Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2020

01-06-2020

Ontology-Based Radiology Teaching File Summarization, Coverage, and Integration

Authors: Priya Deshpande, Alexander Rasin, Jun Son, Sungmin Kim, Eli Brown, Jacob Furst, Daniela S. Raicu, Steven M. Montner, Samuel G. Armato III

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Radiology teaching file repositories contain a large amount of information about patient health and radiologist interpretation of medical findings. Although valuable for radiology education, the use of teaching file repositories has been hindered by the ability to perform advanced searches on these repositories given the unstructured format of the data and the sparseness of the different repositories. Our term coverage analysis of two major medical ontologies, Radiology Lexicon (RadLex) and Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT), and two teaching file repositories, Medical Imaging Resource Community (MIRC) and MyPacs, showed that both ontologies combined cover 56.3% of terms in the MIRC and only 17.9% of terms in MyPacs. Furthermore, the overlap between the two ontologies (i.e., terms included by both the RadLex and UMLS SNOMED CT) was a mere 5.6% for the MIRC and 2% for the RadLex. Clustering the content of the teaching file repositories showed that they focus on different diagnostic areas within radiology. The MIRC teaching file covers mostly pediatric cases; a few cases are female patients with heart-, chest-, and bone-related diseases. The MyPacs contains a range of different diseases with no focus on a particular disease category, gender, or age group. MyPacs also provides a wide variety of cases related to the neck, face, heart, chest, and breast. These findings provide valuable insights on what new cases should be added or how existent cases may be integrated to provide more comprehensive data repositories. Similarly, the low-term coverage by the ontologies shows the need to expand ontologies with new terminology such as new terms learned from these teaching file repositories and validated by experts. While our methodology to organize and index data using clustering approaches and medical ontologies is applied to teaching file repositories, it can be applied to any other medical clinical data.
Literature
9.
go back to reference Deshpande P, Rasin A, Sriram Y, Fang C, Brown E, Furst J, Raicu DS: Multimodal ranked search over integrated repository of radiology data sources. KDIR 372–383, 2019 Deshpande P, Rasin A, Sriram Y, Fang C, Brown E, Furst J, Raicu DS: Multimodal ranked search over integrated repository of radiology data sources. KDIR 372–383, 2019
11.
go back to reference Deshpande P, Rasin A, Furst J, Raicu D, Antani S: Diis: A biomedical data access framework for aiding data driven research supporting fair principles. Data 4(2):54, 2019CrossRef Deshpande P, Rasin A, Furst J, Raicu D, Antani S: Diis: A biomedical data access framework for aiding data driven research supporting fair principles. Data 4(2):54, 2019CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ramos J, et al.: Using tf-idf to determine word relevance in document queries. In Proceedings of the first instructional conference on machine learning, volume 242,. Piscataway, NJ, 2003, pp 133–142 Ramos J, et al.: Using tf-idf to determine word relevance in document queries. In Proceedings of the first instructional conference on machine learning, volume 242,. Piscataway, NJ, 2003, pp 133–142
25.
go back to reference Stuart L: Crawford. Extensions to the cart algorithm. Int J Man Mach Stud 31(2):197–217, 1989CrossRef Stuart L: Crawford. Extensions to the cart algorithm. Int J Man Mach Stud 31(2):197–217, 1989CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Murtagh F, Legendre P: Ward’s Hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement Ward’s Criterion? J Classif 31(3):274–295, 2014CrossRef Murtagh F, Legendre P: Ward’s Hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement Ward’s Criterion? J Classif 31(3):274–295, 2014CrossRef
27.
go back to reference De-Arteaga M, Eggel I, Bao D, Rubin D, Kahn, Jr CE, Muller H: Comparing image search behaviour in the ARRS GoldMiner search engine and a clinical PACS/RIS. J Biomed Inform 56:57–64, 2015CrossRef De-Arteaga M, Eggel I, Bao D, Rubin D, Kahn, Jr CE, Muller H: Comparing image search behaviour in the ARRS GoldMiner search engine and a clinical PACS/RIS. J Biomed Inform 56:57–64, 2015CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Woods RW, Eng J: Evaluating the completeness of RadLex in the chest radiography domain. 20:1329–1333, 11 2013. Woods RW, Eng J: Evaluating the completeness of RadLex in the chest radiography domain. 20:1329–1333, 11 2013.
32.
go back to reference Wang KC, Sandhu RS, Shin J, Shih G: RadLex and structured reporting in body imaging. 2017. Wang KC, Sandhu RS, Shin J, Shih G: RadLex and structured reporting in body imaging. 2017.
33.
go back to reference Bulu H, Sippo DA, Lee JM, Burnside ES, Rubin DL: Proposing new RadLex terms by analyzing free-text mammography reports. J Digit Imaging:1–8, 2018 Bulu H, Sippo DA, Lee JM, Burnside ES, Rubin DL: Proposing new RadLex terms by analyzing free-text mammography reports. J Digit Imaging:1–8, 2018
34.
go back to reference Percha B, Zhang Y, Bozkurt S, Rubin D, Altman RB, Langlotz CP: Expanding a radiology lexicon using contextual patterns in radiology reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 25(6):679–685, 2018CrossRef Percha B, Zhang Y, Bozkurt S, Rubin D, Altman RB, Langlotz CP: Expanding a radiology lexicon using contextual patterns in radiology reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 25(6):679–685, 2018CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Chan PYW, Kahn CE: Evaluating completeness of a radiology glossary using iterative refinement. J Digit Imaging:1–3, 2018 Chan PYW, Kahn CE: Evaluating completeness of a radiology glossary using iterative refinement. J Digit Imaging:1–3, 2018
38.
go back to reference Martin-Carreras T, Kahn, Jr CE: Coverage and readability of information resources to help patients understand radiology reports. J Am Coll Radiol, 2017 Martin-Carreras T, Kahn, Jr CE: Coverage and readability of information resources to help patients understand radiology reports. J Am Coll Radiol, 2017
42.
go back to reference Goff DJ, Loehfelm TW: Automated radiology report summarization using an open-source natural language processing pipeline. J Digit Imaging:1–8, 2017 Goff DJ, Loehfelm TW: Automated radiology report summarization using an open-source natural language processing pipeline. J Digit Imaging:1–8, 2017
43.
go back to reference Chen P-H, Zafar H, Galperin-Aizenberg M, Cook T: Integrating natural language processing and machine learning algorithms to categorize oncologic response in radiology reports. J Digit Imaging:1–7, 2017 Chen P-H, Zafar H, Galperin-Aizenberg M, Cook T: Integrating natural language processing and machine learning algorithms to categorize oncologic response in radiology reports. J Digit Imaging:1–7, 2017
44.
go back to reference Hassanpour S, Langlotz CP: Unsupervised topic modeling in a large free text radiology report repository. J Digit Imaging 29(1):59–62, 2016CrossRef Hassanpour S, Langlotz CP: Unsupervised topic modeling in a large free text radiology report repository. J Digit Imaging 29(1):59–62, 2016CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ontology-Based Radiology Teaching File Summarization, Coverage, and Integration
Authors
Priya Deshpande
Alexander Rasin
Jun Son
Sungmin Kim
Eli Brown
Jacob Furst
Daniela S. Raicu
Steven M. Montner
Samuel G. Armato III
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-020-00331-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2020 Go to the issue