724PubMedCrossRef Ruan PK, Gray RJ (2008) Analyses of cumulative incidence functions via non-parametric multiple imputation. Stat Med 27:5709–5724PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Harris EE, Hwang W-T, Lee EA et al (2006) The impact of HER-2 status on local recurrence in women with stage I–II breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Breast J 12:431–436PubMedCrossRef Harris EE, Hwang W-T, Lee EA et al (2006) The impact of HER-2 status on local recurrence in women with stage I–II breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Breast J 12:431–436PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S et al (2010) Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 11:55–65PubMedCrossRef Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S et al (2010) Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 11:55–65PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tang G, Shak S, Paik S et al (2011) Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP-B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127:133–142PubMedCrossRef Tang G, Shak S, Paik S et al (2011) Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP-B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127:133–142PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Buchholz TA et al (2005) Improving local control with breast-conserving therapy: a 27-year single-institution experience. Cancer 104:20–29PubMedCrossRef Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Buchholz TA et al (2005) Improving local control with breast-conserving therapy: a 27-year single-institution experience. Cancer 104:20–29PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Pass H, Vicini FA, Kestin LL et al (2004) Changes in management techniques and patterns of disease recurrence over time in patients with breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy at a single institution. Cancer 101:713–720PubMedCrossRef Pass H, Vicini FA, Kestin LL et al (2004) Changes in management techniques and patterns of disease recurrence over time in patients with breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy at a single institution. Cancer 101:713–720PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J et al (2005) Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1673–1684PubMedCrossRef Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J et al (2005) Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1673–1684PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Halyard MY, Dueck AC, Pisansky TM et al (2010) Impact of adjuvant trastuzumab on local regional recurrence: Data from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831 study (Abstract). Presented at the 33rd Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), San Antonio, Texas, 8–12 December 2010 Halyard MY, Dueck AC, Pisansky TM et al (2010) Impact of adjuvant trastuzumab on local regional recurrence: Data from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831 study (Abstract). Presented at the 33rd Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), San Antonio, Texas, 8–12 December 2010
Metadata
Title
Prognostic value of biologic subtype and the 21-gene recurrence score relative to local recurrence after breast conservation treatment with radiation for early stage breast carcinoma: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E2197 study
Authors
Lawrence J. Solin
Robert Gray
Lori J. Goldstein
Abram Recht
Frederick L. Baehner
Steven Shak
Sunil Badve
Edith A. Perez
Lawrence N. Shulman
Silvana Martino
Nancy E. Davidson
George W. Sledge Jr.
Joseph A. Sparano
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2072-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine