Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 1/2013

01-02-2013 | Review Article

Does PET/MR in human brain imaging provide optimal co-registration? A critical reflection

Authors: Uwe Pietrzyk, Hans Herzog

Published in: Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The introduction of hybrid positron emission/magnetic resonance tomography (PET/MR) in diagnostic clinical imaging was a major step in the evolution of ever-more sophisticated imaging systems combining two strategies formerly regarded as technically incompatible in a single device. The advent of PET/MR opened up many new avenues in clinical and research environments, mainly by providing multi-modality images obtained during a single examination. Ideally, simultaneous data acquisition with hybrid PET/MR should warrant exact image co-registration of all multi-modality image volumes provided by both systems. This assumes that there is negligible mutual electronic, technical and logistical interference on the respective simultaneous measurements. Recently, such hybrid dedicated head and whole-body systems were successfully applied in an increasing number of cases. When employed for brain imaging, PET/MR has the potential to provide high-resolution multi-modality datasets. However, it also demands careful consideration of the multitude of features offered, as well as the limitations. There are open issues that have to be considered, such as the handling of patient motion during extended periods of data acquisition, optimized sampling of derived images to ease the visual interpretation and quantitative evaluation of co-registered images. This paper will briefly summarize the current status of PET/MR within the framework of developments for image co-registration and discuss current limitations and future perspectives.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pelizzari CA, Chen GTY, Halpern H et al (1989) Accurate three-dimensional registration of CT, PET and/or MR images of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:20–26PubMedCrossRef Pelizzari CA, Chen GTY, Halpern H et al (1989) Accurate three-dimensional registration of CT, PET and/or MR images of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:20–26PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Heiss WD (1990) Three-dimensional alignment of functional and morphological tomograms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14:51–59PubMedCrossRef Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Heiss WD (1990) Three-dimensional alignment of functional and morphological tomograms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14:51–59PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Skalski J, Wahl RL, Meyer CR (2002) Comparison of mutual information-based warping accuracy for fusing body CT and PET by 2 methods: CT mapped onto PET emission scan versus CT mapped onto PET transmission scan. J Nucl Med 43:1184–1187PubMed Skalski J, Wahl RL, Meyer CR (2002) Comparison of mutual information-based warping accuracy for fusing body CT and PET by 2 methods: CT mapped onto PET emission scan versus CT mapped onto PET transmission scan. J Nucl Med 43:1184–1187PubMed
4.
go back to reference Pietrzyk U (2001) Registration of MRI and PET images for clinical applications. In: Hajnal JV, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ (eds) Medical image registration. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 199–216CrossRef Pietrzyk U (2001) Registration of MRI and PET images for clinical applications. In: Hajnal JV, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ (eds) Medical image registration. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 199–216CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T (2000) A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 41:1369–1379PubMed Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T (2000) A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 41:1369–1379PubMed
6.
go back to reference Schlemmer HP, Pichler B, Schmand M et al (2008) Simultaneous MR/PET imaging of the human brain: feasibility study. Radiology 248:1028–1035PubMedCrossRef Schlemmer HP, Pichler B, Schmand M et al (2008) Simultaneous MR/PET imaging of the human brain: feasibility study. Radiology 248:1028–1035PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Delso G, Fürst S, Jakoby B et al (2011) Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MRI scanner. J Nucl Med 52:1914–1922PubMedCrossRef Delso G, Fürst S, Jakoby B et al (2011) Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MRI scanner. J Nucl Med 52:1914–1922PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Herzog H, Langen KJ, Weirich C et al (2011) High resolution BrainPET combined with simultaneous MRI. Nuklearmedizin 50:74–82PubMedCrossRef Herzog H, Langen KJ, Weirich C et al (2011) High resolution BrainPET combined with simultaneous MRI. Nuklearmedizin 50:74–82PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Drzezga A, Souvatzoglou M, Eiber M et al (2012) First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses. J Nucl Med 53:845–855PubMedCrossRef Drzezga A, Souvatzoglou M, Eiber M et al (2012) First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses. J Nucl Med 53:845–855PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Buchbender C, Heusner TA, Lauenstein TC et al (2012) Oncologic PET/MRI, part 1: tumors of the brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. J Nucl Med 53:928–938PubMedCrossRef Buchbender C, Heusner TA, Lauenstein TC et al (2012) Oncologic PET/MRI, part 1: tumors of the brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. J Nucl Med 53:928–938PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zaidi H, Ojha N, Morich M et al (2011) Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET/MRI system. Phys Med Biol 56:3091–3106PubMedCrossRef Zaidi H, Ojha N, Morich M et al (2011) Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET/MRI system. Phys Med Biol 56:3091–3106PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bergström M, Biethuis J, Eriksson L et al (1981) Head fixation device for reproducible position alignment in transmission CT and positron emission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 5:136–141PubMedCrossRef Bergström M, Biethuis J, Eriksson L et al (1981) Head fixation device for reproducible position alignment in transmission CT and positron emission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 5:136–141PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mazziotta JC, Phelps ME, Meadors AK et al (1982) Anatomical localization schemes for use in positron emission computed tomography using a specially designed headholder. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6:848–853PubMedCrossRef Mazziotta JC, Phelps ME, Meadors AK et al (1982) Anatomical localization schemes for use in positron emission computed tomography using a specially designed headholder. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6:848–853PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fox PT, Perlmutter JS, Raichle ME (1985) A stereotactic method of anatomical localization for positron emission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:141–153PubMedCrossRef Fox PT, Perlmutter JS, Raichle ME (1985) A stereotactic method of anatomical localization for positron emission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:141–153PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Fink G et al (1994) An interactive technique for three- dimensional image registration: validation for PET, SPECT, MRI and CT brain studies. J Nucl Med 35:2011–2018PubMed Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Fink G et al (1994) An interactive technique for three- dimensional image registration: validation for PET, SPECT, MRI and CT brain studies. J Nucl Med 35:2011–2018PubMed
16.
go back to reference Woods RP, Cherry SR, Mazziotta JC (1992) Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16:620–633PubMedCrossRef Woods RP, Cherry SR, Mazziotta JC (1992) Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16:620–633PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Woods RP, Mazziotta JC, Cherry SR (1993) MRI-PET registration with automated algorithm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17:536–546PubMedCrossRef Woods RP, Mazziotta JC, Cherry SR (1993) MRI-PET registration with automated algorithm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17:536–546PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wells WM III, Viola P, Atsumo H et al (1996) Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Imaging Anal 1:35–51CrossRef Wells WM III, Viola P, Atsumo H et al (1996) Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Imaging Anal 1:35–51CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D et al (1997) Multi-modalityity image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16:187–198PubMedCrossRef Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D et al (1997) Multi-modalityity image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16:187–198PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Studholme C, Hill DLJ, Hawkes D (1997) Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. Med Phys 24:25–35PubMedCrossRef Studholme C, Hill DLJ, Hawkes D (1997) Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. Med Phys 24:25–35PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kuhl DE, Hale J, Eaton WL (1966) Transmission scanning: a useful adjunct to conventional emission scanning for accurately keying isotope deposition to radiographic anatomy. Radiology 87:278–284PubMed Kuhl DE, Hale J, Eaton WL (1966) Transmission scanning: a useful adjunct to conventional emission scanning for accurately keying isotope deposition to radiographic anatomy. Radiology 87:278–284PubMed
22.
go back to reference Pietrzyk U, Scheidhauer K, Scharl A et al (1995) Presurgical visualization of primary breast carcinoma with PET emission and transmission imaging. J Nucl Med 36:1882–1884PubMed Pietrzyk U, Scheidhauer K, Scharl A et al (1995) Presurgical visualization of primary breast carcinoma with PET emission and transmission imaging. J Nucl Med 36:1882–1884PubMed
23.
go back to reference Beyer T, Antoch G, Mueller SP et al (2004) Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med 45:25S–35SPubMed Beyer T, Antoch G, Mueller SP et al (2004) Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med 45:25S–35SPubMed
24.
go back to reference Beyer T, Freudenberg LS, Czernin J et al (2011) The future of hybrid imaging—part 3: pET/MR, small-animal imaging and beyond. Insights Imaging 2:235–246PubMedCrossRef Beyer T, Freudenberg LS, Czernin J et al (2011) The future of hybrid imaging—part 3: pET/MR, small-animal imaging and beyond. Insights Imaging 2:235–246PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cho ZH, Son YD, Kim HK et al (2008) A fusion PET/MRI system with a high-resolution research tomograph-PET and ultra-high field 7.0T-MRI for the molecular-genetic imaging of the brain. Proteomics 8:1302–1323PubMedCrossRef Cho ZH, Son YD, Kim HK et al (2008) A fusion PET/MRI system with a high-resolution research tomograph-PET and ultra-high field 7.0T-MRI for the molecular-genetic imaging of the brain. Proteomics 8:1302–1323PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Catana C, Benner T, van der Kouwe A et al (2011) MRI-assisted PET motion correction for neurologic studies in an integrated MR-PET Scanner. J Nucl Med 52:154–161PubMedCrossRef Catana C, Benner T, van der Kouwe A et al (2011) MRI-assisted PET motion correction for neurologic studies in an integrated MR-PET Scanner. J Nucl Med 52:154–161PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference De Yong HWAM, van der Velden FHP, Kloet RW et al (2007) Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner. Phys Med Biol 52:1505–1526CrossRef De Yong HWAM, van der Velden FHP, Kloet RW et al (2007) Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner. Phys Med Biol 52:1505–1526CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Heiss W-D (2009) The potential of PET/MR for brain imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36(Suppl1):S105–S112PubMedCrossRef Heiss W-D (2009) The potential of PET/MR for brain imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36(Suppl1):S105–S112PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Haacke EM (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging. Physical principles and sequences design. Wiley, London, pp 570–590 Haacke EM (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging. Physical principles and sequences design. Wiley, London, pp 570–590
31.
go back to reference Van der Kouwe AJW, Benner T, Dale AM (2006) Real-time rigid body motion correction and shimming using cloverleaf navigators. Magn Reson Med 56:1019–1032PubMedCrossRef Van der Kouwe AJW, Benner T, Dale AM (2006) Real-time rigid body motion correction and shimming using cloverleaf navigators. Magn Reson Med 56:1019–1032PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD et al (1995) Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Map 2:165–189CrossRef Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD et al (1995) Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Map 2:165–189CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Guerin B, Cho S, Chun SY et al (2011) Nonrigid PET motion compensation in the lower abdomen using simultaneous tagged-MRI and PET imaging. Med Phys 38:3025–3038PubMedCrossRef Guerin B, Cho S, Chun SY et al (2011) Nonrigid PET motion compensation in the lower abdomen using simultaneous tagged-MRI and PET imaging. Med Phys 38:3025–3038PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference King AP, Buerger C, Tsoumpas C, Marsden PK, Schaeffter T (2012) Thoracic respiratory motion estimation from MRI using a statistical model and a 2-D image navigator. Med Image Anal 16:252–264PubMedCrossRef King AP, Buerger C, Tsoumpas C, Marsden PK, Schaeffter T (2012) Thoracic respiratory motion estimation from MRI using a statistical model and a 2-D image navigator. Med Image Anal 16:252–264PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Müller-Gärtner HW, Links JM, Prince JL et al (1992) Measurement of radiotracer concentration in brain gray matter using positron emission tomography: MRI-based correction for partial volume effects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 12:571–583PubMedCrossRef Müller-Gärtner HW, Links JM, Prince JL et al (1992) Measurement of radiotracer concentration in brain gray matter using positron emission tomography: MRI-based correction for partial volume effects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 12:571–583PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Meltzer CC, Kinahan PE, Greer PJ et al (1999) Comparative evaluation of MR-based partial-volume correction schemes for PET. J Nucl Med 40:2053–2065PubMed Meltzer CC, Kinahan PE, Greer PJ et al (1999) Comparative evaluation of MR-based partial-volume correction schemes for PET. J Nucl Med 40:2053–2065PubMed
38.
go back to reference Rousset O, Rahmim A, Alavi A, Zaidi H (2007) Partial volume correction strategies in PET. PET Clin 2:235–249CrossRef Rousset O, Rahmim A, Alavi A, Zaidi H (2007) Partial volume correction strategies in PET. PET Clin 2:235–249CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Wang H, Fei B (2012) An MR image-guided, voxel-based partial volume correction method for PET images. Med Phys 39:179–195PubMedCrossRef Wang H, Fei B (2012) An MR image-guided, voxel-based partial volume correction method for PET images. Med Phys 39:179–195PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Ullisch MG, Scheins JJ, Weirich C et al (2012) MR-based PET Motion correction procedure for simultaneous MR-PET neuroimaging of human brain. PLoSone 7(11):e48149 Ullisch MG, Scheins JJ, Weirich C et al (2012) MR-based PET Motion correction procedure for simultaneous MR-PET neuroimaging of human brain. PLoSone 7(11):e48149
42.
go back to reference Herzog H, van den Hoff J (2012) Combined PET/MR systems: an overview and comparison of currently available options. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 56:247–267PubMed Herzog H, van den Hoff J (2012) Combined PET/MR systems: an overview and comparison of currently available options. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 56:247–267PubMed
Metadata
Title
Does PET/MR in human brain imaging provide optimal co-registration? A critical reflection
Authors
Uwe Pietrzyk
Hans Herzog
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0968-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1352-8661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-012-0359-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 1/2013 Go to the issue