Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 5/2011

01-10-2011

A Pilot Study on Using Eye Tracking to Understand Assessment of Surgical Outcomes from Clinical Photography

Authors: Min Soon Kim, Angela Burgess, Andrew J. Waters, Gregory P. Reece, Elisabeth K. Beahm, Melissa A. Crosby, Karen M. Basen-Engquist, Mia K. Markey

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Appearance changes resulting from breast cancer treatment impact the quality of life of breast cancer survivors, but current approaches to evaluating breast characteristics are very limited. It is challenging, even for experienced plastic surgeons, to describe how different aspects of breast morphology impact overall assessment of esthetics. Moreover, it is difficult to describe what they are looking for in a manner that facilitates quantification. The goal of this study is to assess the potential of using eye-tracking technology to understand how plastic surgeons assess breast morphology by recording their gaze path while they rate physical characteristics of the breasts, e.g., symmetry, based on clinical photographs. In this study, dwell time, transition frequency, dwell sequence conditional probabilities, and dwell sequence joint probabilities were analyzed across photographic poses and three observers. Dwell-time analysis showed that all three surgeons spent the majority of their time on the anterior–posterior (AP) views. Similarly, transition frequency analysis between regions showed that there were substantially more transitions between the breast regions in the AP view, relative to the number of transitions between other views. The results of both the conditional and joint probability analyses between the breast regions showed that the highest probabilities of transitions were observed between the breast regions in the AP view (APRB, APLB) followed by the oblique views and the lateral views to complete evaluation of breast surgical outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Breast Cancer Facts & Figures: Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2009–2010 Breast Cancer Facts & Figures: Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2009–2010
2.
go back to reference 2000/2006/2007 National Plastic Surgery Statistics, Arlington Heights, IL: American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2008 2000/2006/2007 National Plastic Surgery Statistics, Arlington Heights, IL: American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2008
3.
go back to reference Kim MS, Sbalchiero JC, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Beahm EK, Markey MK: Assessment of breast aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:186e–194e, 2008PubMedCrossRef Kim MS, Sbalchiero JC, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Beahm EK, Markey MK: Assessment of breast aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:186e–194e, 2008PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Smith DJJ, Palin WEJ, Katch V, Bennett JE: Surgical treatment of congenital breast asymmetry. Ann Plast Surg 17:92–101, 1986PubMedCrossRef Smith DJJ, Palin WEJ, Katch V, Bennett JE: Surgical treatment of congenital breast asymmetry. Ann Plast Surg 17:92–101, 1986PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Westreich M: Anthropomorphic breast measurement: Protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468–479, 1997PubMedCrossRef Westreich M: Anthropomorphic breast measurement: Protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468–479, 1997PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim MS, Reece GP, Beahm EK, Miller MJ, Neely Atkinson E, Markey MK: Objective assessment of aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: measuring ptosis from clinical photographs. Comput Biol Med 37:49–59, 2007PubMedCrossRef Kim MS, Reece GP, Beahm EK, Miller MJ, Neely Atkinson E, Markey MK: Objective assessment of aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: measuring ptosis from clinical photographs. Comput Biol Med 37:49–59, 2007PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kim MS, Rodney WN, Cooper T, Kite C, Reece GP, Markey MK: Towards quantifying the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: comparison of clinical photography and colorimetry. J Eval Clin Pract 15:20–31, 2009PubMedCrossRef Kim MS, Rodney WN, Cooper T, Kite C, Reece GP, Markey MK: Towards quantifying the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: comparison of clinical photography and colorimetry. J Eval Clin Pract 15:20–31, 2009PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kim MS, Rodney WN, Reece GP, Beahm EK, Crosby MA, Markey MK (2010) Quantifying the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: assessment of surgical scars from clinical photographs. J Eval Clin Pract (in press) Kim MS, Rodney WN, Reece GP, Beahm EK, Crosby MA, Markey MK (2010) Quantifying the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: assessment of surgical scars from clinical photographs. J Eval Clin Pract (in press)
9.
go back to reference Pezner RD, et al: Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11:575–578, 1985PubMedCrossRef Pezner RD, et al: Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11:575–578, 1985PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Manson P: Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58–70, 2002PubMedCrossRef Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Manson P: Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58–70, 2002PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AAJ, Carlson GW: Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54:471–476, 2005PubMedCrossRef Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AAJ, Carlson GW: Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54:471–476, 2005PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vrieling C, et al: Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC “boost versus no boost” trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45:667–676, 1999PubMedCrossRef Vrieling C, et al: Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC “boost versus no boost” trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45:667–676, 1999PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mello-Thoms C: How does the perception of a lesion influence visual search strategy in mammogram reading? Acad Radiol 13:275–288, 2006PubMedCrossRef Mello-Thoms C: How does the perception of a lesion influence visual search strategy in mammogram reading? Acad Radiol 13:275–288, 2006PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Krupinski EA: Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms. Acad Radiol 3:137–144, 1996PubMedCrossRef Krupinski EA: Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms. Acad Radiol 3:137–144, 1996PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Krupinski EA: Visual search of mammographic images: influence of lesion subtlety. Acad Radiol 12:965–969, 2005PubMedCrossRef Krupinski EA: Visual search of mammographic images: influence of lesion subtlety. Acad Radiol 12:965–969, 2005PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mello-Thoms C, Dunn S, Nodine CF, Kundel HL, Weinstein SP: The perception of breast cancer: What differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography? Acad Radiol 9:1004–1012, 2002PubMedCrossRef Mello-Thoms C, Dunn S, Nodine CF, Kundel HL, Weinstein SP: The perception of breast cancer: What differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography? Acad Radiol 9:1004–1012, 2002PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nguyen HT, Isaacowitz DM, Rubin PAD: Age- and fatigue-related markers of human faces: an eye-tracking study. Ophthalmology 116:355–360, 2009PubMedCrossRef Nguyen HT, Isaacowitz DM, Rubin PAD: Age- and fatigue-related markers of human faces: an eye-tracking study. Ophthalmology 116:355–360, 2009PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dixson B, Grimshaw G, Linklater W, Dixson A: Eye-tracking of men's preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Arch Sex Behav., 2009. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9523-5 Dixson B, Grimshaw G, Linklater W, Dixson A: Eye-tracking of men's preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Arch Sex Behav., 2009. doi:10.​1007/​s10508-009-9523-5
19.
go back to reference Ishii L, Carey J, Byrne P, Zee DS, Ishii M: Measuring attentional bias to peripheral facial deformities. Laryngoscope 119:459–465, 2009PubMedCrossRef Ishii L, Carey J, Byrne P, Zee DS, Ishii M: Measuring attentional bias to peripheral facial deformities. Laryngoscope 119:459–465, 2009PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yavuzer R, Smirnes S, Jackson IT: Guidelines for standard photography in plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 46:293–300, 2001PubMedCrossRef Yavuzer R, Smirnes S, Jackson IT: Guidelines for standard photography in plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 46:293–300, 2001PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Herbert AM, et al: Searching for symmetry: eye movements during a difficult symmetry detection task. J Vis 6:24–24, 2006CrossRef Herbert AM, et al: Searching for symmetry: eye movements during a difficult symmetry detection task. J Vis 6:24–24, 2006CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mappus IV, RL, Ferguson RW, Czechowski K, Corballis PM: Spotting Differences: How Qualitative Asymmetries Influence Visual Search. Stresa, Italy, 2005 Mappus IV, RL, Ferguson RW, Czechowski K, Corballis PM: Spotting Differences: How Qualitative Asymmetries Influence Visual Search. Stresa, Italy, 2005
23.
Metadata
Title
A Pilot Study on Using Eye Tracking to Understand Assessment of Surgical Outcomes from Clinical Photography
Authors
Min Soon Kim
Angela Burgess
Andrew J. Waters
Gregory P. Reece
Elisabeth K. Beahm
Melissa A. Crosby
Karen M. Basen-Engquist
Mia K. Markey
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-010-9338-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Journal of Digital Imaging 5/2011 Go to the issue