Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2008

01-12-2008

Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates?

Authors: Ravinder Singh, Alex Omiccioli, Susan Hegge, Craig McKinley

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Incisional hernias are a common postoperative complication with abdominal surgery. The major risk factors for their development include wound infection, obesity, and age. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of extraction-site location and technique on incisional hernia rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Methods

A prospective study of 208 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery between March 2002 and July 2006 was performed. The study included only patients who had an extraction site on the abdominal wall. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up evaluation or underwent conversion to open procedure. For the 166 patients included in the study, the mean follow-up period was 20.2 ± 14.4 months. Extraction-site incisions were classified into two groups: midline or off-midline. Midline wounds involved sharp division of the linea alba and were closed with a single layer of no.1 Vicryl. Off-midline incisions involved sharp division of the anterior and posterior sheaths with blunt spreading of the muscular layers and were closed in two layers with no. 1 Vicryl. Risk factors including wound infection, body mass index (BMI), age, and diabetes were analyzed.

Results

The incisional hernia rate for the entire series was 7.8%. The incisional hernia rate was 17.6% for the midline group (n = 74) and 0% for the off-midline group (n = 92) (p = 0.0002, statistically significant). There was no statistically significant difference in age, BMI, diabetes, follow-up time, or wound infection rate between the two groups.

Conclusion

In this series, the midline extraction site resulted in a significantly higher incisional hernia rate statistically than the off-midline extraction sites. The authors therefore have adopted an off-midline blunt muscle-splitting extraction site when performing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Literature
2.
go back to reference O’Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA (2003) Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surg J R Coll Surg Edinb Ireland 1:17–22 O’Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA (2003) Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surg J R Coll Surg Edinb Ireland 1:17–22
3.
go back to reference Franklin ME Jr, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, Dorman JP, Glass JL, Norem R, Diaz A (1996) Prospective comparison of open vs laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 39:S35–S46PubMedCrossRef Franklin ME Jr, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, Dorman JP, Glass JL, Norem R, Diaz A (1996) Prospective comparison of open vs laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 39:S35–S46PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R (1996) Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis: outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 10:15–18PubMedCrossRef Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R (1996) Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis: outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 10:15–18PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54PubMedCrossRef Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ramos JM, Beart RW Jr, Goes R, Ortega AE, Schlinkert RT (1995) Role of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery: a prospective evaluation of 200 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 38:494–501PubMedCrossRef Ramos JM, Beart RW Jr, Goes R, Ortega AE, Schlinkert RT (1995) Role of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery: a prospective evaluation of 200 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 38:494–501PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schwenk W, Bohm B, Witt C, Junghans T, Grundel K, Muller JM (1999) Pulmonary function following laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resection: a randomized controlled evaluation. Arch Surg 134:6–12PubMedCrossRef Schwenk W, Bohm B, Witt C, Junghans T, Grundel K, Muller JM (1999) Pulmonary function following laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resection: a randomized controlled evaluation. Arch Surg 134:6–12PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schwenk W, Bohm B, Muller JM (1998) Postoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 12:1131–1136PubMedCrossRef Schwenk W, Bohm B, Muller JM (1998) Postoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 12:1131–1136PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schwenk W, Bohm B, Haase O, Junghans T, Muller JM (1998) Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383:49–55PubMedCrossRef Schwenk W, Bohm B, Haase O, Junghans T, Muller JM (1998) Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383:49–55PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332PubMedCrossRef Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287:321–328PubMedCrossRef Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287:321–328PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Berthou JC, Charbonneau P (1999) Elective laparoscopic management of sigmoid diverticulitis: results in a series of 110 patients. Surg Endosc 13:457–460PubMedCrossRef Berthou JC, Charbonneau P (1999) Elective laparoscopic management of sigmoid diverticulitis: results in a series of 110 patients. Surg Endosc 13:457–460PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brunt LM (2002) The positive impact of laparoscopic adrenalectomy on complications of adrenal surgery. Surg Endosc 16:252–257PubMedCrossRef Brunt LM (2002) The positive impact of laparoscopic adrenalectomy on complications of adrenal surgery. Surg Endosc 16:252–257PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Champault GG, Barrat C, Raselli R, Elizalde A, Catheline JM (2002) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma: a prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:88–95PubMedCrossRef Champault GG, Barrat C, Raselli R, Elizalde A, Catheline JM (2002) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma: a prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:88–95PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Degiuli M, Mineccia M, Bertone A, Pennazio M, Spandre M, Cavallero M, Calvo (2004) Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 18:427–432 Degiuli M, Mineccia M, Bertone A, Pennazio M, Spandre M, Cavallero M, Calvo (2004) Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 18:427–432
17.
go back to reference Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2003) Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 197:177–181PubMedCrossRef Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2003) Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 197:177–181PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Franklin ME, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, Dorman JP, Glass JL, Norem R, Diaz A (1996) Prospective comparison of open vs laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five year results. Dis Colon Rectum 39:S35–S46PubMedCrossRef Franklin ME, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, Dorman JP, Glass JL, Norem R, Diaz A (1996) Prospective comparison of open vs laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five year results. Dis Colon Rectum 39:S35–S46PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lumley J, Stitz R, Stevenson A, Fielding G, Luck A (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: intermediate- to long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 45:867–874PubMedCrossRef Lumley J, Stitz R, Stevenson A, Fielding G, Luck A (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: intermediate- to long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 45:867–874PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Montgomery JS, Johnston K, Wolf JS (2005) Wound complications after hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Urol 174:2226–2280PubMedCrossRef Montgomery JS, Johnston K, Wolf JS (2005) Wound complications after hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Urol 174:2226–2280PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Vignali A, Braga M, Zuliani W, Frassion M, Radaelli G, Di Carlo V (2004) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery modifies risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1686–1693 Vignali A, Braga M, Zuliani W, Frassion M, Radaelli G, Di Carlo V (2004) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery modifies risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1686–1693
22.
go back to reference Kadar N, Reich H, Liu CY, Manko GF, Gimpelson R (1993) Incisional hernias after major laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 5:1493–1495 Kadar N, Reich H, Liu CY, Manko GF, Gimpelson R (1993) Incisional hernias after major laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 5:1493–1495
23.
go back to reference Neshat C, Nezhat F, Seidman DS, Neshat C (1997) Incisional hernias after operative laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2:111–115CrossRef Neshat C, Nezhat F, Seidman DS, Neshat C (1997) Incisional hernias after operative laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2:111–115CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Hall TJ, Donaldson DR, Broughton AC, Brennan TG (1980) Vertical abdominal incisions: a choice? Br J Surg 67:395–399PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Hall TJ, Donaldson DR, Broughton AC, Brennan TG (1980) Vertical abdominal incisions: a choice? Br J Surg 67:395–399PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kendall WH, Brennan G, Guillou J (1991) Suture length-to-wound length ratio and integrity of midline and lateral paramedian incisions. Br J Surg 78:705–707PubMedCrossRef Kendall WH, Brennan G, Guillou J (1991) Suture length-to-wound length ratio and integrity of midline and lateral paramedian incisions. Br J Surg 78:705–707PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Grantcharov TP, Rosenberg J (2001) Vertical compared with transverse incisions in abdominal surgery. Eur J Surg 167:260–267PubMedCrossRef Grantcharov TP, Rosenberg J (2001) Vertical compared with transverse incisions in abdominal surgery. Eur J Surg 167:260–267PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Troxel SA, Das S (2005) Incisional hernia following hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for renal cell cancer. JSLS 2:196–198 Troxel SA, Das S (2005) Incisional hernia following hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for renal cell cancer. JSLS 2:196–198
28.
go back to reference Winslow ER, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Brunt LM (2002) Wound complication of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Surg Endosc 10:1420–1425CrossRef Winslow ER, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Brunt LM (2002) Wound complication of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Surg Endosc 10:1420–1425CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ihedioha U, Mackay G, Leung E, Molloy RG, O’Dwyer PJ (2007) Laparoscopic colorectal resection does not reduce incisional hernia rates when compared with open colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 22:689–692CrossRef Ihedioha U, Mackay G, Leung E, Molloy RG, O’Dwyer PJ (2007) Laparoscopic colorectal resection does not reduce incisional hernia rates when compared with open colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 22:689–692CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates?
Authors
Ravinder Singh
Alex Omiccioli
Susan Hegge
Craig McKinley
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9845-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2008 Go to the issue