Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2011

01-08-2011 | Preclinical study

High RASSF1A promoter methylation levels are predictive of poor prognosis in fine-needle aspirate washings of breast cancer lesions

Authors: Ana Teresa Martins, Paula Monteiro, João Ramalho-Carvalho, Vera L. Costa, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Conceição Leal, Rui Henrique, Carmen Jerónimo

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Previously, we reported that the accuracy of cytological diagnosis of breast lesions could be augmented through the quantitative assessment of DNA methylation of fine-needle aspirate (FNA) washings. Herein, we aimed at the evaluation of the prognostic value of quantitative promoter methylation at three gene loci (APC, CCND2, and RASSF1A) in a large series of FNA washings from breast lesions. Methylation levels of three gene promoters were assessed by quantitative methylation-specific PCR in bisulfite-modified DNA from 211 FNA washings, comprising 178 carcinomas and 33 benign lesions, both histopathologically confirmed. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the diagnostic performance of the gene panel in distinguishing cancer from non-cancerous lesions. Relevant clinicopathologic data and time to progression and/or death from breast cancer were correlated with methylation findings. Log-rank test and Cox-regression model identified independent predictors of prognosis. APC, CCND2, and RASSF1A methylation levels differed significantly between malignant and benign lesions. ROC curve analysis confirmed the diagnostic performance of the gene panel. In univariate analysis, stage was significantly associated with overall, disease-specific and disease-free survival, whereas tumor grade was associated with disease-specific and disease-free survival. Remarkably, RASSF1A methylation was significantly and independently associated with worse disease-free survival in the final multivariate analysis. We confirmed that quantitative gene promoter methylation augments the diagnostic performance of cytopathology. Importantly, and in addition to standard clinicopathologic parameters, RASSF1A high-methylation levels are independent predictors of worse outcome in breast cancer. Thus, epigenetic biomarkers provide valuable tools for breast cancer patient management.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E (2010) Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer 46(4):765–781PubMedCrossRef Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E (2010) Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer 46(4):765–781PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59(4):225–249PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59(4):225–249PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jeronimo C, Costa I, Martins MC, Monteiro P, Lisboa S, Palmeira C et al (2003) Detection of gene promoter hypermethylation in fine needle washings from breast lesions. Clin Cancer Res 9(9):3413–3417PubMed Jeronimo C, Costa I, Martins MC, Monteiro P, Lisboa S, Palmeira C et al (2003) Detection of gene promoter hypermethylation in fine needle washings from breast lesions. Clin Cancer Res 9(9):3413–3417PubMed
4.
go back to reference Nemec CF, Listinsky J, Rim A (2007) How should we screen for breast cancer? Mammography, ultrasonography, MRI. Clevel Clin J Med 74(12):897–904CrossRef Nemec CF, Listinsky J, Rim A (2007) How should we screen for breast cancer? Mammography, ultrasonography, MRI. Clevel Clin J Med 74(12):897–904CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hamill J, Campbell ID, Mayall F, Bartlett AS, Darlington A (2002) Improved breast cytology results with near patient FNA diagnosis. Acta Cytol 46(1):19–24PubMedCrossRef Hamill J, Campbell ID, Mayall F, Bartlett AS, Darlington A (2002) Improved breast cytology results with near patient FNA diagnosis. Acta Cytol 46(1):19–24PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Esteller M (2007) Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histone-modification maps. Nat Rev Genet 8(4):286–298PubMedCrossRef Esteller M (2007) Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histone-modification maps. Nat Rev Genet 8(4):286–298PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hinshelwood RA, Clark SJ (2008) Breast cancer epigenetics: normal human mammary epithelial cells as a model system. J Mol Med 86(12):1315–1328PubMedCrossRef Hinshelwood RA, Clark SJ (2008) Breast cancer epigenetics: normal human mammary epithelial cells as a model system. J Mol Med 86(12):1315–1328PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Liu JW, Nagpal JK, Jeronimo C, Lee JE, Henrique R, Kim MS et al (2008) Hypermethylation of MCAM gene is associated with advanced tumor stage in prostate cancer. Prostate 68(4):418–426PubMedCrossRef Liu JW, Nagpal JK, Jeronimo C, Lee JE, Henrique R, Kim MS et al (2008) Hypermethylation of MCAM gene is associated with advanced tumor stage in prostate cancer. Prostate 68(4):418–426PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Page DL, Sakamoto G (1987) Infiltrating carcinoma: major histological types. Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh Page DL, Sakamoto G (1987) Infiltrating carcinoma: major histological types. Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh
12.
go back to reference Elston CW, Ellis IO (1998) Assessment of histological grade. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh Elston CW, Ellis IO (1998) Assessment of histological grade. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
13.
