Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2011

01-12-2011 | Original Article

Surrogacy of tumor response and progression-free survival for overall survival in metastatic breast cancer resistant to both anthracyclines and taxanes

Authors: Yoshihiro Matsubara, Satomi Sakabayashi, Tsutomu Nishimura, Takanori Ishida, Noriaki Ohuchi, Satoshi Teramukai, Masanori Fukushima

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In breast cancer, the validity of surrogate endpoints for overall survival (OS) is a matter of controversy.

Methods

In order to generate a hypothesis, we evaluated whether tumor response or progression-free survival (PFS) could be valid surrogates for OS in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Data from 30 patients were available from a phase II study of trastuzumab and capecitabine in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer resistant to both anthracyclines and taxanes. The proportional hazards (PH) model was applied to evaluate the relationship between OS and tumor response or PFS. In addition, to explore prognostic factors influencing OS or post-progression survival, the PH model with a stepwise regression procedure was applied.

Results

The relationship between tumor response and PFS was highly significant (P = 0.0036); however, there was no significant relationship between tumor response and OS or between PFS and OS. In the multivariate analysis, the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (P = 0.0011), neutrophil count (P = 0.0033), and creatinine (P = 0.0085) were statistically significantly associated with OS.

Conclusion

We generated a hypothesis that neither PFS nor tumor response were valid as surrogate endpoints for OS, at least in the phase II trial for metastatic breast cancer resistant to both anthracyclines and taxanes. We also found that the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, neutrophil count, and creatinine were prognostic factors for OS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration (2007) Guidance for Industry Clinical Trial Endpoints for the Approval of Cancer Drugs and Biologics U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration (2007) Guidance for Industry Clinical Trial Endpoints for the Approval of Cancer Drugs and Biologics
2.
go back to reference Ueno NT, Buzdar AU, Singletary SE et al (1997) Combined-modality treatment of inflammatory breast carcinoma: twenty years of experience at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 40:321–329PubMedCrossRef Ueno NT, Buzdar AU, Singletary SE et al (1997) Combined-modality treatment of inflammatory breast carcinoma: twenty years of experience at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 40:321–329PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Berg CD, Swain SM (1994) Results of concomitantly administered chemoradiation for locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 4:226–235PubMedCrossRef Berg CD, Swain SM (1994) Results of concomitantly administered chemoradiation for locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 4:226–235PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ishida T, Kiba T, Takeda M et al (2009) Phase II study of capecitabine and trastuzumab combination chemotherapy in patients with HER2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancers resistant to both anthracyclines and taxanes. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64:361–369PubMedCrossRef Ishida T, Kiba T, Takeda M et al (2009) Phase II study of capecitabine and trastuzumab combination chemotherapy in patients with HER2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancers resistant to both anthracyclines and taxanes. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64:361–369PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bruzzi P, Del Mastro L, Sormani MP et al (2005) Objective response to chemotherapy as a potential surrogate end point of survival in metastatic breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 23:5117–5125PubMedCrossRef Bruzzi P, Del Mastro L, Sormani MP et al (2005) Objective response to chemotherapy as a potential surrogate end point of survival in metastatic breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 23:5117–5125PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Burzykowski T, Buyse M, Piccart-Gebhart MJ et al (2008) Evaluation of tumor response, disease control, progression-free survival, and time to progression as potential surrogate end points in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:1987–1992PubMedCrossRef Burzykowski T, Buyse M, Piccart-Gebhart MJ et al (2008) Evaluation of tumor response, disease control, progression-free survival, and time to progression as potential surrogate end points in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:1987–1992PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hackshaw A, Knight A, Barrett-Lee P et al (2005) Surrogate markers and survival in women receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 93:1215–1221PubMedCrossRef Hackshaw A, Knight A, Barrett-Lee P et al (2005) Surrogate markers and survival in women receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 93:1215–1221PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Weir CJ, Walley RJ (2006) Statistical evaluation of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints: a literature review. Stat Med 25:183–203PubMedCrossRef Weir CJ, Walley RJ (2006) Statistical evaluation of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints: a literature review. Stat Med 25:183–203PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Baker SG (2006) Surrogate endpoints: wishful thinking or reality? J Natl Cancer Inst 98:502–503 Baker SG (2006) Surrogate endpoints: wishful thinking or reality? J Natl Cancer Inst 98:502–503
11.
go back to reference Prentice RL (1989) Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. Stat Med 8:431–440PubMedCrossRef Prentice RL (1989) Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. Stat Med 8:431–440PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Greenberg PA, Hortobagyi GN, Smith TL et al (1996) Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 14:2197–2205PubMed Greenberg PA, Hortobagyi GN, Smith TL et al (1996) Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 14:2197–2205PubMed
13.
go back to reference Teramukai S, Kitano T, Kishida Y et al (2009) Pretreatment neutrophil count as an independent prognostic factor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of Japan Multinational Trial Organisation LC00-03. Eur J Cancer 45: 1950-1958 Teramukai S, Kitano T, Kishida Y et al (2009) Pretreatment neutrophil count as an independent prognostic factor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of Japan Multinational Trial Organisation LC00-03. Eur J Cancer 45: 1950-1958
14.
go back to reference Paesmans M, Sculier JP, Libert P et al (1995) Prognostic factors for survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: univariate and multivariate analyses including recursive partitioning and amalgamation algorithms in 1, 052 patients. The European Lung Cancer Working Party. J Clin Oncol 13:1221–1230PubMed Paesmans M, Sculier JP, Libert P et al (1995) Prognostic factors for survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: univariate and multivariate analyses including recursive partitioning and amalgamation algorithms in 1, 052 patients. The European Lung Cancer Working Party. J Clin Oncol 13:1221–1230PubMed
15.
go back to reference Negrier S, Escudier B, Gomez F et al (2002) Prognostic factors of survival and rapid progression in 782 patients with metastatic renal carcinomas treated by cytokines: a report from the Groupe Francais d’Immunotherapie. Ann Oncol 13:1460–1468PubMedCrossRef Negrier S, Escudier B, Gomez F et al (2002) Prognostic factors of survival and rapid progression in 782 patients with metastatic renal carcinomas treated by cytokines: a report from the Groupe Francais d’Immunotherapie. Ann Oncol 13:1460–1468PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Atzpodien J, Royston P, Wandert T et al (2003) Metastatic renal carcinoma comprehensive prognostic system. Br J Cancer 88:348–353PubMedCrossRef Atzpodien J, Royston P, Wandert T et al (2003) Metastatic renal carcinoma comprehensive prognostic system. Br J Cancer 88:348–353PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Donskov F, Hokland M, Marcussen N et al (2006) Monocytes and neutrophils as ‘bad guys’ for the outcome of interleukin-2 with and without histamine in metastatic renal cell carcinoma—results from a randomised phase II trial. Br J Cancer 94:218–226PubMedCrossRef Donskov F, Hokland M, Marcussen N et al (2006) Monocytes and neutrophils as ‘bad guys’ for the outcome of interleukin-2 with and without histamine in metastatic renal cell carcinoma—results from a randomised phase II trial. Br J Cancer 94:218–226PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schmidt H, Bastholt L, Geertsen P et al (2005) Elevated neutrophil and monocyte counts in peripheral blood are associated with poor survival in patients with metastatic melanoma: a prognostic model. Br J Cancer 93:273–278PubMedCrossRef Schmidt H, Bastholt L, Geertsen P et al (2005) Elevated neutrophil and monocyte counts in peripheral blood are associated with poor survival in patients with metastatic melanoma: a prognostic model. Br J Cancer 93:273–278PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schmidt H, Suciu S, Punt CJ et al (2007) Pretreatment levels of peripheral neutrophils and leukocytes as independent predictors of overall survival in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IV Melanoma: results of the EORTC 18951 Biochemotherapy Trial. J Clin Oncol 25:1562–1569PubMedCrossRef Schmidt H, Suciu S, Punt CJ et al (2007) Pretreatment levels of peripheral neutrophils and leukocytes as independent predictors of overall survival in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IV Melanoma: results of the EORTC 18951 Biochemotherapy Trial. J Clin Oncol 25:1562–1569PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Walsh SR, Cook EJ, Goulder F et al (2005) Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 91:181–184PubMedCrossRef Walsh SR, Cook EJ, Goulder F et al (2005) Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 91:181–184PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yamanaka T, Matsumoto S, Teramukai S et al (2007) The baseline ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes is associated with patient prognosis in advanced gastric cancer. Oncology 73:215–220PubMedCrossRef Yamanaka T, Matsumoto S, Teramukai S et al (2007) The baseline ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes is associated with patient prognosis in advanced gastric cancer. Oncology 73:215–220PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Beers MH, Porter RS, Jones TV, Kaplan JL, Berkwits M (eds) (2006) The Merck manual of diagnosis and therapy, 18th edn. Wiley Beers MH, Porter RS, Jones TV, Kaplan JL, Berkwits M (eds) (2006) The Merck manual of diagnosis and therapy, 18th edn. Wiley
Metadata
Title
Surrogacy of tumor response and progression-free survival for overall survival in metastatic breast cancer resistant to both anthracyclines and taxanes
Authors
Yoshihiro Matsubara
Satomi Sakabayashi
Tsutomu Nishimura
Takanori Ishida
Noriaki Ohuchi
Satoshi Teramukai
Masanori Fukushima
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0231-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine