Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 3/2005

01-03-2005

Volume Measurements of the Anal Sphincter Complex in Healthy Controls and Fecal-Incontinent Patients With a Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Endoanal Ultrasonography Images

Authors: Rachel L. West, M.D., Ph.D., Richelle J. F. Felt-Bersma, M.D., Ph.D., Bettina E. Hansen, M.Sc., W. Rudolf Schouten, M.D., Ph.D., Ernst J. Kuipers, M.D., Ph.D.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 3/2005

Login to get access

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine sphincter volume, length, and external anal sphincter thickness in healthy controls and fecal incontinent patients by use of a three-dimensional reconstruction of endoanal ultrasonography images.

METHODS

Forty-four controls (15 males, 15 females, and 14 parous females) and 28 incontinent parous females (with and without a sphincter defect) were studied. Internal anal sphincter, external anal sphincter and puborectalis volume, sphincter length, and external anal sphincter thickness were measured. Intraobserver and interobserver variability were assessed. Anal pressure profile was also determined.

RESULTS

Internal anal sphincter and external anal sphincter volumes were larger in males than in females (P = 0.001 and P = 0.04), and external anal sphincter volume was smaller in parous females but this was not significant (P = 0.084). Anterior sphincter length was longer in males (P = 0.004) and shorter in parous females (P = 0.06). Males had a larger anterior external anal sphincter thickness (P = 0.018); parity made no difference. Sphincter volumes were not smaller in incontinent females. Incontinent females with a sphincter defect had a shorter anterior sphincter length than that of continent (P = 0.001) and incontinent females without a sphincter defect (P < 0.001). Anterior external anal sphincter thickness was smaller in incontinent females with a sphincter defect (P = 0.006), and posterior and right external anal sphincter thickness was smaller in incontinent females without a sphincter defect (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03). Intraobserver variability was seen for internal anal sphincter volume and sphincter length, but there was no interobserver variability. Correlation between anal pressures and endoanal ultrasonography measurements was poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in anal sphincter volumes are seen for gender but not for parity. Fecal incontinence is not associated with loss of sphincter volume. However, anterior sphincter length and external anal sphincter thickness are smaller.
Literature
1.
Sultan, AH, Kamm, MA, Hudson, CN, Thomas, JM, Bartram, CI 1993Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal deliveryN Engl J Med329190511CrossRefPubMed
2.
Oberwalder, M, Connor, J, Wexner, SD 2003Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damageBr J Surg9013337PubMed
3.
Law, PJ, Bartram, CI 1989Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomyGastrointest Radiol1434953PubMed
4.
Law, PJ, Kamm, MA, Bartram, CI 1991Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinenceBr J Surg783124PubMed
5.
Bartram, CI, Sultan, AH 1995Anal endosonography in faecal incontinenceGut3746PubMed
6.
Sultan, AH, Kamm, MA, Talbot, IC, Nicholls, RJ, Bartram, CI 1994Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologicallyBr J Surg814635PubMed
7.
Deen, KI, Kumar, D, Williams, JG, Olliff, J, Keighley, MR 1993Anal sphincter defects. Correlation between endoanal ultrasound and surgeryAnn Surg2182015PubMed
8.
Sultan, AH, Nicholls, RJ, Kamm, MA, Hudson, CN, Beynon, J, Bartram, CI 1993Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomyBr J Surg8050811PubMed
9.
Felt-Bersma, RJ, Cuesta, MA, Koorevaar, M 1996Anal sphincter repair improves anorectal function and endosonographic image: a prospective clinical studyDis Colon Rectum3987885PubMed
10.
Briel, JW, Stoker, J, Rociu, E, Lameris, JS, Hop, WC, Schouten, WR 1999External anal sphincter atrophy on endoanal magnetic resonance imaging adversely affects continence after sphincteroplastyBr J Surg8613227PubMed
11.
Williams, AB, Bartram, CI, Modhwadia, D,  et al. 2001Endocoil magnetic resonance imaging quantification of external anal sphincter atrophyBr J Surg888539PubMed
12.
Gold, DM, Bartram, CI, Halligan, S, Humphries, KN, Kamm, MA, Kmiot, WA 1999Three-dimensional endoanal sonography in assessing anal canal injuryBr J Surg8636570PubMed
13.
Williams, AB, Bartram, CI, Halligan, S, Spencer, JA, Nicholls, RJ, Kmiot, WA 2001Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery using three-dimensional endosonographyObstet Gynecol977705PubMed
14.
Williams, AB, Spencer, JA, Bartram, CI 2002Assessment of third degree tears using three-dimensional anal endosonography with combined anal manometry: a novel techniqueBJOG1098335PubMed
15.
Vaizey, CJ, Carapeti, E, Cahill, JA, Kamm, MA 1999Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systemsGut447780PubMedCrossRef
16.
Bland, JM, Altman, DG 1986Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurementLancet130710PubMed
17.
Cornella, JL, Hibner, M, Fenner, DE, Kriegshauser, JS, Hentz, J, Magrina, JF 2003Three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic resonance images of the anal sphincter and correlation between sphincter volume and pressureAm J Obstet Gynecol1891305PubMed
18.
Poen, AC, Felt-Bersma, RJ, Deville, W, Cuesta, MA, Meuwissen, SG 1997Normal values and reproducibility of anal endosonographic measurementsEur J Ultrasound610310
19.
Sultan, AH, Kamm, MA, Hudson, CN, Nicholls, JR, Bartram, CI 1994Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometryClin Radiol4936874PubMed
20.
Schafer, A, Enck, P, Heyer, T, Gantke, B, Frieling, T, Lubke, HJ 1994Endosonography of the anal sphincters: incontinent and continent patients and healthy controlsZ Gastroenterol3232831PubMed
21.
Nielsen, MB, Hauge, C, Rasmussen, OO, Sorensen, M, Pedersen, JF, Christiansen, J 1992Anal sphincter size measured by endosonography in healthy volunteers. Effect of age, sex, and parityActa Radiol334536PubMedCrossRef
22.
Felt-Bersma, RJ, Klinkenberg-Knol, EC, Meuwissen, SG 1990Anorectal function investigations in incontinent and continent patients. Differences and discriminatory valueDis Colon Rectum3347986PubMed
23.
Gantke, B, Schafer, A, Enck, P, Lubke, HJ 1993Sonographic, manometric, and myographic evaluation of the anal sphincters morphology and functionDis Colon Rectum36103741PubMed
24.
Nielsen, MB, Hauge, C, Pedersen, JF, Christiansen, J 1993Endosonographic evaluation of patients with anal incontinence: findings and influence on surgical managementAJR Am J Roentgenol1607715PubMed
25.
Felt-Bersma, RJ, Cuesta, MA, Koorevaar, M,  et al. 1992Anal endosonography: relationship with anal manometry and neurophysiologic testsDis Colon Rectum359449PubMed
26.
Voyvodic, F, Rieger, NA, Skinner, S,  et al. 2003Endosonographic imaging of anal sphincter injury: does the size of the tear correlate with the degree of dysfunction?Dis Colon Rectum4673541PubMed
27.
Enck, P, Heyer, T 1997How reproducible are measures of the anal sphincter muscle diameter by endoanal ultrasound?Am J Gastroenterol922936PubMed
28.
Gold, DM, Halligan, S, Kmiot, WA, Bartram, CI 1999Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in anal endosonographyBr J Surg863715PubMed
29.
Hussain, SM, Stoker, J, Lameris, JS 1995Anal sphincter complex: endoanal MR imaging of normal anatomyRadiology1976717PubMed
30.
deSouza, NM, Puni, R, Kmiot, WA, Bartram, CI, Hall, AS, Bydder, GM 1995MRI of the anal sphincterJ Comput Assist Tomogr1974551PubMed
31.
Williams, AB, Malouf, AJ, Bartram, CI, Halligan, S, Kamm, MA, Kmiot, WA 2001Assessment of external anal sphincter morphology in idiopathic fecal incontinence with endocoil magnetic resonance imagingDig Dis Sci46146671PubMed
32.
Rociu, E, Stoker, J, Eijkemans, MJ, Lameris, JS 2000Normal anal sphincter anatomy and age- and sex-related variations at high-spatial-resolution endoanal MR imagingRadiology217395401PubMed
33.
Malouf, AJ, Halligan, S, Williams, AB, Bartram, CI, Dhillon, S, Kamm, MA 2001Prospective assessment of interobserver agreement for endoanal MRI in fecal incontinenceAbdom Imaging26768PubMed
34.
Malouf, AJ, Williams, AB, Halligan, S, Bartram, CI, Dhillon, S, Kamm, MA 2000Prospective assessment of accuracy of endoanal MR imaging and endosonography in patients with fecal incontinenceAJR Am J Roentgenol1757415PubMed
35.
Williams, AB, Bartram, CI, Halligan, S, Marshall, MM, Nicholls, RJ, Kmiot, WA 2002Endosonographic anatomy of the normal anal canal compared with endocoil magnetic resonance imagingDis Colon Rectum4517683PubMed
36.
Briel, JW, Zimmerman, DD, Stoker, J,  et al. 2000Relationship between sphincter morphology on endoanal MRI and histopathological aspects of the external anal sphincterInt J Colorectal Dis158790PubMed
Metadata
Title
Volume Measurements of the Anal Sphincter Complex in Healthy Controls and Fecal-Incontinent Patients With a Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Endoanal Ultrasonography Images
Authors
Rachel L. West, M.D., Ph.D.
Richelle J. F. Felt-Bersma, M.D., Ph.D.
Bettina E. Hansen, M.Sc.
W. Rudolf Schouten, M.D., Ph.D.
Ernst J. Kuipers, M.D., Ph.D.
Publication date
01-03-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0811-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2005

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 3/2005 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Metastatic Testicular Carcinoma From the Colon With Clinical, Immunophenotypical, and Molecular Characterization: Report of a Case

OriginalPaper

Use of Malone Antegrade Continence Enema in Patients With Perineal Colostomy After Rectal Resection

OriginalPaper

Outcome of Anterior Sphincter Repair for Obstetric Injury: Comparison of Early and Late Results

Original Contributions

Lavage Enhances the Production of Proinflammatory Mediators by Peritoneal Mesothelial Cells in an Experimental Model

OriginalPaper

Practice Parameters for the Management of Rectal Cancer (Revised)

OriginalPaper

Announcements