Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical and Experimental Medicine 3/2018

Open Access 01-08-2018 | Original Article

Good glycaemic control is associated with a better prognosis in breast cancer patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Authors: Yen-Lin Chang, Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu, Shih-Yi Lin, Wen-Shyong Liou

Published in: Clinical and Experimental Medicine | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Although diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the risk factors associated with increased breast cancer (BC) mortality, the effects of glycaemic control on the prognosis of BC have not been thoroughly evaluated. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the relationship between glycaemic control and BC prognosis and to determine an optimal target of glycaemic control for BC patients with diabetes. We included 2812 stage 0–3 BC women, of whom 145 were diabetic and were 2667 non-diabetic. In those with diabetes, a mean haemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) < 7% (n = 77) was defined as well-controlled diabetes, while a mean HbA1C > 9% (n = 16) was defined as poorly controlled diabetes. All of the BC populations were followed from the date on which BC was diagnosed until 31 December 2015. Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the adjusted hazards for all-cause mortality and BC-specific mortality. After controlling for the baseline and BC-related confounders, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality and the HR for BC-specific mortality were 3.65 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.13–11.82) and 8.37 (95% CI 1.90–36.91), respectively, for poorly controlled diabetic women and non-DM women. However, for the diabetic women with good glycaemic control, the HRs of all-cause mortality and BC-specific mortality were not significantly different (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.42–1.01; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.18–3.32, respectively) from those for both mortalities in non-DM patients. For moderate controlled diabetic women, the HRs for all-cause mortality and BC-specific mortality were 1.95 (95% CI 0.89–4.27) and 3.55 (95% CI 1.369–9.30), respectively. This pilot and retrospective cohort study reveals a relationship between glycaemic control and BC prognosis in diabetic women. In addition, well-controlled HbA1C, with maintained mean HbA1C values under 7%, may be associated with a better progression outcome of BC.
Literature
4.
go back to reference America Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts and figures 2013–2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc.; 2013. America Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts and figures 2013–2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc.; 2013.
7.
go back to reference Roglic G. WHO Global report on diabetes: a summary. Int J Noncommun Dis. 2016;1(1):3–8.CrossRef Roglic G. WHO Global report on diabetes: a summary. Int J Noncommun Dis. 2016;1(1):3–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer; 2010. Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer; 2010.
22.
go back to reference Frederick LG, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer; 2013. Frederick LG, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer; 2013.
24.
go back to reference Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm—2017 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(2):207–38. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP161682.CS.CrossRefPubMed Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm—2017 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(2):207–38. https://​doi.​org/​10.​4158/​EP161682.​CS.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Good glycaemic control is associated with a better prognosis in breast cancer patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Authors
Yen-Lin Chang
Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu
Shih-Yi Lin
Wen-Shyong Liou
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Medicine / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1591-8890
Electronic ISSN: 1591-9528
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-018-0497-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Clinical and Experimental Medicine 3/2018 Go to the issue