Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2015

01-04-2015 | Original Article

Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS)

Authors: Shiro Saito, Kazuto Ito, Atsunori Yorozu, Manabu Aoki, Hirofumi Koga, Takefumi Satoh, Toshio Ohashi, Naoyuki Shigematsu, Shinichiro Maruo, Takashi Kikuchi, Shinsuke Kojima, Takushi Dokiya, Masanori Fukushima, Hidetoshi Yamanaka

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of brachytherapy with permanent iodine-125 seed implantation (PI) for prostate cancer. The nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) has continued since July 2005. This manuscript presents the rationale, J-POPS study design, and the characteristics of initial participants enrolled in this study from July 2005 to June 2007.

Methods

All participants were treated with PI in accordance with the American Brachytherapy Society recommendations. The primary outcome measure was biochemical progression-free survival. Progression-free survival, overall survival, cause-specific survival, longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life, disease-specific quality of life, the International Prostate Symptom Score, and the incidence of adverse events were also investigated as secondary outcome measurements.

Results

Overall, 6,927 patients were enrolled by the end of 2010, that is approximately 40 % of all cases treated around the country. During the first 2 years, 2,354 participants were enrolled and 2,339 were actually treated with PI. The age range of participants was 45 to 89 years (median 69 years) and their risk classifications were 1,037 (44.3 %) at low risk, 1,126 (48.1 %) at intermediate risk, and 134 (5.7 %) at high risk, in addition to 16 participants whose classification was unknown. Of all patients, 76.6 % were treated with PI without external beam radiation therapy and 49.3 % received neoadjuvant hormone therapy.

Conclusions

The J-POPS, a nationwide prospective cohort study that enrolled approximately 40 % of all PI cases in Japan, will provide highly reliable evidence, including outcomes and quality of life, after long-term follow-up.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Catalona WJ, Bigg SW (1990) Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients. J Urol 143:538–543PubMed Catalona WJ, Bigg SW (1990) Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients. J Urol 143:538–543PubMed
2.
go back to reference Porter CR, Kodama K, Gibbons RP et al (2006) 25-year prostate cancer control and survival outcomes: a 40-year radical prostatectomy single institution series. J Urol 176:569–574CrossRefPubMed Porter CR, Kodama K, Gibbons RP et al (2006) 25-year prostate cancer control and survival outcomes: a 40-year radical prostatectomy single institution series. J Urol 176:569–574CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M et al (2011) Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1708–1717CrossRefPubMed Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M et al (2011) Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1708–1717CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD et al (2007) Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 8:475–487CrossRefPubMed Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD et al (2007) Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 8:475–487CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Peinemann F, Grouven U, Bartel C et al (2011) Permanent interstitial low-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer: a systematic review of randomised and nonrandomised controlled clinical trials. Eur Urol 60:881–893CrossRefPubMed Peinemann F, Grouven U, Bartel C et al (2011) Permanent interstitial low-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer: a systematic review of randomised and nonrandomised controlled clinical trials. Eur Urol 60:881–893CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rosenthal SA, Bittner NH, Beyer DC et al (2011) American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and American College of Radiology (ACR) practice guideline for the transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:335–341CrossRefPubMed Rosenthal SA, Bittner NH, Beyer DC et al (2011) American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and American College of Radiology (ACR) practice guideline for the transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:335–341CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Nag S, Beyer D, Friedland J et al (1999) American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44:789–799CrossRefPubMed Nag S, Beyer D, Friedland J et al (1999) American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44:789–799CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nag S (2000) Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: summary of American Brachytherapy Society recommendations. Semin Urol Oncol 18:133–136PubMed Nag S (2000) Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: summary of American Brachytherapy Society recommendations. Semin Urol Oncol 18:133–136PubMed
10.
go back to reference Nag S, Bice W, DeWyngaert K et al (2000) The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetric analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46(1):221–230CrossRefPubMed Nag S, Bice W, DeWyngaert K et al (2000) The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetric analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46(1):221–230CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rivard MJ, Butler WM, Devlin PM et al (2007) American Brachytherapy Society recommends no change for prostate permanent implant dose prescriptions using iodine-125 or palladium-103. Brachytherapy 6:34–37CrossRefPubMed Rivard MJ, Butler WM, Devlin PM et al (2007) American Brachytherapy Society recommends no change for prostate permanent implant dose prescriptions using iodine-125 or palladium-103. Brachytherapy 6:34–37CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gleason DF, Mellinger GT (1974) The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol 111:58–64PubMed Gleason DF, Mellinger GT (1974) The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol 111:58–64PubMed
13.
go back to reference Harada M, Nemoto R (1999) Gleason grading system in general rule for clinical and pathological studies on prostate cancer in Japan and WHO classification of tumours (in Japanese). Jpn J Urol Surg 12:1033–1036 Harada M, Nemoto R (1999) Gleason grading system in general rule for clinical and pathological studies on prostate cancer in Japan and WHO classification of tumours (in Japanese). Jpn J Urol Surg 12:1033–1036
14.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 6th edn. Wiley, New York Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 6th edn. Wiley, New York
15.
go back to reference Wallner K, Roy J, Harrison L (1995) Dosimetry guidelines to minimize urethral and rectal morbidity following transperineal I-125 prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32:465–471CrossRefPubMed Wallner K, Roy J, Harrison L (1995) Dosimetry guidelines to minimize urethral and rectal morbidity following transperineal I-125 prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32:465–471CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Stock RG, Stone NN, Dahlal M et al (2002) What is the optimal dose for 125I prostate implant? A dose–response analysis of biochemical control, posttreatment prostate biopsies, and long-term urinary symptoms. Brachytherapy 1:83–89CrossRefPubMed Stock RG, Stone NN, Dahlal M et al (2002) What is the optimal dose for 125I prostate implant? A dose–response analysis of biochemical control, posttreatment prostate biopsies, and long-term urinary symptoms. Brachytherapy 1:83–89CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Waterman FM, Dicker AP (2003) Probability of late rectal morbidity in 125I prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:342–353CrossRefPubMed Waterman FM, Dicker AP (2003) Probability of late rectal morbidity in 125I prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:342–353CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bittner N, Merrick GS, Wallner KE et al (2010) Whole-pelvis radiotherapy in combination with interstitial brachytherapy: does coverage of the pelvic lymph nodes improve treatment outcome in high-risk prostate cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:1078–1084CrossRefPubMed Bittner N, Merrick GS, Wallner KE et al (2010) Whole-pelvis radiotherapy in combination with interstitial brachytherapy: does coverage of the pelvic lymph nodes improve treatment outcome in high-risk prostate cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:1078–1084CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Roach M 3rd, Hanks G, Thames H Jr et al (2006) Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:965–974CrossRefPubMed Roach M 3rd, Hanks G, Thames H Jr et al (2006) Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:965–974CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS)
Authors
Shiro Saito
Kazuto Ito
Atsunori Yorozu
Manabu Aoki
Hirofumi Koga
Takefumi Satoh
Toshio Ohashi
Naoyuki Shigematsu
Shinichiro Maruo
Takashi Kikuchi
Shinsuke Kojima
Takushi Dokiya
Masanori Fukushima
Hidetoshi Yamanaka
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-014-0704-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine