Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 6/2008

01-11-2008 | Original Article

Process modification and emergency department radiology service

Authors: Robert DeFlorio, Bret Coughlin, Ryan Coughlin, Haiping Li, John Santoro, Bridget Akey, Michael Favreau

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Our purpose was to demonstrate the impact of changes in technology, staffing, and departmental processes on service levels in emergency department (ED) radiology. We also attempted to determine if report turnaround time affects ED patient throughput. Radiology performance was evaluated before and after the modifications of processes integral to the interpretation of ED imaging. Picture archiving and communication system, voice recognition (VR), staffing, physical site, work flow, and administrative modifications were undertaken over ∼2 years. The average time interval from the exam completion to report signature was 5,184 min (standard deviation (SD) of 1,858 min before the implementation of VR and other modifications of ED radiology processes). In post initial modifications, it was 150 min (SD, 169 min) and 157 min (SD, 215 min) in post additional modifications. The percentage of the signed written reports available in less than or equal to 60 min was 0%, 27%, and 40%, respectively. Ongoing improvements are needed to increase the service levels for ED radiology. Further improvement will require collaboration and adjustment with the ongoing assessment of metrics.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McCaig LF, Burt CW (2005) National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2003 Emergency Department summary. Adv Data 358:1–40 McCaig LF, Burt CW (2005) National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2003 Emergency Department summary. Adv Data 358:1–40
5.
go back to reference Sedlak SK, Roberts A (2004) Implementation of best practices to reduce overall emergency department length of stay. Top Emerg Med 26(4):312–321 Sedlak SK, Roberts A (2004) Implementation of best practices to reduce overall emergency department length of stay. Top Emerg Med 26(4):312–321
6.
go back to reference Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Shastri K (2003) The future of radiology reporting. In: Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Weiss DL (eds) Electronic reporting in the digital medical enterprise. SCAR, Great Falls, VA, pp 83–104 Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Shastri K (2003) The future of radiology reporting. In: Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Weiss DL (eds) Electronic reporting in the digital medical enterprise. SCAR, Great Falls, VA, pp 83–104
9.
go back to reference Mehta A, Dreyer K (2000) Do picture archiving and communication systems improve report turnaround times? J Digit Imaging 13:105–107PubMedCrossRef Mehta A, Dreyer K (2000) Do picture archiving and communication systems improve report turnaround times? J Digit Imaging 13:105–107PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Process modification and emergency department radiology service
Authors
Robert DeFlorio
Bret Coughlin
Ryan Coughlin
Haiping Li
John Santoro
Bridget Akey
Michael Favreau
Publication date
01-11-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-008-0735-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

Emergency Radiology 6/2008 Go to the issue