Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 7/2021

01-07-2021 | Rectal Cancer | Original Article

An initial experience with a novel technique of single-port robotic resection for rectal cancer

Authors: H. J. Kim, G.-S. Choi, S. H. Song, J. S. Park, S. Y. Park, S. M. Lee, J. A. Choi

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The da Vinci single-port (SP) system is designed to facilitate single-incision robotic surgery in a narrow space. We developed a new procedure of rectal resection using this system. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of SP robotic rectal resection for rectal cancer patients based on our initial experience.

Methods

A study was conducted on consecutive patients with mid or low rectal cancer who had SP robotic resection at our institution between July and September 2020. The demographic characteristics, perioperative data, and pathology results of the patients were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

There were 5 patients (3 males, 2 females, median age 57 years (range 36–73 years). The median tumor height from the anal verge was 4 cm (range 3−5 cm). Two patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy for advanced rectal cancer. A single docking was conducted, and the median docking time was 4 min 20 s (range 3 min 30 s to 5 min). The median total operation time was 195 min (range 155−240 min), and the median time of pelvic dissection was 45 min (range 36−62 min). All patients had circumferential and distal tumor-free resection margins. One patient experienced an anastomosis-related complication. The median duration of hospital stay was 7 days (range 7−8 days).

Conclusions

Our initial experience suggests that SP robotic rectal resection is safe and feasible. Further clinical trials comparing SP and multiport robotic rectal resection should be conducted to verify the superior aspects of this new system.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1569–1580CrossRef Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1569–1580CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Park JS, Kim NK, Kim SH, Lee KY, Lee KY, Shin JY, Kim CN, Choi GS, Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (2015) Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 102:1567–1573CrossRef Park JS, Kim NK, Kim SH, Lee KY, Lee KY, Shin JY, Kim CN, Choi GS, Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (2015) Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 102:1567–1573CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2485–2493CrossRef Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2485–2493CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY (2013) The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison–open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 257:95–101CrossRef Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY (2013) The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison–open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 257:95–101CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kim J, Baek SJ, Kang DW, Roh YE, Lee JW, Kwak HD, Kwak JM, Kim SH (2017) Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum 60:266–273CrossRef Kim J, Baek SJ, Kang DW, Roh YE, Lee JW, Kwak HD, Kwak JM, Kim SH (2017) Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum 60:266–273CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jones R, Dobbs RW, Halgrimson WR, Vigneswaran HT, Madueke I, Wilson J, Abern MR, Crivellaro S (2020) Single port robotic radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci SP platform: a step by step approach. Can J Urol 27:10263–10269PubMed Jones R, Dobbs RW, Halgrimson WR, Vigneswaran HT, Madueke I, Wilson J, Abern MR, Crivellaro S (2020) Single port robotic radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci SP platform: a step by step approach. Can J Urol 27:10263–10269PubMed
7.
go back to reference Van Abel KM, Yin LX, Price DL, Janus JR, Kasperbauer JL, Moore EJ (2020) One-year outcomes for da Vinci single port robot for transoral robotic surgery. Head Neck 42:2077–2087CrossRef Van Abel KM, Yin LX, Price DL, Janus JR, Kasperbauer JL, Moore EJ (2020) One-year outcomes for da Vinci single port robot for transoral robotic surgery. Head Neck 42:2077–2087CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Park HS, Lee J, Lee H, Lee K, Song SY, Toesca A (2019) Development of robotic mastectomy using a single-port surgical robot system. J Breast Cancer 23:107–112CrossRef Park HS, Lee J, Lee H, Lee K, Song SY, Toesca A (2019) Development of robotic mastectomy using a single-port surgical robot system. J Breast Cancer 23:107–112CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Luján JA, Soriano MT, Abrisqueta J, Pérez D, Parrilla P (2015) Single-port colectomy vs multi-port laparoscopic colectomy. Systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 2800 procedures. Cir Esp 93:307–319CrossRef Luján JA, Soriano MT, Abrisqueta J, Pérez D, Parrilla P (2015) Single-port colectomy vs multi-port laparoscopic colectomy. Systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 2800 procedures. Cir Esp 93:307–319CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marks JH, Salem JF, Anderson BK, Josse JM, Schoonyoung HP (2020) Single-port robotic left colectomy: first clinical experience using the SP robot (rSILS). Tech Coloproctol 24:57–63CrossRef Marks JH, Salem JF, Anderson BK, Josse JM, Schoonyoung HP (2020) Single-port robotic left colectomy: first clinical experience using the SP robot (rSILS). Tech Coloproctol 24:57–63CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Marks JH, Kunkel E, Salem J, Martin C, Schoonyoung HP, Agarwal S (2020) rSILS: initial clinical experience with single-port robotic (SPr) right colectomy. Tech Coloproctol 24:817–822CrossRef Marks JH, Kunkel E, Salem J, Martin C, Schoonyoung HP, Agarwal S (2020) rSILS: initial clinical experience with single-port robotic (SPr) right colectomy. Tech Coloproctol 24:817–822CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kneist W, Stein H, Rheinwald M (2020) Da Vinci single-port robot-assisted transanal mesorectal excision: a promising preclinical experience. Surg Endosc 34:3232–3235CrossRef Kneist W, Stein H, Rheinwald M (2020) Da Vinci single-port robot-assisted transanal mesorectal excision: a promising preclinical experience. Surg Endosc 34:3232–3235CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1066–1074CrossRef Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1066–1074CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Brockhaus AC, Sauerland S, Saad S (2016) Single-incision versus standard multi-incision laparoscopic colectomy in patients with malignant or benign colonic disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and assessment of the evidence. BMC Surg 16:71CrossRef Brockhaus AC, Sauerland S, Saad S (2016) Single-incision versus standard multi-incision laparoscopic colectomy in patients with malignant or benign colonic disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and assessment of the evidence. BMC Surg 16:71CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Koh DC, Tsang CB, Kim SH (2011) A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci® surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection. Surg Endosc 25:1945–1952CrossRef Koh DC, Tsang CB, Kim SH (2011) A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci® surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection. Surg Endosc 25:1945–1952CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3195–3202CrossRef Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3195–3202CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860CrossRef Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lee JL, Alsaleem HA, Kim JC (2020) Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives. Ann Surg Treat Res 98:31–43CrossRef Lee JL, Alsaleem HA, Kim JC (2020) Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives. Ann Surg Treat Res 98:31–43CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Morelli L, Di Franco G, Guadagni S, Rossi L, Palmeri M, Furbetta N, Gianardi D, Bianchini M, Caprili G, D’Isidoro C, Mosca F, Moglia A, Cuschieri A (2018) Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si. Surg Endosc 32:589–600CrossRef Morelli L, Di Franco G, Guadagni S, Rossi L, Palmeri M, Furbetta N, Gianardi D, Bianchini M, Caprili G, D’Isidoro C, Mosca F, Moglia A, Cuschieri A (2018) Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si. Surg Endosc 32:589–600CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kaouk J, Valero R, Sawczyn G, Garisto J (2020) Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and description of technique. BJU Int 125:182–189CrossRef Kaouk J, Valero R, Sawczyn G, Garisto J (2020) Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and description of technique. BJU Int 125:182–189CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kim K, Kang SW, Kim JK, Lee CR, Lee J, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY (2020) Robotic transaxillary hemithyroidectomy using the da Vinci SP robotic system: initial experience with 10 consecutive cases. Surg Innov 27:256–264CrossRef Kim K, Kang SW, Kim JK, Lee CR, Lee J, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY (2020) Robotic transaxillary hemithyroidectomy using the da Vinci SP robotic system: initial experience with 10 consecutive cases. Surg Innov 27:256–264CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An initial experience with a novel technique of single-port robotic resection for rectal cancer
Authors
H. J. Kim
G.-S. Choi
S. H. Song
J. S. Park
S. Y. Park
S. M. Lee
J. A. Choi
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02457-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Techniques in Coloproctology 7/2021 Go to the issue