Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

Comparison between chemoselection and definitive radiotherapy in patients with cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Authors: Yusuke Nakata, Nobuhiro Hanai, Daisuke Nishikawa, Hidenori Suzuki, Yusuke Koide, Yujiro Fukuda, Motoo Nomura, Takeshi Kodaira, Takeshi Shimizu, Yasuhisa Hasegawa

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Backgroud

Laryngeal preservation is an important consideration when treating cervical esophageal cancers (CECs) such as laryngeal cancer. The standard treatment for CEC allowing laryngeal preservation is chemoradiotherapy. However, in cases of laryngeal cancer, chemoselection has also been applied as a treatment strategy that promotes larynx preservation. This strategy involves assigning the appropriate radical treatment according to the primary tumor’s response to induction chemotherapy. Since there have been no studies of the application of chemoselection in CEC cases, the present study compared the results, including laryngeal preservation rates, obtained upon applying chemoselection and chemoradiotherapy to CEC.

Study design

This was a retrospective cohort study of cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated using chemoselection or chemoradiotherapy at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital between January 2000 and March 2013. A total of 42 patients were enrolled.

Results

The 2-year overall survival and laryngeal preservation rates for the chemoselection group versus the primary radiotherapy group were 65.1 and 57.3 versus 40 and 83.3%, respectively (P = 0.017 and P = 0.122, respectively). The 2-year locoregional control rates for the chemoselection and primary radiotherapy groups were 68 and 25%, respectively (P = 0.045).

Conclusion

The chemoselection group achieved favorable results. Therefore, chemoselection can be applied as a treatment strategy for CEC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H et al (2015) Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2008. Esophagus 12:130–157CrossRef Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H et al (2015) Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2008. Esophagus 12:130–157CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nikbakhsh N, Saidi F, Fahimi H (2012) A new technical approach to cancers of the cervical esophagus. Arch Iran Med 15:298–302PubMed Nikbakhsh N, Saidi F, Fahimi H (2012) A new technical approach to cancers of the cervical esophagus. Arch Iran Med 15:298–302PubMed
4.
go back to reference Mendenhall WM, Sombeck MD, Parsons JT et al (1994) Management of cervical esophageal carcinoma. Semin Radiat Oncol 4:179–191CrossRefPubMed Mendenhall WM, Sombeck MD, Parsons JT et al (1994) Management of cervical esophageal carcinoma. Semin Radiat Oncol 4:179–191CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Stahl M, Mariette C, Haustermans K et al (2013) Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24(Suppl 6):51–56. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt342 Stahl M, Mariette C, Haustermans K et al (2013) Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24(Suppl 6):51–56. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdt342
9.
go back to reference Urba S, Wolf G, Eisbruch A et al (2006) Single-cycle induction chemotherapy selects patients with advanced laryngeal cancer for combined chemoradiation: a new treatment paradigm. J Clin Oncol 24:593–598CrossRefPubMed Urba S, Wolf G, Eisbruch A et al (2006) Single-cycle induction chemotherapy selects patients with advanced laryngeal cancer for combined chemoradiation: a new treatment paradigm. J Clin Oncol 24:593–598CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Japan Esophageal Society (2015) Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th English edn. Kanehara & Co. Ltd., Tokyo Japan Esophageal Society (2015) Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th English edn. Kanehara & Co. Ltd., Tokyo
11.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies; development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies; development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Stuschke M, Stahl M, Wilke H et al (1999) Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervical oesophagus. Oncology 57:99–105CrossRefPubMed Stuschke M, Stahl M, Wilke H et al (1999) Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervical oesophagus. Oncology 57:99–105CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference The Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group (1991) Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 324:1685–1690CrossRef The Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group (1991) Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 324:1685–1690CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison between chemoselection and definitive radiotherapy in patients with cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Authors
Yusuke Nakata
Nobuhiro Hanai
Daisuke Nishikawa
Hidenori Suzuki
Yusuke Koide
Yujiro Fukuda
Motoo Nomura
Takeshi Kodaira
Takeshi Shimizu
Yasuhisa Hasegawa
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1149-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine