Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Medical Ultrasonics 2/2018

01-04-2018 | Original Article

Sonographic assessment of subacromial bursa distension during arm abduction: establishing a threshold value in the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome

Authors: Gokhan Soker, Bozkurt Gulek, Eda Soker, Omer Kaya, Ibrahim Inan, Muhammet Arslan, Kaan Esen, Derya Memis, Cengiz Yilmaz

Published in: Journal of Medical Ultrasonics | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In this study, we aimed to establish a quantitative threshold value in the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome by measuring the thickness of the subacromial bursa during abduction and adduction.

Materials and methods

Forty-five patients with subacromial impingement syndrome and 54 healthy individuals underwent dynamic shoulder ultrasonography. The subacromial bursa, between the supraspinatus tendon margin and peribursal adipose tissue, was measured between the acromion and humeral head at its widest part. The subacromial impingement ratio was calculated by dividing the subacromial bursa thickness during abduction to the subacromial bursa thickness during adduction. Shapiro–Wilk test was used in the assessment of normal distribution of parameters.

Results

The mean subacromial bursa thickness in the abduction position was 1.8 ± 1.1 mm in the study group and 0.9 ± 0.3 mm in the control group. The mean subacromial bursa thickness in the adduction position was 0.9 ± 0.5 mm in the study group and 0.8 ± 0.3 mm in the control group. The subacromial impingement ratio showed a statistically significant difference between groups (p < 0.0001), and the ratio being 2.0 ± 0.5 in the study group and 1.2 ± 0.1 in the control group. For measurements performed in the abduction position, the best cut-off value was calculated as 1.3 mm, and sensitivity and specificity were 70.6 and 85.2%, respectively. The best cut-off value was 1.4 for the subacromial impingement ratio, and sensitivity and specificity were 88.2 and 96.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

Subacromial impingement ratio is a very practical and reliable method in subacromial impingement syndrome diagnosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Taimela S, FIMPACT Investigators, et al. Finnish Subacromial Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT): a protocol for a randomised trial comparing arthroscopic subacromial decompression and diagnostic arthroscopy (placebo control), with an exercise therapy control, in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e014087.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Taimela S, FIMPACT Investigators, et al. Finnish Subacromial Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT): a protocol for a randomised trial comparing arthroscopic subacromial decompression and diagnostic arthroscopy (placebo control), with an exercise therapy control, in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e014087.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Akyol Y, Ulus Y, Durmuş D, et al. Shoulder muscle strength in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: its relationship with duration of quality of life and emotional status. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;59:176–81. Akyol Y, Ulus Y, Durmuş D, et al. Shoulder muscle strength in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: its relationship with duration of quality of life and emotional status. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;59:176–81.
3.
go back to reference Neer CS. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;173:70–7. Neer CS. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;173:70–7.
4.
go back to reference Daghir AA, Sookur PA, Shah S, et al. Dynamic ultrasound of the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa in patients with shoulder impingement: a comparison with normal volunteers. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41:1047–53.CrossRef Daghir AA, Sookur PA, Shah S, et al. Dynamic ultrasound of the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa in patients with shoulder impingement: a comparison with normal volunteers. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41:1047–53.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Micheroli R, Kyburz D, Ciurea A, et al. Correlation of findings in clinical and high resolution ultrasonography examinations of the painful shoulder. J Ultrason. 2015;15:29–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Micheroli R, Kyburz D, Ciurea A, et al. Correlation of findings in clinical and high resolution ultrasonography examinations of the painful shoulder. J Ultrason. 2015;15:29–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
7.
go back to reference Ottenheijm RP, Jansen MJ, Staal JB, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic ultrasound in patients with suspected subacromial disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1616–25.CrossRefPubMed Ottenheijm RP, Jansen MJ, Staal JB, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic ultrasound in patients with suspected subacromial disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1616–25.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hegedus EJ, Goode A, Campbell S, et al. Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:80–92.CrossRefPubMed Hegedus EJ, Goode A, Campbell S, et al. Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:80–92.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bureau NJ, Beauchamp M, Cardinal E, et al. Dynamic sonography evaluation of shoulder impingement syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:216–20.CrossRefPubMed Bureau NJ, Beauchamp M, Cardinal E, et al. Dynamic sonography evaluation of shoulder impingement syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:216–20.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mulyadi E, Harish S, O’Neill J, et al. MRI of impingement syndromes of the shoulder. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:307–18.CrossRefPubMed Mulyadi E, Harish S, O’Neill J, et al. MRI of impingement syndromes of the shoulder. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:307–18.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Beaulieu CF, Hodge DK, Bergman AG, et al. Glenohumeral relationships during physiologic shoulder motion and stress testing: initial experience with open MR imaging and active imaging-plane registration. Radiology. 1999;212:699–705.CrossRefPubMed Beaulieu CF, Hodge DK, Bergman AG, et al. Glenohumeral relationships during physiologic shoulder motion and stress testing: initial experience with open MR imaging and active imaging-plane registration. Radiology. 1999;212:699–705.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Graichen H, Bonel H, Stammberger T, et al. Subacromial space width changes during abduction and rotation: a 3-D MR imaging study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1999;21:59–66.CrossRefPubMed Graichen H, Bonel H, Stammberger T, et al. Subacromial space width changes during abduction and rotation: a 3-D MR imaging study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1999;21:59–66.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Daenen B, Houben G, Bauduin E, et al. Ultrasound of the shoulder. JBR-BTR. 2007;90:325–37.PubMed Daenen B, Houben G, Bauduin E, et al. Ultrasound of the shoulder. JBR-BTR. 2007;90:325–37.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Guerini H, Pluot E, Pessis E, et al. Tears at the myotendinous junction of the infraspinatus: ultrasound findings. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015;96:349–56.CrossRefPubMed Guerini H, Pluot E, Pessis E, et al. Tears at the myotendinous junction of the infraspinatus: ultrasound findings. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015;96:349–56.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hsu JC, Chen PH, Huang KC, et al. Efficiency of quantitative echogenicity for investigating supraspinatus tendinopathy by the gray-level histogram of two ultrasound devices. J Med Ultrason. 2017;44:297–303.CrossRef Hsu JC, Chen PH, Huang KC, et al. Efficiency of quantitative echogenicity for investigating supraspinatus tendinopathy by the gray-level histogram of two ultrasound devices. J Med Ultrason. 2017;44:297–303.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lee MH, Sheehan SE, Orwin JF, et al. Comprehensive shoulder US examination: a standardized approach with multimodality correlation for common shoulder disease. Radiographics. 2016;36:1606–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee MH, Sheehan SE, Orwin JF, et al. Comprehensive shoulder US examination: a standardized approach with multimodality correlation for common shoulder disease. Radiographics. 2016;36:1606–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Cullen DM, Breidahl WH, Janes GC. Diagnostic accuracy of shoulder ultrasound performed by a single operator. Australas Radiol. 2007;51:226–9.CrossRefPubMed Cullen DM, Breidahl WH, Janes GC. Diagnostic accuracy of shoulder ultrasound performed by a single operator. Australas Radiol. 2007;51:226–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Khoury V, Cardinal E, Bureau NJ. Musculoskeletal sonography: a dynamic tool for usual and unusual disorders. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:63–73.CrossRef Khoury V, Cardinal E, Bureau NJ. Musculoskeletal sonography: a dynamic tool for usual and unusual disorders. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:63–73.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference O’Connor PJ, Rankine J, Gibbon WW, et al. Interobserver variation in sonography of the painful shoulder. J Clin Ultrasound. 2005;33:53–6.CrossRefPubMed O’Connor PJ, Rankine J, Gibbon WW, et al. Interobserver variation in sonography of the painful shoulder. J Clin Ultrasound. 2005;33:53–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cole B, Twibill K, Lam P, et al. Not all ultrasounds are created equal: general sonography versus musculoskeletal sonography in the detection of rotator cuff tears. Shoulder Elbow. 2016;8:250–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cole B, Twibill K, Lam P, et al. Not all ultrasounds are created equal: general sonography versus musculoskeletal sonography in the detection of rotator cuff tears. Shoulder Elbow. 2016;8:250–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference van Holsbeeck M, Introcaso JH. Sonography of bursa. In: van Holsbeeck M, Introcaso JH, editors. Musculoskeletal ultrasound. Missouri: Mosby; 2001. p. 131–69. van Holsbeeck M, Introcaso JH. Sonography of bursa. In: van Holsbeeck M, Introcaso JH, editors. Musculoskeletal ultrasound. Missouri: Mosby; 2001. p. 131–69.
22.
go back to reference Corazza A, Orlandi D, Fabbro E, et al. Dynamic high resolution ultrasound of the shoulder: how we do it. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:266–77.CrossRefPubMed Corazza A, Orlandi D, Fabbro E, et al. Dynamic high resolution ultrasound of the shoulder: how we do it. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:266–77.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gerber C, Zubler V, Hodler J, et al. Dynamic imaging and function of partial supraspinatus tendon tears. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:1180–6.CrossRefPubMed Gerber C, Zubler V, Hodler J, et al. Dynamic imaging and function of partial supraspinatus tendon tears. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:1180–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Farin PU, Jaroma H, Harju A, et al. Shoulder impingement syndrome: sonographic evaluation. Radiology. 1990;176:845–9.CrossRefPubMed Farin PU, Jaroma H, Harju A, et al. Shoulder impingement syndrome: sonographic evaluation. Radiology. 1990;176:845–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Hollister MS, Mack LA, Pattern RM, et al. Association of sonographically detected subacromial/subdeltoid bursal effusion and intraarticular fluid without rotator cuff tear. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:605–8.CrossRefPubMed Hollister MS, Mack LA, Pattern RM, et al. Association of sonographically detected subacromial/subdeltoid bursal effusion and intraarticular fluid without rotator cuff tear. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:605–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Collins RA, Gristina AG, Carter RE, et al. Ultrasonography of the shoulder. Static and dynamic imaging. Orthop Clin N Am. 1987;18:351–60. Collins RA, Gristina AG, Carter RE, et al. Ultrasonography of the shoulder. Static and dynamic imaging. Orthop Clin N Am. 1987;18:351–60.
28.
go back to reference Wang YC, Wang HK, Chen WS, et al. Dynamic visualization of the coracoacromial ligament by ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:1242–8.CrossRefPubMed Wang YC, Wang HK, Chen WS, et al. Dynamic visualization of the coracoacromial ligament by ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:1242–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Roy JS, Braën C, Leblond J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography, MRI and MR arthrography in the characterisation of rotator cuff disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:1316–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Roy JS, Braën C, Leblond J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography, MRI and MR arthrography in the characterisation of rotator cuff disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:1316–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Read JW, Perko M. Shoulder ultrasound: diagnostic accuracy for impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tear, and biceps tendon pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7:264–71.CrossRefPubMed Read JW, Perko M. Shoulder ultrasound: diagnostic accuracy for impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tear, and biceps tendon pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7:264–71.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Brossmann J, Preidler KW, Pedowitz RA, et al. Shoulder impingement syndrome: influence of shoulder position on rotator cuff impingement—an anatomic study. AJR. 1996;167:1511–5.CrossRefPubMed Brossmann J, Preidler KW, Pedowitz RA, et al. Shoulder impingement syndrome: influence of shoulder position on rotator cuff impingement—an anatomic study. AJR. 1996;167:1511–5.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Tsai YH, Huang TJ, Hsu WH, et al. Detection of subacromial bursa thickening by sonography in shoulder impingement. Chang Gung Med J. 2007;30:135–41.PubMed Tsai YH, Huang TJ, Hsu WH, et al. Detection of subacromial bursa thickening by sonography in shoulder impingement. Chang Gung Med J. 2007;30:135–41.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Neumann CH, Holt RG, Steinbach LS, et al. MR imaging of the shoulder: appearance of the supraspinatus tendon in asymptomatic volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158:1281–7.CrossRefPubMed Neumann CH, Holt RG, Steinbach LS, et al. MR imaging of the shoulder: appearance of the supraspinatus tendon in asymptomatic volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158:1281–7.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Coucanis G, Breidahl W, Burnham S. The relationship between subacromial bursa thickness on ultrasound and shoulder pain in open water endurance swimmers over time. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18:373–7.CrossRef Coucanis G, Breidahl W, Burnham S. The relationship between subacromial bursa thickness on ultrasound and shoulder pain in open water endurance swimmers over time. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18:373–7.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Tagliafico A, Cadoni A, Bignotti B, Martinoli C. High-resolution ultrasound of rotator cuff and biceps reflection pulley in non-elite junior tennis players: anatomical study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tagliafico A, Cadoni A, Bignotti B, Martinoli C. High-resolution ultrasound of rotator cuff and biceps reflection pulley in non-elite junior tennis players: anatomical study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Nutton RW, McBirnie JM, Phillips C. Treatment of chronic rotator-cuff impingement by arthroscopic subacromial decompression. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1997;79:73–6.CrossRef Nutton RW, McBirnie JM, Phillips C. Treatment of chronic rotator-cuff impingement by arthroscopic subacromial decompression. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1997;79:73–6.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Henkus HE, Cobben LP, Coerkamp EG, et al. The accuracy of subacromial injections: a prospective randomized magnetic resonance imaging study. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:277–82.CrossRefPubMed Henkus HE, Cobben LP, Coerkamp EG, et al. The accuracy of subacromial injections: a prospective randomized magnetic resonance imaging study. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:277–82.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Sonographic assessment of subacromial bursa distension during arm abduction: establishing a threshold value in the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome
Authors
Gokhan Soker
Bozkurt Gulek
Eda Soker
Omer Kaya
Ibrahim Inan
Muhammet Arslan
Kaan Esen
Derya Memis
Cengiz Yilmaz
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1346-4523
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2254
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-017-0839-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Journal of Medical Ultrasonics 2/2018 Go to the issue