Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2008

01-03-2008 | Epidemiology

Breast cancer: a candidate gene approach across the estrogen metabolic pathway

Authors: Christina Justenhoven, Ute Hamann, Falk Schubert, Marc Zapatka, Christiane B. Pierl, Sylvia Rabstein, Silvia Selinski, Tina Mueller, Katja Ickstadt, Michael Gilbert, Yon-Dschun Ko, Christian Baisch, Beate Pesch, Volker Harth, Hermann M. Bolt, Caren Vollmert, Thomas Illig, Roland Eils, Jürgen Dippon, Hiltrud Brauch

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Polymorphisms within the estrogen metabolic pathway are prime candidates for a possible association with breast cancer risk. We investigated 11 genes encoding key proteins of this pathway for their potential contribution to breast cancer risk. Of these CYP17A1, CYP19A1, EPHX1, HSD17B1, SRD5A2, and PPARG2 participate in biosynthesis, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, COMT, GSTP1, and SOD2 in catabolism and detoxification. We performed a population-based case-control study with 688 incident breast cancer cases and 724 controls from Germany and genotyped 18 polymorphisms by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), PCR based RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism), and TaqMan® allelic discrimination. Genotype frequencies were compared between cases and controls and odds ratios were calculated by conditional logistic regression. Further statistical analyses were based on cluster analysis, multifactor dimensionality reduction, logic regression, and global testing. Single factor analyses pointed to CYP1B1_1294_GG as a possible breast cancer risk modulator (OR = 2.57; 95% CI: 1.34–4.93) and two way stratification suggested associations between BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and COMT_472_GG (P = 0.0076 and P = 0.0026), BMI < 20 kg/m2 and HSD17B1_937_GG (P = 0.0082) as well as CYP17A1_-34_CC and HRT use ≥10 years (P = 0.0063). Following correction for multiple testing none of these associations remained significant. No significant association between breast cancer risk and genetic polymorphisms was observed in multifactor analyses. The tested polymorphisms of the estrogen metabolic pathway may not play a direct role in breast cancer risk. Therefore, future association studies should be extended to other polymorphisms and other regulatory pathways.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108PubMed Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108PubMed
2.
go back to reference Stewart BW, Kleihues P (2003) World cancer report. IARC Press, Lyon Stewart BW, Kleihues P (2003) World cancer report. IARC Press, Lyon
3.
go back to reference Malone KE, Daling JR, Doody DR et al (2006) Prevalence and predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based study of breast cancer in white and black American women ages 35 to 64 years. Cancer Res 66:8297–8308PubMedCrossRef Malone KE, Daling JR, Doody DR et al (2006) Prevalence and predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based study of breast cancer in white and black American women ages 35 to 64 years. Cancer Res 66:8297–8308PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Walsh T, Casadei S, Coats KH et al (2006) Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. Jama 295:1379–1388PubMedCrossRef Walsh T, Casadei S, Coats KH et al (2006) Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. Jama 295:1379–1388PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Meijers-Heijboer H, van den Ouweland A, Klijn J et al (2002) Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2(*)1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Nat Genet 31:55–59PubMedCrossRef Meijers-Heijboer H, van den Ouweland A, Klijn J et al (2002) Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2(*)1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Nat Genet 31:55–59PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rahman N, Seal S, Thompson D et al (2007) PALB2, which encodes a BRCA2-interacting protein, is a breast cancer susceptibility gene. Nat Genet 39:165–167PubMedCrossRef Rahman N, Seal S, Thompson D et al (2007) PALB2, which encodes a BRCA2-interacting protein, is a breast cancer susceptibility gene. Nat Genet 39:165–167PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference The CHEK2 Breast Cancer Case-Control Consortium (2004) CHEK2*1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from 10 studies. Am J Hum Genet 74:1175–1182CrossRef The CHEK2 Breast Cancer Case-Control Consortium (2004) CHEK2*1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from 10 studies. Am J Hum Genet 74:1175–1182CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cox A, Dunning AM, Garcia-Closas M et al (2007) A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet 39:352–358PubMedCrossRef Cox A, Dunning AM, Garcia-Closas M et al (2007) A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet 39:352–358PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Key TJ, Allen NE, Spencer EA et al (2002) The effect of diet on risk of cancer. Lancet 360:861–868PubMedCrossRef Key TJ, Allen NE, Spencer EA et al (2002) The effect of diet on risk of cancer. Lancet 360:861–868PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zumoff B (1998) Does postmenopausal estrogen administration increase the risk of breast cancer? Contributions of animal, biochemical, and clinical investigative studies to a resolution of the controversy. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 217:30–37PubMed Zumoff B (1998) Does postmenopausal estrogen administration increase the risk of breast cancer? Contributions of animal, biochemical, and clinical investigative studies to a resolution of the controversy. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 217:30–37PubMed
13.
go back to reference Beral V (2003) Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the million women study. Lancet 362:419–427PubMedCrossRef Beral V (2003) Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the million women study. Lancet 362:419–427PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pesch B, Ko Y, Brauch H et al (2005) Factors modifying the association between hormone-replacement therapy and breast cancer risk. Eur J Epidemiol 20:699–711PubMedCrossRef Pesch B, Ko Y, Brauch H et al (2005) Factors modifying the association between hormone-replacement therapy and breast cancer risk. Eur J Epidemiol 20:699–711PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL et al (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the women’s health initiative randomized controlled trial. Jama 288:321–333PubMedCrossRef Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL et al (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the women’s health initiative randomized controlled trial. Jama 288:321–333PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (1996) Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies. Collaborative group on hormonal factors in breast cancer. Lancet 347:1713–1727CrossRef Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (1996) Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies. Collaborative group on hormonal factors in breast cancer. Lancet 347:1713–1727CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kahlenborn C, Modugno F, Potter DM et al (2006) Oral contraceptive use as a risk factor for premenopausal breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1290–1302PubMedCrossRef Kahlenborn C, Modugno F, Potter DM et al (2006) Oral contraceptive use as a risk factor for premenopausal breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1290–1302PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pharoah PD, Dunning AM, Ponder BA et al (2004) Association studies for finding cancer-susceptibility genetic variants. Nat Rev Cancer 4:850–860PubMedCrossRef Pharoah PD, Dunning AM, Ponder BA et al (2004) Association studies for finding cancer-susceptibility genetic variants. Nat Rev Cancer 4:850–860PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hunter DJ, Riboli E, Haiman CA et al (2005) A candidate gene approach to searching for low-penetrance breast and prostate cancer genes. Nat Rev Cancer 5:977–985PubMedCrossRef Hunter DJ, Riboli E, Haiman CA et al (2005) A candidate gene approach to searching for low-penetrance breast and prostate cancer genes. Nat Rev Cancer 5:977–985PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Justenhoven C, Hamann U, Pesch B et al (2004) ERCC2 genotypes and a corresponding haplotype are linked with breast cancer risk in a German population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:2059–2064PubMed Justenhoven C, Hamann U, Pesch B et al (2004) ERCC2 genotypes and a corresponding haplotype are linked with breast cancer risk in a German population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:2059–2064PubMed
21.
go back to reference Vollmert C, Windl O, Xiang W et al (2006) Significant association of a M129V independent polymorphism in the 5′ UTR of the PRNP gene with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in a large German case-control study. J Med Genet 43:e53PubMedCrossRef Vollmert C, Windl O, Xiang W et al (2006) Significant association of a M129V independent polymorphism in the 5′ UTR of the PRNP gene with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in a large German case-control study. J Med Genet 43:e53PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jaremko M, Justenhoven C, Abraham BK et al (2005) MALDI-TOF MS and TaqMan assisted SNP genotyping of DNA isolated from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPET). Hum Mutat 25:232–238PubMedCrossRef Jaremko M, Justenhoven C, Abraham BK et al (2005) MALDI-TOF MS and TaqMan assisted SNP genotyping of DNA isolated from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPET). Hum Mutat 25:232–238PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Thompson PA, Shields PG, Freudenheim JL et al (1998) Genetic polymorphisms in catechol-O-methyltransferase, menopausal status, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Res 58:2107–2110PubMed Thompson PA, Shields PG, Freudenheim JL et al (1998) Genetic polymorphisms in catechol-O-methyltransferase, menopausal status, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Res 58:2107–2110PubMed
24.
go back to reference Bergman-Jungestrom M, Gentile M, Lundin AC et al (1999) Association between CYP17 gene polymorphism and risk of breast cancer in young women. Int J Cancer 84:350–353PubMedCrossRef Bergman-Jungestrom M, Gentile M, Lundin AC et al (1999) Association between CYP17 gene polymorphism and risk of breast cancer in young women. Int J Cancer 84:350–353PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kurosaki K, Saitoh H, Oota H et al (1997) Combined polymorphism associated with a 3-bp deletion in the 5′- flanking region of a tetrameric short tandem repeat at the CYP19 locus. Nippon Hoigaku Zasshi 51:191–195PubMed Kurosaki K, Saitoh H, Oota H et al (1997) Combined polymorphism associated with a 3-bp deletion in the 5′- flanking region of a tetrameric short tandem repeat at the CYP19 locus. Nippon Hoigaku Zasshi 51:191–195PubMed
26.
go back to reference Kristensen VN, Andersen TI, Lindblom A et al (1998) A rare CYP19 (aromatase) variant may increase the risk of breast cancer. Pharmacogenetics 8:43–48PubMedCrossRef Kristensen VN, Andersen TI, Lindblom A et al (1998) A rare CYP19 (aromatase) variant may increase the risk of breast cancer. Pharmacogenetics 8:43–48PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tworoger SS, Chubak J, Aiello EJ et al (2004) Association of CYP17, CYP19, CYP1B1, and COMT polymorphisms with serum and urinary sex hormone concentrations in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:94–101PubMedCrossRef Tworoger SS, Chubak J, Aiello EJ et al (2004) Association of CYP17, CYP19, CYP1B1, and COMT polymorphisms with serum and urinary sex hormone concentrations in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:94–101PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Berstein LM, Imyanitov EN, Suspitsin EN et al (2001) CYP19 gene polymorphism in endometrial cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 127:135–138PubMedCrossRef Berstein LM, Imyanitov EN, Suspitsin EN et al (2001) CYP19 gene polymorphism in endometrial cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 127:135–138PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Haiman CA, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D et al (2000) A tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism in CYP19 and breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer 87:204–210PubMedCrossRef Haiman CA, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D et al (2000) A tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism in CYP19 and breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer 87:204–210PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Changes and Enhancement Through Release 8.0 Cary, NC: SAS Institute. SAS/STAT Software 2000 Changes and Enhancement Through Release 8.0 Cary, NC: SAS Institute. SAS/STAT Software 2000
31.
go back to reference Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P (2001) A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet 68:978–989PubMedCrossRef Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P (2001) A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet 68:978–989PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Stephens M, Donnelly P (2003) A comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 73:1162–1169PubMedCrossRef Stephens M, Donnelly P (2003) A comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 73:1162–1169PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Ickstadt K, Muller T, Schwender H (in press) Analysing SNPs–are there needles in the haysack? Chance Ickstadt K, Muller T, Schwender H (in press) Analysing SNPs–are there needles in the haysack? Chance
34.
go back to reference Selinski S (2006) Similarity measures for clustering SNP and epideiological data. Technical report, SFB 475, Department of Statistics. University of Dortmund, Germany Selinski S (2006) Similarity measures for clustering SNP and epideiological data. Technical report, SFB 475, Department of Statistics. University of Dortmund, Germany
35.
go back to reference Hahn LW, Ritchie MD, Moore JH (2002) Multifactor dimensionality reduction of detecting gene–gene interactions. Bioinformatics 19:376–382CrossRef Hahn LW, Ritchie MD, Moore JH (2002) Multifactor dimensionality reduction of detecting gene–gene interactions. Bioinformatics 19:376–382CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Moore JH (2003) Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene–gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity. Genet Epidemiol 24:150–157PubMedCrossRef Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Moore JH (2003) Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene–gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity. Genet Epidemiol 24:150–157PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Roodi N et al (2001) Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet 69:138–147PubMedCrossRef Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Roodi N et al (2001) Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet 69:138–147PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, LeBlanc M (2003) Logic regression. J Comput Graph Stat 12:475–511CrossRef Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, LeBlanc M (2003) Logic regression. J Comput Graph Stat 12:475–511CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Schwender H, Ickstadt K (2006) Identification of SNP interactions using logic regression. Technical report, SFB 475, Department of Statistics. University of Dortmund, Germany Schwender H, Ickstadt K (2006) Identification of SNP interactions using logic regression. Technical report, SFB 475, Department of Statistics. University of Dortmund, Germany
40.
go back to reference Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM et al (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5:R80PubMedCrossRef Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM et al (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5:R80PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Goeman JJ, van de Geer SA, de KF et al (2004) A global test for groups of genes: testing association with a clinical outcome. Bioinformatics 20:93–99 Goeman JJ, van de Geer SA, de KF et al (2004) A global test for groups of genes: testing association with a clinical outcome. Bioinformatics 20:93–99
42.
go back to reference Wen W, Cai Q, Shu XO et al (2005) Cytochrome P450 1B1 and catechol-O-methyltransferase genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in Chinese women: results from the shanghai breast cancer study and a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:329–335PubMedCrossRef Wen W, Cai Q, Shu XO et al (2005) Cytochrome P450 1B1 and catechol-O-methyltransferase genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in Chinese women: results from the shanghai breast cancer study and a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:329–335PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Abu-Abid S, Szold A, Klausner J (2002) Obesity and cancer. J Med 33:73–86PubMed Abu-Abid S, Szold A, Klausner J (2002) Obesity and cancer. J Med 33:73–86PubMed
44.
go back to reference Lorincz AM, Sukumar S (2006) Molecular links between obesity and breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 13:279–292PubMedCrossRef Lorincz AM, Sukumar S (2006) Molecular links between obesity and breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 13:279–292PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Crooke PS, Ritchie MD, Hachey DL et al (2006) Estrogens, enzyme variants, and breast cancer: a risk model. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1620–1629PubMedCrossRef Crooke PS, Ritchie MD, Hachey DL et al (2006) Estrogens, enzyme variants, and breast cancer: a risk model. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1620–1629PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Ioannidis JP (2006) Common genetic variants for breast cancer: 32 largely refuted candidates and larger prospects. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1350–1353PubMedCrossRef Ioannidis JP (2006) Common genetic variants for breast cancer: 32 largely refuted candidates and larger prospects. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1350–1353PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Breast Cancer Association Consortium (2006) Commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer: results from the breast cancer association consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1382–1396PubMedCrossRef Breast Cancer Association Consortium (2006) Commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer: results from the breast cancer association consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1382–1396PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Folkerd EJ, Martin LA, Kendall A et al (2006) The relationship between factors affecting endogenous oestradiol levels in postmenopausal women and breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 102:250–255PubMedCrossRef Folkerd EJ, Martin LA, Kendall A et al (2006) The relationship between factors affecting endogenous oestradiol levels in postmenopausal women and breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 102:250–255PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Breast cancer: a candidate gene approach across the estrogen metabolic pathway
Authors
Christina Justenhoven
Ute Hamann
Falk Schubert
Marc Zapatka
Christiane B. Pierl
Sylvia Rabstein
Silvia Selinski
Tina Mueller
Katja Ickstadt
Michael Gilbert
Yon-Dschun Ko
Christian Baisch
Beate Pesch
Volker Harth
Hermann M. Bolt
Caren Vollmert
Thomas Illig
Roland Eils
Jürgen Dippon
Hiltrud Brauch
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9586-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine