Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 9/2008

01-09-2008 | Multimedia Article

Feasibility and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Sacrocolporectopexy for Combined Vaginal and Rectal Prolapse

Authors: P. M. Sagar, M.D., F.R.C.S., D. K. Thekkinkattil, M.R.C.S., R. M. Heath, M.D., F.R.C.S., J. Woodfield, F.R.C.S.A., S. Gonsalves, M.R.C.S., C. R. Landon, M.D., F.R.C.O.G.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 9/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Prolapse of multiple pelvic organs causes a variety of symptoms that impair a patient’s quality of life. A laparoscopic procedure is described that uses a mesh fixation of the mid-compartment vagina to the sacrum with additional rectopexy to correct both the anatomical deformities and the dysfunction of the posterior compartment.

Methods

Patients with significant rectal and vaginal prolapse with or without rectocele were recruited. A thorough preoperative physiological assessment of each of the compartments of the pelvic floor was carried out. Patients also completed the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory before and six months after surgery.

Results

Ten patients underwent the procedure of laparoscopic sacrocolporectopexy (median age 47 years, interquartile range 43–53). No mortality or morbidity occurred. Median global distress inventory scores were significantly lower postoperatively (8.3, interquartile range 0–20.8 vs. 37.5, interquartile range 16.6–60.4) P = 0.012. All three median subscales were also significantly lower postoperatively. The procedure corrected associated rectoceles and descent of the perineum on straining.

Conclusion

The described laparoscopic procedure of mesh sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy was safe and feasible and conferred good symptomatic improvement in pelvic floor dysfunction.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Swift SE. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obst Gynecol 2000;183:277–85.CrossRef Swift SE. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obst Gynecol 2000;183:277–85.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, et al. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:299–05.PubMedCrossRef Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, et al. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:299–05.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Versi E, Harvey MA, Cardozo L, et al. Urogenital prolapse and atrophy at menopause: a prevalence study. Int Urogynecol J 2001;12:107–10.CrossRef Versi E, Harvey MA, Cardozo L, et al. Urogenital prolapse and atrophy at menopause: a prevalence study. Int Urogynecol J 2001;12:107–10.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mellgren A, Johansson C, Dolk A, et al. Enterocoele demonstrated by defecography is associated with other pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis 1994;9:121–4.PubMedCrossRef Mellgren A, Johansson C, Dolk A, et al. Enterocoele demonstrated by defecography is associated with other pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis 1994;9:121–4.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kuijpers HC, Scheuer M. Disorders of impaired fecal control: a clinical and manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:207–11.PubMedCrossRef Kuijpers HC, Scheuer M. Disorders of impaired fecal control: a clinical and manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:207–11.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Onwude JL. Genital prolapse in women. Clin Evid 2006;15:1–2. Onwude JL. Genital prolapse in women. Clin Evid 2006;15:1–2.
7.
go back to reference Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M. Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 2004;91:1188–91.PubMedCrossRef Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M. Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 2004;91:1188–91.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality of life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;93:103–13.CrossRef Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality of life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;93:103–13.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lim M, Sagar PM, Gonsalves S, Thekkinkattil D, Landon C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in females: functional outcome of mesh sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy as a combined procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1412–21.PubMedCrossRef Lim M, Sagar PM, Gonsalves S, Thekkinkattil D, Landon C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in females: functional outcome of mesh sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy as a combined procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1412–21.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Collopy BT, Barham KA. Abdominal colporectopexy with pelvic cul-de-sac closure. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:522–29.PubMedCrossRef Collopy BT, Barham KA. Abdominal colporectopexy with pelvic cul-de-sac closure. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:522–29.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2002;89:35–9.PubMedCrossRef Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2002;89:35–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, Melek S, Hugney C. Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1752–8.PubMedCrossRef Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, Melek S, Hugney C. Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1752–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference D’Hoore, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1919–23.PubMedCrossRef D’Hoore, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1919–23.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Slawik S, Soulsby R, Carter H, Payne H, Dixon AR. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal scarocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Colorectal Dis 2008;10:138–43.PubMed Slawik S, Soulsby R, Carter H, Payne H, Dixon AR. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal scarocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Colorectal Dis 2008;10:138–43.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Altman D, Falconer C. Perioperative morbidity using transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:303–08.PubMed Altman D, Falconer C. Perioperative morbidity using transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:303–08.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Su KC, Mutone MF, Terry CL, Hale DS. Abdominovaginal sacral colpoperineopexy: patient perceptions, anatomical outcomes, and graft erosions. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007;18:503–11.PubMedCrossRef Su KC, Mutone MF, Terry CL, Hale DS. Abdominovaginal sacral colpoperineopexy: patient perceptions, anatomical outcomes, and graft erosions. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007;18:503–11.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Snyder TE, Krantz KE. Abdomino-retroperitoneal sacral colpopexy for correction of vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:944–9.PubMed Snyder TE, Krantz KE. Abdomino-retroperitoneal sacral colpopexy for correction of vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:944–9.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Hardiman PJ, Drutz HP. Sacrospinous vault suspension and abdominal colposacropexy: success rates and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:612–6.PubMedCrossRef Hardiman PJ, Drutz HP. Sacrospinous vault suspension and abdominal colposacropexy: success rates and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:612–6.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Varner RE, Plessala KJ, Richter H. Effects of sacrocolposuspension on the lower urinary tract. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1684–9.PubMedCrossRef Varner RE, Plessala KJ, Richter H. Effects of sacrocolposuspension on the lower urinary tract. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1684–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Paraskevas P, Ziprin P, Darzi A. A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1930–40.PubMedCrossRef Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Paraskevas P, Ziprin P, Darzi A. A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1930–40.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Feasibility and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Sacrocolporectopexy for Combined Vaginal and Rectal Prolapse
Authors
P. M. Sagar, M.D., F.R.C.S.
D. K. Thekkinkattil, M.R.C.S.
R. M. Heath, M.D., F.R.C.S.
J. Woodfield, F.R.C.S.A.
S. Gonsalves, M.R.C.S.
C. R. Landon, M.D., F.R.C.O.G.
Publication date
01-09-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 9/2008
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9371-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2008

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 9/2008 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

The Author Replies