Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Brain Topography 2/2019

01-03-2019 | Magnetoencephalography | Original Paper

Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG

Authors: John G. Samuelsson, Sheraz Khan, Padmavathi Sundaram, Noam Peled, Matti S. Hämäläinen

Published in: Brain Topography | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) use non-invasive sensors to detect neural currents. Since the contribution of superficial neural sources to the measured M/EEG signals are orders-of-magnitude stronger than the contribution of subcortical sources, most MEG and EEG studies have focused on cortical activity. Subcortical structures, however, are centrally involved in both healthy brain function as well as in many neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. In this paper, we present a method that can separate and suppress the cortical signals while preserving the subcortical contributions to the M/EEG data. The resulting signal subspace of the data mainly originates from subcortical structures. Our method works by utilizing short-baseline planar gradiometers with short-sighted sensitivity distributions as reference sensors for cortical activity. Since the method is completely data-driven, forward and inverse modeling are not required. In this study, we use simulations and auditory steady state response experiments in a human subject to demonstrate that the method can remove the cortical signals while sparing the subcortical signals. We also test our method on MEG data recorded in an essential tremor patient with a deep brain stimulation implant and show how it can be used to reduce the DBS artifact in the MEG data by ~ 99.9% without affecting low frequency brain rhythms.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Griffiths DJ (2005) Introduction to electrodynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Griffiths DJ (2005) Introduction to electrodynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
go back to reference Jordan C (1875) Essai sur la géométrie à n dimensions. Bull Soc Math France 3:103–174CrossRef Jordan C (1875) Essai sur la géométrie à n dimensions. Bull Soc Math France 3:103–174CrossRef
go back to reference Knuutila JE et al (1993) A 122-channel whole-cortex SQUID system for measuring the brain’s magnetic fields. IEEE Trans Magn 29:3315–3320CrossRef Knuutila JE et al (1993) A 122-channel whole-cortex SQUID system for measuring the brain’s magnetic fields. IEEE Trans Magn 29:3315–3320CrossRef
go back to reference Kuwada S, Anderson JS, Batra R, Fitzpatrick DC, Teissier N, D’Angelo WR (2002) Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. J Am Acad Audiol 13:188–204 Kuwada S, Anderson JS, Batra R, Fitzpatrick DC, Teissier N, D’Angelo WR (2002) Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. J Am Acad Audiol 13:188–204
go back to reference Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 8:194–208CrossRef Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 8:194–208CrossRef
go back to reference Wanderah T, Gould D (2016) Nolte’s the human brain: an introduction to its functional anatomy, 7th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia Wanderah T, Gould D (2016) Nolte’s the human brain: an introduction to its functional anatomy, 7th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia
Metadata
Title
Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG
Authors
John G. Samuelsson
Sheraz Khan
Padmavathi Sundaram
Noam Peled
Matti S. Hämäläinen
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Brain Topography / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0896-0267
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6792
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-018-00694-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Brain Topography 2/2019 Go to the issue