Top

Esophagus

Published in:

01-03-2012 | Original Article

Interobserver agreement on endoscopic diagnosis of low-grade reflux esophagitis, including minimal changes

Authors: Noriaki Manabe, Ken Haruma, Yoshio Hoshihara, Yoshikazu Kinoshita, Michio Hongo, Hiroyasu Makuuchi

Published in: Esophagus | Issue 1/2012

Abstract

Background

In Japan, the majority of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease have low-grade reflux esophagitis (RE), including minimal changes, and the modified Los Angeles (LA) classification is widely used. However, there have been few evaluations of interobserver agreement with this classification. This study was performed to elucidate the level of interobserver agreement for diagnosis low-grade RE, including minimal changes, and to identify any clinical factors that influenced the results.

Methods

A total of 114 endoscopists from university hospitals, community hospitals, and private practice participated. They assessed the grade of esophagitis in 8 patients by viewing endoscopic images. The images were projected onto a screen, and all of the endoscopists reviewed images together. The diagnosis was selected from the following five categories: grade M, grade A, short-segment columnar-lined esophagus, diagnosis difficult due to poor image quality, and others. After discussiing the endoscopic diagnosis, the images were projected in a random order and the endoscopists viewed them again. Kappa coefficients of reliability were calculated before and after the discussion, and we also evaluated factors influencing the results.

Results

The kappa values obtained before and after discussion were 0.41 and 0.70, respectively. We found three factors that influenced interobserver agreement: specialty, years of experience with endoscopic examination, and mean esophageal observation time per endoscopic examination.

Conclusions

The modified LA classification is reliable for diagnosing low-grade RE (including minimal changes) in Japan, although several factors can influence interobserver agreement.

Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R, Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–20.PubMedCrossRef

Manabe N, Haruma K, Mihara M, Miyoshi E, Hamada H, Kido S, et al. The increasing incidence of reflux esophagitis during the past 20 years in Japan. Gastroenterology. 1999;166:A244.

Mishima I, Adachi K, Arima N, Amano K, Takashima T, Moritani M, et al. Prevalence of endoscopically negative and positive gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Japanese. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1005–9.PubMedCrossRef

Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Dent J, De Dombal FT, Galmiche JP, et al. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:85–92.PubMedCrossRef

Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999;45:172–80.PubMedCrossRef

Fujiwara Y, Higuchi K, Watanabe Y, Shiba M, Watanabe T, Tominaga K, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in Japan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20:26–9.PubMedCrossRef

Inamori M, Togawa J, Nagase H, Abe Y, Umezawa T, Nakajima A, et al. Clinical characteristics of Japanese reflux esophagitis patients as determined by Los Angeles classification. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:172–6.PubMedCrossRef

Fujimoto K, Iwakiri R, Okamoto K, Oda K, Tanaka A, Tsunada S, Sakata H, et al. Characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Japan: increased prevalence in elderly women. J Gastroenterol. 2003;38(Suppl 15):3–6.PubMed

Fujimoto K. Review article: prevalence and epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Japan. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20(Suppl 8):5–8.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Hongo M. Minimal changes in reflux esophagitis: red ones and white ones. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:95–9.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Hoshihara Y, Hashimoto M. Endoscopic classification of reflux esophagitis. Nippon Rinsho. 2000;58:1808–12 (in Japanese with English abstract).

12.

Amano Y, Ishimura N, Furuta K, Okita K, Masaharu M, Azumi T, et al. Interobserver agreement on classifying endoscopic diagnoses of nonerosive esophagitis. Endoscopy. 2006;38:1032–5.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Kusano M, Ino K, Yamada T, Kawamura O, Toki M, Ohwada T, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in endoscopic assessment of GERD using the “Los Angeles” classification. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:700–4.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Hoshihara Y, Kogure T, Yamamoto T, Hashimoto M, Yamamoto N, Tanaka T, et al. Diagnosis of short segment Barrett’s esophagus. Stom Intest. 1999;34:133–9.

15.

Schnell T, Sontag S, Chejfec G. Adenocarcinoma arising in tongues or in short segments of Barrett’s esophagus. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37:137–43.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Nandurkar S, Tally NJ, Martin CJ, Ng THK, Adams S. Short segment Barrett’s oesophagus: prevalence, diagnosis and associations. Gut. 1997;40:710–5.PubMedCrossRef

17.

de Mas CR, Kramer M, Seifert E, Rippin G, Vieth M, Stolte M. Short Barrett: prevalence and risk factors. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;34:1065–70.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Harada M, Nagashima R, Takeda H, Takahashi T. Endoscopic resection of adenocarcinoma arising in a tongue of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:427–9.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Yagi K, Nakamura A, Sekine A, Tamiya Y, Oyamatsu M. Magnified view of adenocarcinoma in short segment Barrett’s esophagus treated by endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:278–81.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Aoki T, Kawamura Y, Kouzu T. Definition of Barrett esophagus (epithelium). Rep Jpn Soc Esophageal Dis. 2000;20–3 (in Japanese).

21.

Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef

22.

Siegel S, Castellan NJ Jr. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1988. p. 285–91.

23.

McDougall NI, Johnston BT, Collins JS, McFarland RJ, Love AH. Disease progression in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease as determined by repeat oesophageal pH monitoring and endoscopy 3 to 4.5 years after diagnosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;9:1161–7.PubMed

24.

Fass R. Erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD): comparison of epidemiologic, physiologic, and therapeutic characteristics. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:131–7.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Joh T, Miwa H, Higuchi K, Shimatani T, Manabe N, Adachi K, ARS Research Group, et al. Validity of endoscopic classification of nonerosive reflux disease. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:444–9.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Kusano M, Shirai N, Yamaguchi K, Hongo M, Chiba T, Kinoshita Y, Acid-Related Symptom (ARS) Research Group. It is possible to classify non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients into endoscopically normal groups and minimal change groups by subjective symptoms and responsiveness to rabeprazole—a report from a study with Japanese patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:3082–94.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Miwa H, Yokoyama T, Hori K, Sakagami T, Oshima T, Tomita T, et al. Interobserver agreement in endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis using a modified Los Angeles classification incorporating grades N and M: a validation study in a cohort of Japanese endoscopists. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:355–63.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Vieth M, Fiocca R, Haringsma J, Delarive J, Wiesel PH, Tam W, et al. Radial distribution of dilated intercellular spaces of the esophageal squamous epithelium in patients with reflux disease exhibiting discrete endoscopic lesions. Dig Dis. 2004;22:208–12.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Caviglia R, Ribolsi M, Maggiano N, Gabbrielli AM, Emerenziani S, Guarino MP, et al. Dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in nonerosive reflux disease patients with physiological esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:543–8.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Narayani RI, Burton MP, Young GS. Utility of esophageal biopsy in the diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease. Dis Esophagus. 2003;16:187–92.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Falk GW. Is conventional endoscopic identification of non-erosive reflux disease adequate? Digestion. 2008;78(Suppl 1):17–23.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Pandolfino JE, Vakil NB, Kahrilas PJ. Comparison of inter- and intraobserver consistency for grading of esophagitis by expert and trainee endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:639–43.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Bytzer P, Havelund T, Hansen JM. Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993;28:119–25.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Wu JC. Endoscopic grading of reflux esophagitis in Asia: it’s time to start. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1–2.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Interobserver agreement on endoscopic diagnosis of low-grade reflux esophagitis, including minimal changes
Authors: Noriaki Manabe
Ken Haruma
Yoshio Hoshihara
Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Michio Hongo
Hiroyasu Makuuchi
Publication date: 01-03-2012
Publisher: Springer Japan
Published in: Esophagus / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Electronic ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-011-0307-3

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Interobserver agreement on endoscopic diagnosis of low-grade reflux esophagitis, including minimal changes

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Predictive factors for early recurrence in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after curative esophagectomy

Endotracheal metastasis from basaloid squamous carcinoma of the esophagus

Early-stage primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus detected simultaneously with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Post-esophagectomy chylothorax successfully treated with the combination of thoracic duct clipping and octreotide administration

A successful rescue with extra-anatomical bypass for massive bleeding of the brachiocephalic artery following salvage pharyngo-esophagectomy

Posterior mediastinal lymph node dissection using the pneumomediastinum method for esophageal cancer

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page