Top

Published in:

01-06-2007 | Current Status

Systematic Review of the Costs of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Authors: Henry M. Dowson, M.R.C.S., Andy Huang, F.R.C.S., Yuen Soon, F.R.C.S., Heather Gage, Ph.D., David P. Lovell, Ph.D., Timothy A. Rockall, F.R.C.S.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 6/2007

Purpose

Recent studies have confirmed the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic colorectal surgery; however, its use has not become widespread. One reason for this is perceived economic implications. A systematic review was undertaken examining the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for articles comparing laparoscopic colorectal surgery and open surgery. Primary outcome measures were operating room, direct hospital, and indirect costs. Secondary outcomes were conversion rates and length of hospital stay. The percentage difference in costs was used for comparisons between studies.

Results

Twenty-nine articles were identified in which cost data were presented (total number of patients 3,681); the economic data in most studies was limited. Operating room costs were greater for laparoscopic colorectal surgery than open surgery in all studies (median difference, 50 percent; interquartile range, 27–78 percent; P < 0.001). There was no overall difference in total hospital costs (median difference, 0 percent; interquartile range, −17.5 to 21 percent). Only two articles collected data on indirect costs, with both in favor of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Hospital stay was shorter for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in all studies (median difference, 2.8 days; interquartile range, 1.3–3.7; P < 0.001). Median conversion rate was 7.8 percent (mean, 14 percent; interquartile range, 6–21 percent).

Conclusions

Operating room costs are greater for laparoscopic colorectal surgery than open surgery. Total hospital costs are similar. There may be societal benefits associated with lower indirect costs for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Cost should not be a deterrent to performing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Jacobs, M, Verdeja, JC, Goldstein, HS 1991Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy)Surg Laparosc Endosc1144150PubMed

Abraham, NS, Young, JM, Solomon, MJ 2004Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancerBr J Surg9111111124PubMedCrossRef

Solomon, MJ, Young, CJ, Eyers, AA, Roberts, RA 2002Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapseBr J Surg893539PubMedCrossRef

Braga, M, Vignali, A, Gianotti, L, et al. 2002Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcomeAnn Surg236759767PubMedCrossRef

Clinical outcomes of surgical therapy study group2004A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancerN Engl J Med35020502059CrossRef

Guillou, PJ, Quirke, P, Thorpe, H, et al. 2005Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialLancet36517181726PubMedCrossRef

Stage, JG, Schulze, S, Moller, P, et al. 1997Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinomaBr J Surg84391396PubMedCrossRef

Lacy, AM, Garcia-Valdecasas, JC, Delgado, S, et al. 2002Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trialLancet35922242229PubMedCrossRef

Veldkamp, R, Kuhry, E, Hop, WC, et al. 2005Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trialLancet Oncol6477484PubMedCrossRef

10.

Veldkamp, R, Gholghesaei, M, Bonjer, HJ, et al. 2004Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)Surg Endosc1811631185PubMedCrossRef

11.

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons website. Position statements. Laparoscopic colectomy for curable cancer. 2003. Available at: http://www.fascrs.org. Accessed April 2006.

12.

Rawlins, M 1999In pursuit of quality: the National Institute for Clinical ExcellenceLancet35310791082PubMedCrossRef

13.

Drummond, MF, Jefferson, TO 1996Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working PartyBMJ313275283PubMed

14.

Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, eds. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

15.

National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). A designation of levels of evidence. A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. Canberra, Australia, 1999. Available at: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications. Accessed 1 March 2006.

16.

Cuschieri, A, Ferreira, E, Goh, P, et al. 1997Guidelines for conducting economic outcomes studies for endoscopic proceduresSurg Endosc11308314PubMedCrossRef

17.

Falk, PM, Beart, RW,Jr, Wexner, SD, et al. 1993Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisalDis Colon Rectum362834PubMedCrossRef

18.

Senagore, AJ, Luchtefeld, MA, Mackeigan, JM, Mazier, WP 1993Open colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy: are there differences?Am Surg59549554PubMed

19.

Musser, DJ, Boorse, RC, Madera, F, Reed, JF,3rd 1994Laparoscopic colectomy: at what cost?Surg Laparosc Endosc415PubMed

20.

Hoffman, GC, Baker, JW, Fitchett, CW, Vansant, JH 1994Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Initial experienceAnn Surg219732743PubMedCrossRef

21.

Ye, TM, Cattey, RP, Henry, LG 1994Laparoscopically assisted colon resections compare favorably with open techniqueSurg Laparosc Endosc42531PubMed

22.

Saba, AK, Kerlakian, GM, Kasper, GC, Hearn, AT 1995Laparoscopic assisted colectomies versus open colectomyJ Laparoendosc Surg516PubMed

23.

Pfeifer, J, Wexner, SD, Reissman, P, et al. 1995Laparoscopic vs open colon surgery. Costs and outcomeSurg Endosc913221326PubMed

24.

Liberman, MA, Phillips, EH, Carroll, BJ, et al. 1996Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costsSurg Endosc101518PubMedCrossRef

25.

Philipson, BM, Bokey, EL, Moore, JW, et al. 1997Cost of open versus laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for cancerWorld J Surg21214217PubMedCrossRef

26.

Kohler, L, Rixen, D, Troidl, H 1998Laparoscopic colorectal resection for diverticulitisInt J Colorectal Dis134347PubMedCrossRef

27.

Khalili, TM, Fleshner, PR, Hiatt, JR, et al. 1998Colorectal cancer: comparison of laparoscopic with open approachesDis Colon Rectum41832838PubMedCrossRef

28.

Joo, JS, Amarnath, L, Wexner, SD 1998Is laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps beneficial?Surg Endosc1213411344PubMedCrossRef

29.

