Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2009

Open Access 01-04-2009 | Clinical trial

Optimal delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting improves outcome of breast cancer patients

Authors: Isabel Chirivella, Begoña Bermejo, Amelia Insa, Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, Ana Magro, Susana Rosello, Elisa García-Garre, Paloma Martín, Ana Bosch, Ana Lluch

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate the dose–response effect of an adjuvant anthracycline-based non-taxane chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients. This was a retrospective database analysis. Selection criteria included patients treated for early breast cancer from years 1980 to 2000 with an adjuvant anthracycline-based non-taxane chemotherapy. The delivery of chemotherapy was assessed through the number of delayed cycles, the number of delayed days and the relative dose intensity (RDI) administered (≥85%, <85%). Seven hundred and ninety-three breast cancer patients were included. The Kaplan–Meier disease-free survival (DFS) was affected by the number of delayed cycles (P < 0.0001), the number of delayed days (P < 0.0001) and the RDI (P = 0.0029). The Kaplan–Meier overall survival (OS) was also affected by the number of delayed cycles (P = 0.0008) and days (P = 0.0115), as well as the RDI (P = 0.0055). The Cox regression models showed that, when the number of nodes affected and the hormonal receptor status were controlled, all the study variables maintained their significance on DFS, but not on OS. The dose–response effect is a crucial factor in the administration of anthracycline-based non-taxane schedules for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. Delays and/or reductions of chemotherapy should be avoided if possible to achieve the maximal benefit.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bonadonna G, Brusamolino E, Valagussa P et al (1976) Combination chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment in operable breast cancer. N Engl J Med 294:405–410PubMed Bonadonna G, Brusamolino E, Valagussa P et al (1976) Combination chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment in operable breast cancer. N Engl J Med 294:405–410PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bonadonna G, Moliterni A, Zambetti M et al (2005) 30 years’ follow up of randomised studies of adjuvant CMF in operable breast cancer: cohort study. BMJ 330:217PubMedCrossRef Bonadonna G, Moliterni A, Zambetti M et al (2005) 30 years’ follow up of randomised studies of adjuvant CMF in operable breast cancer: cohort study. BMJ 330:217PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Martin M, Villar A, Sole-Calvo A et al (2003) Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group. Ann Oncol 14:833–842PubMedCrossRef Martin M, Villar A, Sole-Calvo A et al (2003) Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group. Ann Oncol 14:833–842PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Henderson IC, Hayes DF, Gelman R (1988) Dose-response in the treatment of breast cancer: a critical review. J Clin Oncol 6:1501–1515PubMed Henderson IC, Hayes DF, Gelman R (1988) Dose-response in the treatment of breast cancer: a critical review. J Clin Oncol 6:1501–1515PubMed
6.
go back to reference Bonadonna G, Valagussa P (1981) Dose-response effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 304:10–15PubMed Bonadonna G, Valagussa P (1981) Dose-response effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 304:10–15PubMed
7.
go back to reference Senn HJ, Barett-Mahler AR, Jungi WF et al (1989) Adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with LMF + BCG in node-negative and node-positive breast cancer patients: 10 year results. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 25:513–525PubMedCrossRef Senn HJ, Barett-Mahler AR, Jungi WF et al (1989) Adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with LMF + BCG in node-negative and node-positive breast cancer patients: 10 year results. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 25:513–525PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Velez-Garcia E, Carpenter JT Jr, Moore M et al (1992) Postsurgical adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in women with breast cancer and positive axillary nodes: a South-Eastern Cancer Study Group (SEG) Trial. Eur J Cancer 28A:1833–1837PubMedCrossRef Velez-Garcia E, Carpenter JT Jr, Moore M et al (1992) Postsurgical adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in women with breast cancer and positive axillary nodes: a South-Eastern Cancer Study Group (SEG) Trial. Eur J Cancer 28A:1833–1837PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Howell A, Rubens RD, Bush H et al (1984) A controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with melphalan versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil for breast cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 96:74–89PubMed Howell A, Rubens RD, Bush H et al (1984) A controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with melphalan versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil for breast cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 96:74–89PubMed
10.
go back to reference Ahmann DL, O’Fallon JR, Scanlon PW et al (1982) A preliminary assessment of factors associated with recurrent disease in a surgical adjuvant clinical trial for patients with breast cancer with special emphasis on the aggressiveness of therapy. Am J Clin Oncol 5:371–381PubMedCrossRef Ahmann DL, O’Fallon JR, Scanlon PW et al (1982) A preliminary assessment of factors associated with recurrent disease in a surgical adjuvant clinical trial for patients with breast cancer with special emphasis on the aggressiveness of therapy. Am J Clin Oncol 5:371–381PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Colleoni M, Price K, Castiglione-Gertsch M et al (1998) Dose-response effect of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group. Eur J Cancer 34:1693–1700PubMedCrossRef Colleoni M, Price K, Castiglione-Gertsch M et al (1998) Dose-response effect of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group. Eur J Cancer 34:1693–1700PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lyman GH, Dale DC, Crawford J (2003) Incidence and predictors of low dose-intensity in adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy: a nationwide study of community practices. J Clin Oncol 21:4524–4531PubMedCrossRef Lyman GH, Dale DC, Crawford J (2003) Incidence and predictors of low dose-intensity in adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy: a nationwide study of community practices. J Clin Oncol 21:4524–4531PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Budman DR (2004) Dose and schedule as determinants of outcomes in chemotherapy for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 31:3–9PubMedCrossRef Budman DR (2004) Dose and schedule as determinants of outcomes in chemotherapy for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 31:3–9PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Poikonen P, Blomqvist C, Joensuu H (2001) Effect of obesity on the leukocyte nadir in women treated with adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil dosed according to body surface area. Acta Oncol 40:67–71PubMedCrossRef Poikonen P, Blomqvist C, Joensuu H (2001) Effect of obesity on the leukocyte nadir in women treated with adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil dosed according to body surface area. Acta Oncol 40:67–71PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rosner GL, Hargis JB, Hollis DR et al (1996) Relationship between toxicity and obesity in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: results from cancer and leukemia group B study 8541. J Clin Oncol 14:3000–3008PubMed Rosner GL, Hargis JB, Hollis DR et al (1996) Relationship between toxicity and obesity in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: results from cancer and leukemia group B study 8541. J Clin Oncol 14:3000–3008PubMed
17.
go back to reference Colleoni M, Li S, Gelber RD et al (2005) Relation between chemotherapy dose, oestrogen receptor expression, and body-mass index. Lancet 366:1108–1110PubMedCrossRef Colleoni M, Li S, Gelber RD et al (2005) Relation between chemotherapy dose, oestrogen receptor expression, and body-mass index. Lancet 366:1108–1110PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Goodwin PJ, Boyd NF (1990) Body size and breast cancer prognosis: a critical review of the evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 16:205–214PubMedCrossRef Goodwin PJ, Boyd NF (1990) Body size and breast cancer prognosis: a critical review of the evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 16:205–214PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wood WC, Budman DR, Korzun AH et al (1994) Dose and dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II, node-positive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 330:1253–1259PubMedCrossRef Wood WC, Budman DR, Korzun AH et al (1994) Dose and dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II, node-positive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 330:1253–1259PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Redmond C, Fisher B, Wieand HS (1983) The methodologic dilemma in retrospectively correlating the amount of chemotherapy received in adjuvant therapy protocols with disease-free survival. Cancer Treat Rep 67:519–526PubMed Redmond C, Fisher B, Wieand HS (1983) The methodologic dilemma in retrospectively correlating the amount of chemotherapy received in adjuvant therapy protocols with disease-free survival. Cancer Treat Rep 67:519–526PubMed
Metadata
Title
Optimal delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting improves outcome of breast cancer patients
Authors
Isabel Chirivella
Begoña Bermejo
Amelia Insa
Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo
Ana Magro
Susana Rosello
Elisa García-Garre
Paloma Martín
Ana Bosch
Ana Lluch
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0018-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine