Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2016

01-06-2016

Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Masses in Breast DCE-MRI

Authors: Emi Honda, Ryohei Nakayama, Hitoshi Koyama, Akiyoshi Yamashita

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to develop a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast masses in dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Our database consisted 90 DCE-MRI examinations, each of which contained four sequential phase images; this database included 28 benign masses and 62 malignant masses. In our CAD scheme, we first determined 11 objective features of masses by taking into account the image features and the dynamic changes in signal intensity that experienced radiologists commonly use for describing masses in DCE-MRI. Quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) was employed to distinguish between benign and malignant masses. As the input of the QDA, a combination of four objective features was determined among the 11 objective features according to a stepwise method. These objective features were as follows: (i) the change in signal intensity from 2 to 5 min; (ii) the change in signal intensity from 0 to 2 min; (iii) the irregularity of the shape; and (iv) the smoothness of the margin. Using this approach, the classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were shown to be 85.6 % (77 of 90), 87.1 % (54 of 62), and 82.1 % (23 of 28), respectively. Furthermore, the positive and negative predictive values were 91.5 % (54 of 59) and 74.2 % (23 of 31), respectively. Our CAD scheme therefore exhibits high classification accuracy and is useful in the differential diagnosis of masses in DCE-MRI images.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Preda P, Turetschek K, Daldrup H: The choice of region of interest measures incontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image characterization of experimental breast tumors. Investig Radiol 40:349–354, 2005CrossRef Preda P, Turetschek K, Daldrup H: The choice of region of interest measures incontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image characterization of experimental breast tumors. Investig Radiol 40:349–354, 2005CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D: Systematicreview: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 148:671–679, 2008CrossRefPubMed Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D: Systematicreview: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 148:671–679, 2008CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Fausto A, Esseridou A, Leo GD, Kirchin MA: Gadobenate dimeglu-mine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance. Investig Radiol 43:236–242, 2008CrossRef Sardanelli F, Fausto A, Esseridou A, Leo GD, Kirchin MA: Gadobenate dimeglu-mine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance. Investig Radiol 43:236–242, 2008CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pinker K, Grabner G, Bogner W, Gruber S, Szomolanyi P, Trattnig S, et al: A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results. Investig Radiol 44:553–558, 2009CrossRef Pinker K, Grabner G, Bogner W, Gruber S, Szomolanyi P, Trattnig S, et al: A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results. Investig Radiol 44:553–558, 2009CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al: Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778, 2005CrossRefPubMed Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al: Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778, 2005CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al: Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476, 2005CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al: Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476, 2005CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Podo F, D’Agnolo G, et al: Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 242:698–715, 2007CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Podo F, D’Agnolo G, et al: Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 242:698–715, 2007CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hylton N, Kuhl CK, Lehman C, Pisano ED, Causer P, Schnitt SJ, Smazal SF, Stelling CB, Weatherall PT, Schnall MD: Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292:2735–2742, 2004CrossRefPubMed Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hylton N, Kuhl CK, Lehman C, Pisano ED, Causer P, Schnitt SJ, Smazal SF, Stelling CB, Weatherall PT, Schnall MD: Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292:2735–2742, 2004CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH: Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246:116–124, 2008CrossRefPubMed Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH: Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246:116–124, 2008CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hrung JM, Sonnad SS, Schwartz JS, Langlotz CP: Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 6:387–397, 1999CrossRefPubMed Hrung JM, Sonnad SS, Schwartz JS, Langlotz CP: Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 6:387–397, 1999CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Doi K: Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imaging Graph 31(4–5):198–211, 2007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Doi K: Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imaging Graph 31(4–5):198–211, 2007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U, Newstead GM: Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys 33(8):2878–2887, 2006CrossRefPubMed Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U, Newstead GM: Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys 33(8):2878–2887, 2006CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yang Q, Li L, Zhang J, Shao G, Zheng B: A computerized global MR image feature analysis scheme to assist diagnosis of breast cancer: a preliminary assessment. Eur J Radiol 83(7):1086–1091, 2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang Q, Li L, Zhang J, Shao G, Zheng B: A computerized global MR image feature analysis scheme to assist diagnosis of breast cancer: a preliminary assessment. Eur J Radiol 83(7):1086–1091, 2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Yang Q, Li L, Zhang J, Shao G, Zhang C, Zheng B: Computer-aided diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI images using bilateral asymmetry of contrast enhancement between two breasts. J Digit Imaging 27(1):152–160, 2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang Q, Li L, Zhang J, Shao G, Zhang C, Zheng B: Computer-aided diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI images using bilateral asymmetry of contrast enhancement between two breasts. J Digit Imaging 27(1):152–160, 2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Rakoczy M, McGaughey D, Korenberg MJ, Levman J, Martel AL: Feature selection in computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. J Digit Imaging 26(2):198–208, 2013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rakoczy M, McGaughey D, Korenberg MJ, Levman J, Martel AL: Feature selection in computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. J Digit Imaging 26(2):198–208, 2013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Agliozzo S, De Luca M, Bracco C, Vignati A, Giannini V, Martincich L, Carbonaro LA, Bert A, Sardanelli F, Regge D: Computer-aided diagnosis for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI of mass-like lesions using a multiparametric model combining a selection of morphological, kinetic, and spatiotemporal features. Med Phys 39(4):1704–1715, 2012CrossRefPubMed Agliozzo S, De Luca M, Bracco C, Vignati A, Giannini V, Martincich L, Carbonaro LA, Bert A, Sardanelli F, Regge D: Computer-aided diagnosis for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI of mass-like lesions using a multiparametric model combining a selection of morphological, kinetic, and spatiotemporal features. Med Phys 39(4):1704–1715, 2012CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lee SH, Kim JH, Cho N, Park JS, Yang Z, Jung YS, Moon WK: Multilevel analysis of spatiotemporal association features for differentiation of tumor enhancement patterns in breast DCE-MRI. Med Phys 37(8):3940–3956, 2010CrossRefPubMed Lee SH, Kim JH, Cho N, Park JS, Yang Z, Jung YS, Moon WK: Multilevel analysis of spatiotemporal association features for differentiation of tumor enhancement patterns in breast DCE-MRI. Med Phys 37(8):3940–3956, 2010CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference American College of Radiology: Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 5th edition: American College of Radiology, 2013 American College of Radiology: Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 5th edition: American College of Radiology, 2013
20.
go back to reference Otsu N: A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(1):62–66, 1979CrossRef Otsu N: A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(1):62–66, 1979CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Liao P-S, Chen T-S, Chung P-S: A Fast Algorithm for Multilevel Thresholding. J Inf Sci Eng 17(5):713–727, 2001 Liao P-S, Chen T-S, Chung P-S: A Fast Algorithm for Multilevel Thresholding. J Inf Sci Eng 17(5):713–727, 2001
22.
go back to reference Gilhuijs KG, Giger ML, Bick U: Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. Med Phys 25(9):1647–1654, 1998CrossRefPubMed Gilhuijs KG, Giger ML, Bick U: Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. Med Phys 25(9):1647–1654, 1998CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Chen W, Giger ML, Lan L, Bick U: Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. Med Phys 31(5):1076–1082, 2004CrossRefPubMed Chen W, Giger ML, Lan L, Bick U: Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. Med Phys 31(5):1076–1082, 2004CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kuncheva LI: Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley, New York, 2004CrossRef Kuncheva LI: Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley, New York, 2004CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Masses in Breast DCE-MRI
Authors
Emi Honda
Ryohei Nakayama
Hitoshi Koyama
Akiyoshi Yamashita
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9856-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2016 Go to the issue