Bouvet, M, Mansfield, PF, Skibber, JM, et al. 1998Clinical, pathologic, and economic parameters of laparoscopic colon resection for cancerAm J Surg176554558PubMedCrossRef

30.

Young-Fadok, TM, Hall Long, K, McConnell, EJ, et al. 2001Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costsSurg Endosc15450454PubMedCrossRef

31.

Senagore, AJ, Duepree, HJ, Delaney, CP, et al. 2002Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differencesDis Colon Rectum45485490PubMedCrossRef

32.

Duepree, HJ, Senagore, AJ, Delaney, CP, et al. 2002Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn’s diseaseDis Colon Rectum45605610PubMedCrossRef

33.

Shore, G, Gonzalez, QH, Bondora, A, Vickers, SM 2003Laparoscopic vs conventional ileocolectomy for primary Crohn’s diseaseArch Surg1387679PubMedCrossRef

34.

Delaney, CP, Kiran, RP, Senagore, AJ, et al. 2003Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgeryAnn Surg2386772PubMedCrossRef

35.

Janson, M, Bjorholt, I, Carlsson, P, et al. 2004Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancerBr J Surg91409417PubMedCrossRef

36.

Maartense, S, Dunker, MS, Slors, JF, et al. 2004Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trialAnn Surg240984992PubMedCrossRef

37.

Leung, KL, Kwok, SP, Lam, SC, et al. 2004Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trialLancet36311871192PubMedCrossRef

38.

Sokolovic, E, Buchmann, P, Schlomowitsch, F, Szucs, TD 2004Comparison of resource utilization and long-term quality-of-life outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional colorectal surgerySurg Endosc1816631667PubMed

39.

Salkeld, G, Bagia, M, Solomon, M 2004Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexyBr J Surg9111881191PubMedCrossRef

40.

Zheng, MH, Feng, B, Lu, AG, et al. 2005Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinomaWorld J Gastroenterol11323326PubMed

41.

Delaney, CP, Pokala, N, Senagore, AJ, et al. 2005Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomyDis Colon Rectum48975981PubMedCrossRef

42.

Pokala, N, Delaney, CP, Senagore, AJ, et al. 2005Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative studySurg Endosc19531535PubMedCrossRef

43.

Senagore, AJ, Brannigan, A, Kiran, RP, et al. 2005Diagnosis-related group assignment in laparoscopic and open colectomy: financial implications for payer and providerDis Colon Rectum4810161020PubMedCrossRef

44.

Braga, M, Vignali, A, Zuliani, W, et al. 2005Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trialAnn Surg242890896PubMedCrossRef

45.

King, PM, Blazeby, JM, Ewings, P, et al. 2006Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programmeBr J Surg93300308PubMedCrossRef

46.

Bokey, EL, Moore, JW, Chapuis, PH, Newland, RC 1996Morbidity and mortality following laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for cancerDis Colon Rectum39S24S28PubMedCrossRef

47.

Tucker, JG, Ambroze, WL, Orangio, GR, et al. 1995Laparoscopically assisted bowel surgery. Analysis of 114 casesSurg Endosc9297300PubMedCrossRef

48.

Gibson, M, Byrd, C, Pierce, C, et al. 2000Laparoscopic colon resections: a five-year retrospective reviewAm Surg66245249PubMed

49.

Targarona, EM, Gracia, E, Garriga, J, et al. 2002Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and costSurg Endosc16234239PubMedCrossRef

50.

Ballantyne, GH 1995Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: review of results in 752 patientsGastroenterologist37589PubMed

51.

Casillas, S, Delaney, CP 2005Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel diseaseDig Surg22135142PubMedCrossRef

52.

Casillas, S, Delaney, CP, Senagore, AJ, et al. 2004Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome?Dis Colon Rectum4716801685PubMedCrossRef

53.

Delaney, CP, Lynch, AC, Senagore, AJ, Fazio, VW 2003Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgeryDis Colon Rectum4616331639PubMedCrossRef

54.

Kohler, L, Holthausen, U, Troidl, H 1997Laparoscopic colorectal surgery—attempt at evaluating a new technologyChirurg68794800PubMedCrossRef

55.

Kuhry, E, Bonjer, HJ, Haglind, E, et al. 2005Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancerSurg Endosc19687692PubMedCrossRef

56.

Chapman, AE, Levitt, MD, Hewett, P, et al. 2001Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies: a systematic reviewAnn Surg234590606PubMedCrossRef

57.

Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003145. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2.

58.

Harinath, G, Shah, PR, Haray, PN, Foster, ME 2005Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland-where are we now?Colorectal Dis78689PubMedCrossRef

59.

Sheldon, TA, Cullum, N, Dawson, D, et al. 2004What’s the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients’ notes, and interviewsBMJ329999PubMedCrossRef

60.

Sculpher M. The role and estimation of productivity costs in economic evaluation. In: Drummond M, McGuire A, eds. Economic evaluation in healthcare. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2001;94–112.

Title: Systematic Review of the Costs of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
Authors: Henry M. Dowson, M.R.C.S.
Andy Huang, F.R.C.S.
Yuen Soon, F.R.C.S.
Heather Gage, Ph.D.
David P. Lovell, Ph.D.
Timothy A. Rockall, F.R.C.S.
Publication date: 01-06-2007
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 6/2007
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0234-5

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Systematic Review of the Costs of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2007

The Risk of Cancer in Patients with Crohn’s Disease

Proctalgia Fugax: Demographic and Clinical Characteristics. What Every Doctor Should Know from a Prospective Study of 54 Patients

Mesenteric Fibromatosis as a Potential Source of False-Positive Interpretation of FDG-PET: Report of a Case

Announcements

Complications and Sexual Function After Vaginectomy for Anorectal Tumors

Patient Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life After Treatment for Colon Cancer