go back to reference Greene FLPD, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Greene FLPD, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Clark SJ, Harrison J, Paul CL, Frommer M (1994) High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. Nucleic Acids Res 22(15):2990–2997PubMedCrossRef Clark SJ, Harrison J, Paul CL, Frommer M (1994) High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. Nucleic Acids Res 22(15):2990–2997PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eads CA, Danenberg KD, Kawakami K, Saltz LB, Blake C, Shibata D et al (2000) MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res 28(8):E32PubMedCrossRef Eads CA, Danenberg KD, Kawakami K, Saltz LB, Blake C, Shibata D et al (2000) MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res 28(8):E32PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lehmann U, Langer F, Feist H, Glockner S, Hasemeier B, Kreipe H (2002) Quantitative assessment of promoter hypermethylation during breast cancer development. Am J Pathol 160(2):605–612PubMedCrossRef Lehmann U, Langer F, Feist H, Glockner S, Hasemeier B, Kreipe H (2002) Quantitative assessment of promoter hypermethylation during breast cancer development. Am J Pathol 160(2):605–612PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jeronimo C, Henrique R, Hoque MO, Ribeiro FR, Oliveira J, Fonseca D et al (2004) Quantitative RARbeta2 hypermethylation: a promising prostate cancer marker. Clin Cancer Res 10(12 Pt 1):4010–4014PubMedCrossRef Jeronimo C, Henrique R, Hoque MO, Ribeiro FR, Oliveira J, Fonseca D et al (2004) Quantitative RARbeta2 hypermethylation: a promising prostate cancer marker. Clin Cancer Res 10(12 Pt 1):4010–4014PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Henrique R, Ribeiro FR, Fonseca D, Hoque MO, Carvalho AL, Costa VL et al (2007) High promoter methylation levels of APC predict poor prognosis in sextant biopsies from prostate cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 13(20):6122–6129PubMedCrossRef Henrique R, Ribeiro FR, Fonseca D, Hoque MO, Carvalho AL, Costa VL et al (2007) High promoter methylation levels of APC predict poor prognosis in sextant biopsies from prostate cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 13(20):6122–6129PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pu RT, Laitala LE, Alli PM, Fackler MJ, Sukumar S, Clark DP (2003) Methylation profiling of benign and malignant breast lesions and its application to cytopathology. Mod Pathol 16(11):1095–1101PubMedCrossRef Pu RT, Laitala LE, Alli PM, Fackler MJ, Sukumar S, Clark DP (2003) Methylation profiling of benign and malignant breast lesions and its application to cytopathology. Mod Pathol 16(11):1095–1101PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dulaimi E, Hillinck J, Ibanez de Caceres I, Al-Saleem T, Cairns P (2004) Tumor suppressor gene promoter hypermethylation in serum of breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 10(18 Pt 1):6189–6193PubMedCrossRef Dulaimi E, Hillinck J, Ibanez de Caceres I, Al-Saleem T, Cairns P (2004) Tumor suppressor gene promoter hypermethylation in serum of breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 10(18 Pt 1):6189–6193PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bardou VJ, Arpino G, Elledge RM, Osborne CK, Clark GM (2003) Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases. J Clin Oncol 21(10):1973–1979PubMedCrossRef Bardou VJ, Arpino G, Elledge RM, Osborne CK, Clark GM (2003) Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases. J Clin Oncol 21(10):1973–1979PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Euhus DM, Bu D, Milchgrub S, Xie XJ, Bian A, Leitch AM et al (2008) DNA methylation in benign breast epithelium in relation to age and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(5):1051–1059PubMedCrossRef Euhus DM, Bu D, Milchgrub S, Xie XJ, Bian A, Leitch AM et al (2008) DNA methylation in benign breast epithelium in relation to age and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(5):1051–1059PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Van der Auwera I, Bovie C, Svensson C, Trinh XB, Limame R, van Dam P et al (2010) Quantitative methylation profiling in tumor and matched morphologically normal tissues from breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 10:97PubMedCrossRef Van der Auwera I, Bovie C, Svensson C, Trinh XB, Limame R, van Dam P et al (2010) Quantitative methylation profiling in tumor and matched morphologically normal tissues from breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 10:97PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jin Z, Tamura G, Tsuchiya T, Sakata K, Kashiwaba M, Osakabe M et al (2001) Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene promoter hypermethylation in primary breast cancers. Br J Cancer 85(1):69–73PubMedCrossRef Jin Z, Tamura G, Tsuchiya T, Sakata K, Kashiwaba M, Osakabe M et al (2001) Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene promoter hypermethylation in primary breast cancers. Br J Cancer 85(1):69–73PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Muller HM, Widschwendter A, Fiegl H, Ivarsson L, Goebel G, Perkmann E et al (2003) DNA methylation in serum of breast cancer patients: an independent prognostic marker. Cancer Res 63(22):7641–7645PubMed Muller HM, Widschwendter A, Fiegl H, Ivarsson L, Goebel G, Perkmann E et al (2003) DNA methylation in serum of breast cancer patients: an independent prognostic marker. Cancer Res 63(22):7641–7645PubMed
26.
go back to reference Hoque MO, Feng Q, Toure P, Dem A, Critchlow CW, Hawes SE et al (2006) Detection of aberrant methylation of four genes in plasma DNA for the detection of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(26):4262–4269PubMedCrossRef Hoque MO, Feng Q, Toure P, Dem A, Critchlow CW, Hawes SE et al (2006) Detection of aberrant methylation of four genes in plasma DNA for the detection of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(26):4262–4269PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
High RASSF1A promoter methylation levels are predictive of poor prognosis in fine-needle aspirate washings of breast cancer lesions
Authors
Ana Teresa Martins
Paula Monteiro
João Ramalho-Carvalho
Vera L. Costa
Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Conceição Leal
Rui Henrique
Carmen Jerónimo
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1160-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine