Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Esophagus 2/2017

01-04-2017 | Review Article

Optimal acid suppressive treatment for adequate symptom relief and prevention of the complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease: differences in long-term clinical course and pathophysiology among disease subtypes

Authors: Noriaki Manabe, Ken Haruma

Published in: Esophagus | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic long-standing disease. Most patients with GERD are thought to require long-term treatment with acid suppressants, with proton pump inhibitors being the drugs of choice in managing these patients. However, there has been no consensus about the frequency of spontaneous remission of GERD. Furthermore, the duration of treatment is individually based, and the end-point of treatment is also not clear. As the symptoms of GERD may be intermittent or occur on most days of the week, treatment may be short term, lasting 8–12 weeks, or long term, lasting more than 1 year. Moreover, treatment may be continuous, intermittent, or on-demand. In contrast, maintenance therapy consists of the lowest proton pump inhibitor dose necessary for adequate symptom relief and prevention of GERD-related complications. GERD has been classified into three subgroups based on endoscopic severity: non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), mild erosive esophagitis (EE), and severe EE. Because these three subgroups differ in long-term clinical course and pathophysiology, their treatment strategies should differ. Treatment of severe EE should include two clinical goals: relief of GERD symptoms and prevention of EE-related complications, such as esophageal ulcer bleeding and/or strictures. However, because mild EE, including NERD, rarely progresses to severe EE during symptom-driven treatment, treatment of these patients should have one clinical goal: relief of GERD symptoms.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–20.CrossRefPubMed Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–20.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Heidelbaugh JJ, Goldberg KL, Inadomi JM. Overutilization of proton pump inhibitors: a review of cost-effectiveness and risk [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(Suppl 2):S27–32.CrossRefPubMed Heidelbaugh JJ, Goldberg KL, Inadomi JM. Overutilization of proton pump inhibitors: a review of cost-effectiveness and risk [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(Suppl 2):S27–32.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wallace JL, Syer S, Denou E, et al. Proton pump inhibitors exacerbate NSAID-induced small intestinal injury by inducing dysbiosis. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1314–22.CrossRefPubMed Wallace JL, Syer S, Denou E, et al. Proton pump inhibitors exacerbate NSAID-induced small intestinal injury by inducing dysbiosis. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1314–22.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Iwakiri K, Kinoshita Y, Habu Y, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:751–67.CrossRefPubMed Iwakiri K, Kinoshita Y, Habu Y, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:751–67.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Agréus L, Svärdsudd K, Talley NJ, et al. Natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional abdominal disorders: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2905–14.CrossRefPubMed Agréus L, Svärdsudd K, Talley NJ, et al. Natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional abdominal disorders: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2905–14.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Olafsdottir LB, Gudjonsson H, Jonsdottir HH, et al. Natural history of heartburn: a 10-year population-based study. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:639–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Olafsdottir LB, Gudjonsson H, Jonsdottir HH, et al. Natural history of heartburn: a 10-year population-based study. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:639–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Rey E, Moreno-Elola-Olaso C, Artalejo FR, et al. Association between weight gain and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in the general population. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:229–33.CrossRefPubMed Rey E, Moreno-Elola-Olaso C, Artalejo FR, et al. Association between weight gain and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in the general population. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:229–33.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hallan A, Bomme M, Hveem K, et al. Risk factors on the development of new-onset gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. A population-based prospective cohort study: the HUNT study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:393–400.CrossRefPubMed Hallan A, Bomme M, Hveem K, et al. Risk factors on the development of new-onset gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. A population-based prospective cohort study: the HUNT study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:393–400.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Miyamoto M, Haruma K, Kuwabara M, et al. High incidence of newly-developed gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Japanese community: a 6-year followup study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:393–7.CrossRefPubMed Miyamoto M, Haruma K, Kuwabara M, et al. High incidence of newly-developed gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Japanese community: a 6-year followup study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:393–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Azumi T, Adachi K, Arima N, et al. Five-year follow-up study of patients with reflux symptoms and reflux esophagitis in annual medical check-up field. Intern Med. 2008;47:691–6.CrossRefPubMed Azumi T, Adachi K, Arima N, et al. Five-year follow-up study of patients with reflux symptoms and reflux esophagitis in annual medical check-up field. Intern Med. 2008;47:691–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kawanishi M. Will symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease develop into reflux esophagitis? J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:440–3.CrossRefPubMed Kawanishi M. Will symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease develop into reflux esophagitis? J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:440–3.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kuster E, Ros E, Toledo-Pimentel V, et al. Predictive factors of the long term outcome in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: six year follow up of 107 patients. Gut. 1994;35:8–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kuster E, Ros E, Toledo-Pimentel V, et al. Predictive factors of the long term outcome in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: six year follow up of 107 patients. Gut. 1994;35:8–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Garrido Serrano A, Guerrero Igea FJ, et al. Clinical features and endoscopic progression of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2003;95:712–6.PubMed Garrido Serrano A, Guerrero Igea FJ, et al. Clinical features and endoscopic progression of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2003;95:712–6.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Bardhan KD, Royston C, Nayyar AK. Reflux rising! An essay on witnessing a disease in evolution. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38:163–8.CrossRefPubMed Bardhan KD, Royston C, Nayyar AK. Reflux rising! An essay on witnessing a disease in evolution. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38:163–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Labenz J, Nocon M, Lind T, et al. Prospective follow-up data from the ProGERD study suggest that GERD is not a categorial disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2457–62.CrossRefPubMed Labenz J, Nocon M, Lind T, et al. Prospective follow-up data from the ProGERD study suggest that GERD is not a categorial disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2457–62.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Isolauri J, Luostarinen M, Isolauri E, et al. Natural course of gastroesophageal reflux disease: 17–22 year follow-up of 60 patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:37–41.PubMed Isolauri J, Luostarinen M, Isolauri E, et al. Natural course of gastroesophageal reflux disease: 17–22 year follow-up of 60 patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:37–41.PubMed
17.
go back to reference McDougall NI, Johnston BT, Collins JS, et al. Three- to 4.5-year prospective study of prognostic indicators in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998;33:1016–22.CrossRefPubMed McDougall NI, Johnston BT, Collins JS, et al. Three- to 4.5-year prospective study of prognostic indicators in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998;33:1016–22.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Pace F, Bollani S, Molteni P, et al. Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis (NERD)—a reappraisal 10 years on. Dig Liver Dis. 2004;36:111–5.CrossRefPubMed Pace F, Bollani S, Molteni P, et al. Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis (NERD)—a reappraisal 10 years on. Dig Liver Dis. 2004;36:111–5.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sontag SJ, Sonnenberg A, Schnell TG, et al. The long-term natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:398–404.CrossRefPubMed Sontag SJ, Sonnenberg A, Schnell TG, et al. The long-term natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:398–404.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bajbouj M, Reichenberger J, Neu B, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical and endoscopic follow-up study of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Z Gastroenterol. 2005;43:1303–7.CrossRefPubMed Bajbouj M, Reichenberger J, Neu B, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical and endoscopic follow-up study of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Z Gastroenterol. 2005;43:1303–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Falkenback D, Oberg S, Johnsson F, et al. Is the course of gastroesophageal reflux disease progressive? A 21-year follow-up. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:1277–87.CrossRefPubMed Falkenback D, Oberg S, Johnsson F, et al. Is the course of gastroesophageal reflux disease progressive? A 21-year follow-up. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:1277–87.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference McDougall NI, Johnston BT, Kee F, et al. Natural history of reflux oesophagitis: a 10 year follow up of its effect on patient symptomatology and quality of life. Gut. 1996;38:481–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McDougall NI, Johnston BT, Kee F, et al. Natural history of reflux oesophagitis: a 10 year follow up of its effect on patient symptomatology and quality of life. Gut. 1996;38:481–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Manabe N, Yoshihara M, Sasaki A, et al. Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with low-grade reflux esophagitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17:949–54.CrossRefPubMed Manabe N, Yoshihara M, Sasaki A, et al. Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with low-grade reflux esophagitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17:949–54.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Manabe N, Haruma K, Ohgoshi H, et al. Is the course of gastroesophageal reflux disease progressive? Ther Res. 2011;32:590–3. Manabe N, Haruma K, Ohgoshi H, et al. Is the course of gastroesophageal reflux disease progressive? Ther Res. 2011;32:590–3.
26.
go back to reference Rai A, Orlando R. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 1998;14:326–33.CrossRef Rai A, Orlando R. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 1998;14:326–33.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Spechler SJ. Epidemiology and natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Digestion. 1992;51:24–9.CrossRefPubMed Spechler SJ. Epidemiology and natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Digestion. 1992;51:24–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
go back to reference Cameron AJ, Lomboy CT. Barrett’s esophagus: age, prevalence, and extent of columnar epithelium. Gastroenterolgy. 1992;103:1241–5.CrossRef Cameron AJ, Lomboy CT. Barrett’s esophagus: age, prevalence, and extent of columnar epithelium. Gastroenterolgy. 1992;103:1241–5.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Malfertheiner P, Nocon M, Vieth M, et al. Evolution of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease over 5 years under routine medical care–the ProGERD study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:154–64.CrossRefPubMed Malfertheiner P, Nocon M, Vieth M, et al. Evolution of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease over 5 years under routine medical care–the ProGERD study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:154–64.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Hietanen E, Raitakari OT, Backman H. Validity of ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH measurement in the diagnosis of reflux disease. Clin Physiol. 1995;15:491–8.CrossRefPubMed Hietanen E, Raitakari OT, Backman H. Validity of ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH measurement in the diagnosis of reflux disease. Clin Physiol. 1995;15:491–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Orlando RC, Bryson JC, Powell DW. Mechanisms of H+ injury in rabbit esophageal epithelium. Am J Physiol. 1984;246(6 Pt 1):G718–24.PubMed Orlando RC, Bryson JC, Powell DW. Mechanisms of H+ injury in rabbit esophageal epithelium. Am J Physiol. 1984;246(6 Pt 1):G718–24.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Snow JC, Goldstein JL, Schmidt LN, et al. Rabbit esophageal cells show regulatory volume decrease: ionic basis and effect of pH. Gastroenterology. 1993;105:102–10.CrossRefPubMed Snow JC, Goldstein JL, Schmidt LN, et al. Rabbit esophageal cells show regulatory volume decrease: ionic basis and effect of pH. Gastroenterology. 1993;105:102–10.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Mastracci L, Bruzzone M, Pacella E, et al. The contribution of intraepithelial inflammatory cells to the histological diagnosis of microscopic esophagitis. Esophagus. 2016;13:80–7.CrossRef Mastracci L, Bruzzone M, Pacella E, et al. The contribution of intraepithelial inflammatory cells to the histological diagnosis of microscopic esophagitis. Esophagus. 2016;13:80–7.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ. GERD pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and clinical manifestations. Cleve Clin J Med. 2003;70(Suppl 5):S4–19.CrossRefPubMed Kahrilas PJ. GERD pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and clinical manifestations. Cleve Clin J Med. 2003;70(Suppl 5):S4–19.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Vaezi MF, Singh S, Richter JE. Role of acid and duodenogastric reflux in esophageal mucosal injury: a review of animal and human studies. Gastroenterology. 1995;108:1897–907.CrossRefPubMed Vaezi MF, Singh S, Richter JE. Role of acid and duodenogastric reflux in esophageal mucosal injury: a review of animal and human studies. Gastroenterology. 1995;108:1897–907.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Dodds WJ, Dent J, Hogan WJ, et al. Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1547–52.CrossRefPubMed Dodds WJ, Dent J, Hogan WJ, et al. Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1547–52.CrossRefPubMed
40.
41.
go back to reference Akutagawa K, Iwakiri R, Hara M, et al. Risk factors for low response to proton-pump inhibitor treatment in reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease evaluated by the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophagus. 2015;12:225–32.CrossRef Akutagawa K, Iwakiri R, Hara M, et al. Risk factors for low response to proton-pump inhibitor treatment in reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease evaluated by the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophagus. 2015;12:225–32.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Eriksen CA, Cullen PT, Sutton D, et al. Abnormal esophageal transit in patients with typical reflux symptoms but normal endoscopic and pH profiles. Am J Surg. 1991;161:657–61.CrossRefPubMed Eriksen CA, Cullen PT, Sutton D, et al. Abnormal esophageal transit in patients with typical reflux symptoms but normal endoscopic and pH profiles. Am J Surg. 1991;161:657–61.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, et al. Esophageal peristaltic dysfunction in peptic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 1986;91:897–904.CrossRefPubMed Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, et al. Esophageal peristaltic dysfunction in peptic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 1986;91:897–904.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Iwakiri K, Sugiura T, Hayashi Y, et al. Esophageal motility in Japanese patients with Barrett’s esophagus. J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:1036–41.CrossRefPubMed Iwakiri K, Sugiura T, Hayashi Y, et al. Esophageal motility in Japanese patients with Barrett’s esophagus. J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:1036–41.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Adachi K, Fujishiro H, Katsube T, et al. Predominant nocturnal acid reflux in patients with Los Angeles grade C and D reflux esophagitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;16:1191–6.CrossRefPubMed Adachi K, Fujishiro H, Katsube T, et al. Predominant nocturnal acid reflux in patients with Los Angeles grade C and D reflux esophagitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;16:1191–6.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Manabe N, Haruma K, Kamada T, et al. PPI maintenance therapy can control patients with severe reflux esophagitis in Japan. Ther Res. 2009;30:470–3. Manabe N, Haruma K, Kamada T, et al. PPI maintenance therapy can control patients with severe reflux esophagitis in Japan. Ther Res. 2009;30:470–3.
