Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 3/2005

01-03-2005

Side-to-Side Stapled Anastomosis Strongly Reduces Anastomotic Leak Rates in Crohn’s Disease Surgery

Authors: Andrea Resegotti, M.D., Marco Astegiano, M.D., Enzo C. Farina, M.D., Giovannino Ciccone, M.D., Giovanni Avagnina, M.D., Alberto Giustetto, M.D., Donata Campra, M.D., Gian Ruggero Fronda, M.D.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 3/2005

Login to get access

PURPOSE

Anastomotic configuration may influence anastomotic leak rates. The aim of this study was to determine whether a side-to-side stapled ileocolonic anastomosis produces lower anastomotic leak rates than those with a handsewn end-to-end ileocolonic anastomosis after ileocecal or ileocolonic resection for Crohn’s disease.

METHODS

A series of 122 consecutive patients underwent elective ileocecal or ileocolonic resection with ileocolonic anastomosis for Crohn’s disease from January 1998 to June 2003: 71 had handsewn end-to-end anastomosis and 51 had side-to-side stapled anastomosis. The choice between the two anastomoses was left to the surgeon’s preference. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess if there was any difference in anastomotic leak rates.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, preoperative presence of abscess or fistula, history of smoking, and albumin levels. More patients were taking steroids in the handsewn group than in the stapled group. In the handsewn group there were 10 anastomotic leaks (14.1 percent) and in the stapled group there was 1 anastomotic leak (2.0 percent) (risk difference, +12.1 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7–22.2; P = 0.02). Anastomotic configuration was the sole variable that influenced anastomotic leak rates at univariate analysis. Mortality was 1.4 percent in the handsewn group and 0 percent in the stapled group. Complications other than anastomotic leak developed in 11 patients in the handsewn group and in 6 patients in the stapled group. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 12.3 days in the handsewn group and 9.7 days in the stapled group (P = 0.03). Excluding those patients who had an anastomotic leak, the difference was still present (handsewn group, 10.1 days; stapled group, 9.1 days; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Although confirmation from randomized, controlled trials is required, side-to-side stapled anastomosis seems to substantially decrease anastomotic leak rates in surgical patients with Crohn’s disease, compared with handsewn end-to-end anastomosis. Postoperative hospital stay decreased in the stapled anastomosis group, and this was not entirely a result of decreased anastomotic leak rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yamamoto, T, Allan, RN, Keighley, MR 2000Risk factors for intra-abdominal sepsis after surgery in Crohn’s diseaseDis Colon Rectum4311415PubMed Yamamoto, T, Allan, RN, Keighley, MR 2000Risk factors for intra-abdominal sepsis after surgery in Crohn’s diseaseDis Colon Rectum4311415PubMed
2.
go back to reference Meagher, AP, Wolff, BG 1994Right hemicolectomy with a linear cutting staplerDis Colon Rectum3710435PubMed Meagher, AP, Wolff, BG 1994Right hemicolectomy with a linear cutting staplerDis Colon Rectum3710435PubMed
3.
go back to reference Muñoz-Juárez, M, Yamamoto, T, Wolff, BG, Keighley, MR 2001Wide-lumen stapled anastomosis vs. conventional end-to-end anastomosis in the treatment of Crohn’s diseaseDis Colon Rectum44206PubMed Muñoz-Juárez, M, Yamamoto, T, Wolff, BG, Keighley, MR 2001Wide-lumen stapled anastomosis vs. conventional end-to-end anastomosis in the treatment of Crohn’s diseaseDis Colon Rectum44206PubMed
4.
go back to reference Fingerhut, A, Elhadad, A, Hay, JM, Lacaine, F, Flamant, Y 1994Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical ResearchSurgery11648490PubMed Fingerhut, A, Elhadad, A, Hay, JM, Lacaine, F, Flamant, Y 1994Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical ResearchSurgery11648490PubMed
5.
go back to reference Frileux, P, Quilichini, MA, Tiret, E, et al. 1988Single-layer anastomosis in surgery of the large bowel. A prospective study on 316 cases in a university hospitalInt J Colorectal Dis3325PubMed Frileux, P, Quilichini, MA, Tiret, E,  et al. 1988Single-layer anastomosis in surgery of the large bowel. A prospective study on 316 cases in a university hospitalInt J Colorectal Dis3325PubMed
6.
go back to reference Curley, SA, Allison, DC, Smith, DE, Doberneck, RC 1988Analysis of techniques and results in 347 consecutive colon anastomosesAm J Surg155597601PubMed Curley, SA, Allison, DC, Smith, DE, Doberneck, RC 1988Analysis of techniques and results in 347 consecutive colon anastomosesAm J Surg155597601PubMed
7.
go back to reference Cajozzo, M, Compagno, G, DiTora, P, Spallitta, SI, Bazan, P 1990Advantages and disadvantages of mechanical vs. manual anastomosis in colorectal surgery. A prospective studyActa Chir Scand1561679PubMed Cajozzo, M, Compagno, G, DiTora, P, Spallitta, SI, Bazan, P 1990Advantages and disadvantages of mechanical vs. manual anastomosis in colorectal surgery. A prospective studyActa Chir Scand1561679PubMed
8.
go back to reference Elhadad, A 1990Anastomoses colo-rectales: à la main ou à la machine? Essai contrôlé multicentrique par tirage au sortChirurgie1164258PubMed Elhadad, A 1990Anastomoses colo-rectales: à la main ou à la machine? Essai contrôlé multicentrique par tirage au sortChirurgie1164258PubMed
9.
go back to reference Golub, R, Golub, RW, Cantu, R, Stein, HD 1997A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomosesJ Am Coll Surg18436472PubMed Golub, R, Golub, RW, Cantu, R, Stein, HD 1997A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomosesJ Am Coll Surg18436472PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kracht, M, Hay, JM, Fagniez, PL, Fingerhut, A 1993Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? A prospective, multicenter, randomised trialInt J Colorectal Dis82933PubMed Kracht, M, Hay, JM, Fagniez, PL, Fingerhut, A 1993Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? A prospective, multicenter, randomised trialInt J Colorectal Dis82933PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kracht, M 1990Anastomose colique droite manuelle ou mécanique?Chirurgie1164158PubMed Kracht, M 1990Anastomose colique droite manuelle ou mécanique?Chirurgie1164158PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kracht, M. 1991Le point sur les meilleures anastomoses après résection coliqueAnn Chir452958PubMed Kracht, M. 1991Le point sur les meilleures anastomoses après résection coliqueAnn Chir452958PubMed
13.
go back to reference Cubertafond, P, Cucchiaro, G, Lesourd-Pontonnier, F, Gainant, A 1992Complications postopératoires précoces des résections anastomoses en chirurgie colique ou colo-rectale: analyse de 627 observationsChirurgie1188691PubMed Cubertafond, P, Cucchiaro, G, Lesourd-Pontonnier, F, Gainant, A 1992Complications postopératoires précoces des résections anastomoses en chirurgie colique ou colo-rectale: analyse de 627 observationsChirurgie1188691PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hashemi, M, Novell, JR, Lewis, AA 1998Side to-side stapled anastomosis may delay recurrence in Crohn’s diseaseDis Colon Rectum4112936PubMed Hashemi, M, Novell, JR, Lewis, AA 1998Side to-side stapled anastomosis may delay recurrence in Crohn’s diseaseDis Colon Rectum4112936PubMed
15.
go back to reference Yamamoto, T, Bain, IM, Mylonakis, E, Allan, RN, Keighley, MR 1999Stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis versus sutured end-to-end anastomosis after ileocolonic resection in Crohn’s diseaseScand J Gastroenterol3470813PubMed Yamamoto, T, Bain, IM, Mylonakis, E, Allan, RN, Keighley, MR 1999Stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis versus sutured end-to-end anastomosis after ileocolonic resection in Crohn’s diseaseScand J Gastroenterol3470813PubMed
16.
go back to reference Smedh, K, Andersson, M, Johansson, H, Hagberg, T 2002Preoperative management is more important than choice of sutured or stapled anastomosis in Crohn’s diseaseEur J Surg1681547PubMed Smedh, K, Andersson, M, Johansson, H, Hagberg, T 2002Preoperative management is more important than choice of sutured or stapled anastomosis in Crohn’s diseaseEur J Surg1681547PubMed
17.
go back to reference Kusunoki, M, Ikeuchi, H, Yanagi, H, Shoji, Y, Yamamura, T 1998A comparison of stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in Crohn’s diseaseDig Surg1567982PubMed Kusunoki, M, Ikeuchi, H, Yanagi, H, Shoji, Y, Yamamura, T 1998A comparison of stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in Crohn’s diseaseDig Surg1567982PubMed
18.
go back to reference Post, S, Betzler, M, Ditfurth, B, Schürmann, G, Küppers, P, Herfarth, C 1991Risks of intestinal anastomoses in Crohn’s diseaseAnn Surg2133742PubMed Post, S, Betzler, M, Ditfurth, B, Schürmann, G, Küppers, P, Herfarth, C 1991Risks of intestinal anastomoses in Crohn’s diseaseAnn Surg2133742PubMed
19.
go back to reference Heimann, TM, Greenstein, AJ, Mechanic, L, Aufses, AH 1985Early complications following surgical treatment for Crohn’s diseaseAnn Surg2014948PubMed Heimann, TM, Greenstein, AJ, Mechanic, L, Aufses, AH 1985Early complications following surgical treatment for Crohn’s diseaseAnn Surg2014948PubMed
20.
go back to reference Fasth, S, Hellberg, R, Hultén, L, Magnusson, O 1980Early complications after surgical treatment for Crohn’s disease with particular reference to factors affecting their developmentActa Chir Scand14651926PubMed Fasth, S, Hellberg, R, Hultén, L, Magnusson, O 1980Early complications after surgical treatment for Crohn’s disease with particular reference to factors affecting their developmentActa Chir Scand14651926PubMed
21.
go back to reference Ballantyne, GH 1991A victory for handsewn anastomoses [editorial]?Dis Colon Rectum346256PubMed Ballantyne, GH 1991A victory for handsewn anastomoses [editorial]?Dis Colon Rectum346256PubMed
22.
go back to reference Graffner, H, Andersson, L, Lowenhielm, P, Walther, B 1984The healing process of anastomoses of the colon: a comparative study using single, double-layer or stapled anastomosisDis Colon Rectum2776771PubMed Graffner, H, Andersson, L, Lowenhielm, P, Walther, B 1984The healing process of anastomoses of the colon: a comparative study using single, double-layer or stapled anastomosisDis Colon Rectum2776771PubMed
23.
go back to reference Galandiuk, S 1998Stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in Crohn’s disease [editorial]Dig Surg15655PubMed Galandiuk, S 1998Stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in Crohn’s disease [editorial]Dig Surg15655PubMed
24.
go back to reference Dziki, AJ, Duncan, MD, Harmon, JW, et al. 1991Advantages of handsewn over stapled bowel anastomosisDis Colon Rectum344428PubMed Dziki, AJ, Duncan, MD, Harmon, JW,  et al. 1991Advantages of handsewn over stapled bowel anastomosisDis Colon Rectum344428PubMed
25.
go back to reference Hallböök, O, Johansson, K, Sjödahl, R 1996Laser Doppler blood flow measurement in rectal resection for carcinoma—comparison between the straight and colonic j-pouch reconstructionBr J Surg8338992PubMed Hallböök, O, Johansson, K, Sjödahl, R 1996Laser Doppler blood flow measurement in rectal resection for carcinoma—comparison between the straight and colonic j-pouch reconstructionBr J Surg8338992PubMed
Metadata
Title
Side-to-Side Stapled Anastomosis Strongly Reduces Anastomotic Leak Rates in Crohn’s Disease Surgery
Authors
Andrea Resegotti, M.D.
Marco Astegiano, M.D.
Enzo C. Farina, M.D.
Giovannino Ciccone, M.D.
Giovanni Avagnina, M.D.
Alberto Giustetto, M.D.
Donata Campra, M.D.
Gian Ruggero Fronda, M.D.
Publication date
01-03-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0786-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2005

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 3/2005 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Selected Abstracts