Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Odontology 2/2018

01-04-2018 | Original Article

A stepwise under-prepared osteotomy technique improves primary stability in shallow-placed implants: a preliminary study for simultaneous vertical ridge augmentation

Authors: Daisuke Ueno, Kei Nakamura, Kousuke Kojima, Takeshi Toyoshima, Hideaki Tanaka, Kazuhiko Ueda, Kiyoshi Koyano, Toshiro Kodama

Published in: Odontology | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Simultaneous vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) can reduce treatment procedures and surgery time, but the concomitant reduction in primary stability (PS) of a shallow-placed implant imparts risk to its prognosis. Although several studies have reported improvements in PS, there is little information from any simultaneous VRA model. This study aimed to evaluate whether tapered implants with stepwise under-prepared osteotomy could improve the PS of shallow-placed implants in an in vitro model of simultaneous VRA. Tapered implants (Straumann® Bone Level Tapered implant; BLT) and hybrid implants (Straumann® Bone Level implant; BL) were investigated in this study. A total of 80 osteotomies of different depths (4, 6, 8, 10 mm) were created in rigid polyurethane foam blocks, and each BLT and BL was inserted by either standard (BLT-S, BL-S) or a stepwise under-prepared (BLT-U, BL-U) osteotomy protocol. The PS was evaluated by measuring maximum insertion torque (IT), implant stability quotient (ISQ), and removal torque (RT). The significance level was set at P < 0.05. There were no significant differences in IT, ISQ or RT when comparing BLT-S and BL-S or BLT-U and BL-U at placement depths of 6 and 8 mm. When comparison was made between osteotomy protocols, IT was significantly greater in BLT-U than in BLT-S at all placement depths. A stepwise under-prepared osteotomy protocol improves initial stability of a tapered implant even in a shallow-placed implant model. BLT-U could be a useful protocol for simultaneous VRA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Winter W, Mohrle S, Holst S, Karl M. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:532–9.PubMed Winter W, Mohrle S, Holst S, Karl M. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:532–9.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Gehrke SA, Neto UTS, Fabbro MD. Does implant design affect implant primary stability? A resonance frequency analysis-based randomized split-mouth clinical trial. J Oral Implantol. 2015;6:e281–6.CrossRef Gehrke SA, Neto UTS, Fabbro MD. Does implant design affect implant primary stability? A resonance frequency analysis-based randomized split-mouth clinical trial. J Oral Implantol. 2015;6:e281–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Mellström D, Sennerby L. Brånemark implants and osteoporosis: a clinical exploratory study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001;3:50–6.CrossRefPubMed Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Mellström D, Sennerby L. Brånemark implants and osteoporosis: a clinical exploratory study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001;3:50–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Sennerby L. Clinical outcome of Brånemark system implants of various diameters: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:671–7.PubMed Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Sennerby L. Clinical outcome of Brånemark system implants of various diameters: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:671–7.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:213–20.CrossRefPubMed Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:213–20.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yamaguchi Y, Shiota M, Munakata M, Kasugai S, Ozeki M. Effect of implant design on primary stability using torque-time curves in artificial bone. Int J Implant Dent. 2015;1:21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yamaguchi Y, Shiota M, Munakata M, Kasugai S, Ozeki M. Effect of implant design on primary stability using torque-time curves in artificial bone. Int J Implant Dent. 2015;1:21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Meredith N, Friberg B, Sennerby L, Aparicio C. Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:269–75.PubMed Meredith N, Friberg B, Sennerby L, Aparicio C. Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:269–75.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ottoni JM, Oliveira ZF, Mansini R, Cabral AM. Correlation between placement torque and survival of single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:769–76.PubMed Ottoni JM, Oliveira ZF, Mansini R, Cabral AM. Correlation between placement torque and survival of single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:769–76.PubMed
9.
go back to reference O’Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:474–80.CrossRefPubMed O’Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:474–80.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Toyoshima T, Wagner W, Klein MO, Stender E, Wieland M, Al-Nawas B. Primary stability of a hybrid self-tapping implant compared to a cylindrical non-self-tapping implant with respect to drilling protocols in an ex vivo model. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:71–8.CrossRefPubMed Toyoshima T, Wagner W, Klein MO, Stender E, Wieland M, Al-Nawas B. Primary stability of a hybrid self-tapping implant compared to a cylindrical non-self-tapping implant with respect to drilling protocols in an ex vivo model. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:71–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference O’Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Jagger D, Meredith N. A comparison of two methods of enhancing implant primary stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6:48–57.CrossRefPubMed O’Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Jagger D, Meredith N. A comparison of two methods of enhancing implant primary stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6:48–57.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Romanos GE, Ciornei G, Jucan A, Malmstrom H, Gupta B. In vitro assessment of primary stability of Straumann(R) implant designs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:89–95.CrossRefPubMed Romanos GE, Ciornei G, Jucan A, Malmstrom H, Gupta B. In vitro assessment of primary stability of Straumann(R) implant designs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:89–95.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Divac M, Stawarczyk B, Sahrmann P, Attin T, Schmidlin PR. Influence of residual bone thickness on primary stability of hybrid self-tapping and cylindric non-self-tapping implants in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:84–8.CrossRefPubMed Divac M, Stawarczyk B, Sahrmann P, Attin T, Schmidlin PR. Influence of residual bone thickness on primary stability of hybrid self-tapping and cylindric non-self-tapping implants in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:84–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Romanos GE, Basha-Hijazi A, Gupta B, Ren YF, Malmstrom H. Role of clinician’s experience and implant design on implant stability. an ex vivo study in artificial soft bones. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:166–71.CrossRefPubMed Romanos GE, Basha-Hijazi A, Gupta B, Ren YF, Malmstrom H. Role of clinician’s experience and implant design on implant stability. an ex vivo study in artificial soft bones. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:166–71.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:423–32.CrossRefPubMed Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:423–32.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Steigenga JT, al-Shammari KF, Nociti FH, Misch CE, Wang HL. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant Dent. 2003;12:306–17.CrossRefPubMed Steigenga JT, al-Shammari KF, Nociti FH, Misch CE, Wang HL. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant Dent. 2003;12:306–17.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Merheb J, Van Assche N, Coucke W, Jacobs R, Naert I, Quirynen M. Relationship between cortical bone thickness or computerized tomography-derived bone density values and implant stability. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2010;21:612–7.CrossRef Merheb J, Van Assche N, Coucke W, Jacobs R, Naert I, Quirynen M. Relationship between cortical bone thickness or computerized tomography-derived bone density values and implant stability. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2010;21:612–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2008;8:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2008;8:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Jacobs R. Preoperative radiologic planning of implant surgery in compromised patients. Periodontol. 2000;2003(33):12–25. Jacobs R. Preoperative radiologic planning of implant surgery in compromised patients. Periodontol. 2000;2003(33):12–25.
Metadata
Title
A stepwise under-prepared osteotomy technique improves primary stability in shallow-placed implants: a preliminary study for simultaneous vertical ridge augmentation
Authors
Daisuke Ueno
Kei Nakamura
Kousuke Kojima
Takeshi Toyoshima
Hideaki Tanaka
Kazuhiko Ueda
Kiyoshi Koyano
Toshiro Kodama
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Odontology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Electronic ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-017-0316-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Odontology 2/2018 Go to the issue