Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 7/2021

01-07-2021 | Urge Incontinence | Original Article

Non-dynamic graciloplasty is an effective treatment for patients with passive fecal incontinence

Authors: M. E. Knol, H. S. Snijders, M. C. DeRuiter, S. M. P. Koch, J. T. M. van der Heyden, C. I. M. Baeten

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Fecal incontinence is a multifactorial problem and its etiology is complex. Various therapies are available and different success rates have been described. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of non-dynamic graciloplasty in patients with passive fecal incontinence.

Methods

We retrospectively studied charts of patients with fecal incontinence treated with graciloplasty at our institution from November 2015 until June 2018. Patients were included according to the following criteria: (1) presence of predominantly passive fecal incontinence and (2) presence of a lax perineal body. Primary outcome was the effectiveness, defined as a significant reduction or absence of the complaints of passive fecal incontinence at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Second, we studied the safety of the procedure evaluating the complications within 30 days after surgery.

Results

Thirty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-six of them, in addition to passive incontinence as the main symptom, had some degree of fecal urgency. The median age at the first visit to the outpatient clinic was 64.0 years (IQR 52–68). Most patients were female (n = 29, 94%). At 3 months after graciloplasty, 71% (22 of 31) of patients were successfully treated for their passive fecal incontinence. At 6 months, the success rate of the graciloplasty increased to 77%. At 12 months among the patients who were still seen in the clinic, the success rate was 58% (18/31). Two patients cancelled follow-up visits after 3 months, because of failure to control symptoms in 1 case. After 6 months, 9 patients were given the choice to do telephone follow-up only. Of these 11 patients without in-person follow-up, 10 were contacted 1 year after surgery and in 7 of them, the graciloplasty was effective in controlling their passive fecal incontinence for an overall success rate of 80% (25/31). Of the 26 patients with mixed passive and urge incontinence, 6 (23%) still complained of urge incontinence at 1 year. Of these patients with persistent urge incontinence, 6 underwent sacral nerve stimulation which was successful in 4. Two serious complications occurred within 30 days. A rectal perforation requiring temporary colostomy and a recto-vaginal fistula which was successfully repaired.

Conclusion

Non-dynamic graciloplasty is an effective treatment for passive fecal incontinence. Differentiation based on subtypes of fecal incontinence might be important for a pattern-specific approach to treatment. More research is necessary to determine the right indications for more invasive treatments of fecal incontinence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bharucha AE, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR et al (2005) Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women. Gastroenterology 129:42–49CrossRef Bharucha AE, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR et al (2005) Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women. Gastroenterology 129:42–49CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ng KS, Sivakumaran Y, Nassar N et al (2015) Fecal incontinence: community prevalence and associated factors—a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 58:1194–1209CrossRef Ng KS, Sivakumaran Y, Nassar N et al (2015) Fecal incontinence: community prevalence and associated factors—a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 58:1194–1209CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Simren M, Palsson OS, Whitehead WE (2017) Update on Rome IV criteria for colorectal disorders: implications for clinical practice. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 19:15CrossRef Simren M, Palsson OS, Whitehead WE (2017) Update on Rome IV criteria for colorectal disorders: implications for clinical practice. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 19:15CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rao SS, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G et al (2016) Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 150:143–1442CrossRef Rao SS, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G et al (2016) Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 150:143–1442CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Van Meegdenburg MM, Meinds RJ, Trzpis M et al (2018) Subtypes and symptoms of fecal incontinence in the Dutch population: a cross-sectional study. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:919–925CrossRef Van Meegdenburg MM, Meinds RJ, Trzpis M et al (2018) Subtypes and symptoms of fecal incontinence in the Dutch population: a cross-sectional study. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:919–925CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O et al (2008) Is a morphologically intact anal sphincter necessary for success with sacral nerve modulation in patients with faecal incontinence? Colorectal Dis 10:257–262CrossRef Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O et al (2008) Is a morphologically intact anal sphincter necessary for success with sacral nerve modulation in patients with faecal incontinence? Colorectal Dis 10:257–262CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Uludag O, Koch SM, Vliegen RF (2010) Sacral neuromodulation: does it affect the rectoanal angle in patients with fecal incontinence? World J Surg 34:1109–1114CrossRef Uludag O, Koch SM, Vliegen RF (2010) Sacral neuromodulation: does it affect the rectoanal angle in patients with fecal incontinence? World J Surg 34:1109–1114CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wald A (2018) Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 20:9CrossRef Wald A (2018) Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 20:9CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mathai V, Seow-Choen F (1995) Anterior rectal mucosal prolapse: an easily treated cause of anorectal symptoms. Br J Surg 82:753–754CrossRef Mathai V, Seow-Choen F (1995) Anterior rectal mucosal prolapse: an easily treated cause of anorectal symptoms. Br J Surg 82:753–754CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mattana C, Maria G, Pescatori M (1989) Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids and rectal mucosal prolapse in constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 32:372–375CrossRef Mattana C, Maria G, Pescatori M (1989) Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids and rectal mucosal prolapse in constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 32:372–375CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW et al (1952) Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle; a report of four cases in children. Ann Surg 135:853–862CrossRef Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW et al (1952) Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle; a report of four cases in children. Ann Surg 135:853–862CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Leguit P Jr, van Baal JG, Brummelkamp WH (1985) Gracilis muscle transposition in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Long-term follow-up and evaluation of anal pressure recordings. Dis Colon Rectum 28:1–4CrossRef Leguit P Jr, van Baal JG, Brummelkamp WH (1985) Gracilis muscle transposition in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Long-term follow-up and evaluation of anal pressure recordings. Dis Colon Rectum 28:1–4CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Christiansen J, Sørensen M, Rasmussen OO (1990) Gracilis muscle transposition for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 77:1039–1040CrossRef Christiansen J, Sørensen M, Rasmussen OO (1990) Gracilis muscle transposition for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 77:1039–1040CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Faucheron JL, Hannoun L, Thome C et al (1994) Is fecal continence improved by nonstimulated gracilis muscle transposition? Dis Colon Rectum 37:979–983CrossRef Faucheron JL, Hannoun L, Thome C et al (1994) Is fecal continence improved by nonstimulated gracilis muscle transposition? Dis Colon Rectum 37:979–983CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pickrell K, Masters F, Georgiade N et al (1954) Rectal sphincter reconstruction using gracilis muscle transplant. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 13:46–55CrossRef Pickrell K, Masters F, Georgiade N et al (1954) Rectal sphincter reconstruction using gracilis muscle transplant. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 13:46–55CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pickrell K, Georgiade N, Maguire C et al (1955) Correction of rectal incontinence; transplantation of the gracilis muscle to construct a rectal sphincter. Am J Surg 90:721–726CrossRef Pickrell K, Georgiade N, Maguire C et al (1955) Correction of rectal incontinence; transplantation of the gracilis muscle to construct a rectal sphincter. Am J Surg 90:721–726CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Corman ML (1985) Gracilis muscle transposition for anal incontinence: late results. Br J Surg 72(Suppl):S21-22PubMed Corman ML (1985) Gracilis muscle transposition for anal incontinence: late results. Br J Surg 72(Suppl):S21-22PubMed
18.
go back to reference Eccersley AJ, Lunniss PJ, Williams NS (1999) Unstimulated graciloplasty in traumatic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 86:1071–1072CrossRef Eccersley AJ, Lunniss PJ, Williams NS (1999) Unstimulated graciloplasty in traumatic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 86:1071–1072CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Baeten C, Spaans F, Fluks A (1988) An implanted neuromuscular stimulator for fecal continence following previously implanted gracilis muscle. report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 31:134–137CrossRef Baeten C, Spaans F, Fluks A (1988) An implanted neuromuscular stimulator for fecal continence following previously implanted gracilis muscle. report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 31:134–137CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Boyle DJ, Murphy J, Hotouras A et al (2014) Electrically stimulated gracilis neosphincter for end-stage fecal incontinence: the long-term outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 57:215–222CrossRef Boyle DJ, Murphy J, Hotouras A et al (2014) Electrically stimulated gracilis neosphincter for end-stage fecal incontinence: the long-term outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 57:215–222CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rongen MJ, Uludag O, El Nagger K (2003) Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46:716–721CrossRef Rongen MJ, Uludag O, El Nagger K (2003) Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46:716–721CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Walega P, Romaniszyn M, Siarkiewicz B et al (2015) Dynamic versus adynamic graciloplasty in treatment of end-stage fecal incontinence: is the implantation of the pacemaker really necessary? 12-month follow-up in a clinical, physiological, and functional study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015:698516CrossRef Walega P, Romaniszyn M, Siarkiewicz B et al (2015) Dynamic versus adynamic graciloplasty in treatment of end-stage fecal incontinence: is the implantation of the pacemaker really necessary? 12-month follow-up in a clinical, physiological, and functional study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015:698516CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gohil AJ, Gupta AK, Jesudason MR et al (2019) Graciloplasty for anal incontinence—is electrical stimulation necessary? Ann Plast Surg 82:671–678CrossRef Gohil AJ, Gupta AK, Jesudason MR et al (2019) Graciloplasty for anal incontinence—is electrical stimulation necessary? Ann Plast Surg 82:671–678CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM et al (1995) Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 322:1600–1605CrossRef Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM et al (1995) Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 322:1600–1605CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pickrell K, Georgiade N, Richard EF et al (1959) Gracilis muscle transplant for the correction of neurogenic rectal incontinence. Surg Clin North Am 39:1405–1415CrossRef Pickrell K, Georgiade N, Richard EF et al (1959) Gracilis muscle transplant for the correction of neurogenic rectal incontinence. Surg Clin North Am 39:1405–1415CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Baeten CG, Bailey HR, Bakka A et al (2000) Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum 43:743–751CrossRef Baeten CG, Bailey HR, Bakka A et al (2000) Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum 43:743–751CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Chapman AE, Geerdes B, Hewett P et al (2002) Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 89:138–153CrossRef Chapman AE, Geerdes B, Hewett P et al (2002) Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 89:138–153CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Rosen HR, Novi G, Zoech G et al (1998) Restoration of anal sphincter function by single-stage dynamic graciloplasty with a modified (split sling) technique. Am J Surg 175:187–193CrossRef Rosen HR, Novi G, Zoech G et al (1998) Restoration of anal sphincter function by single-stage dynamic graciloplasty with a modified (split sling) technique. Am J Surg 175:187–193CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Janssen PTJ, Komen N, Melenhorst J et al (2017) Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence: a review of the central mechanisms of action. J Clin Gastroenterol 51:669–676CrossRef Janssen PTJ, Komen N, Melenhorst J et al (2017) Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence: a review of the central mechanisms of action. J Clin Gastroenterol 51:669–676CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Koch SM, Uludag O, El Nagger K et al (2008) Colonic irrigation for defecation disorders after dynamic graciloplasty. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:195–200CrossRef Koch SM, Uludag O, El Nagger K et al (2008) Colonic irrigation for defecation disorders after dynamic graciloplasty. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:195–200CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Koch SM, Uludag O, Rongen MJ et al (2004) Dynamic graciloplasty in patients born with anal atresia. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1711–1719CrossRef Koch SM, Uludag O, Rongen MJ et al (2004) Dynamic graciloplasty in patients born with anal atresia. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1711–1719CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Non-dynamic graciloplasty is an effective treatment for patients with passive fecal incontinence
Authors
M. E. Knol
H. S. Snijders
M. C. DeRuiter
S. M. P. Koch
J. T. M. van der Heyden
C. I. M. Baeten
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02455-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Techniques in Coloproctology 7/2021 Go to the issue