Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2011

01-08-2011 | Preclinical study

Development of 95-gene classifier as a powerful predictor of recurrences in node-negative and ER-positive breast cancer patients

Authors: Yasuto Naoi, Kazuki Kishi, Tomonori Tanei, Ryo Tsunashima, Naoomi Tominaga, Yosuke Baba, Seung Jin Kim, Tetsuya Taguchi, Yasuhiro Tamaki, Shinzaburo Noguchi

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Our aim was to develop an accurate diagnostic system using gene expression analysis by means of DNA microarray for prognosis of node-negative and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients in order to identify a subset of patients who can be safely spared adjuvant chemotherapy. A diagnostic system comprising a 95-gene classifier was developed for predicting the prognosis of node-negative and ER-positive breast cancer patients by using already published DNA microarray (gene expression) data (n = 549) as the training set and the DNA microarray data (n = 105) obtained at our institute as the validation set. Performance of the 95-gene classifier was compared with that of conventional prognostic factors as well as of the genomic grade index (GGI) based on the expression of 70 genes. With the 95-gene classifier we could classify the 105 patients in the validation set into a high-risk (n = 44) and a low-risk (n = 61) group with 10-year recurrence-free survival rates of 93 and 53%, respectively (P = 8.6e−7). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the 95-gene classifier was the most important and significant predictor of recurrence (P = 9.6e−4) independently of tumor size, histological grade, progesterone receptor, HER2, Ki67, or GGI. The 95-gene classifier developed by us can predict the prognosis of node-negative and ER-positive breast cancer patients with high accuracy. The 95-gene classifier seems to perform better than the GGI. As many as 58% of the patients classified into the low-risk group with this classifier could be safely spared adjuvant chemotherapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, Van de Vijver MJ et al (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415:530–536CrossRef van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, Van de Vijver MJ et al (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415:530–536CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Paik S (2007) Development and clinical utility of a 21-gene recurrence score prognostic assay in patients with early breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. Oncologist 12:631–635PubMedCrossRef Paik S (2007) Development and clinical utility of a 21-gene recurrence score prognostic assay in patients with early breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. Oncologist 12:631–635PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S et al (2006) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:262–272PubMedCrossRef Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S et al (2006) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:262–272PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Morimoto K, Kim SJ, Tanei T et al (2009) Stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase 1-positive breast cancers are characterized by negative estrogen receptor, positive human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2, and high Ki67 expression. Cancer Sci 100:1062–1068PubMedCrossRef Morimoto K, Kim SJ, Tanei T et al (2009) Stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase 1-positive breast cancers are characterized by negative estrogen receptor, positive human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2, and high Ki67 expression. Cancer Sci 100:1062–1068PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410PubMedCrossRef Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yixin W, Profjan GM, Yi Z et al (2005) Gene-expression profile to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet 365:634–635 Yixin W, Profjan GM, Yi Z et al (2005) Gene-expression profile to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet 365:634–635
7.
go back to reference Lance DM, Johanna S, Joshy G et al (2005) An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutant status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival. PNAS 102:13550–13555CrossRef Lance DM, Johanna S, Joshy G et al (2005) An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutant status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival. PNAS 102:13550–13555CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sherene L, Christine D, Benjamin HK et al (2007) Definition of clinically distant molecular subtypes in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas through genomic grade. J Clin Oncol 25:1239–1246CrossRef Sherene L, Christine D, Benjamin HK et al (2007) Definition of clinically distant molecular subtypes in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas through genomic grade. J Clin Oncol 25:1239–1246CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Christine D, Fanny P, Sherene L et al (2007) Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicancer independent validation series. Clin Cancer Res 13:3207–3214CrossRef Christine D, Fanny P, Sherene L et al (2007) Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicancer independent validation series. Clin Cancer Res 13:3207–3214CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sherene L, Benjamin HK, Christine D et al (2008) Predicting prognosis using molecular profiling in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. BMC Genomics 9:239CrossRef Sherene L, Benjamin HK, Christine D et al (2008) Predicting prognosis using molecular profiling in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. BMC Genomics 