Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gastric Cancer 2/2011

01-06-2011 | Original Article

The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification

Authors: Sumin Chae, Anbok Lee, Joo-Ho Lee

Published in: Gastric Cancer | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The most important prognostic factor after curative surgery for gastric carcinoma is the presence of lymph node metastases. According to the 7th edition of the UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer, N classification was categorized as N0 (no regional lymph node metastasis), N1 (1–2 regional lymph node metastases), N2 (3–6 regional lymph node metastases), and N3 (7 or more regional lymph node metastases). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rationality of the new UICC/AJCC N classification in comparison with the 6th UICC classification.

Methods

From August 2002 to July 2006, 295 patients with gastric cancer underwent curative resection with D2 lymph node dissection by a single surgeon. We analyzed retrospectively the significant prognostic factors and identified the suitability of the 7th UICC N staging system.

Results

According to the 7th UICC N classification, the 5-year cumulative survival rates (5-YSR) of N0, N1, N2, N3a, and N3b were 89.7, 73.6, 54.9, 23.1, and 5.4%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Using univariate analysis, the N classification of the 7th and 6th UICC/AJCC TNM staging system, T classification of the 7th UICC TNM staging system, size and location of tumor, and histology were associated with the overall survival of gastric cancer after curative surgery. However, Cox regression multivariate analysis showed the 7th UICC N classification was an independent prognostic factor instead of the 6th UICC N classification (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The 7th UICC classification for lymph node metastasis is thought to be a more reliable prognostic factor for gastric cancer than the 6th classification.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sobin LH. TNM: principles, history, and relation to other prognostic factors. Cancer. 2001;91:1589–92.CrossRefPubMed Sobin LH. TNM: principles, history, and relation to other prognostic factors. Cancer. 2001;91:1589–92.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Manfe AZ, Segalina P, Maffei Faccioli A. Prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Our experience and review of the literature. Minerva Chir. 2000;55:299–305.PubMed Manfe AZ, Segalina P, Maffei Faccioli A. Prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Our experience and review of the literature. Minerva Chir. 2000;55:299–305.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Del Rio P, Dell’Abate P, Soliani P, Arcuri MF, Tacci S, Ziegler S, et al. Old and New TNM in carcinoma of gastric antrum: analysis of our personal experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:912–6.CrossRefPubMed Del Rio P, Dell’Abate P, Soliani P, Arcuri MF, Tacci S, Ziegler S, et al. Old and New TNM in carcinoma of gastric antrum: analysis of our personal experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:912–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Maruyama K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T. Prognostic factors of gastric cancer patients and new TNM classification [abstract]. Gut. 1999;45(suppl 5):66A. Maruyama K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T. Prognostic factors of gastric cancer patients and new TNM classification [abstract]. Gut. 1999;45(suppl 5):66A.
6.
go back to reference D’Ugo D, Pacelli F, Persiani R, Pende V, Ianni A, Papa V, et al. Impact of the latest TNM classification for gastric cancer: retrospective analysis on 94 D2 gastrectomies. World J Surg. 2002;26:672–7.CrossRefPubMed D’Ugo D, Pacelli F, Persiani R, Pende V, Ianni A, Papa V, et al. Impact of the latest TNM classification for gastric cancer: retrospective analysis on 94 D2 gastrectomies. World J Surg. 2002;26:672–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kim JP, Kim YW, Yang HK, Noh DY. Significant prognostic factors by multivariate analysis of 3926 gastric cancer patients. World J Surg. 1994;18:872–7.CrossRefPubMed Kim JP, Kim YW, Yang HK, Noh DY. Significant prognostic factors by multivariate analysis of 3926 gastric cancer patients. World J Surg. 1994;18:872–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Bottecher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg. 1998;228:449–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siewert JR, Bottecher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg. 1998;228:449–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Deng JY, Liang H, Sun D, Wang D, Pan Y. Suitability of 7th UICC N stage for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients after curative resection in China. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1259–66.CrossRefPubMed Deng JY, Liang H, Sun D, Wang D, Pan Y. Suitability of 7th UICC N stage for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients after curative resection in China. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1259–66.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma—2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1998; 1: 10–24CrossRefPubMed Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma—2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1998; 1: 10–24CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hermanek P, Sobin L.H (eds) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (UICC). 4th edn. Berlin: Springer; 1987. pp. 43–46 Hermanek P, Sobin L.H (eds) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (UICC). 4th edn. Berlin: Springer; 1987. pp. 43–46
12.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. TNM classification of malignant tumors (UICC). 5th ed. New York: Wiley; 1997. p. 59–62. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. TNM classification of malignant tumors (UICC). 5th ed. New York: Wiley; 1997. p. 59–62.
13.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Wittekind C, Gospodarowicz M (eds) TNM classification of malignant tumors (UICC). 7th edn. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. pp. 73–77 Sobin LH, Wittekind C, Gospodarowicz M (eds) TNM classification of malignant tumors (UICC). 7th edn. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. pp. 73–77
14.
15.
go back to reference Yamamura Y, Nakajima T, Ohta K, Nashimoto A, Arai K, Hiratsuka M, et al. Determining prognostic factors for gastric cancer using the regression tree method. Gastric Cancer. 2002;5:201–7.CrossRefPubMed Yamamura Y, Nakajima T, Ohta K, Nashimoto A, Arai K, Hiratsuka M, et al. Determining prognostic factors for gastric cancer using the regression tree method. Gastric Cancer. 2002;5:201–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kooby DA, Suriawinata A, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF, Karpeh MS. Biologic predictors of survival in node-negative gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2003;237:828–35.PubMedPubMedCentral Kooby DA, Suriawinata A, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF, Karpeh MS. Biologic predictors of survival in node-negative gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2003;237:828–35.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Yokota T, Kunii Y, Teshima S, Yamada Y, Saito T, Takahashi M, et al. Significant prognostic factors in patients with early gastric cancer. Int Surg. 2000;85:286–90.PubMed Yokota T, Kunii Y, Teshima S, Yamada Y, Saito T, Takahashi M, et al. Significant prognostic factors in patients with early gastric cancer. Int Surg. 2000;85:286–90.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Kim JP, Lee JH, Kim SJ, Yu HJ, Yang HK. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in 10 783 patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:125–33.CrossRefPubMed Kim JP, Lee JH, Kim SJ, Yu HJ, Yang HK. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in 10 783 patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:125–33.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Omejc M, Juvan R, Jelenc F, Repse S. Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: Correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification. Int Surg. 2001;86:14–9.PubMed Omejc M, Juvan R, Jelenc F, Repse S. Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: Correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification. Int Surg. 2001;86:14–9.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Hermanek P. The superiority of the new international Union Against Cancer and American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging of gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:1763–5.CrossRefPubMed Hermanek P. The superiority of the new international Union Against Cancer and American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging of gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:1763–5.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ichikura T, Tomimatsu S, Uefuji K, Kimura M, Uchida T, Morita D, et al. Evaluation of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification. Cancer. 1999;86:553–8.CrossRefPubMed Ichikura T, Tomimatsu S, Uefuji K, Kimura M, Uchida T, Morita D, et al. Evaluation of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification. Cancer. 1999;86:553–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Celen O, Yildirim E, Gulben K, Berberoglu U. Prediction of survival in gastric carcinoma related to lymph node grading by the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer System or the Japanese system. Eur J Surg Suppl. 2003;588:33–9. Celen O, Yildirim E, Gulben K, Berberoglu U. Prediction of survival in gastric carcinoma related to lymph node grading by the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer System or the Japanese system. Eur J Surg Suppl. 2003;588:33–9.
23.
go back to reference Inoue K, Nakane Y, Iiyama H, Sato M, Kanbara T, Nakai K, et al. The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:27–34.CrossRefPubMed Inoue K, Nakane Y, Iiyama H, Sato M, Kanbara T, Nakai K, et al. The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:27–34.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Persiani R, Rausei S, Biondi A, Boccia S, Cananzi F, D’Ugo D. Ratio of metastatic lymph nodes: impact on staging and survival of gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;34:519–24.CrossRefPubMed Persiani R, Rausei S, Biondi A, Boccia S, Cananzi F, D’Ugo D. Ratio of metastatic lymph nodes: impact on staging and survival of gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;34:519–24.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Deng JY, Liang H, Sun D, Zhan HJ, Wang XN. The most appropriate category of metastatic lymph nodes to evaluate overall survival of gastric cancer following curative resection. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:343–8.CrossRefPubMed Deng JY, Liang H, Sun D, Zhan HJ, Wang XN. The most appropriate category of metastatic lymph nodes to evaluate overall survival of gastric cancer following curative resection. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:343–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Huang B, Zheng X, Wang Z, Wang M, Dong Y, Zhao B, et al. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:61–7.CrossRefPubMed Huang B, Zheng X, Wang Z, Wang M, Dong Y, Zhao B, et al. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:61–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Katai H, Yoshimura K, Maruyama K, Sasako M, Sano T. Evaluation of the new International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:1796–800.CrossRefPubMed Katai H, Yoshimura K, Maruyama K, Sasako M, Sano T. Evaluation of the new International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:1796–800.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Yang H, Ahn H, Yoon H, Kong S, Cho J, Park D, et al. Application of new TNM staging system for gastric cancer and prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes. abstract 8th IGCC 2009, S51, pp. 29 Yang H, Ahn H, Yoon H, Kong S, Cho J, Park D, et al. Application of new TNM staging system for gastric cancer and prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes. abstract 8th IGCC 2009, S51, pp. 29
29.
go back to reference Klein Kranenbarg E, Hermans J, van Krieken JH, van de Velde CJ. Evaluation of the 5th edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: improved prognostic value. Br J Cancer. 2001;84(1):64–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klein Kranenbarg E, Hermans J, van Krieken JH, van de Velde CJ. Evaluation of the 5th edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: improved prognostic value. Br J Cancer. 2001;84(1):64–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification
Authors
Sumin Chae
Anbok Lee
Joo-Ho Lee
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Gastric Cancer / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0024-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Gastric Cancer 2/2011 Go to the issue

Editor’s comment

Blowin’ in the wind