Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2010

01-11-2010 | Epidemiology

The p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 51,236 subjects

Authors: Li-Xin Qiu, Jian Zhang, Xiao-Dong Zhu, Chun-Lei Zheng, Si Sun, Zhong-Hua Wang, Xin-Min Zhao, Jia-Lei Wang, Lei-Ping Wang, Hui Yu, Kai Xue, Xi-Chun Hu

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Published data on the association between p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between the p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and breast cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for co-dominant model (Ser/Arg vs. Ser/Ser, Arg/Arg vs. Ser/Ser), dominant model (Arg/Arg + Ser/Arg vs. Ser/Ser), and recessive model (Arg/Arg vs. Ser/Arg + Ser/Ser). A total of 21 studies including 22,109 cases and 29,127 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant associations were found between p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and breast cancer risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risk was found for Caucasians (Arg/Arg vs. Ser/Ser: OR 1.496, 95% CI 1.164–1.924; and recessive model: OR 1.492, 95% CI 1.161–1.919). When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found for population-based studies (Ser/Arg vs. Ser/Ser: OR 1.085, 95% CI 1.019–1.156). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism may be associated with breast cancer development in Caucasian. However, large sample and representative population-based studies with homogeneous breast cancer patients and well-matched controls are warranted to confirm this finding.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108CrossRefPubMed Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Pharoah PD, Dunning AM, Ponder BA, Easton DF (2004) Association studies for finding cancer-susceptibility genetic variants. Nat Rev Cancer 4:850–860CrossRefPubMed Pharoah PD, Dunning AM, Ponder BA, Easton DF (2004) Association studies for finding cancer-susceptibility genetic variants. Nat Rev Cancer 4:850–860CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Qiu LX, Yuan H, Yu KD, Mao C, Chen B, Zhan P, Xue K, Zhang J, Hu XC (2009) Glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 46,281 subjects. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0636-2 Qiu LX, Yuan H, Yu KD, Mao C, Chen B, Zhan P, Xue K, Zhang J, Hu XC (2009) Glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 46,281 subjects. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-009-0636-2
4.
go back to reference Qiu LX, Yao L, Yuan H, Mao C, Chen B, Zhan P, Xue K, Zhang J, Hu XC (2010) IGFBP3 A-202C polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 33,557 cases and 45,254 controls. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0739-9 Qiu LX, Yao L, Yuan H, Mao C, Chen B, Zhan P, Xue K, Zhang J, Hu XC (2010) IGFBP3 A-202C polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 33,557 cases and 45,254 controls. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi: 10.​1007/​s10549-010-0739-9
5.
go back to reference Qiu LX, Chen B, Mao C, Zhan P, Yuan H, Xue K, Li J, Hu XC (2009) STK15 F31I polymorphism is associated with breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 25, 014 subjects. Breast Cancer Res Treat 118:599–603CrossRef Qiu LX, Chen B, Mao C, Zhan P, Yuan H, Xue K, Li J, Hu XC (2009) STK15 F31I polymorphism is associated with breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 25, 014 subjects. Breast Cancer Res Treat 118:599–603CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gartel AL, Radhakrishnan SK (2005) Lost in transcription: p21 repression, mechanisms, and consequences. Cancer Res 65:3980–3985CrossRefPubMed Gartel AL, Radhakrishnan SK (2005) Lost in transcription: p21 repression, mechanisms, and consequences. Cancer Res 65:3980–3985CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mousses S, Ozcelik H, Lee PD, Malkin D, Bull SB, Andrulis IL (1995) Two variants of the CIP1/WAF1 gene occur together and are associated with human cancer. Hum Mol Genet 4:1089–1092CrossRefPubMed Mousses S, Ozcelik H, Lee PD, Malkin D, Bull SB, Andrulis IL (1995) Two variants of the CIP1/WAF1 gene occur together and are associated with human cancer. Hum Mol Genet 4:1089–1092CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lukas J, Groshen S, Saffari B (1997) WAF1/Cip1 gene polymorphism and expression in carcinomas of the breast, ovary, and endometrium. Am J Pathol 150:167–175PubMed Lukas J, Groshen S, Saffari B (1997) WAF1/Cip1 gene polymorphism and expression in carcinomas of the breast, ovary, and endometrium. Am J Pathol 150:167–175PubMed
9.
go back to reference The MARIE-GENICA Consortium on Genetic Susceptibility for Menopausal Hormone Therapy Related Breast Cancer Risk (2009) Polymorphisms in the BRCA1 and ABCB1 genes modulate menopausal hormone therapy associated breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0489-8 The MARIE-GENICA Consortium on Genetic Susceptibility for Menopausal Hormone Therapy Related Breast Cancer Risk (2009) Polymorphisms in the BRCA1 and ABCB1 genes modulate menopausal hormone therapy associated breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-009-0489-8
10.
go back to reference Ma H, Jin G, Hu Z, Zhai X, Chen W, Wang S (2006) Variant genotypes of CDKN1A and CDKN1B are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in Chinese women. Int J Cancer 119:2173–2178CrossRefPubMed Ma H, Jin G, Hu Z, Zhai X, Chen W, Wang S (2006) Variant genotypes of CDKN1A and CDKN1B are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in Chinese women. Int J Cancer 119:2173–2178CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tarasov VA, Aslanyan MM, Tsyrendorzhiyeva ES, Litvinov SS, Gar’kavtseva RF, Altukhov YP (2006) Genetically determined subdivision of human populations with respect to the risk of breast cancer in women. Dokl Biol Sci 406:66–69CrossRefPubMed Tarasov VA, Aslanyan MM, Tsyrendorzhiyeva ES, Litvinov SS, Gar’kavtseva RF, Altukhov YP (2006) Genetically determined subdivision of human populations with respect to the risk of breast cancer in women. Dokl Biol Sci 406:66–69CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Keshava C, Frye BL, Wolff MS, McCanlies EC, Weston A (2002) Waf-1 (p21) and p53 polymorphisms in breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:127–130 (erratum in: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:1682)PubMed Keshava C, Frye BL, Wolff MS, McCanlies EC, Weston A (2002) Waf-1 (p21) and p53 polymorphisms in breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:127–130 (erratum in: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:1682)PubMed
13.
go back to reference Cox A, Dunning AM, Garcia-Closas M (2007) A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet 39:352–358CrossRefPubMed Cox A, Dunning AM, Garcia-Closas M (2007) A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet 39:352–358CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10:101–129CrossRef Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10:101–129CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748PubMed Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748PubMed
16.
go back to reference DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clini Trials 7:177–188CrossRef DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clini Trials 7:177–188CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tobias A (1999) Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-analysis estimate. Stata Tech Bull 8:15–17 Tobias A (1999) Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-analysis estimate. Stata Tech Bull 8:15–17
18.
go back to reference Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634PubMed Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hirschhorn JN, Lohmueller K, Byrne E (2002) A comprehensive review of genetic association studies. Genet Med 4:45–61CrossRefPubMed Hirschhorn JN, Lohmueller K, Byrne E (2002) A comprehensive review of genetic association studies. Genet Med 4:45–61CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M (2004) Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:434–442CrossRefPubMed Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M (2004) Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:434–442CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 51,236 subjects
Authors
Li-Xin Qiu
Jian Zhang
Xiao-Dong Zhu
Chun-Lei Zheng
Si Sun
Zhong-Hua Wang
Xin-Min Zhao
Jia-Lei Wang
Lei-Ping Wang
Hui Yu
Kai Xue
Xi-Chun Hu
Publication date
01-11-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0858-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine