Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Lasers in Medical Science 5/2020

01-07-2020 | Hyperhidrosis | Original Article

A comparative study between intradermal botulinum toxin A and fractional microneedle radiofrequency (FMR) for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis

Authors: Paisal Rummaneethorn, Thep Chalermchai

Published in: Lasers in Medical Science | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Microneedle radiofrequency (FMR) for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis radiofrequency (RF) technology is a new modality that applied deep heat energy directly affecting the epidermis and dermis. Limiting data about FMR for axillary hyperhidrosis is concerning. To compare clinical efficacy between fractional microneedle radiofrequency and intradermal botulinum toxin type A injection. This study was a randomized, intraindividual split-side comparative study. Twenty female subjects clinically diagnosed of primary axillary hyperhidrosis were enrolled. All subjects randomly assigned to receive either FMR device on one side of axilla or 50 units of intradermal botulinum toxin A on contralateral side of axilla. Treatment with FMR device was scheduled for 2 sessions for 4 weeks apart. After treatment, mean Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Score (HDSS) of both groups revealed remarkably better reduction from the baseline (p < 000.1). By comparing between the two groups at the endpoint visit (12th week), the botulinum toxin A group had significantly better reduction of mean HDSS score than the microneedle RF group with 1.60 (0.59) versus 2.05 (0.68), respectively (p = 0.0332). At the week-12 visit, the botulinum toxin A group had significantly better participant’s satisfaction score by quartile rating scale than the microneedle RF group (2.55 + 0.69 versus 1.70 + 1.03, respectively, p = 0.004). Therefore, the botulinum toxin A group also demonstrated with significantly better improvement for their quality of life by DLQI score at the 12th week than the microneedle RF group (p = 0.013). Intradermal botulinum toxin A had better efficacy than fractional microneedle radiofrequency for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Atkins JL, Butler PE (2002) Hyperhidrosis: a review of current management. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:222–228CrossRef Atkins JL, Butler PE (2002) Hyperhidrosis: a review of current management. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:222–228CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cohen JL, Cohen G, Solish N, Murray CA (2007) Diagnosis, impact, and management of focal hyperhidrosis: treatment review including botulinum toxin therapy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 15:17–30 v-vi CrossRef Cohen JL, Cohen G, Solish N, Murray CA (2007) Diagnosis, impact, and management of focal hyperhidrosis: treatment review including botulinum toxin therapy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 15:17–30 v-vi CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Heckmann M, Ceballos-Baumann AO, Plewig G, Hyperhidrosis Study G (2001) Botulinum toxin A for axillary hyperhidrosis (excessive sweating). N Engl J Med 344:488–493CrossRef Heckmann M, Ceballos-Baumann AO, Plewig G, Hyperhidrosis Study G (2001) Botulinum toxin A for axillary hyperhidrosis (excessive sweating). N Engl J Med 344:488–493CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Naumann M, Lowe NJ (2001) Botulinum toxin type A in treatment of bilateral primary axillary hyperhidrosis: randomised, parallel group, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Bmj 323:596–599CrossRef Naumann M, Lowe NJ (2001) Botulinum toxin type A in treatment of bilateral primary axillary hyperhidrosis: randomised, parallel group, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Bmj 323:596–599CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lowe NJ, Glaser DA, Eadie N et al (2007) Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: a 52-week multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety. J Am Acad Dermatol 56:604–611CrossRef Lowe NJ, Glaser DA, Eadie N et al (2007) Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: a 52-week multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety. J Am Acad Dermatol 56:604–611CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lolis MS, Goldberg DJ (2012) Radiofrequency in cosmetic dermatology: a review. Dermatol Surg 38:1765–1776CrossRef Lolis MS, Goldberg DJ (2012) Radiofrequency in cosmetic dermatology: a review. Dermatol Surg 38:1765–1776CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hong HC, Lupin M, O’Shaughnessy KF (2012) Clinical evaluation of a microwave device for treating axillary hyperhidrosis. Dermatol Surg 38:728–735CrossRef Hong HC, Lupin M, O’Shaughnessy KF (2012) Clinical evaluation of a microwave device for treating axillary hyperhidrosis. Dermatol Surg 38:728–735CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Naumann M, Dressler D, Hallett M et al (2013) Evidence-based review and assessment of botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of secretory disorders. Toxicon 67:141–152CrossRef Naumann M, Dressler D, Hallett M et al (2013) Evidence-based review and assessment of botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of secretory disorders. Toxicon 67:141–152CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Abtahi-Naeini B, Naeini FF, Saffaei A et al (2016) Treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis by fractional microneedle radiofrequency: is it still effective after long-term follow-up? Indian J Dermatol 61:234PubMedPubMedCentral Abtahi-Naeini B, Naeini FF, Saffaei A et al (2016) Treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis by fractional microneedle radiofrequency: is it still effective after long-term follow-up? Indian J Dermatol 61:234PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Abtahi-Naeini B, Naeini FF, Adibi N, Pourazizi M (2015) Quality of life in patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis before and after treatment with fractionated microneedle radiofrequency. J Res Med Sci 20:631–635CrossRef Abtahi-Naeini B, Naeini FF, Adibi N, Pourazizi M (2015) Quality of life in patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis before and after treatment with fractionated microneedle radiofrequency. J Res Med Sci 20:631–635CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kim M, Shin JY, Lee J, Kim JY, Oh SH (2013) Efficacy of fractional microneedle radiofrequency device in the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: a pilot study. Dermatology 227:243–249CrossRef Kim M, Shin JY, Lee J, Kim JY, Oh SH (2013) Efficacy of fractional microneedle radiofrequency device in the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: a pilot study. Dermatology 227:243–249CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Naeini FF, Saffaei A, Pourazizi M, Abtahi-Naeini B (2015) Histopathological evidence of efficacy of microneedle radiofrequency for treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 81:288–290CrossRef Naeini FF, Saffaei A, Pourazizi M, Abtahi-Naeini B (2015) Histopathological evidence of efficacy of microneedle radiofrequency for treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 81:288–290CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A comparative study between intradermal botulinum toxin A and fractional microneedle radiofrequency (FMR) for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis
Authors
Paisal Rummaneethorn
Thep Chalermchai
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0268-8921
Electronic ISSN: 1435-604X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-02958-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Lasers in Medical Science 5/2020 Go to the issue