Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2008

01-11-2008 | Clinical Trial

Scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy

Authors: Eunyoung Ko, Wonshik Han, Jong Won Lee, Jihyoung Cho, Eun-Kyu Kim, So-Youn Jung, Mee Joo Kang, Woo Kyung Moon, In Ae Park, Sung-Won Kim, Ku Sang Kim, Eun Sook Lee, Kyu Hong Min, Seok Won Kim, Dong-Young Noh

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to determine factors that predict under-evaluation of malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB), and to develop a prediction algorithm for scoring the possibility of a diagnosis upgrade to malignancy based on clinical, radiological and pathological factors. Methods The study enrolled patients diagnosed with ADH at ultrasound-guided CNB who subsequently underwent surgical excision of the lesion. Multivariate analysis was used to identify relevant clinical, radiological and pathological factors that may predict malignancy. Results A total of 102 patients with ADH at CNB were identified. Of the 74 patients who underwent subsequent surgical excision, 34 (45.8%) were diagnosed with invasive or in situ malignant foci. Multivariate analysis revealed that age >50 years, microcalcification on mammography, size on imaging >15 mm and a palpable lesion were independent predictors of malignancy. Focal ADH was a negative predictor. A scoring system was developed based on logistic regression models and beta coefficients for each variable. The area under the ROC curve was 0.903 (95% CI: 0.82–0.94), and the negative predictive value was 100% for a score ≤3.5. Similar findings were observed for a validation dataset of 54 patients at other institutions. Conclusions A scoring system to predict malignancy in patients diagnosed with ADH at CNB was developed based on five factors: age, palpable lesion, microcalcification on mammography, size on imaging and focal ADH. This system was able to identify a subset of patients with lesions likely to be benign, indicating that imaging follow-up rather than surgical excision may be appropriate.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zhao L, Freimanis R, Bergman S et al (2003) Biopsy needle technique and the accuracy of diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia for mammographic abnormalities. Am Surg 69(9):757–762PubMed Zhao L, Freimanis R, Bergman S et al (2003) Biopsy needle technique and the accuracy of diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia for mammographic abnormalities. Am Surg 69(9):757–762PubMed
2.
go back to reference Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM et al (2005) The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases. Ann Surg 242(5):701–707PubMedCrossRef Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM et al (2005) The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases. Ann Surg 242(5):701–707PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Houssami N, Ciatto S, Ellis I et al (2007) Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates. Cancer 109(3):487–495PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Ciatto S, Ellis I et al (2007) Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates. Cancer 109(3):487–495PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ et al (1994) Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 193(2):359–364PubMed Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ et al (1994) Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 193(2):359–364PubMed
5.
go back to reference Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA et al (1993) US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 187(2):507–511PubMed Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA et al (1993) US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 187(2):507–511PubMed
6.
go back to reference Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE et al (1990) Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 176(3):741–747PubMed Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE et al (1990) Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 176(3):741–747PubMed
7.
go back to reference Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP et al (1995) Stereotaxic core biopsy of impalpable spiculated breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165(3):551–554PubMed Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP et al (1995) Stereotaxic core biopsy of impalpable spiculated breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165(3):551–554PubMed
8.
go back to reference Burbank F (1997) Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 202(3):843–847PubMed Burbank F (1997) Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 202(3):843–847PubMed
9.
go back to reference Ciatto S, Houssami N, Ambrogetti D et al (2007) Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101(3):291–297PubMedCrossRef Ciatto S, Houssami N, Ambrogetti D et al (2007) Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101(3):291–297PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM (2002) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 224(2):548–554PubMedCrossRef Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM (2002) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 224(2):548–554PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brown TA, Wall JW, Christensen ED et al (1998) Atypical hyperplasia in the era of stereotactic core needle biopsy. J Surg Oncol 67(3):168–173PubMedCrossRef Brown TA, Wall JW, Christensen ED et al (1998) Atypical hyperplasia in the era of stereotactic core needle biopsy. J Surg Oncol 67(3):168–173PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sohn V, Arthurs Z, Herbert G et al (2007) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: improved accuracy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted versus the 14-gauge core biopsy needle. Ann Surg Oncol 14(9):2497–2501PubMedCrossRef Sohn V, Arthurs Z, Herbert G et al (2007) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: improved accuracy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted versus the 14-gauge core biopsy needle. Ann Surg Oncol 14(9):2497–2501PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mercado CL, Hamele-Bena D, Oken SM et al (2006) Papillary lesions of the breast at percutaneous core-needle biopsy. Radiology 238(3):801–808PubMedCrossRef Mercado CL, Hamele-Bena D, Oken SM et al (2006) Papillary lesions of the breast at percutaneous core-needle biopsy. Radiology 238(3):801–808PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gisvold JJ, Goellner JR, Grant CS et al (1994) Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(4):815–820PubMed Gisvold JJ, Goellner JR, Grant CS et al (1994) Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(4):815–820PubMed
15.
go back to reference Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH et al (2005) Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Korean J Radiol 6(2):102–109PubMedCrossRef Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH et al (2005) Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Korean J Radiol 6(2):102–109PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD et al (1998) Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 208(1):251–260PubMed Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD et al (1998) Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 208(1):251–260PubMed
17.
go back to reference Mercado CL, Hamele-Bena D, Singer C et al (2001) Papillary lesions of the breast: evaluation with stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 221(3):650–655PubMedCrossRef Mercado CL, Hamele-Bena D, Singer C et al (2001) Papillary lesions of the breast: evaluation with stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 221(3):650–655PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Parker SH, Klaus AJ, McWey PJ et al (2001) Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using a handheld device. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(2):405–408PubMed Parker SH, Klaus AJ, McWey PJ et al (2001) Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using a handheld device. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(2):405–408PubMed
19.
go back to reference Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (2003) WHO classification tumors of the breast and female genital organs. WHO IARC Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (2003) WHO classification tumors of the breast and female genital organs. WHO IARC
20.
go back to reference Liberman L (2000) Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 38(4):791–807PubMedCrossRef Liberman L (2000) Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 38(4):791–807PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC et al (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(5):1341–1346PubMed Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC et al (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(5):1341–1346PubMed
22.
go back to reference Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH et al (1997) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 204(2):485–488PubMed Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH et al (1997) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 204(2):485–488PubMed
23.
go back to reference Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH (2003) Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(2):347–351PubMed Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH (2003) Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(2):347–351PubMed
24.
go back to reference Grady I, Gorsuch H, Wilburn-Bailey S (2005) Ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision of breast lesions: an accurate technique in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Surg 201(1):14–17PubMedCrossRef Grady I, Gorsuch H, Wilburn-Bailey S (2005) Ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision of breast lesions: an accurate technique in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Surg 201(1):14–17PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Moon WK, Im JG, Koh YH et al (2000) US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. Radiology 217(3):849–854PubMed Moon WK, Im JG, Koh YH et al (2000) US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. Radiology 217(3):849–854PubMed
26.
go back to reference Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL (2003) Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(4):941–948PubMed Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL (2003) Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(4):941–948PubMed
27.
go back to reference Margenthaler JA, Duke D, Monsees BS et al (2006) Correlation between core biopsy and excisional biopsy in breast high-risk lesions. Am J Surg 192(4):534–537PubMedCrossRef Margenthaler JA, Duke D, Monsees BS et al (2006) Correlation between core biopsy and excisional biopsy in breast high-risk lesions. Am J Surg 192(4):534–537PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ely KA, Carter BA, Jensen RA et al (2001) Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia: a probabilistic approach to reporting. Am J Surg Pathol 25(8):1017–1021PubMedCrossRef Ely KA, Carter BA, Jensen RA et al (2001) Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia: a probabilistic approach to reporting. Am J Surg Pathol 25(8):1017–1021PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Scardino PT (2002) Nomograms as predictive models. Semin Urol Oncol 20(2):108–115PubMedCrossRef Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Scardino PT (2002) Nomograms as predictive models. Semin Urol Oncol 20(2):108–115PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kattan MW, Giri D, Panageas KS et al (2004) A tool for predicting breast carcinoma mortality in women who do not receive adjuvant therapy. Cancer 101(11):2509–2515PubMedCrossRef Kattan MW, Giri D, Panageas KS et al (2004) A tool for predicting breast carcinoma mortality in women who do not receive adjuvant therapy. Cancer 101(11):2509–2515PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hwang RF, Krishnamurthy S, Hunt KK et al (2003) Clinicopathologic factors predicting involvement of nonsentinel axillary nodes in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10(3):248–254PubMedCrossRef Hwang RF, Krishnamurthy S, Hunt KK et al (2003) Clinicopathologic factors predicting involvement of nonsentinel axillary nodes in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10(3):248–254PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Degnim AC, Reynolds C, Pantvaidya G et al (2005) Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg 190(4):543–550PubMedCrossRef Degnim AC, Reynolds C, Pantvaidya G et al (2005) Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg 190(4):543–550PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy
Authors
Eunyoung Ko
Wonshik Han
Jong Won Lee
Jihyoung Cho
Eun-Kyu Kim
So-Youn Jung
Mee Joo Kang
Woo Kyung Moon
In Ae Park
Sung-Won Kim
Ku Sang Kim
Eun Sook Lee
Kyu Hong Min
Seok Won Kim
Dong-Young Noh
Publication date
01-11-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9824-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine