Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Original Article

Randomized phase II study of daily and alternate-day administration of S-1 for advanced gastric cancer (JFMC43-1003)

Authors: Hiroaki Tanaka, Mitsuro Kanda, Satoshi Morita, Masataka Taguri, Kazuhiro Nishikawa, Mitsuo Shimada, Kazuya Muguruma, Keisuke Koeda, Masazumi Takahashi, Mikihito Nakamori, Hiroyuki Konno, Akihito Tsuji, Yoshinori Hosoya, Tetsuhiko Shirasaka, Susumu Yamamitsu, Michio Sowa, Masaki Kitajima, Masazumi Okajima, Michiya Kobayashi, Junichi Sakamoto, Shigetoyo Saji, Kosei Hirakawa

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Although S-1 based chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer has generally been accepted in Japan, discontinuations of treatment have been reported due to grade 3 or more adverse events. The present randomized phase II study was conducted to test whether alternate-day administration of S-1 would be comparably efficient and reduce adverse events compared with conventional daily administration in the first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

132 patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned to 1:2 ratios to receive treatment with daily at a standard dose of 80 mg/m2/day or alternate-day administration group received S-1 on 4 days a week. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were safety, overall survival, time to treatment failure (TTF), disease control rate, and response rate.

Results

The 6-month PFS rate of the alternate-day administration group was 20.9% and failed to show significant difference from the pre-specified threshold at 15% (p = 0.117), whereas that of the daily administration group was 39.1% and significantly higher than the threshold (p = 0.001). The hazard ratio of the alternate-day administration group compared with the daily administration group was 1.753 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–2.68, p = 0.010). With regard to OS, the hazard ratio of the alternate-day administration group compared with the daily administration group was 1.487 (95% CI 0.97–2.29, p = 0.072). The median TTF were 4.2 and 2.8 months in the daily and alternate-day administration group, respectively (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

The alternate-day administration of S-1 was not recommended as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sugimachi K, Maehara Y, Horikoshi N et al (1999) An early phase II study of oral S-1, a newly developed 5-fluorouracil derivative for advanced and recurrent gastrointestinal cancers. The S-1 Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group. Oncology 57(3):202–210CrossRefPubMed Sugimachi K, Maehara Y, Horikoshi N et al (1999) An early phase II study of oral S-1, a newly developed 5-fluorouracil derivative for advanced and recurrent gastrointestinal cancers. The S-1 Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group. Oncology 57(3):202–210CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H et al (1996) Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs 7(5):548–557CrossRefPubMed Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H et al (1996) Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs 7(5):548–557CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakano S et al (2000) Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil, in advanced gastric cancer. For the S-1 Cooperative Gastric Cancer Study Group. Oncology 58(3):191–197CrossRefPubMed Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakano S et al (2000) Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil, in advanced gastric cancer. For the S-1 Cooperative Gastric Cancer Study Group. Oncology 58(3):191–197CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sakata Y, Ohtsu A, Horikoshi N et al (1998) Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 (1M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1M otastat potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 34(11):1715–1720CrossRefPubMed Sakata Y, Ohtsu A, Horikoshi N et al (1998) Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 (1M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1M otastat potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 34(11):1715–1720CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ako E, Ohira M, Yamashita Y et al (2008) Efficacy of S-1 for gastric cancer patients with positive peritoneal lavage cytology. Hepatogastroenterology 55(86–87):1939–1942PubMed Ako E, Ohira M, Yamashita Y et al (2008) Efficacy of S-1 for gastric cancer patients with positive peritoneal lavage cytology. Hepatogastroenterology 55(86–87):1939–1942PubMed
10.
go back to reference Yamaue H, Satoi S, Kanbe T et al (2014) Phase II clinical study of alternate-day oral therapy with S-1 as first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73(1):97–102. doi:10.1007/s00280-013-2323-6 CrossRefPubMed Yamaue H, Satoi S, Kanbe T et al (2014) Phase II clinical study of alternate-day oral therapy with S-1 as first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73(1):97–102. doi:10.​1007/​s00280-013-2323-6 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Fukushima M (1993) Inhibition by oxonic acid of gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-fluorouracil without loss of its antitumor activity in rats. Can Res 53(17):4004–4009 Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Fukushima M (1993) Inhibition by oxonic acid of gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-fluorouracil without loss of its antitumor activity in rats. Can Res 53(17):4004–4009
13.
go back to reference Arai W, Hosoya Y, Haruta H et al (2008) Comparison of alternate-day versus consecutive-day treatment with S-1: assessment of tumor growth inhibition and toxicity reduction in gastric cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Int J Clin Oncol 13(6):515–520. doi:10.1007/s10147-008-0780-4 CrossRefPubMed Arai W, Hosoya Y, Haruta H et al (2008) Comparison of alternate-day versus consecutive-day treatment with S-1: assessment of tumor growth inhibition and toxicity reduction in gastric cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Int J Clin Oncol 13(6):515–520. doi:10.​1007/​s10147-008-0780-4 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Randomized phase II study of daily and alternate-day administration of S-1 for advanced gastric cancer (JFMC43-1003)
Authors
Hiroaki Tanaka
Mitsuro Kanda
Satoshi Morita
Masataka Taguri
Kazuhiro Nishikawa
Mitsuo Shimada
Kazuya Muguruma
Keisuke Koeda
Masazumi Takahashi
Mikihito Nakamori
Hiroyuki Konno
Akihito Tsuji
Yoshinori Hosoya
Tetsuhiko Shirasaka
Susumu Yamamitsu
Michio Sowa
Masaki Kitajima
Masazumi Okajima
Michiya Kobayashi
Junichi Sakamoto
Shigetoyo Saji
Kosei Hirakawa
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1157-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine