Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
AIDS and Behavior
Published in: AIDS and Behavior 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Substantive Review

Criminalization of HIV Exposure: A Review of Empirical Studies in the United States

Authors: Dini Harsono, Carol L. Galletly, Elaine O’Keefe, Zita Lazzarini

Published in: AIDS and Behavior | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

This review of literature identifies and describes US empirical studies on the criminalization of HIV exposure, examines findings on key questions about these laws, highlights knowledge gaps, and sets a course for future research. Studies published between 1990 and 2014 were identified through key word searches of relevant electronic databases and discussions with experts. Twenty-five empirical studies were identified. Sixteen of these studies used quantitative methods with more than half of these being cross-sectional survey studies. Study samples included male and female HIV-positive persons, HIV-positive and -negative men who have sex with men, public health personnel, and medical providers. Research questions addressed awareness of and attitudes toward HIV exposure laws, potential influences of these laws on seropositive status disclosure for persons living with HIV, HIV testing for HIV-negative persons, safer sex practices for both groups, and associations between HIV exposure laws and HIV-related stigma. Surveys of the laws and studies of enforcement practices were also conducted. Attention should be shifted from examining attitudes about these laws to exploring their potential influence on public health practices and behaviors related to the HIV continuum of care. Studies examining enforcement and prosecution practices are also needed. Adapting a theoretical framework in future research may be useful in better understanding the influence of HIV exposure laws on HIV risk behaviors.
Literature
1.
Galletly CL, Pinkerton SD. Conflicting messages: how criminal HIV disclosure laws undermine public health efforts to control the spread of HIV. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(5):451–61.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Lazzarini Z, Galletly CL, Mykhalovskiy E, Harsono D, O’Keefe E, Singer M, et al. Criminalization of HIV transmission and exposure: research and policy agenda. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(8):1350–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
O’Byrne P, Bryan A, Roy M. HIV criminal prosecutions and public health: an examination of the empirical research. Med Humanit. 2013;39(2):85–90.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Lehman JS, Carr MH, Nichol AJ, Ruisanchez A, Knight DW, Langford AE, et al. Prevalence and public health implications of state laws that criminalize potential HIV exposure in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(6):997–1006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Dalton HL. Criminal law. In: Burris S, Dalton HL, Miller JL, Yale AIDS Law Project, editors. AIDS law today: a new guide for the public. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1993. p. 242–62.
6.
Galletly CL, Lazzarini Z. Charges for criminal exposure to HIV and aggravated prostitution filed in the Nashville, Tennessee Prosecutorial Region 2000–2010. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(8):2624–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
8.
9.
Lazzarini Z, Bray S, Burris S. Evaluating the impact of criminal laws on HIV risk behavior. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30(2):239–53.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Hoppe T. From sickness to badness: the criminalization of HIV in Michigan. Soc Sci Med. 2014;101:139–47.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Ahmed A, Hanssens C, Kelly B. Protecting HIV-positive women’s human rights: recommendations for the United States National HIV/AIDS strategy. Reprod Health Matters. 2009;17(34):127–34.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Burris S, Cameron E. The case against criminalization of HIV transmission. JAMA. 2008;300(5):578–81.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Gostin LO, Hodge JG Jr. Handling cases of willful exposure through HIV partner counseling and referral services. Women’s Rts L Rep. 2001;23:45–62.
15.
Tesoriero JM, Battles HB, Heavner K, Leung S-YJ, Nemeth C, Pulver W, et al. The effect of name-based reporting and partner notification on HIV testing in New York State. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(4):728–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Hecht FM, Chesney MA, Lehman JS, Osmond D, Vranizan K, Colman S, et al. Does HIV reporting by name deter testing? AIDS. 2000;14(12):1801–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
19.
Vernazza P, Hirschel B, Bernasconi E, Flepp M. Les personnes séropositives ne souffrant d’aucune autre MST et suivant un traitement antirétroviral efficace ne transmettent pas le VIH par voie sexuelle (HIV-infected patients under HAART without any other sexually transmitted infection do not transmit HIV by sexual intercourse). Bull Med Suisses. 2008;89(5):165–9.
20.
Loutfy M, Tyndall M, Baril J-G, Montaner JSG, Kaul R, Hankins C. Canadian consensus statement on HIV and its transmission in the context of criminal law. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2014;25(3):135–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Hermann DH. Criminalizing conduct related to HIV transmission. St Louis Univ Public Law Rev. 1990;9(2):351–78.PubMed
22.
Galletly CL, Pinkerton SD. Toward rational criminal HIV exposure laws. J Law Med Ethics. 2004;32(2):327–37, 191–2.
23.
Kenney SV. Criminalizing HIV transmission: lessons from history and a model for the future. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1992;8:245–73.PubMed
24.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9 (W64).CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
Lee SG. Criminal law and HIV testing: empirical analysis of how at-risk individuals respond to the law. Yale J Health Pol’y L Ethics. 2014;14(1):194–238.
27.
Close EM. An exploration of the implementation and effects of the North Carolina HIV control measures [master’s thesis]. Duke University; 2012.
28.
Klitzman R, Kirshenbaum S, Kittel L, Morin S, Daya S, Mastrogiacomo M, et al. Naming names: Perceptions of name-based HIV reporting, partner notification, and criminalization of non-disclosure among persons living with HIV. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2004;1(3):38–57.CrossRef
29.
Barber B. Knowledge and attitudes toward HIV/AIDS and HIV law among probationers and parolees in Alabama [master’s thesis]. University of Alabama; 2013.
30.
31.
Burris S, Beletsky L, Burleson JA, Case P, Lazzarini Z. Do criminal laws influence HIV risk behavior? An empirical trial. Ariz State Law J. 2007;39:467–517.
32.
Wise DL. Criminal penalties for non-disclosure of HIV-positive status: effects on HIV testing rates and incidence [dissertation]. University of Missouri, Kansas City; 2008.
33.
Horvath KJ, Weinmeyer R, Rosser S. Should it be illegal for HIV-positive persons to have unprotected sex without disclosure? An examination of attitudes among US men who have sex with men and the impact of state law. AIDS Care. 2010;22(10):1221–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Francis AM, Mialon HM. The optimal penalty for sexually transmitting HIV. Am Law Econ Rev. 2008;10(2):388–423.CrossRef
35.
Blankenship KM, Bray SJ, Merson MH. Structural interventions in public health. AIDS. 2000;14(Suppl 1):S11–21.CrossRefPubMed
36.
37.
Mykhalovskiy E, Betteridge G. Who? What? Where? When? And with what Consequences? An analysis of criminal cases of HIV non-disclosure in Canada. Can J Law Soc. 2012;27(01):31–53.CrossRef
38.
Galletly CL, Dickson-Gomez J. HIV seropositive status disclosure to prospective sex partners and criminal laws that require it: perspectives of persons living with HIV. Int J STD AIDS. 2009;20(9):613–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Galletly CL, Difranceisco W, Pinkerton SD. HIV-positive persons’ awareness and understanding of their state’s criminal HIV disclosure law. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(6):1262–9.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Galletly CL, Pinkerton SD, DiFranceisco W. A quantitative study of Michigan’s criminal HIV exposure law. AIDS Care. 2012;24(2):174–9.PubMed
41.
Galletly CL, Glasman LR, Pinkerton SD, Difranceisco W. New Jersey’s HIV exposure law and the HIV-related attitudes, beliefs, and sexual and seropositive status disclosure behaviors of persons living with HIV. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(11):2135–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Gorbach PM, Galea JT, Amani B, Shin A, Celum C, Kerndt P, et al. Don’t ask, don’t tell: patterns of HIV disclosure among HIV positive men who have sex with men with recent STI practising high risk behaviour in Los Angeles and Seattle. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80(6):512–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Lichtenstein B, Whetten K, Rubenstein C. “Notify your partners–it’s the law”: HIV providers and mandatory disclosure. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2014;13(4):372–8.CrossRef
44.
45.
Hoppe T. Controlling sex in the name of “public health”: social control and Michigan HIV law. Soc Probl. 2013;60(1):27–49.CrossRef
46.
Galletly CL, Pinkerton SD. Preventing HIV transmission via HIV exposure laws: applying logic and mathematical modeling to compare statutory approaches to penalizing undisclosed exposure to HIV. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36(3):577–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Delavande A, Goldman D, Sood N. Criminal prosecution and HIV-related risky behavior. J Law Econ. 2010;53(4):741–82.CrossRef
48.
Duru OK, Collins RL, Ciccarone DH, Morton SC, Stall R, Beckman R, et al. Correlates of sex without serostatus disclosure among a national probability sample of HIV patients. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(5):495–507.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Phillips JC, Webel A, Rose CD, Corless IB, Sullivan KM, Voss J, et al. Associations between the legal context of HIV, perceived social capital, and HIV antiretroviral adherence in North America. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:736.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Burris S. Law and the social risk of health care: lessons from HIV testing. Alb L Rev. 1997;61:831–96.
51.
Bolsewicz K, Vallely A, Debattista J, Whittaker A, Fitzgerald L. Factors impacting HIV testing: a review–perspectives from Australia, Canada, and the UK. AIDS Care. 2015;27(5):570–80.CrossRefPubMed
52.
53.
Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(6):493–505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Bernard EJ, Azad Y, Vandamme AM, Weait M, Geretti AM. HIV forensics: pitfalls and acceptable standards in the use of phylogenetic analysis as evidence in criminal investigations of HIV transmission. HIV Med. 2007;8(6):382–7.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Sweeney P, Gardner LI, Buchacz K, Garland PM, Mugavero MJ, Bosshart JT, et al. Shifting the paradigm: using HIV surveillance data as a foundation for improving HIV care and preventing HIV infection. Milbank Q. 2013;91(3):558–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Finitsis DJ, Stall RD, Friedman SR. Theory, analysis, social justice, and criminalizing HIV transmission: a commentary on Lehman and colleagues (2014). AIDS Behav. 2014;18(6):1007–10.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Singer M, Clair S. Syndemics and public health: reconceptualizing disease in bio-social context. Med Anthropol Q. 2003;17(4):423–41.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Friedman SR, Sandoval M, Mateu-Gelabert P, Rossi D, Gwadz M, Dombrowski K, et al. Theory, measurement and hard times: some issues for HIV/AIDS research. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):1915–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
60.
Timmermans S, Gabe J. Introduction: connecting criminology and sociology of health and illness. Soc Health Illn. 2002;24(5):501–16.CrossRef
61.
Mykhalovskiy E. The problem of “significant risk”: exploring the public health impact of criminalizing HIV non-disclosure. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(5):668–75.CrossRefPubMed
62.
63.
64.
Marks G, Crepaz N. HIV-positive men’s sexual practices in the context of self-disclosure of HIV status. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;27(1):79–85.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Criminalization of HIV Exposure: A Review of Empirical Studies in the United States
Authors
Dini Harsono
Carol L. Galletly
Elaine O’Keefe
Zita Lazzarini
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
AIDS and Behavior / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1090-7165
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3254
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1540-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

AIDS and Behavior 1/2017 Go to the issue

Original Paper

The “Safe Sex” Conundrum: Anticipated Stigma From Sexual Partners as a Barrier to PrEP Use Among Substance Using MSM Engaging in Transactional Sex

Original Paper

HIV Serostatus Disclosure to Sexual Partners Among Sexually Active People Living with HIV in South Africa: Results from the 2012 National Population-Based Household Survey

Original Paper

Taking into Account the Quality of the Relationship in HIV Disclosure

Original Paper

A Livelihood Intervention to Reduce the Stigma of HIV in Rural Kenya: Longitudinal Qualitative Study

Original Paper

Association Between Enacted Stigma and HIV-Related Risk Behavior Among MSM, National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, 2011

Original Paper

Relationship of Stigma and Depression Among Newly HIV-Diagnosed Chinese Men Who Have Sex with Men

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch now

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits