Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2010

01-06-2010 | Preclinical study

Clinical evaluation of chemotherapy response predictors developed from breast cancer cell lines

Authors: Cornelia Liedtke, Jing Wang, Attila Tordai, William F. Symmans, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Ludwig Kiesel, Kenneth Hess, Keith A. Baggerly, Kevin R. Coombes, Lajos Pusztai

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The goal of this study was to develop pharmacogenomic predictors in response to standard chemotherapy drugs in breast cancer cell lines and test their predictive value in patients who received treatment with the same drugs. Nineteen human breast cancer cell lines were tested for sensitivity to paclitaxel (T), 5-fluorouracil (F), doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) in vitro. Baseline gene expression data were obtained for each cell line with Affymetrix U133A gene chips, and multigene predictors of sensitivity were derived for each drug separately. These predictors were applied individually and in combination to human gene expression data generated with the same Affymetrix platform from fine needle aspiration specimens of 133 stage I-III breast cancers. Tumor samples were obtained at baseline, and each patient received 6 months of preoperative TFAC chemotherapy followed by surgery. Cell line-derived prediction results were correlated with the observed pathologic response to chemotherapy. Statistically robust differentially expressed genes between sensitive and resistant cells could only be found for paclitaxel. False discovery rates associated with the informative genes were high for all other drugs. For each drug, the top 100 differentially expressed genes were combined into a drug-specific response predictor. When these cell line-based predictors were applied to patient data, there was no significant correlation between observed response and predicted response either for individual drug predictors or combined predictions. Cell line-derived predictors of response to four commonly used chemotherapy drugs did not predict response accurately in patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pusztai L, Anderson K, Hess KR (2007) Pharmacogenomic predictor discovery in phase II clinical trials for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:6080–6086CrossRefPubMed Pusztai L, Anderson K, Hess KR (2007) Pharmacogenomic predictor discovery in phase II clinical trials for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:6080–6086CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Potti A, Dressman HK, Bild A, Riedel RF, Chan G, Sayer R, Cragun J, Cottrill H, Kelley MJ, Petersen R, Harpole D, Marks J, Berchuck A, Ginsburg GS, Febbo P, Lancaster J, Nevins JR (2006) Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics. Nat Med 12:1294–1300CrossRefPubMed Potti A, Dressman HK, Bild A, Riedel RF, Chan G, Sayer R, Cragun J, Cottrill H, Kelley MJ, Petersen R, Harpole D, Marks J, Berchuck A, Ginsburg GS, Febbo P, Lancaster J, Nevins JR (2006) Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics. Nat Med 12:1294–1300CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bonnefoi H, Potti A, Delorenzi M, Mauriac L, Campone M, Tubiana-Hulin M, Petit T, Rouanet P, Jassem J, Blot E, Becette V, Farmer P, André S, Acharya CR, Mukherjee S, Cameron D, Bergh J, Nevins JR, Iggo RD (2007) Validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00–01 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 8:1071–1078CrossRefPubMed Bonnefoi H, Potti A, Delorenzi M, Mauriac L, Campone M, Tubiana-Hulin M, Petit T, Rouanet P, Jassem J, Blot E, Becette V, Farmer P, André S, Acharya CR, Mukherjee S, Cameron D, Bergh J, Nevins JR, Iggo RD (2007) Validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00–01 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 8:1071–1078CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hsu DS, Balakumaran BS, Acharya CR, Vlahovic V, Walters KS, Garman K, Anders C, Riedel RF, Lancaster J, Harpole D, Dressman HK, Nevins JR, Febbo PG, Potti A (2007) Pharmacogenomic strategies provide a rational approach to the treatment of cisplatin-resistant patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:4350–4357CrossRefPubMed Hsu DS, Balakumaran BS, Acharya CR, Vlahovic V, Walters KS, Garman K, Anders C, Riedel RF, Lancaster J, Harpole D, Dressman HK, Nevins JR, Febbo PG, Potti A (2007) Pharmacogenomic strategies provide a rational approach to the treatment of cisplatin-resistant patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:4350–4357CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Baggerly KA, Coombes KR, Neeley ES (2008) Run batch effects potentially compromise the usefulness of genomic signatures for ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:1186–1187CrossRefPubMed Baggerly KA, Coombes KR, Neeley ES (2008) Run batch effects potentially compromise the usefulness of genomic signatures for ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:1186–1187CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Symmans WF, Ayers M, Clark EA, Stec J, Hess KR, Sneige N, Buchholz TA, Krishnamurthy S, Ibrahim NK, Buzdar AU, Theriault RL, Rosales MF, Thomas ES, Gwyn KM, Green MC, Syed AR, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2003) Total RNA