Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 5/2005

01-05-2005 | Original Contribution

Diagnosis-Related Group Assignment in Laparoscopic and Open Colectomy: Financial Implications for Payer and Provider

Authors: Anthony J. Senagore, M.D., Ann Brannigan, M.D., Ravi P. Kiran, M.S., F.R.C.S., Karen Brady, B.S.N., Conor P. Delaney, M.Ch., Ph.D., F.R.C.S.I.(Gen.)

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 5/2005

Login to get access

PURPOSE

In carefully matched patients, the length of hospital stay after laparoscopic colectomy is shorter than after open surgery. Higher operating room costs for laparoscopic surgery are offset by lower costs for hospitalization because of less utilization of pharmacy, laboratory, and nursing services. Clinical outcome is comparable. We examined the effect of the surgical approach for colectomy (open vs. laparoscopic) regarding the reasons for disease-related group assignment to disease-related group 148, and institutional cost under Part A of the U.S. Medicare system.

METHODS

Colectomy patients were assigned to either disease-related group 148 (colorectal resection with complications) or disease-related group 149 (colorectal resection without complications) with significant institutional reimbursement implications (disease-related group 149, $8,310; disease-related group 148, $20,291). A total of 100 consecutive disease-related group 148 patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy from July 2000 to September 2002 were identified from a prospective database and case-matched with 100 patients undergoing open colectomy. Patients were matched for gender, age, operative procedure, and pathology. A certified coder determined the reason(s) for disease-related group 148 assignment, which were grouped into: preoperative comorbidity, a combination of preoperative comorbidity/postoperative complications, or postoperative complications alone.

RESULTS

Significantly more lapararoscopy patients were assigned to disease-related group 148 solely because of preoperative comorbidities (62 percent vs. 21 percent; P < 0.0001). Significantly more patients in the open surgery group were classified as disease-related group 148 solely because of postoperative complications (22 percent vs. 42 percent; P < 0.0001). An additional group of patients were assigned to the disease-related group 148 category based on a combination of preoperative and postoperative diagnoses (16 percent vs. 37 percent). The mean direct hospital costs were significantly less for laparoscopy patients ($3971 vs. $5997; P = 0.0095). Increased cost to Part A of Medicare for 20 open surgery patients who “migrated” to disease-related group 148 because of postoperative complications was $239,620.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data are the first to demonstrate that disease related group assignment can change solely because of a differential rate of postoperative complications for two competing operative techniques. This change occurred at twice the rate for open colectomy and resulted in significantly increased cost to the insurer under a prospective payment program. The savings to the institution coupled with the shortened length of stay offset the potential loss in revenue to the institution.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Philipson, BM, Bokey, EL, Moore, JW, Chapuis, PH, Bagge, E 1997Cost of open versus laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for cancerWorld J Surg212147PubMed Philipson, BM, Bokey, EL, Moore, JW, Chapuis, PH, Bagge, E 1997Cost of open versus laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for cancerWorld J Surg212147PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bokey, EL, Moore, JW, Chapuis, PH, Newland, RC 1996Morbidity and mortality following laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer (Suppl)Dis Colon Rectum39S248PubMed Bokey, EL, Moore, JW, Chapuis, PH, Newland, RC 1996Morbidity and mortality following laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer (Suppl)Dis Colon Rectum39S248PubMed
3.
go back to reference Joo, JS, Amarnath, L, Wexner, SD 1998Is laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps beneficial?Surg Endosc1213414PubMed Joo, JS, Amarnath, L, Wexner, SD 1998Is laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps beneficial?Surg Endosc1213414PubMed
4.
go back to reference Falk, PM, Beart, RW, Wexner, SD, et al. 1993Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisalDis Colon Rectum362834PubMed Falk, PM, Beart, RW, Wexner, SD,  et al. 1993Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisalDis Colon Rectum362834PubMed
5.
go back to reference Pfeifer, J, Wexner, SD, Reissman, P, et al. 1995Laparoscopic vs open colon surgery: costs and outcomeSurg Endosc913226PubMed Pfeifer, J, Wexner, SD, Reissman, P,  et al. 1995Laparoscopic vs open colon surgery: costs and outcomeSurg Endosc913226PubMed
6.
go back to reference Bergamaschi, R, Arnaud, JP 1997Immediately recognizable benefits and drawbacks after laparoscopic colon resection for benign diseaseSurg Endosc118024PubMed Bergamaschi, R, Arnaud, JP 1997Immediately recognizable benefits and drawbacks after laparoscopic colon resection for benign diseaseSurg Endosc118024PubMed
7.
go back to reference Young-Fadok, TM, Hall-Long, K, McConnell, EJ, Gomez-Rey, G, Cabanela, RL 2001Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease: improved outcomes and reduced costsSurg Endosc154504PubMed Young-Fadok, TM, Hall-Long, K, McConnell, EJ, Gomez-Rey, G, Cabanela, RL 2001Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease: improved outcomes and reduced costsSurg Endosc154504PubMed
8.
go back to reference Liberman, MA, Phillips, EH, Carroll, BJ, Fallas, M, Rosenthal, R 1996Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis: outcome and costsSurg Endosc10158PubMed Liberman, MA, Phillips, EH, Carroll, BJ, Fallas, M, Rosenthal, R 1996Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis: outcome and costsSurg Endosc10158PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kohler, L, Rixen, D, Troidl, H 1998Laparoscopic colorectal resection for diverticulitisInt J Colorectal Dis13437PubMed Kohler, L, Rixen, D, Troidl, H 1998Laparoscopic colorectal resection for diverticulitisInt J Colorectal Dis13437PubMed
10.
go back to reference Senagore, AJ, Luchtefeld, MA, Mackeigan, JM, Mazier, WP 1993Open colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy: are there differences?Am Surg5954954PubMed Senagore, AJ, Luchtefeld, MA, Mackeigan, JM, Mazier, WP 1993Open colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy: are there differences?Am Surg5954954PubMed
11.
go back to reference Senagore, AJ, Duepree, HJ, Delaney, CP, Dissanaike, S, Brady, KM, Fazio, VW 2002Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differencesDis Colon Rectum4548590PubMed Senagore, AJ, Duepree, HJ, Delaney, CP, Dissanaike, S, Brady, KM, Fazio, VW 2002Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differencesDis Colon Rectum4548590PubMed
12.
go back to reference Larach, S, Ferrera, A 1996Cost analysisJager, RWexner, SD eds. Laparoscopic colorectal surgeryChurchill-LivingstoneNew York3216 Larach, S, Ferrera, A 1996Cost analysisJager, RWexner, SD eds. Laparoscopic colorectal surgeryChurchill-LivingstoneNew York3216
13.
go back to reference Duepree, HJ, Senagore, AJ, Delaney, CP, Brady, KM, Fazio, VW 2002Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn’s diseaseDis Colon Rectum4560510PubMed Duepree, HJ, Senagore, AJ, Delaney, CP, Brady, KM, Fazio, VW 2002Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn’s diseaseDis Colon Rectum4560510PubMed
14.
go back to reference Delaney, CP, Kiran, RP, Senagore, AJ, Brady, K, Fazio, VW 2003Case-matched comparison and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal sugeryAnn Surg2386772PubMed Delaney, CP, Kiran, RP, Senagore, AJ, Brady, K, Fazio, VW 2003Case-matched comparison and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal sugeryAnn Surg2386772PubMed
15.
go back to reference Bemelman, WA, Slors, JF, Dunker, MS, et al. 2000Laparoscopic-assisted vs open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a comparative studySurg Endosc147215PubMed Bemelman, WA, Slors, JF, Dunker, MS,  et al. 2000Laparoscopic-assisted vs open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a comparative studySurg Endosc147215PubMed
16.
go back to reference Young-Fadok, TM, Radice, E, Nelson, H, Harmsen, WS 2000Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps: a case-matched seriesMayo Clin Proc753448PubMedCrossRef Young-Fadok, TM, Radice, E, Nelson, H, Harmsen, WS 2000Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps: a case-matched seriesMayo Clin Proc753448PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Berwick, DM 2003Disseminating innovations in healthcareJAMA289196975PubMed Berwick, DM 2003Disseminating innovations in healthcareJAMA289196975PubMed
18.
go back to reference Muckleroy, SK, Ratzer, ER, Fenoglio, ME 1999Laparoscopic colon surgery for benign disease: a comparison to open surgeryJ Soc Laparoendosc Surg3337 Muckleroy, SK, Ratzer, ER, Fenoglio, ME 1999Laparoscopic colon surgery for benign disease: a comparison to open surgeryJ Soc Laparoendosc Surg3337
19.
go back to reference Kakisako, K, Sato, K, Adachi, Y, Shiraishi, N, Miyahara, M, Kitano, S 2000Laparoscopic colectomy for Dukes A colon cancerSurg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech106670PubMed Kakisako, K, Sato, K, Adachi, Y, Shiraishi, N, Miyahara, M, Kitano, S 2000Laparoscopic colectomy for Dukes A colon cancerSurg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech106670PubMed
20.
go back to reference Franklin, ME, Rosenthal, D, Abrego-Medina, D, et al. 1996Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five-year resultsDis Colon Rectum39S3546PubMed Franklin, ME, Rosenthal, D, Abrego-Medina, D,  et al. 1996Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five-year resultsDis Colon Rectum39S3546PubMed
21.
go back to reference Marubashi, S, Yano, H, Monden, T, et al. 2000The usefulness, indications, and complications of laparoscopy-assisted colectomy in comparison with those of open colectomy for colorectal carcinomaSurg Today304916PubMed Marubashi, S, Yano, H, Monden, T,  et al. 2000The usefulness, indications, and complications of laparoscopy-assisted colectomy in comparison with those of open colectomy for colorectal carcinomaSurg Today304916PubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnosis-Related Group Assignment in Laparoscopic and Open Colectomy: Financial Implications for Payer and Provider
Authors
Anthony J. Senagore, M.D.
Ann Brannigan, M.D.
Ravi P. Kiran, M.S., F.R.C.S.
Karen Brady, B.S.N.
Conor P. Delaney, M.Ch., Ph.D., F.R.C.S.I.(Gen.)
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0907-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2005

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 5/2005 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

The Authors Reply