9:239CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rafael AI, Bridget H, Francois C et al (2003) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4:249–264CrossRef Rafael AI, Bridget H, Francois C et al (2003) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4:249–264CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Choi JK, Yu U, Kim S et al (2003) Combining multiple microarray studies and modeling interstudy variation. Bioinformatics 19(Suppl 1):i84–i90PubMedCrossRef Choi JK, Yu U, Kim S et al (2003) Combining multiple microarray studies and modeling interstudy variation. Bioinformatics 19(Suppl 1):i84–i90PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Desmedt C, Giobbie-Hurder A, Neven P et al (2009) The Gene expression Grade Index: a potential predictor of relapse for endocrine-treated breast cancer patients in the BIG 1–98 trial. BMC Med Genomics 2:40PubMedCrossRef Desmedt C, Giobbie-Hurder A, Neven P et al (2009) The Gene expression Grade Index: a potential predictor of relapse for endocrine-treated breast cancer patients in the BIG 1–98 trial. BMC Med Genomics 2:40PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Piette F et al (2008) Comparison of prognostic gene expression signatures for breast cancer. BMC Genomics 9:394PubMedCrossRef Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Piette F et al (2008) Comparison of prognostic gene expression signatures for breast cancer. BMC Genomics 9:394PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stec J, Wang J, Coombes K et al (2005) Comparison of the predictive accuracy of DNA array-based multigene classifiers across cDNA arrays and Affymetrix GeneChips. J Mol Diagn 7:357–367PubMedCrossRef Stec J, Wang J, Coombes K et al (2005) Comparison of the predictive accuracy of DNA array-based multigene classifiers across cDNA arrays and Affymetrix GeneChips. J Mol Diagn 7:357–367PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, Linn SC, Keijzer R et al (2009) Validation of 70-gene prognosis signature in node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:483–495PubMedCrossRef Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, Linn SC, Keijzer R et al (2009) Validation of 70-gene prognosis signature in node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:483–495PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ishitobi M, Goranova TE, Komoike Y et al (2010) Clinical utility of the 70-gene MammaPrint profile in a Japanese population. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:508–512PubMedCrossRef Ishitobi M, Goranova TE, Komoike Y et al (2010) Clinical utility of the 70-gene MammaPrint profile in a Japanese population. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:508–512PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Buyse M, Loi S, van’t Veer L et al (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1183–1192PubMedCrossRef Buyse M, Loi S, van’t Veer L et al (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1183–1192PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wittner BS, Sgroi DC, Ryan PD et al (2008) Analysis of the MammaPrint breast cancer assay in a predominantly postmenopausal cohort. Clin Cancer Res 14:2988–2993PubMedCrossRef Wittner BS, Sgroi DC, Ryan PD et al (2008) Analysis of the MammaPrint breast cancer assay in a predominantly postmenopausal cohort. Clin Cancer Res 14:2988–2993PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sparano JA, Paik S (2008) Development of the 21-gene assay and its application in clinical practice and clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 26:721–728PubMedCrossRef Sparano JA, Paik S (2008) Development of the 21-gene assay and its application in clinical practice and clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 26:721–728PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mamounas EP, Tang G, Fisher B et al (2010) Association between the 21-gene recurrence score assay and risk of locoregional recurrence in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. J Clin Oncol 28:1677–1683PubMedCrossRef Mamounas EP, Tang G, Fisher B et al (2010) Association between the 21-gene recurrence score assay and risk of locoregional recurrence in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. J Clin Oncol 28:1677–1683PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Albain KS, Paik S, van’t Veer L (2009) Prediction of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in endocrine responsive, early breast cancer using multigene assays. Breast 18(Suppl 3):S141–S145PubMedCrossRef Albain KS, Paik S, van’t Veer L (2009) Prediction of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in endocrine responsive, early breast cancer using multigene assays. Breast 18(Suppl 3):S141–S145PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sparano JA (2006) TAILORx: trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx). Clin Breast Cancer 7:347–350PubMedCrossRef Sparano JA (2006) TAILORx: trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx). Clin Breast Cancer 7:347–350PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Zujewski JA, Kamin L (2008) Trial assessing individualized options for treatment for breast cancer: the TAILORx trial. Future Oncol 4:603–610PubMedCrossRef Zujewski JA, Kamin L (2008) Trial assessing individualized options for treatment for breast cancer: the TAILORx trial. Future Oncol 4:603–610PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of 95-gene classifier as a powerful predictor of recurrences in node-negative and ER-positive breast cancer patients
Authors
Yasuto Naoi
Kazuki Kishi
Tomonori Tanei
Ryo Tsunashima
Naoomi Tominaga
Yosuke Baba
Seung Jin Kim
Tetsuya Taguchi
Yasuhiro Tamaki
Shinzaburo Noguchi
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1145-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine