Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Regorafenib | Original Article

Prognostic scores for evaluating the survival benefit of regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an exploratory analysis of the REGOTAS study

Authors: Toshikazu Moriwaki, Shota Fukuoka, Toshiki Masuishi, Atsuo Takashima, Yosuke Kumekawa, Takeshi Kajiwara, Kentaro Yamazaki, Taito Esaki, Akitaka Makiyama, Tadamichi Denda, Yukimasa Hatachi, Takeshi Suto, Naotoshi Sugimoto, Masanobu Enomoto, Toshiaki Ishikawa, Tomomi Kashiwada, Eiji Oki, Yoshito Komatsu, Akihito Tsuji, Kenji Tsuchihashi, Daisuke Sakai, Hideki Ueno, Takao Tamura, Kimihiro Yamashita, Yasuhiro Shimada

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) has been recognized as a later-line standard treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), not all patients have beneficial outcomes. This study aimed to develop a prognostic scoring system for evaluating the overall survival (OS) benefit.

Methods

Patients included in the REGOTAS study, which comprised 489 patients (regorafenib group: 199; FTD/TPI group: 290 patients), were evaluated. OS was analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional model. The prognostic score was calculated using the worst four individual factors weighted by hazard ratio, and the total scores were categorized as low-, moderate-, and high-OS benefit.

Results

The worst four factors in the regorafenib group were AST > 40 IU/dL (point, + 3), CRP ≥ 1.0 mg/dL (+ 2), number of metastatic organ site ≥ 3 (+ 2), and duration from initiation of 1st-line chemotherapy < 18 months (+ 2), while they were AST (+ 2), CRP (+ 2), CA19-9 > 37.0 U/mL (+ 2), and ECOG PS ≥ 1 (+ 2) in the FTD/TPI group. These corresponded to a total prognostic score of > 5, 2–4, and 0 points in the regorafenib group and 8, 2–6, and 0 points in the FTD/TPI group. The median OS in the low, moderate, and high OS benefit group was 3.3 (95% CI 3.0–3.7), 8.1 (95% CI 6.4–9.7), and 12.6 months (95% CI 10.6–14.6) in the regorafenib group and 2.8 (95% CI 2.0–3.5), 7.5 (95% CI 6.6–8.3), and 15.4 months (95% CI 9.7–21.2) in the FTD/TPI group.

Conclusion

These prognostic scores are useful for identifying patients with mCRC who will obtain survival benefits from these drugs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Modest DP, Pant S, Sartore-Bianchi A (2019) Treatment sequencing in metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 109:70–83CrossRef Modest DP, Pant S, Sartore-Bianchi A (2019) Treatment sequencing in metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 109:70–83CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A et al (2013) Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 381(9863):303–312CrossRef Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A et al (2013) Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 381(9863):303–312CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A et al (2015) Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(20):1909–1919CrossRef Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A et al (2015) Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(20):1909–1919CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sueda T, Sakai D, Kudo T et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of regorafenib or TAS-102 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies. Anticancer Res 36(8):4299–4306PubMed Sueda T, Sakai D, Kudo T et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of regorafenib or TAS-102 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies. Anticancer Res 36(8):4299–4306PubMed
5.
go back to reference Masuishi T, Taniguchi H, Hamauchi S et al (2017) Regorafenib versus trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison. Clin Colorectal Cancer 16(2):e15–e22CrossRef Masuishi T, Taniguchi H, Hamauchi S et al (2017) Regorafenib versus trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison. Clin Colorectal Cancer 16(2):e15–e22CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Unseld M, Drimmel M, Siebenhuner A et al (2018) Optimizing treatment sequence for late-line metastatic colorectal cancer patients using trifluridine/tipiracil and regorafenib. Clin Colorectal Cancer 17(4):274–279CrossRef Unseld M, Drimmel M, Siebenhuner A et al (2018) Optimizing treatment sequence for late-line metastatic colorectal cancer patients using trifluridine/tipiracil and regorafenib. Clin Colorectal Cancer 17(4):274–279CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Moriwaki T, Fukuoka S, Taniguchi H et al (2018) Propensity score analysis of regorafenib versus trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy (REGOTAS): a Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Multicenter Observational Study. Oncologist 23(1):7–15CrossRef Moriwaki T, Fukuoka S, Taniguchi H et al (2018) Propensity score analysis of regorafenib versus trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy (REGOTAS): a Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Multicenter Observational Study. Oncologist 23(1):7–15CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yamaguchi K, Komatsu Y, Satoh T et al (2019) Large-scale, prospective observational study of regorafenib in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-world clinical setting. Oncologist 24:e450–e457CrossRef Yamaguchi K, Komatsu Y, Satoh T et al (2019) Large-scale, prospective observational study of regorafenib in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-world clinical setting. Oncologist 24:e450–e457CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cremolini C, Rossini D, Martinelli E et al (2018) Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter register in the frame of the Italian Compassionate Use Program. Oncologist 23(10):1178–1187CrossRef Cremolini C, Rossini D, Martinelli E et al (2018) Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter register in the frame of the Italian Compassionate Use Program. Oncologist 23(10):1178–1187CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shibutani M, Nagahara H, Fukuoka T et al (2019) Prognostic significance of the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor as later-line chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 39(2):1051–1057CrossRef Shibutani M, Nagahara H, Fukuoka T et al (2019) Prognostic significance of the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor as later-line chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 39(2):1051–1057CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tsuchihashi K, Ito M, Moriwaki T et al (2018) Role of predictive value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for later-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 17(4):e687–e697CrossRef Tsuchihashi K, Ito M, Moriwaki T et al (2018) Role of predictive value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for later-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 17(4):e687–e697CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Adenis A, de la Fouchardiere C, Paule B et al (2016) Survival, safety, and prognostic factors for outcome with regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: results from a multicenter study (REBECCA) nested within a compassionate use program. BMC Cancer 16:412CrossRef Adenis A, de la Fouchardiere C, Paule B et al (2016) Survival, safety, and prognostic factors for outcome with regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: results from a multicenter study (REBECCA) nested within a compassionate use program. BMC Cancer 16:412CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Riedl JM, Posch F, Moik F et al (2017) Inflammatory biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer: prognostic and predictive role beyond the first line setting. Oncotarget 8(56):96048–96061CrossRef Riedl JM, Posch F, Moik F et al (2017) Inflammatory biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer: prognostic and predictive role beyond the first line setting. Oncotarget 8(56):96048–96061CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Skuja E, Gerina-Berzina A, Hegmane A et al (2018) Duration of previous treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil. Mol Clin Oncol 8(5):699–702PubMedPubMedCentral Skuja E, Gerina-Berzina A, Hegmane A et al (2018) Duration of previous treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil. Mol Clin Oncol 8(5):699–702PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Song A, Eo W, Lee S (2015) Comparison of selected inflammation-based prognostic markers in relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 21(43):12410–12420CrossRef Song A, Eo W, Lee S (2015) Comparison of selected inflammation-based prognostic markers in relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 21(43):12410–12420CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prognostic scores for evaluating the survival benefit of regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an exploratory analysis of the REGOTAS study
Authors
Toshikazu Moriwaki
Shota Fukuoka
Toshiki Masuishi
Atsuo Takashima
Yosuke Kumekawa
Takeshi Kajiwara
Kentaro Yamazaki
Taito Esaki
Akitaka Makiyama
Tadamichi Denda
Yukimasa Hatachi
Takeshi Suto
Naotoshi Sugimoto
Masanobu Enomoto
Toshiaki Ishikawa
Tomomi Kashiwada
Eiji Oki
Yoshito Komatsu
Akihito Tsuji
Kenji Tsuchihashi
Daisuke Sakai
Hideki Ueno
Takao Tamura
Kimihiro Yamashita
Yasuhiro Shimada
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01600-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 4/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine