Skip to main content
Top
Published in: AIDS and Behavior 1/2017

Open Access 01-07-2017

Investing for Impact: The Global Fund Approach to Measurement of AIDS Response

Authors: Suman Jain, Nathalie Zorzi

Published in: AIDS and Behavior | Special Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The Global Fund raises and invests nearly US$4 billion a year to support programs run in more than 140 countries. The Global Fund strategy 2012–2016 is focused on “Investing for Impact”. In order to accomplish this, timely and accurate data are needed to inform strategies and prioritize activities to achieve greater coverage with quality services. Monitoring and evaluation is intrinsic to the Global Fund’s system of performance-based funding. The Global Fund invests in strengthening measurement and reporting of results at all stages of the grant cycle. The Global Fund approach to measurement is based on three key principles—(1) simplified reporting: the Global Fund has updated its measurement guidance to focus on impact, coverage and quality with the use of a harmonized set of indicators. (2) Supporting data systems—based on a common framework developed and supported by partners, it promotes investment in five common data systems: routine reporting including HMIS; Surveys—population based and risk group surveys; Analysis, reviews and transparency; Administrative and financial data sources; and, Vital registration systems. (3) Strengthen data use: the Global Fund funding encourages use of data at all levels—national, subnational and site level. Countries do not automatically prioritize M&E but when guidance, tools and investments are available, there is high level utilization of M&E systems in program design, planning, implementation, and results reporting. An in-depth analysis of the available data helps the Global Fund and countries to direct investments towards interventions where impact could be achieved and focus on target population groups and geographic areas that are most affected.
Footnotes
1
The grant rating methodology gives a rating of: A = Grant is meeting or exceeding expectations (90 to ≥100% achievement of targets), B1 = Performance is adequate (60–89% achievement), B2 = Performance is inadequate but potential demonstrated (30–59% achievement), and C = Unacceptable (<30% performance).
 
2
The Global Fund does not have a country-level presence outside of its offices in Geneva, Switzerland. Instead, it hires Local Fund Agents to oversee, verify and report on grant performance.
 
3
Special Initiatives is a pool of resources approved by the Global Fund Board on 07 March 2014 to support a Humanitarian Emergency Fund; Country Data Systems; Technical Assistance on Community, Rights and Gender; and Enhancing Value for Money and Financial Sustainability of Global Fund Supported Programs. More information on Special Initiatives is available here: http://​www.​theglobalfund.​org/​Knowledge/​Decisions/​GF/​B31/​DP06/​.
 
4
The Global Fund priority countries are categorized as follows: High Impact Africa 1—Congo (Democratic Republic), Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, South Africa, Sudan. High Impact Africa 2—Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Zanzibar, Malawi. High Impact Asia—Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Pakistan, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Others—Rwanda, Ukraine, Haiti.
 
5
Bangladesh, Cambodia, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, Malawi, Philippines, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Thailand, Viet Nam, Afghanistan, Benin, Burundi, Cameroon, Haiti, Lesotho, Madagascar, Mali, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Togo, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cape Verde, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Iran, Georgia, Moldova, Guyana, Honduras, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Mauritius, Mongolia, Morocco, Panama, Paraguay, Sri Lanka, Timor Leste.
 
Literature
7.
go back to reference Report of the five year evaluation of the Global Fund, Five Year Evaluation of the Global Fund. Report of the five year evaluation of the Global Fund, Five Year Evaluation of the Global Fund.
12.
13.
go back to reference The Global Fund Enhanced Financial Reporting system. The Global Fund Enhanced Financial Reporting system.
15.
go back to reference National size estimation of Most at Risk Populations for HIV in Sri Lanka, Report, Nov 2015, Size estimation for MAPRs for HIV in Sri Lanka. National size estimation of Most at Risk Populations for HIV in Sri Lanka, Report, Nov 2015, Size estimation for MAPRs for HIV in Sri Lanka.
17.
go back to reference Sabin K, Zhao J, Garcia Calleja JM, Sheng Y, Arias Garcia S, Reinisch A, et al. Availability and quality of size estimations of female sex workers, men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs and transgender women in low- and middle-income countries. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0155150. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sabin K, Zhao J, Garcia Calleja JM, Sheng Y, Arias Garcia S, Reinisch A, et al. Availability and quality of size estimations of female sex workers, men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs and transgender women in low- and middle-income countries. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0155150. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0155150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Investing for Impact: The Global Fund Approach to Measurement of AIDS Response
Authors
Suman Jain
Nathalie Zorzi
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
AIDS and Behavior / Issue Special Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1090-7165
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3254
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1620-6

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2017

AIDS and Behavior 1/2017 Go to the issue