yield and microarray gene expression profiles from fine-needle aspiration biopsy and core-needle biopsy samples of breast carcinoma. Cancer 97:2960–2971CrossRefPubMed Symmans WF, Ayers M, Clark EA, Stec J, Hess KR, Sneige N, Buchholz TA, Krishnamurthy S, Ibrahim NK, Buzdar AU, Theriault RL, Rosales MF, Thomas ES, Gwyn KM, Green MC, Syed AR, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2003) Total RNA yield and microarray gene expression profiles from fine-needle aspiration biopsy and core-needle biopsy samples of breast carcinoma. Cancer 97:2960–2971CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hess KR, Anderson K, Symmans WF, Valero V, Ibrahim N, Mejia JA, Booser D, Theriault RL, Buzdar AU, Dempsey PJ, Rouzier R, Sneige N, Ross JS, Vidaurre T, Gómez HL, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2006) Pharmacogenomic predictor of sensitivity to preoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:4236–4244CrossRefPubMed Hess KR, Anderson K, Symmans WF, Valero V, Ibrahim N, Mejia JA, Booser D, Theriault RL, Buzdar AU, Dempsey PJ, Rouzier R, Sneige N, Ross JS, Vidaurre T, Gómez HL, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2006) Pharmacogenomic predictor of sensitivity to preoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:4236–4244CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, Rajan R, Kuerer H, Valero V, Assad L, Poniecka A, Hennessy B, Green M, Buzdar AU, Singletary SE, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2007) Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4414–4422CrossRefPubMed Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, Rajan R, Kuerer H, Valero V, Assad L, Poniecka A, Hennessy B, Green M, Buzdar AU, Singletary SE, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2007) Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4414–4422CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Malich G, Markovic B, Winder C (1997) The sensitivity and specificity of the MTS tetrazolium assay for detecting the in vitro cytotoxicity of 20 chemicals using human cell lines. Toxicology 124:179–192CrossRefPubMed Malich G, Markovic B, Winder C (1997) The sensitivity and specificity of the MTS tetrazolium assay for detecting the in vitro cytotoxicity of 20 chemicals using human cell lines. Toxicology 124:179–192CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, Ibrahim N, Cristofanilli M, Anderson K, Hess KR, Stec J, Ayers M, Wagner P, Morandi P, Fan C, Rabiul I, Ross JS, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2005) Molecular subtypes of breast cancer respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 11:5678–5685CrossRefPubMed Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, Ibrahim N, Cristofanilli M, Anderson K, Hess KR, Stec J, Ayers M, Wagner P, Morandi P, Fan C, Rabiul I, Ross JS, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2005) Molecular subtypes of breast cancer respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 11:5678–5685CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Pounds S, Morris SW (2003) Estimating the occurrence of false positive and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values. Bioinformatics 19:1236–1242CrossRefPubMed Pounds S, Morris SW (2003) Estimating the occurrence of false positive and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values. Bioinformatics 19:1236–1242CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Staunton JE, Slonim DK, Coller HA, Tamayo P, Angelo MJ, Park J, Scherf U, Lee JK, Reinhold WO, Weinstein JN, Mesirov JP, Lander ES, Golub TR (2001) Chemosensitivity prediction by transcriptional profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10787–10792CrossRefPubMed Staunton JE, Slonim DK, Coller HA, Tamayo P, Angelo MJ, Park J, Scherf U, Lee JK, Reinhold WO, Weinstein JN, Mesirov JP, Lander ES, Golub TR (2001) Chemosensitivity prediction by transcriptional profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10787–10792CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Neve RM, Chin K, Fridlyand J, Yeh J, Baehner FL, Fevr T, Clark L, Bayani N, Coppe JP, Tong F, Speed T, Spellman PT, DeVries S, Lapuk A, Wang NJ, Kuo WL, Stilwell JL, Pinkel D, Albertson DG, Waldman FM, McCormick F, Dickson RB, Johnson MD, Lippman M, Ethier S, Gazdar A, Gray JW (2006) A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. Cancer Cell 10:515–527CrossRefPubMed Neve RM, Chin K, Fridlyand J, Yeh J, Baehner FL, Fevr T, Clark L, Bayani N, Coppe JP, Tong F, Speed T, Spellman PT, DeVries S, Lapuk A, Wang NJ, Kuo WL, Stilwell JL, Pinkel D, Albertson DG, Waldman FM, McCormick F, Dickson RB, Johnson MD, Lippman M, Ethier S, Gazdar A, Gray JW (2006) A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. Cancer Cell 10:515–527CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wistuba II, Behrens C, Milchgrub S, Syed S, Ahmadian M, Virmani AK, Kurvari V, Cunningham TH, Ashfaq R, Minna JD, Gazdar AF (1998) Comparison of features of human breast cancer cell lines and their corresponding tumors. Clin Cancer Res 4:2931–2938PubMed Wistuba II, Behrens C, Milchgrub S, Syed S, Ahmadian M, Virmani AK, Kurvari V, Cunningham TH, Ashfaq R, Minna JD, Gazdar AF (1998) Comparison of features of human breast cancer cell lines and their corresponding tumors. Clin Cancer Res 4:2931–2938PubMed
16.
go back to reference Dudoit S, Fridlyand J, Speed TP (2002) Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data. J Am Stat Assoc 97:77–87CrossRef Dudoit S, Fridlyand J, Speed TP (2002) Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data. J Am Stat Assoc 97:77–87CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ethier SP (1996) Human breast cancer cell lines as models of growth regulation and disease progression. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1:111–121CrossRefPubMed Ethier SP (1996) Human breast cancer cell lines as models of growth regulation and disease progression. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1:111–121CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Shay JW, Wright WE (2007) Tissue culture as a hostile environment: identifying conditions for breast cancer progression studies. Cancer Cell 12:100–101CrossRefPubMed Shay JW, Wright WE (2007) Tissue culture as a hostile environment: identifying conditions for breast cancer progression studies. Cancer Cell 12:100–101CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bellamy WT (1992) Prediction of response to drug therapy of cancer. A review of in vitro assays. Drugs 44:690–708CrossRefPubMed Bellamy WT (1992) Prediction of response to drug therapy of cancer. A review of in vitro assays. Drugs 44:690–708CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Goetz MP, Knox SK, Suman VJ, Rae JM, Safgren SL, Ames MM, Visscher DW, Reynolds C, Couch FJ, Lingle WL, Weinshilboum RM, Fritcher EG, Nibbe AM, Desta Z, Nguyen A, Flockhart DA, Perez EA, Ingle JN (2007) The impact of cytochrome P450 2D6 metabolism in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101:113–121CrossRefPubMed Goetz MP, Knox SK, Suman VJ, Rae JM, Safgren SL, Ames MM, Visscher DW, Reynolds C, Couch FJ, Lingle WL, Weinshilboum RM, Fritcher EG, Nibbe AM, Desta Z, Nguyen A, Flockhart DA, Perez EA, Ingle JN (2007) The impact of cytochrome P450 2D6 metabolism in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101:113–121CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Schrag D, Garewal HS, Burstein HJ, Samson DJ, Von Hoff DD, Somerfield MR (2004) ASCO working group on chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays. American society of clinical oncology technology assessment: chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays. J Clin Oncol 22:3631–3638CrossRefPubMed Schrag D, Garewal HS, Burstein HJ, Samson DJ, Von Hoff DD, Somerfield MR (2004) ASCO working group on chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays. American society of clinical oncology technology assessment: chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays. J Clin Oncol 22:3631–3638CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Mehta RS, Bornstein R, Yu IR, Parker RJ, McLaren CE, Nguyen KP, Li KT, Fruehauf JP (2001) Breast cancer survival and in vitro tumor response in the extreme drug resistance assay. Breast Cancer Res Treat 66:225–237CrossRefPubMed Mehta RS, Bornstein R, Yu IR, Parker RJ, McLaren CE, Nguyen KP, Li KT, Fruehauf JP (2001) Breast cancer survival and in vitro tumor response in the extreme drug resistance assay. Breast Cancer Res Treat 66:225–237CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical evaluation of chemotherapy response predictors developed from breast cancer cell lines
Authors
Cornelia Liedtke
Jing Wang
Attila Tordai
William F. Symmans
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
Ludwig Kiesel
Kenneth Hess
Keith A. Baggerly
Kevin R. Coombes
Lajos Pusztai
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0445-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine