Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The European Journal of Health Economics 8/2018

Open Access 01-11-2018 | Original Paper

The cost-effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma patients in England

Authors: Yang Meng, Nadine Hertel, John Ellis, Edith Morais, Helen Johnson, Zoe Philips, Neil Roskell, Andrew Walker, Dawn Lee

Published in: The European Journal of Health Economics | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Nivolumab was the first programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor to demonstrate long-term survival benefit in a clinical trial setting for advanced melanoma patients.

Objective

To evaluate the cost effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma patients in England.

Methods

A Markov state-transition model was developed to estimate the lifetime costs and benefits of nivolumab versus ipilimumab and dacarbazine for BRAF mutation-negative patients and versus ipilimumab, dabrafenib, and vemurafenib for BRAF mutation-positive patients. Covariate-adjusted parametric curves for time to progression, pre-progression survival, and post-progression survival were fitted based on patient-level data from two trials and long-term ipilimumab survival data. Indirect treatment comparisons between nivolumab, ipilimumab, and dacarbazine were informed by these covariate-adjusted parametric curves, controlling for differences in patient characteristics. Kaplan–Meier data from the literature were digitised and used to fit progression-free and overall survival curves for dabrafenib and vemurafenib. Patient utilities and resource use data were based on trial data or the literature. Patients are assumed to receive nivolumab until there is no further clinical benefit, assumed to be the first of progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or 2 years of treatment.

Results

Nivolumab is the most cost-effective treatment option in BRAF mutation-negative and mutation-positive patients, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £24,483 and £17,362 per quality-adjusted life year, respectively. The model results are most sensitive to assumptions regarding treatment duration for nivolumab and the parameters of the fitted parametric survival curves.

Conclusions

Nivolumab is a cost-effective treatment for advanced melanoma patients in England.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Garbe, C., Peris, K., Hauschild, A., et al.: Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline—update 2012. Eur. J. Cancer 48, 2375–2390 (2012)CrossRef Garbe, C., Peris, K., Hauschild, A., et al.: Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline—update 2012. Eur. J. Cancer 48, 2375–2390 (2012)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Korn, E.L., Liu, P.Y., Lee, S.J., et al.: Meta-analysis of Phase II cooperative group trials in metastatic stage IV melanoma to determine progression-free and overall survival benchmarks for future Phase II trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 527–534 (2008)CrossRef Korn, E.L., Liu, P.Y., Lee, S.J., et al.: Meta-analysis of Phase II cooperative group trials in metastatic stage IV melanoma to determine progression-free and overall survival benchmarks for future Phase II trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 527–534 (2008)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Balch, C.M., Gershenwald, J.E., Soong, S.J., et al.: Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 6199–6206 (2009)CrossRef Balch, C.M., Gershenwald, J.E., Soong, S.J., et al.: Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 6199–6206 (2009)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Garbe, C., Eigentler, T.K., Keilholz, U., et al.: Systematic review of medical treatment in melanoma: current status and future prospects. Oncologist. 16, 5–24 (2011)CrossRef Garbe, C., Eigentler, T.K., Keilholz, U., et al.: Systematic review of medical treatment in melanoma: current status and future prospects. Oncologist. 16, 5–24 (2011)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Agarwala, S.S.: Current systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 9, 587–595 (2009)CrossRef Agarwala, S.S.: Current systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 9, 587–595 (2009)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lorigan, P., Marples, M., Harries, M., et al.: Treatment patterns, outcomes, and resource utilization of patients with metastatic melanoma in the U.K.: the MELODY study. Br. J. Dermatol. 170, 87–95 (2014)CrossRef Lorigan, P., Marples, M., Harries, M., et al.: Treatment patterns, outcomes, and resource utilization of patients with metastatic melanoma in the U.K.: the MELODY study. Br. J. Dermatol. 170, 87–95 (2014)CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cancer Research UK (CRUK). Melanoma statistics and outlook. 2014 Cancer Research UK (CRUK). Melanoma statistics and outlook. 2014
8.
go back to reference Kaufman, H.L., Kirkwood, J.M., Hodi, F.S., et al.: The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on tumour immunotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 10, 588–598 (2013)CrossRef Kaufman, H.L., Kirkwood, J.M., Hodi, F.S., et al.: The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on tumour immunotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 10, 588–598 (2013)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schadendorf, D., Hodi, F.S., Robert, C., et al.: Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from Phase II and Phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 1889–1894 (2015)CrossRef Schadendorf, D., Hodi, F.S., Robert, C., et al.: Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from Phase II and Phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 1889–1894 (2015)CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chapman, P.B., Hauschild, A., Robert, C., et al.: Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 2507–2516 (2011)CrossRef Chapman, P.B., Hauschild, A., Robert, C., et al.: Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 2507–2516 (2011)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hauschild, A., Grob, J.J., Demidov, L.V., et al.: Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label. Phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet 380, 358–365 (2012)CrossRef Hauschild, A., Grob, J.J., Demidov, L.V., et al.: Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label. Phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet 380, 358–365 (2012)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sosman, J.A., Kim, K.B., Schuchter, L., et al.: Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 707–714 (2012)CrossRef Sosman, J.A., Kim, K.B., Schuchter, L., et al.: Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 707–714 (2012)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sullivan, R.J., Flaherty, K.T.: Resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy in melanoma. Eur. J. Cancer 49, 1297–1304 (2013)CrossRef Sullivan, R.J., Flaherty, K.T.: Resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy in melanoma. Eur. J. Cancer 49, 1297–1304 (2013)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wang, C., Thudium, K.B., Han, M., et al.: In vitro characterization of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab, BMS-936558, and in vivo toxicology in non-human primates. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2, 846–856 (2014)CrossRef Wang, C., Thudium, K.B., Han, M., et al.: In vitro characterization of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab, BMS-936558, and in vivo toxicology in non-human primates. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2, 846–856 (2014)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). TA384:Nivolumab for treating advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma. 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). TA384:Nivolumab for treating advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma. 2016
16.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). TA357: Pembrolizumab for treating advanced melanoma after disease progression with ipilimumab. 2015 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). TA357: Pembrolizumab for treating advanced melanoma after disease progression with ipilimumab. 2015
17.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). TA366: Pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma not previously treated with ipilimumab. 2015 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). TA366: Pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma not previously treated with ipilimumab. 2015
18.
go back to reference Hatswell, A.J., Pennington, B., Pericleous, L., et al.: Patient-reported utilities in advanced or metastatic melanoma, including analysis of utilities by time to death. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 12, 140 (2014)CrossRef Hatswell, A.J., Pennington, B., Pericleous, L., et al.: Patient-reported utilities in advanced or metastatic melanoma, including analysis of utilities by time to death. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 12, 140 (2014)CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Porter J, Lee D, Hertel N, et al. Patient reported utilities in first-line advanced or metastatic melanoma: Analysis of trial CA 184-024. ISPOR 17th Annual European Congress. Amsterdam: The Netherlands, 2014CrossRef Porter J, Lee D, Hertel N, et al. Patient reported utilities in first-line advanced or metastatic melanoma: Analysis of trial CA 184-024. ISPOR 17th Annual European Congress. Amsterdam: The Netherlands, 2014CrossRef
20.
go back to reference van den Hout, W.B., Kramer, G.W., Noordijk, E.M., et al.: Cost-utility analysis of short-versus long-course palliative radiotherapy in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 98, 1786–1794 (2006)CrossRef van den Hout, W.B., Kramer, G.W., Noordijk, E.M., et al.: Cost-utility analysis of short-versus long-course palliative radiotherapy in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 98, 1786–1794 (2006)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Robert, C., Long, G.V., Brady, B., et al.: Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 320–330 (2015)CrossRef Robert, C., Long, G.V., Brady, B., et al.: Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 320–330 (2015)CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hodi, F.S., O’Day, S.J., McDermott, D.F., et al.: Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 711–723 (2010)CrossRef Hodi, F.S., O’Day, S.J., McDermott, D.F., et al.: Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 711–723 (2010)CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kotapati S, Dequen P, Ouwens M, et al. Overall survival in the management of pretreated patients with unresectable stage III/IV Melanoma: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. The American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL: USA. 2011CrossRef Kotapati S, Dequen P, Ouwens M, et al. Overall survival in the management of pretreated patients with unresectable stage III/IV Melanoma: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. The American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL: USA. 2011CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wada R, Feng Y, Zhang N, et al. Meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves from selected randomized controlled Phase II/III trials in advanced melanoma. Population Approach Group Europe Meeting. Athens: Greece. 2011 Wada R, Feng Y, Zhang N, et al. Meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves from selected randomized controlled Phase II/III trials in advanced melanoma. Population Approach Group Europe Meeting. Athens: Greece. 2011
25.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). TA319: Ipilimumab for previously untreated advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma. 2014 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). TA319: Ipilimumab for previously untreated advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma. 2014
26.
go back to reference Larkin, J., Hatswell, A.J., Nathan, P., et al.: The predicted impact of ipilimumab usage on survival in previously treated advanced or metastatic melanoma in the UK. PLoS ONE 10, e0145524 (2015)CrossRef Larkin, J., Hatswell, A.J., Nathan, P., et al.: The predicted impact of ipilimumab usage on survival in previously treated advanced or metastatic melanoma in the UK. PLoS ONE 10, e0145524 (2015)CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Latimer N. National Institute for Health an Clinical Excellence (NICE) DSU technical support document 14: Survival analysis for economic evaluations alongside clinical trials—Extrapolation with patient-level data. 2011 Latimer N. National Institute for Health an Clinical Excellence (NICE) DSU technical support document 14: Survival analysis for economic evaluations alongside clinical trials—Extrapolation with patient-level data. 2011
28.
go back to reference Balch, C.M., Buzaid, A.C., Soong, S.J., et al.: Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 19, 3635–3648 (2001)CrossRef Balch, C.M., Buzaid, A.C., Soong, S.J., et al.: Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 19, 3635–3648 (2001)CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics (ONS). National Life Tables, England 2011–2013. 2014 Office for National Statistics (ONS). National Life Tables, England 2011–2013. 2014
30.
go back to reference Oxford Outcomes. Advanced melanoma resource use and costs in Europe: final report. Data on File. 2011 Oxford Outcomes. Advanced melanoma resource use and costs in Europe: final report. Data on File. 2011
31.
go back to reference Beusterien, K.M., Szabo, S.M., Kotapati, S., et al.: Societal preference values for advanced melanoma health states in the United Kingdom and Australia. Br. J. Cancer 101, 387–389 (2009)CrossRef Beusterien, K.M., Szabo, S.M., Kotapati, S., et al.: Societal preference values for advanced melanoma health states in the United Kingdom and Australia. Br. J. Cancer 101, 387–389 (2009)CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Monthly Index of Medical Specialities (MIMS). 2016 Monthly Index of Medical Specialities (MIMS). 2016
33.
go back to reference Department of Health. Drugs and pharmaceutical electronic market information (eMit). 2016 Department of Health. Drugs and pharmaceutical electronic market information (eMit). 2016
34.
go back to reference Department of Health. NHS reference costs 2014–15. 2015 Department of Health. NHS reference costs 2014–15. 2015
35.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). TA268: Melanoma (stage III or IV)—ipilimumab: guidance. 2012 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). TA268: Melanoma (stage III or IV)—ipilimumab: guidance. 2012
36.
go back to reference Hodi S, Kluger H, Sznol M. Durable, long-term survival in previously treated patients with advanced melanoma who received nivolumab monotherapy in a phase I trial. American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting. New Orleans: USA. 2016 Hodi S, Kluger H, Sznol M. Durable, long-term survival in previously treated patients with advanced melanoma who received nivolumab monotherapy in a phase I trial. American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting. New Orleans: USA. 2016
37.
go back to reference Briggs, A., Baker, T., Gilloteau, I., et al.: Partitioned survival versus state transition modeling in oncology: a case study with nivolumab in advanced melanoma. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 18, A338 (2015)CrossRef Briggs, A., Baker, T., Gilloteau, I., et al.: Partitioned survival versus state transition modeling in oncology: a case study with nivolumab in advanced melanoma. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 18, A338 (2015)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The cost-effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma patients in England
Authors
Yang Meng
Nadine Hertel
John Ellis
Edith Morais
Helen Johnson
Zoe Philips
Neil Roskell
Andrew Walker
Dawn Lee
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
The European Journal of Health Economics / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 1618-7598
Electronic ISSN: 1618-7601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-018-0964-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

The European Journal of Health Economics 8/2018 Go to the issue