Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Article

Considering consent: a structural equation modelling analysis of factors influencing decisional quality when accepting newborn screening

Authors: Stuart G. Nicholls, Kevin W. Southern

Published in: Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) programs generate an ethical tension between promoting the uptake of effective public health measures and facilitating informed consent from individuals.

Aim

To explore the factors that affect parental perceptions of decision quality when accepting NBS

Methods

Survey of parents with children screened in 2008 (n = 154, 32 % response rate). Questions were based on previous research and existing measures. The primary outcome was decision quality. Predictors were latent constructs of Attitudes to medicine, Perceived knowledge, Attitudes to screening, and Perceived choice. Responses were analysed using structural equation modelling.

Results

Increases in perceived choice and positive attitudes towards screening improved decision quality. Perceived knowledge had a significant and positive relationship with attitudes to screening (0.375, p < 0.01) as did perceived choice on perceived knowledge (0.806, p < 0.01). Attitudes to screening were also significantly influenced by attitudes to medicine, although less so than the effect of perceived knowledge. The model had good fit on all indices (χ2 = 61.396, df = 48, p = 0.093; CFI = 0.979; RMSEA = 0.043).

Conclusions

Our results implicate the presentation of screening as a key determinant of decision quality both in terms of the immediate information regarding the potential benefits and risks, but also the way in which consent processes are managed. If we want to better understand parent decision-making we need to go beyond analyses of information content, or parental recall of this, but consider the context in which screening is provided.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Al-Jader LN, Goodchild MC, Ryley HC, Harper PS (1990) Attitudes of parents of cystic fibrosis children towards neonatal screening and antenatal diagnosis. Clin Genet 38:460–465PubMedCrossRef Al-Jader LN, Goodchild MC, Ryley HC, Harper PS (1990) Attitudes of parents of cystic fibrosis children towards neonatal screening and antenatal diagnosis. Clin Genet 38:460–465PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Annas GJ (1982) Mandatory PKU screening: the other side of the looking glass. 72:1401-1403 Annas GJ (1982) Mandatory PKU screening: the other side of the looking glass. 72:1401-1403
go back to reference Araia MH, Wilson BJ, Chakraborty P et al (2012) Factors associated with knowledge of and satisfaction with newborn screening education: a survey of mothers. Genet Med 14:963–970PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Araia MH, Wilson BJ, Chakraborty P et al (2012) Factors associated with knowledge of and satisfaction with newborn screening education: a survey of mothers. Genet Med 14:963–970PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM, et al (1999) Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. 3(1) Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM, et al (1999) Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. 3(1)
go back to reference Bodamer OA, Hoffmann GF, Lindner M (2007) Expanded newborn screening in Europe 2007. J Inherit Metab Dis 30:439–444PubMedCrossRef Bodamer OA, Hoffmann GF, Lindner M (2007) Expanded newborn screening in Europe 2007. J Inherit Metab Dis 30:439–444PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Borrajo GJC (2007) Newborn screening in Latin America at the beginning of the 21st century. 30:466-481 Borrajo GJC (2007) Newborn screening in Latin America at the beginning of the 21st century. 30:466-481
go back to reference Bosompra K, Flynn BS, Ashikaga T, Rairikar CJ, Worden JK, Solomon LJ (2000) Likelihood of undergoing genetic testing for cancer risk: a population-based study. Prev Med 30:155–166PubMedCrossRef Bosompra K, Flynn BS, Ashikaga T, Rairikar CJ, Worden JK, Solomon LJ (2000) Likelihood of undergoing genetic testing for cancer risk: a population-based study. Prev Med 30:155–166PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Botkin JR, Goldenberg AJ, Rothwell E, Anderson RA, Lewis MH (2012) Retention and research use of residual newborn screening bloodspots. Pediatrics 131:1–8 Botkin JR, Goldenberg AJ, Rothwell E, Anderson RA, Lewis MH (2012) Retention and research use of residual newborn screening bloodspots. Pediatrics 131:1–8
go back to reference Bunn JY, Bosompra K, Ashikaga T, Flynn BS, Worden JK (2002) Factors influencing intention to obtain a genetic test for colon cancer risk: a population-based study. Prev Med 34(6):567–577PubMedCrossRef Bunn JY, Bosompra K, Ashikaga T, Flynn BS, Worden JK (2002) Factors influencing intention to obtain a genetic test for colon cancer risk: a population-based study. Prev Med 34(6):567–577PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Burgard P, Rupp K, Lindner M et al (2012) Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 2. From screening laboratory results to treatment, follow-up and quality assurance. J Inherit Metab Dis 35(4):613–625PubMedCrossRef Burgard P, Rupp K, Lindner M et al (2012) Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 2. From screening laboratory results to treatment, follow-up and quality assurance. J Inherit Metab Dis 35(4):613–625PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Byrne BM (2001) Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ Byrne BM (2001) Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
go back to reference Campbell E, Ross LF (2003) Parental attitudes regarding newborn screening of PKU and DMD. Am J Med Genet 120A(2):209–214PubMedCrossRef Campbell E, Ross LF (2003) Parental attitudes regarding newborn screening of PKU and DMD. Am J Med Genet 120A(2):209–214PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Campbell E, Ross LF (2005) Parental attitudes and beliefs regarding the genetic testing of children. Community Genet 8:94–102PubMedCrossRef Campbell E, Ross LF (2005) Parental attitudes and beliefs regarding the genetic testing of children. Community Genet 8:94–102PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Champion VL (1999) Revised susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening. Res Nurs Health 22:341–348PubMedCrossRef Champion VL (1999) Revised susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening. Res Nurs Health 22:341–348PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ciske DJ, Haavisto A, Laxova A, Rock LZM, Farrell PM (2001) Genetic counseling and neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an assessment of the communication process. Pediatrics 107(4):699–705PubMedCrossRef Ciske DJ, Haavisto A, Laxova A, Rock LZM, Farrell PM (2001) Genetic counseling and neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an assessment of the communication process. Pediatrics 107(4):699–705PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Clarke A (1997) Newborn screening. In: Harper PS, Clarke A (eds) Genetics, society and clinical practice. Bios, Oxford Clarke A (1997) Newborn screening. In: Harper PS, Clarke A (eds) Genetics, society and clinical practice. Bios, Oxford
go back to reference Creswell J, Plano Clark V (2007) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks Creswell J, Plano Clark V (2007) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
go back to reference Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF (1996) The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1(1):16–29CrossRef Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF (1996) The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1(1):16–29CrossRef
go back to reference Davey A, French D, Dawkins H, O’Leary P (2006) New mothers’ awareness of newborn screening, and their attitudes to the retention and use of screening samples for resarch purposes. 1(3):41-51 Davey A, French D, Dawkins H, O’Leary P (2006) New mothers’ awareness of newborn screening, and their attitudes to the retention and use of screening samples for resarch purposes. 1(3):41-51
go back to reference Davis TC, Humiston SG, Arnold CL et al (2006) Recommendations for effective newborn screening communication: results of focus groups with parents, providers, and experts. Pediatrics 117(5 Pt 2):S326–S340PubMed Davis TC, Humiston SG, Arnold CL et al (2006) Recommendations for effective newborn screening communication: results of focus groups with parents, providers, and experts. Pediatrics 117(5 Pt 2):S326–S340PubMed
go back to reference Detmar S, Hosli E, Dijkstra N, Nijsingh N, Rijnders M, Verweij M (2007) Information and informed consent for neonatal screening: opinions and preferences of parents. Birth 34(3):238–244PubMedCrossRef Detmar S, Hosli E, Dijkstra N, Nijsingh N, Rijnders M, Verweij M (2007) Information and informed consent for neonatal screening: opinions and preferences of parents. Birth 34(3):238–244PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dhondt JL (2005) Implementation of informed consent for a cystic fibrosis newborn screening program in France: low refusal rates for optional testing. J Pediatr 147(3 Suppl):S106–S108PubMedCrossRef Dhondt JL (2005) Implementation of informed consent for a cystic fibrosis newborn screening program in France: low refusal rates for optional testing. J Pediatr 147(3 Suppl):S106–S108PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dugan E, Trachtenberg F, Hall MA (2005) Development of abbreviated measures to assess patient trust in a physician, health insurer, and the medical profession. BMC Health Serv Res 5(64):1–7 Dugan E, Trachtenberg F, Hall MA (2005) Development of abbreviated measures to assess patient trust in a physician, health insurer, and the medical profession. BMC Health Serv Res 5(64):1–7
go back to reference Faden R, Chwalow AJ, Holtzman NA, Horn SD (1982) A survey to evaluate parental consent as public policy for neonatal screening. Am J Public Health 72:1347–1352PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Faden R, Chwalow AJ, Holtzman NA, Horn SD (1982) A survey to evaluate parental consent as public policy for neonatal screening. Am J Public Health 72:1347–1352PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Farrell MH, La Pean A, Ladouceur L (2005) Content of communication by pediatric residents after newborn genetic screening. Pediatrics 116(6):1492–1498PubMedCrossRef Farrell MH, La Pean A, Ladouceur L (2005) Content of communication by pediatric residents after newborn genetic screening. Pediatrics 116(6):1492–1498PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fox R (2006) Informed choice in screening programmes: do leaflets help? A critical literature review. J Public Health (Oxf) 28(4):309-317CrossRef Fox R (2006) Informed choice in screening programmes: do leaflets help? A critical literature review. J Public Health (Oxf) 28(4):309-317CrossRef
go back to reference Green JM, Hewison J, Bekker HL, Bryant LD, Cuckle HS (2004) Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 8(33) Green JM, Hewison J, Bekker HL, Bryant LD, Cuckle HS (2004) Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 8(33)
go back to reference Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
go back to reference Hall MA, Camacho F, Dugan E, Balkrishnan R (2002) Trust in the medical profession: conceptual and measurement issues. Health Serv Res 37(5):1419–1439PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hall MA, Camacho F, Dugan E, Balkrishnan R (2002) Trust in the medical profession: conceptual and measurement issues. Health Serv Res 37(5):1419–1439PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hargreaves K, Stewart R, Oliver S (2004) Pilot study of pre-screening parent leaflet on newborn blood spot screening and health professional communication guidelines. UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre, London Hargreaves K, Stewart R, Oliver S (2004) Pilot study of pre-screening parent leaflet on newborn blood spot screening and health professional communication guidelines. UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre, London
go back to reference Hargreaves K, Stewart R, Oliver S (2005a) Informed choice and public health screening for children: the case of blood spot screening. Health Expect 8:161–171PubMedCrossRef Hargreaves K, Stewart R, Oliver S (2005a) Informed choice and public health screening for children: the case of blood spot screening. Health Expect 8:161–171PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hargreaves K, Stewart R, Oliver S (2005b) Newborn screening information supports public health more than informed choice. Health Educ J 64:110–119 Hargreaves K, Stewart R, Oliver S (2005b) Newborn screening information supports public health more than informed choice. Health Educ J 64:110–119
go back to reference Ho R (2006) Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FLCrossRef Ho R (2006) Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FLCrossRef
go back to reference Holtzman NA, Faden R, Chwalow AJ, Horn SD (1983) Effect of informed parental consent on mother’s knowledge of newborn screening. Pediatrics 72:807–812PubMed Holtzman NA, Faden R, Chwalow AJ, Horn SD (1983) Effect of informed parental consent on mother’s knowledge of newborn screening. Pediatrics 72:807–812PubMed
go back to reference Hu L-T, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6(1):1–55CrossRef Hu L-T, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6(1):1–55CrossRef
go back to reference Jepson RG, Forbes CA, Sowden AJ, Lewis RA (2000) Increasing informed uptake and non-uptake: evidence from a systematic review. Health Expect 4:116–130CrossRef Jepson RG, Forbes CA, Sowden AJ, Lewis RA (2000) Increasing informed uptake and non-uptake: evidence from a systematic review. Health Expect 4:116–130CrossRef
go back to reference Kai J, Ulph F, Cullinan T, Qureshi N (2009) Communication of carrier status information following universal newborn screening for sickle cell disorders and cystic fibrosis: qualitative study of experience and practice. 13(57):1-82, iii Kai J, Ulph F, Cullinan T, Qureshi N (2009) Communication of carrier status information following universal newborn screening for sickle cell disorders and cystic fibrosis: qualitative study of experience and practice. 13(57):1-82, iii
go back to reference Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press, New York Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press, New York
go back to reference Koopmans J, Ross LF (2006) Does familiarity breed acceptance? The influence of policy on physicians’ attitudes toward newborn screening programs. Pediatrics 117(5):1477–1485PubMedCrossRef Koopmans J, Ross LF (2006) Does familiarity breed acceptance? The influence of policy on physicians’ attitudes toward newborn screening programs. Pediatrics 117(5):1477–1485PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Koppaka R (2011) Ten Great Public Health Achievements –- United States, 2001–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 60(19):619–623 Koppaka R (2011) Ten Great Public Health Achievements –- United States, 2001–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 60(19):619–623
go back to reference Lei M, Lomax RG (2005) The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Model 12(1):1–27CrossRef Lei M, Lomax RG (2005) The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Model 12(1):1–27CrossRef
go back to reference Mischler EH, Wilfond BS, Fost NC et al (1998) Cystic fibrosis newborn screening: impact on reproductive behavior and implications for genetic counseling. Pediatrics 102:44–52PubMedCrossRef Mischler EH, Wilfond BS, Fost NC et al (1998) Cystic fibrosis newborn screening: impact on reproductive behavior and implications for genetic counseling. Pediatrics 102:44–52PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moser CA, Kalton G (1971) Survey methods in social investigation. Gower, Dartmouth, UK Moser CA, Kalton G (1971) Survey methods in social investigation. Gower, Dartmouth, UK
go back to reference Muchamore I, Morphett L, Barlow-Stewart K (2006) Community views and perspectives of newborn screening. The Centre for Genetics Education, Sydney, Australia Muchamore I, Morphett L, Barlow-Stewart K (2006) Community views and perspectives of newborn screening. The Centre for Genetics Education, Sydney, Australia
go back to reference Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2010) MPlus: version 6.0. Los Angeles, CA Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2010) MPlus: version 6.0. Los Angeles, CA
go back to reference Newson A (2006) Should parental refusals of newborn screening be respected? 15:135-146 Newson A (2006) Should parental refusals of newborn screening be respected? 15:135-146
go back to reference Nicholls SG (2010) Knowledge or understanding? Informed choice in the context of newborn bloodspot screening. Public Health Ethics 3(2):128–136CrossRef Nicholls SG (2010) Knowledge or understanding? Informed choice in the context of newborn bloodspot screening. Public Health Ethics 3(2):128–136CrossRef
go back to reference Nicholls SG (2012) Proceduralisation, choice and parental reflections on decisions to accept newborn bloodspot screening. J Med Ethics 38:299–303PubMedCrossRef Nicholls SG (2012) Proceduralisation, choice and parental reflections on decisions to accept newborn bloodspot screening. J Med Ethics 38:299–303PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference O’Conner AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. 15(1):25-30 O’Conner AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. 15(1):25-30
go back to reference O’Conner AM (2010) User manual - Decisional Conflict Scale O’Conner AM (2010) User manual - Decisional Conflict Scale
go back to reference Padilla CD, Therrell BL (2007) Newborn screening in the Asia Pacific region. J Inherit Metab Dis 30:490–506PubMedCrossRef Padilla CD, Therrell BL (2007) Newborn screening in the Asia Pacific region. J Inherit Metab Dis 30:490–506PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Parsons EP, Moore C, Israel J, Hood K, Clarke AJ, Bradley DM (2005) Emphasizing parental choice on newborn screening. Br J Midwifery 13:165–168 Parsons EP, Moore C, Israel J, Hood K, Clarke AJ, Bradley DM (2005) Emphasizing parental choice on newborn screening. Br J Midwifery 13:165–168
go back to reference Saadallah AA, Rashed MS (2007) Newborn screening: experiences in the Middle East and North Africa. J Inherit Metab Dis 30(4):482–489PubMedCrossRef Saadallah AA, Rashed MS (2007) Newborn screening: experiences in the Middle East and North Africa. J Inherit Metab Dis 30(4):482–489PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stewart R, Oliver S (2003) What is known about communication with parents about newborn bloodspot screening? UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre, London, UK Stewart R, Oliver S (2003) What is known about communication with parents about newborn bloodspot screening? UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre, London, UK
go back to reference Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston
go back to reference Therrell BL, Johnson A, Williams D (2006) Status of newborn screening programs in the United States. Pediatrics 117(5 Pt 2):S212–S252PubMed Therrell BL, Johnson A, Williams D (2006) Status of newborn screening programs in the United States. Pediatrics 117(5 Pt 2):S212–S252PubMed
go back to reference UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre (2012) Guidelines for newborn blood spot sampling. UK National Screening Committee, London, UK UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre (2012) Guidelines for newborn blood spot sampling. UK National Screening Committee, London, UK
go back to reference Ullman JB (2001) Structural equation modelling. In: Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (eds) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp 653–771 Ullman JB (2001) Structural equation modelling. In: Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (eds) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp 653–771
go back to reference Ulph F, Cullinan T, Qureshi N, Kai J (2011) Familial influences on antenatal and newborn haemoglobinopathy screening. Ethn Health 16(4–5):361–375PubMedCrossRef Ulph F, Cullinan T, Qureshi N, Kai J (2011) Familial influences on antenatal and newborn haemoglobinopathy screening. Ethn Health 16(4–5):361–375PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference van den Berg M, Timmermans DR, Knol DL et al (2008) Understanding pregnant women’s decision making concerning prenatal screening. Health Psychol 27(4):430–437PubMedCrossRef van den Berg M, Timmermans DR, Knol DL et al (2008) Understanding pregnant women’s decision making concerning prenatal screening. Health Psychol 27(4):430–437PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Considering consent: a structural equation modelling analysis of factors influencing decisional quality when accepting newborn screening
Authors
Stuart G. Nicholls
Kevin W. Southern
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0141-8955
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2665
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-013-9651-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2/2014 Go to the issue