47.
48.
go back to reference Cunningham KM, Horowitz M, Riddell PS, et al. Relations among autonomic nerve dysfunction, oesophageal motility, and gastric emptying in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut. 1991;32:1436–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cunningham KM, Horowitz M, Riddell PS, et al. Relations among autonomic nerve dysfunction, oesophageal motility, and gastric emptying in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut. 1991;32:1436–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference Heatley RV, Collins RJ, James PD, et al. Vagal function in relation to gastro-oesophageal reflux and associated motility changes. Br Med J. 1980;280:755–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heatley RV, Collins RJ, James PD, et al. Vagal function in relation to gastro-oesophageal reflux and associated motility changes. Br Med J. 1980;280:755–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Ogilvie AL, James PD, Atkinson M. Impairment of vagal function in reflux oesophagitis. Q J Med. 1985;54:61–74.PubMed Ogilvie AL, James PD, Atkinson M. Impairment of vagal function in reflux oesophagitis. Q J Med. 1985;54:61–74.PubMed
51.
52.
go back to reference Pirtniecks A, Smith LF, Thorpe JA. Autonomic dysfunction in non-specific disorders of oesophageal motility. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:101–5.CrossRefPubMed Pirtniecks A, Smith LF, Thorpe JA. Autonomic dysfunction in non-specific disorders of oesophageal motility. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:101–5.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference McDougall NI, Mooney RB, Ferguson WR, et al. The effect of healing oesophagitis on oesophageal motor function as determined by oesophageal scintigraphy and ambulatory oesophageal motility/pH monitoring. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998;12:899–907.CrossRefPubMed McDougall NI, Mooney RB, Ferguson WR, et al. The effect of healing oesophagitis on oesophageal motor function as determined by oesophageal scintigraphy and ambulatory oesophageal motility/pH monitoring. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998;12:899–907.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Manabe N, Haruma K, Hata J, et al. Autonomic nerve dysfunction is closely associated with the abnormalities of esophageal motility in reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:159–63.CrossRefPubMed Manabe N, Haruma K, Hata J, et al. Autonomic nerve dysfunction is closely associated with the abnormalities of esophageal motility in reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:159–63.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Lind T, Havelund T, Lundell L, et al. On demand therapy with omeprazole for the long-term management of patients with heartburn without oesophagitis: a placebo-controlled randomized trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;13:907–14.CrossRefPubMed Lind T, Havelund T, Lundell L, et al. On demand therapy with omeprazole for the long-term management of patients with heartburn without oesophagitis: a placebo-controlled randomized trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;13:907–14.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Talley NJ, Lauritsen K, Tunturi-Hihnala H, et al. Esomeprazole 20 mg maintains symptom control in endoscopy-negative gastrooesophageal reflux disease: a controlled trial of ‘on-demand’ therapy for 6 months. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:347–54.CrossRefPubMed Talley NJ, Lauritsen K, Tunturi-Hihnala H, et al. Esomeprazole 20 mg maintains symptom control in endoscopy-negative gastrooesophageal reflux disease: a controlled trial of ‘on-demand’ therapy for 6 months. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:347–54.CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Bytzer P, Blum A, De Herdt D, et al. Six-month trial of on demand rabeprazole 10 mg maintains symptom relief in patients with non-erosive reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:181–8.CrossRefPubMed Bytzer P, Blum A, De Herdt D, et al. Six-month trial of on demand rabeprazole 10 mg maintains symptom relief in patients with non-erosive reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:181–8.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Juul-Hansen P, Rydning A. On-demand requirements of patients with endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: H2-blocker vs. proton pump inhibitor. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:207–12.CrossRefPubMed Juul-Hansen P, Rydning A. On-demand requirements of patients with endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: H2-blocker vs. proton pump inhibitor. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:207–12.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Optimal acid suppressive treatment for adequate symptom relief and prevention of the complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease: differences in long-term clinical course and pathophysiology among disease subtypes
Authors
Noriaki Manabe
Ken Haruma
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Esophagus / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Electronic ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-016-0558-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Esophagus 2/2017 Go to the issue