Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2013

01-02-2013 | Original Article

Vertical transumbilical incision versus left lower transverse incision for specimen retrieval during laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Authors: S. W. Lim, J. W. Huh, Y. J. Kim, H. R. Kim

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study compared the short-term surgical outcomes of the vertical transumbilical incision with the left lower transverse incision for specimen retrieval in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

One hundred forty-seven consecutive patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer between April 2010 and December 2010 were classified into one of the two groups according to the site of the minilaparotomy: a transumbilical incision group (n = 92) and a left lower transverse incision group (n = 55).

Results

Demographic data, operation time, estimated blood loss, frequency of transfusion, size of the tumor, number of harvested lymph nodes, distal resection margins, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay were similar between the two groups. Postoperative pain scores were also similar between the two groups. The length of the minilaparotomy incision was shorter in the transumbilical group than the left lower transverse group at operation (mean, 4.6 vs. 6.2 cm, p = 0.000). The postoperative mean satisfaction score was higher in the transumbilical group, but this was not statistically significant (7.6 vs. 7.1, p = 0.224). Fourteen patients in the transumbilical group and 7 patients in the left lower transverse group developed wound-related complications (p = 0.810), including two cases of incisional hernia, both in the transumbilical group. High body mass index (≥25 kg/m2) and longer operative time (≥180 min) were risk factors for wound complications on univariate analysis.

Conclusions

Transumbilical minilaparotomy in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is a good alternative approach with acceptable wound complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W, Vignali A, Pecorelli N, Di Carlo V (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection. Br J Surg 97:1180–1186PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W, Vignali A, Pecorelli N, Di Carlo V (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection. Br J Surg 97:1180–1186PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hemandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG et al (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg 252:84–89PubMedCrossRef Hemandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG et al (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg 252:84–89PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645PubMedCrossRef Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kang SB, Park JS, Kim DW, Lee TG (2010) Intraoperative technical difficulty during laparoscopy-assisted surgery as a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1400–1408PubMedCrossRef Kang SB, Park JS, Kim DW, Lee TG (2010) Intraoperative technical difficulty during laparoscopy-assisted surgery as a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1400–1408PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kawahara H, Kobayashi T, Watanabe K, Kobayashi S, Kashiwagi H, Yanaga K (2009) Where is the best surgical incision for laparoscopic anterior resection? Hepatogastroenterology 56:1629–1632PubMed Kawahara H, Kobayashi T, Watanabe K, Kobayashi S, Kashiwagi H, Yanaga K (2009) Where is the best surgical incision for laparoscopic anterior resection? Hepatogastroenterology 56:1629–1632PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hidalgo JM, Targarona EM, Martinez C, Hernandez P, Balague C, Trias M (2010) Laparoscopic rectal surgery: does immediate outcome differ in respect to sex? Dis Colon Rectum 53:438–444PubMedCrossRef Hidalgo JM, Targarona EM, Martinez C, Hernandez P, Balague C, Trias M (2010) Laparoscopic rectal surgery: does immediate outcome differ in respect to sex? Dis Colon Rectum 53:438–444PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S, McKinley C (2008) Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 22:2596–2600PubMedCrossRef Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S, McKinley C (2008) Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 22:2596–2600PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Orcutt ST, Balentine CJ, Marshall CL et al (2012) Use of a Pfannenstiel incision in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery is associated with a lower risk of wound complications. Tech Coloproctol 16:127–132PubMedCrossRef Orcutt ST, Balentine CJ, Marshall CL et al (2012) Use of a Pfannenstiel incision in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery is associated with a lower risk of wound complications. Tech Coloproctol 16:127–132PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference DeSouza A, Domajnko B, Park J, Marecik S, Prasad L, Abcarian H (2011) Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 25:1031–1036PubMedCrossRef DeSouza A, Domajnko B, Park J, Marecik S, Prasad L, Abcarian H (2011) Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 25:1031–1036PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Takemasa I, Sekimoto M, Ikeda M et al (2010) Video. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2321PubMedCrossRef Takemasa I, Sekimoto M, Ikeda M et al (2010) Video. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2321PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kawahara H, Watanabe K, Ushigome T, Noaki R, Kobayashi S, Yanaga K (2010) Umbilical incision laparoscopic surgery with one assist port for anterior resection. Dig Surg 27:364–366PubMedCrossRef Kawahara H, Watanabe K, Ushigome T, Noaki R, Kobayashi S, Yanaga K (2010) Umbilical incision laparoscopic surgery with one assist port for anterior resection. Dig Surg 27:364–366PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Song F, Glenny AM (1998) Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 85:1232–1241PubMedCrossRef Song F, Glenny AM (1998) Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 85:1232–1241PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tanner J, Khan D, Aplin C, Ball J, Thomas M, Bankart J (2009) Post-discharge surveillance to identify colorectal surgical site infection rates and related costs. J Hosp Infect 72:243–250PubMedCrossRef Tanner J, Khan D, Aplin C, Ball J, Thomas M, Bankart J (2009) Post-discharge surveillance to identify colorectal surgical site infection rates and related costs. J Hosp Infect 72:243–250PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Larson DW, Cima RR, Dozois EJ et al (2006) Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg 243:667–670 Discussion 670–662PubMedCrossRef Larson DW, Cima RR, Dozois EJ et al (2006) Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg 243:667–670 Discussion 670–662PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference O’Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA (2003) Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surgeon 1:17–22PubMedCrossRef O’Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA (2003) Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surgeon 1:17–22PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Vertical transumbilical incision versus left lower transverse incision for specimen retrieval during laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Authors
S. W. Lim
J. W. Huh
Y. J. Kim
H. R. Kim
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0883-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2013 Go to the issue