Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2014

01-02-2014

Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast DCE-MRI Images Using Bilateral Asymmetry of Contrast Enhancement Between Two Breasts

Authors: Qian Yang, Lihua Li, Juan Zhang, Guoliang Shao, Chengjie Zhang, Bin Zheng

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of breasts is an important imaging modality in breast cancer diagnosis with higher sensitivity but relatively lower specificity. The objective of this study is to investigate a new approach to help improve diagnostic performance of DCE-MRI examinations based on the automated detection and analysis of bilateral asymmetry of characteristic kinetic features between the left and right breast. An image dataset involving 130 DCE-MRI examinations was assembled and used in which 80 were biopsy-proved malignant and 50 were benign. A computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme was developed to segment breast areas depicted on each MR image, register images acquired from the sequential MR image scan series, compute average contrast enhancement of all pixels in one breast, and a set of kinetic features related to the difference of contrast enhancement between the left and right breast, and then use a multi-feature based Bayesian belief network to classify between malignant and benign cases. A leave-one-case-out validation method was applied to test CAD performance. The computed area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is 0.78 ± 0.04. The positive and negative predictive values are 0.77 and 0.64, respectively. The study indicates that bilateral asymmetry of kinetic features between the left and right breasts is a potentially useful image biomarker to enhance the detection of angiogenesis associated with malignancy. It also demonstrates the feasibility of applying a simple CAD approach to classify between malignant and benign DCE-MRI examinations based on this new image biomarker.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Cady B, Michaelson JS: The life-sparing potential of mammographic screening. Cancer 91:1699–1703, 2001PubMedCrossRef Cady B, Michaelson JS: The life-sparing potential of mammographic screening. Cancer 91:1699–1703, 2001PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al: Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724–1731, 2001PubMedCrossRef Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al: Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724–1731, 2001PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Smith RA, Cokkindes V, Brooks D, et al: Cancer screening in the United States, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin 61:8–30, 2011PubMedCrossRef Smith RA, Cokkindes V, Brooks D, et al: Cancer screening in the United States, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin 61:8–30, 2011PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al: Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1081–1087, 2000PubMedCrossRef Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al: Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1081–1087, 2000PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175, 2002PubMedCrossRef Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175, 2002PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849, 2004PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849, 2004PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al: American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57:75–89, 2007PubMedCrossRef Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al: American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57:75–89, 2007PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al: Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778, 2005PubMedCrossRef Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al: Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778, 2005PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al: Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476, 2005PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al: Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476, 2005PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Podo F, D’Agnolo G, et al: Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 242:698–715, 2007PubMedCrossRef Sardanelli F, Podo F, D’Agnolo G, et al: Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 242:698–715, 2007PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al: Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427–437, 2004PubMedCrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al: Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427–437, 2004PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al: Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer 106:2318–2326, 2006PubMedCrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al: Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer 106:2318–2326, 2006PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Warner E: Intensive radiologic surveillance: a focus on the psychological issues. Ann Oncol 15:143–147, 2004CrossRef Warner E: Intensive radiologic surveillance: a focus on the psychological issues. Ann Oncol 15:143–147, 2004CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Berg WA, Blume JD, Adams AM, et al: Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology 254:79–87, 2010PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Blume JD, Adams AM, et al: Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology 254:79–87, 2010PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gibbs P, Turnbull LW: Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR image of the breast. Magn Reson Med 50:92–98, 2003PubMedCrossRef Gibbs P, Turnbull LW: Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR image of the breast. Magn Reson Med 50:92–98, 2003PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U, Newstead GM: Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys 33:2878–2887, 2006PubMedCrossRef Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U, Newstead GM: Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys 33:2878–2887, 2006PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaun KS, Reinhardt JM: Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:89–95, 2007PubMedCrossRef Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaun KS, Reinhardt JM: Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:89–95, 2007PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, et al: Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 244:94–103, 2007PubMedCrossRef Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, et al: Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 244:94–103, 2007PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bhooshan N, Giger ML, Jansen SA, Li H, Lan L, Newstead GM: Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. Radiology 254:680–690, 2010PubMedCrossRef Bhooshan N, Giger ML, Jansen SA, Li H, Lan L, Newstead GM: Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. Radiology 254:680–690, 2010PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yuan Y, Giger ML, Li H, Bhooshan N, Sennett CA: Multimodality computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI. Acad Radiol 17:1158–1167, 2010PubMedCrossRef Yuan Y, Giger ML, Li H, Bhooshan N, Sennett CA: Multimodality computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI. Acad Radiol 17:1158–1167, 2010PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Pike MC, Morris EA: Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology 260:50–60, 2011PubMedCrossRef King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Pike MC, Morris EA: Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology 260:50–60, 2011PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J: Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer? Eur Radiol 21:2261–2267, 2011PubMedCrossRef Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J: Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer? Eur Radiol 21:2261–2267, 2011PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Harvey J, Bovbjerg VE: Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 230:29–41, 2004PubMedCrossRef Harvey J, Bovbjerg VE: Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 230:29–41, 2004PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kopans DB: Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk. Radiology 246:348–353, 2008PubMedCrossRef Kopans DB: Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk. Radiology 246:348–353, 2008PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kim M, Wu G, Shen D: Hierarchical alignment of breast DCE-MR images by groupwise registration and robust feature matching. Med Phys 39:353–366, 2012PubMedCrossRef Kim M, Wu G, Shen D: Hierarchical alignment of breast DCE-MR images by groupwise registration and robust feature matching. Med Phys 39:353–366, 2012PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Filev P, Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Helvie MA: Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms. Med Phys 32:515–529, 2005PubMedCrossRef Filev P, Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Helvie MA: Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms. Med Phys 32:515–529, 2005PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wang XH, Park SC, Zheng B: Improving performance of content-based image retrieval schemes in searching for similar breast mass regions: an assessment. Phys Med Biol 54:949–961, 2009PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wang XH, Park SC, Zheng B: Improving performance of content-based image retrieval schemes in searching for similar breast mass regions: an assessment. Phys Med Biol 54:949–961, 2009PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kahn CE, Robert LM, Wang K, et al: Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. Comput. Biol. Med. 27:1929–1940, 1997CrossRef Kahn CE, Robert LM, Wang K, et al: Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. Comput. Biol. Med. 27:1929–1940, 1997CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wang X, Zheng B, Good WF, King JK, Chang Y: Computer-assisted diagnosis of breast cancer using a data-driven Bayesian belief network. Int J Med Informatics 54:115–126, 1999CrossRef Wang X, Zheng B, Good WF, King JK, Chang Y: Computer-assisted diagnosis of breast cancer using a data-driven Bayesian belief network. Int J Med Informatics 54:115–126, 1999CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wang X, Lederman D, Tan J, Zheng B: Computer-aided detection: the impact of machine learning classifier and image feature selection on scheme performance. Int J Intell Inf Process 1:30–40, 2010 Wang X, Lederman D, Tan J, Zheng B: Computer-aided detection: the impact of machine learning classifier and image feature selection on scheme performance. Int J Intell Inf Process 1:30–40, 2010
33.
go back to reference Mitchell TM: Machine learning. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, 1997 Mitchell TM: Machine learning. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, 1997
36.
go back to reference Wang X, Li L, Xu W, Liu W, Lederman D, Zheng B: Improving performance of computer-aided detection of subtle breast masses using an adaptive cueing method. Phys Med Biol 57:561–575, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wang X, Li L, Xu W, Liu W, Lederman D, Zheng B: Improving performance of computer-aided detection of subtle breast masses using an adaptive cueing method. Phys Med Biol 57:561–575, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Wang X, Klym AH, Gur D: Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment. Eur J Radiol. 81:3222–3228, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Wang X, Klym AH, Gur D: Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment. Eur J Radiol. 81:3222–3228, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast DCE-MRI Images Using Bilateral Asymmetry of Contrast Enhancement Between Two Breasts
Authors
Qian Yang
Lihua Li
Juan Zhang
Guoliang Shao
Chengjie Zhang
Bin Zheng
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-013-9617-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2014 Go to the issue